“用户-平台”融合对平台用户商业模式创新影响研究

解学梅, 刘晓杰, 余佳惠

科研管理 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (4) : 119-132.

PDF(1901 KB)
PDF(1901 KB)
科研管理 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (4) : 119-132. DOI: 10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2026.04.012  CSTR: 32148.14.kygl.2026.04.012

“用户-平台”融合对平台用户商业模式创新影响研究

作者信息 +

A study on the impact of "user-platform" integration on platform users' business model innovation

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

探究制造业企业如何借助工业互联网平台实现商业模式创新对推动其转型升级具有重要意义。本文利用376家应用了工业互联网平台的制造业企业调研数据,采用多元回归实证探究“用户-平台”融合(功能融合与主体融合)影响平台用户商业模式创新的内在机制与情境机理。结果发现:(1)“用户-平台”功能融合与主体融合对平台用户商业模式创新(价值主张创新、价值创造创新和价值捕获创新)具有正向影响;(2)组织敏捷性(运营调整敏捷性和市场利用敏捷性)在“用户-平台”融合与平台用户商业模式创新之间发挥中介作用;(3)平台领导力和平台安全性正向调节“用户-平台”融合对平台用户价值创造和价值捕获创新的正向影响;(4)数字化准备度正向调节“用户-平台”功能融合对平台用户组织敏捷性的正向影响及组织敏捷性对价值创造和价值捕获创新的正向影响。研究结论拓展了“用户-平台”融合促进平台用户商业模式创新的理论框架,为制造业企业借助工业互联网平台资源促进商业模式创新提供了理论借鉴。

Abstract

Exploring how manufacturing enterprises take advantage of industrial Internet platforms to achieve business model innovation is of great significance to promote their transformation and upgrading. This study, based on the survey data of 376 manufacturing enterprises that have adopted industrial Internet platforms, and using multivariate regression, empirically explored the mechanism and boundary conditions that "user-platform" integration (i.e., function integration and subject integration) influences platform users' business model innovation. The results showed that: firstly, "user-platform" function integration and subject integration have positive impacts on platform users' business model innovation (i.e., value proposition innovation, value creation innovation and value capture innovation); Secondly, organizational agility (i.e., operational adjustment agility and market capitalizing agility) plays mediating roles in the relationship between "user-platform" integration and platform users' business model innovation; Thirdly, platform leadership and platform security positively moderate the positive effects of "user-platform" integration on the platform users' value creation and value capture innovation; Fourthly, platform users' digital readiness positively moderates the positive effect of "user-platform" function integration on their organizational agility, and the positive effects of organizational agility on value creation and value capture innovation. The conclusions have extended the theoretical framework of "user-platform" integration to promote platform users' business model innovation, and will provide theoretical reference for manufacturing enterprises to utilize the resources from industrial Internet platform to promote business model innovation.

关键词

工业互联网平台 / “用户-平台”融合 / 商业模式创新 / 平台领导力 / 数字化准备度

Key words

industrial internet platform / "user-platform" integration / business model innovation / platform leadership / digital readiness

引用本文

导出引用
解学梅, 刘晓杰, 余佳惠. “用户-平台”融合对平台用户商业模式创新影响研究[J]. 科研管理. 2026, 47(4): 119-132 https://doi.org/10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2026.04.012
Xie Xuemei, Liu Xiaojie, Yu Jiahui. A study on the impact of "user-platform" integration on platform users' business model innovation[J]. Science Research Management. 2026, 47(4): 119-132 https://doi.org/10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2026.04.012
中图分类号: F272.3   

