数字化转型降低企业劳动力成本黏性机理及异质性分析

李健旋

科研管理 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (4) : 162-172.

PDF(1123 KB)
PDF(1123 KB)
科研管理 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (4) : 162-172. DOI: 10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2026.04.016  CSTR: 32148.14.kygl.2026.04.016

数字化转型降低企业劳动力成本黏性机理及异质性分析

作者信息 +

The mechanism and heterogeneity analysis of digital transformation to reduce enterprise labor cost stickness

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

发展新质生产力,激发企业创新发展,需要高度关注企业劳动力成本黏性问题。本文从技术、资源、成本三个维度,基于2010—2022年沪深A股上市公司样本数据,采用经典黏性模型和中介机制模型,分析数字化转型降低企业劳动力成本黏性的结果 表明:数字化转型通过技术替代效应、资源配置效应和调整成本效应,可以显著降低企业劳动力成本黏性;数字化转型对不同产权性质、不同劳动密集度、不同产业以及不同规模企业劳动力成本黏性的降低作用存在显著差异。进一步分析显示,数字化转型提高劳动力成本并促进劳动力就业的同时,也会降低企业劳动力成本黏性。本文的研究对于鼓励企业数字化转型,激发企业持续创新发展,有效降低企业劳动力成本黏性,提升企业市场应变能力和综合竞争力具有重要意义。

Abstract

Developing new quality productive forces, stimulating innovation and development of enterprises requires intensive attention to the issue of enterprise labor cost stickiness. This paper empirically analyzed and tested the role mechanism of digital transformation in affecting the stickiness of enterprise labor cost from such three dimensions as technology, resources and cost, based on the sample data of A-share listed companies in Shanghai and Shenzhen from 2010 to 2022, and adopted the classical stickiness model and the intermediary mechanism model. It was found that digital transformation can significantly reduce labor cost stickiness of enterprises through technology substitution effect, resource allocation effect and adjustment cost effect; there are significant differences in the reduction of labor cost stickiness of enterprises with different property rights, different labor intensity, different industries and different sizes by digital transformation. Further analysis showed that digital transformation not only improves labor costs and promotes labor employment, but also reduces enterprise labor cost stickiness. The research in this paper is of great significance in encouraging digital transformation of enterprises, stimulating continuous innovation and development of enterprises, effectively reducing the labor cost stickiness of enterprises, and enhancing the market resilience and comprehensive competitiveness of enterprises.

关键词

数字化转型 / 劳动力成本黏性 / 技术替代效应 / 资源配置效应 / 调整成本效应

Key words

digital transformation / labor cost stickiness / technology substitution effect / resource allocation effect / adjustment cost effect

引用本文

导出引用
李健旋. 数字化转型降低企业劳动力成本黏性机理及异质性分析[J]. 科研管理. 2026, 47(4): 162-172 https://doi.org/10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2026.04.016
Li Jianxuan. The mechanism and heterogeneity analysis of digital transformation to reduce enterprise labor cost stickness[J]. Science Research Management. 2026, 47(4): 162-172 https://doi.org/10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2026.04.016
中图分类号: F420;F406   

参考文献

[1]
刘媛媛, 刘斌. 劳动保护、成本粘性与企业应对[J]. 经济研究, 2014, 49(5):63-76.
LIU Yuanyuan, LIU Bin. Labor protection, cost stickiness and corporate responses[J]. Economic Research Journal, 2014, 49(5):63-76.
[2]
ANDERSON M C, BANKER R D, JANAKIRAMAN S N. Are selling, general, and administrative costs “sticky”?[J]. Journal of Accounting Research, 2003, 41(1): 47-63.
[3]
张路, 李金彩, 张瀚文, 等. 管理者能力影响企业成本粘性吗?[J]. 会计研究, 2019(3):71-77.
ZHANG Lu, LI Jincai, ZHANG Hanwen, et al. Does managerial competence affect corporate cost stickiness?[J]. Accounting Research, 2019(3):71-77.
[4]
BANKER R D, BYZALOV D, FANG S, et al. Cost management research[J]. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 2018, 30(3): 187-209.
[5]
梁上坤. 机构投资者持股会影响公司费用粘性吗?[J]. 管理世界, 2018, 34(12):133-148.
LIANG Shangkun. Does institutional investor ownership affect the stickiness of company fees?[J]. Journal of Management World, 2018, 34(12):133-148.
[6]
GOLDFARB A, TUCKER C. Digital economics[J]. Journal of Economic Literature, 2019, 57(1): 3-43.
Digital technology is the representation of information in bits. This technology has reduced the cost of storage, computation, and transmission of data. Research on digital economics examines whether and how digital technology changes economic activity. In this review, we emphasize the reduction in five distinct economic costs associated with digital economic activity: search costs, replication costs, transportation costs, tracking costs, and verification costs.
[7]
覃家琦, 谢雁翔, 金振, 等. 工业机器人应用与企业劳动力成本粘性[J]. 金融评论, 2023, 15(5):103-124+126.
QIN Jiaqi, XIE Yanxiang, JIN Zhen, et al. Application of industrial robots and enterprise labor cost stickiness[J]. Chinese Review of Financial Studies, 2023, 15(5):103-124+126.
[8]
陈红, 王稳华, 刘李福, 等. 人工智能对企业成本黏性的影响研究[J]. 科研管理, 2023, 44(1):16-25.
CHEN Hong, WANG Wenhua, LIU Lifu, et al. Research of the impact of artificial intelligence on corporate cost stickiness[J]. Science Research Management, 2023, 44(1):16-25.
[9]
RITTER T, PEDERSEN C L. Digitization capability and the digitalization of business models in business-to business firms: Past, present, and future[J]. Industrial Marketing Management, 2020, 86(4): 180-190.
[10]
丁守海, 冀承. 企业数字化与劳动收入份额新变化[J]. 科学学研究, 2024(2):345-354+404.
摘要
在数字经济蓬勃发展的同时,中国劳动收入份额出现止降转升的新变化。本文基于沪深A股上市公司微观数据,考察了数字化对劳动收入份额的影响及其作用机制。研究发现:劳动收入份额随数字化程度的提升而呈向下的“倒U型”关系;机制检验表明,数字化程度对技能结构的“倒U型”影响是数字化影响劳动收入份额的重要路径;进一步研究发现,现阶段上市公司数字化程度处于“倒U型”曲线的左侧,在未来一段时间内数字化程度提升仍将有助于改善劳资分配关系;不同要素密集度、所有制的上市公司数字化程度对劳动收入份额的“倒U型”影响具有显著差异。为持续提升劳动收入份额,政府应继续加速推进与数字化相关的基础设施建设,加大对企业数字化转型的扶持力度;企业应定期组织职工参与数字化培训,推动劳动者技能结构升级。
DING Shouhai, JI Cheng. Digitalization of enterprises and new changes in labor income shares[J]. Studies in Science of Science, 2024(2):345-354+404.
In recent years, with the rapid development of new technologies such as big data, artificial intelligence and cloud computing, the digital economy has deeply integrated with the real economy. The digital economy has become a new wave, a new driving force and a new engine leading economic development. With the vigorous development of digital economy, China’s income distribution pattern has also seen new changes. In recent years, the labor income share has shown a new trend of turning from declining to rising, and the labor-capital distribution relationship has improved. Therefore, this paper puts forward two important questions: Is there a significant relationship between the new change in China’s labor income share in recent years and the improvement of the degree of digitalization? What channels does digitalization promote the increase of labor income share?This paper uses the micro level data of A-share listed companies in Shanghai and Shenzhen in China, adopts the method of combining text analysis and manual judgment, and constructs indicators to measure the degree of enterprise digitalization from the two dimensions of digital intangible assets and digital keywords. The research finds that the labor income share presents an “inverted U-shaped” downward relationship with the increase of digitization degree. The mechanism test shows that the “inverted U-shaped” effect of digitalization on skill structure is an important path for digitalization to affect labor income share. Further research shows that the digitalization degree of listed companies at the present stage is on the left side of the “inverted U-shaped” curve, and the improvement of digitalization degree will still help to improve labor distribution relations in the future. The “inverted U-shaped” effect of different factor intensities and ownership of listed companies on labor income share is significant. The innovation of this paper mainly includes the following two aspects: First, this paper finds that booming digitalization is promoting the increase of labor income share, which provides important evidence to explain the new change of the increase of labor income share in recent years. Moreover, it is expected that in the future period of time, the improvement of digitalization degree will continue to drive the rise of labor income share. Second, from the perspective of skill structure, this paper discusses the important mechanism of the influence of digitalization on the “inverted U-shaped” labor income share. Accelerating the upgrading of labor skill structure will help to continuously increase the labor income share, and provide feasible solutions for the continuous improvement of labor distribution relations. This paper recommends that the government should continue to accelerate the construction of digital-related infrastructure and increase the support for enterprises’ digital transformation. Enterprises should regularly organize employees to participate in digital training and promote the upgrading of workers’ skill structure.
[11]
张博, 杨丽梅, 陶涛. 人口老龄化与劳动力成本粘性[J]. 会计研究, 2022(1):59-69.
ZHANG Bo, YANG Limei, TAO Tao. Population aging and sticky labor costs[J]. Accounting Research, 2022(1):59-69.
[12]
陈德球, 胡晴. 数字经济时代下的公司治理研究:范式创新与实践前沿[J]. 管理世界, 2022, 38(6):213-240.
CHEN Deqiu, HU Qing. Research on corporate governance in the era of digital economy: Paradigm innovation and practice frontiers[J]. Journal of Management World, 2022, 38(6):213-240.
[13]
BRYNJOLFSSON E, MCELHERAN K. The rapid adoption of data-driven decision-making[J]. American Economic Review, 2016, 106(5): 133-139.
We provide a systematic empirical study of the diffusion and adoption patterns of data-driven decision making (DDD) in the U.S. Using data collected by the Census Bureau for a large representative sample of manufacturing plants, we find that DDD rates nearly tripled (11%-30%) between 2005 and 2010. This rapid diffusion, along with results from a companion paper, are consistent with case-based evidence that DDD tends to be productivity-enhancing. Yet certain plants are significantly more likely to adopt than others. Key correlates of adoption are size, presence of potential complements such as information technology and educated workers, and firm learning.
[14]
CENAMOR J, PARIDA V, WINCENT J. How entrepreneurial SMEs compete through digital platforms: The roles of digital platform capability, network capability and ambidexterity[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2019, 100(7): 196-206.
[15]
袁淳, 肖土盛, 耿春晓, 等. 数字化转型与企业分工:专业化还是纵向一体化[J]. 中国工业经济, 2021(9):137-155.
YUAN Chun, XIAO Tusheng, GENG Chunxiao, et al. Digital transformation and enterprise division of labor: Specialization or vertical integration[J]. China Industrial Economics, 2021(9):137-155.
[16]
ELLER R, ALFORD P, KALLMÜNZER A, et al. Antecedents, consequences, and challenges of small and medium-sized enterprise digitalization[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2020, 112(5): 119-127.
[17]
WARNER K S R, WÄGER M. Building dynamic capabilities for digital transformation: An ongoing process of strategic renewal[J]. Long Range Planning, 2019, 52(3): 326-349.
[18]
PETRIN A, SIVADASAN J. Estimating lost output from allocative inefficiency, with an application to Chile and firing costs[J]. Review of Economics and Statistics, 2013, 95(1): 286-301.
[19]
钟宁桦, 解咪, 钱一蕾, 等. 全球经济危机后中国的信贷配置与稳就业成效[J]. 经济研究, 2021, 56(9):21-38.
ZHONG Ninghua, XIE Mi, QIAN Yilei, et al. The credit allocation and achievement of stabilizing employment after the global economic crises in China[J]. Economic Research Journal, 2021, 56(9):21-38.
[20]
方巧玲, 徐慧, 郝婧宏. 股权质押与劳动力成本粘性:代理观抑或效率观[J]. 审计与经济研究, 2021, 36(6):81-90.
FANG Qiaoling, XU Hui, HAO Jinghong. Equity pledges and sticky labor costs: Agency or efficiency views[J]. Journal of Audit and Economics, 2021, 36(6):81-90.
[21]
焦豪, 杨季枫, 王培暖, 等. 数据驱动的企业动态能力作用机制研究:基于数据全生命周期管理的数字化转型过程分析[J]. 中国工业经济, 2021(11):174-192.
JIAO Hao, YANG Jifeng, WANG Peinuan, et al. Research on the role mechanism of data-driven enterprise dynamic capability: An analysis of digital transformation process based on data full lifecycle management[J]. China Industrial Economics, 2021(11):174-192.

基金

国家自然科学基金青年项目:“基于数据融合的中国制造业智能化转型升级研究”(72102061)
国家自然科学基金面上项目:“中国制造业数字化与绿色化关联耦合机理及测度研究”(72472045)

PDF(1123 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/