参考文献

[1]
FORTINO G, GUERRIERI A, PACE P, et al. IoT platforms and security: An analysis of the leading industrial/commercial solutions[J]. Sensors, 2022, 22(6): 2196.
[2]
余菲菲, 董飞. 平台生态系统下我国中小制造企业与互联网融合发展路径研究[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2019, 36(20): 77-84.
摘要
随着云计算、大数据、物联网等互联技术兴起,互联网平台逐渐成为我国中小制造企业生存与发展的土壤。基于平台生态系统理论与价值共创理论,遵循“主体互动融合—跨业价值重塑—环境协同共生”基本框架,探究我国中小制造企业与互联网融合的内涵及特征。运用嵌入型多案例研究方法,探究我国中小制造企业与互联网融合发展模式,提炼归纳出我国中小制造企业与互联网融合发展的3种路径。
YU Feifei, DONG Fei. Research on development path of integration of Chinese manufacturing SMEs and internet: Under the perspective of platform ecosystem[J]. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 2019, 36(20): 77-84.
[3]
张骁, 刘润喆, 吴小龙, 等. 元赋能:工业互联网平台驱动企业商业模式创新能力构建研究[J]. 管理世界, 2024, 40(7): 26-45+83+46.
ZHANG Xiao, LIU Runzhe, WU Xiaolong, et al. Meta-empowerment: Industrial internet platform drives the building of business model innovation capability in enterprises[J]. Journal of Management World, 2024, 40(7): 26-45+83+46.
[4]
SEETHARAMAN A, PATWA N, SARAVANAN A, et al. Customer expectation from industrial internet of things (iIOT)[J]. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 2019, 30(8): 1161-1178.
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to discuss how the rush of technological change will consolidate the worldwide reach of the internet with more capacity, specifically to control the physical world, including the machines, industrial facilities and frameworks that characterize cutting-edge technology. Design/methodology/approach The data were collected from 203 respondents predominantly from emerging economies, specifically India and SEA. Most of the participants are working professionals. Structural equation modelling was used to analyze data, as it is a popular statistical technique because of its ability to model selected independent variables and take into account all possible forms of measurement error to test an entire theory. Findings The Industrial Internet of Things (IIOT) platform comprises four fundamental capabilities: connectivity, big data, advanced analytics and application development. The IIOT has the potential to provide a high level of synergies between the 4 Ms of manufacturing, namely, man, machine, material and method. Research limitations/implications - The collected data are predominately from India and SEA (close to 75 per cent), while contributions fromother regions are comparatively less, so the findings cannot be generalized to the global context. Practical implications - It is in the interest of service providers to collaborate and provide a universal solution to retain legacy systems to minimize the investment and reduce the security threat, which could boost IIOT adoption while ensuring that manufacturers are able to leverage this new technology efficiently. Originality/value The framework obtained has good quality of validity and reliability indicators. Thus, an alternative framework has been added to customer expectation which is currently a popular topic in the technological changes.
[5]
LI Z, CHEN J, LI Z, et al. Strengthen or weaken? How industrial internet platform affects the core competitiveness of manufacturing companies[J]. Operations Management Research, 2024, 17(1): 220-232.
[6]
ZHAO H, XU G, LIU L, et al. Low-carbon technology innovation decision making of manufacturing companies in the industrial internet platform ecosystem[J]. Sustainability, 2023, 15(4): 3555.
Low carbon has become a highly relevant topic in today’s society, particularly for manufacturing enterprises. To gain insight into how manufacturing enterprises embedded in the industrial internet platform make decisions regarding low-carbon technology innovation, this article examines the service quality of the platform, the low-carbon preferences of the manufacturing enterprises, and government subsidy factors. A platform ecological system game model, comprised of a single manufacturing enterprise and an industrial internet platform, is then established. The results indicate that, under the model’s assumptions, the decarbonization of production can only occur when the cost of low-carbon innovation is below a specific threshold. Decentralized decision making is more effective in promoting low-carbon innovation by the manufacturing enterprises when the cost of low-carbon technology innovation is low. The greater the service quality of the industrial internet platform, the stronger the positive influence of the low-carbon preferences of users and government subsidies on the low-carbon innovation level of the manufacturing enterprises. This study offers useful decision-making advice for both the industrial internet platform and the manufacturing enterprises.
[7]
李君, 周勇, 邱君降, 等. 制造企业工业互联网平台应用水平与绩效评价体系构建与实践[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2021, 27(7): 1843-1859.
摘要
为科学评价企业应用工业互联网平台的水平及成效,引导企业建立健全上平台用平台的路径和机制,推动我国工业互联网平台应用生态持续健康发展,提出一套用于引导和规范平台健康发展的工业互联网平台评价体系,从战略与组织、基础条件、平台应用、业务创新和效能效益5个维度建立了评价的基本框架,给出了具体的评价体系,并基于该体系建设了一套专业评估系统。通过系统采集1 400余家企业工业互联网平台应用数据,从设备上云、工业知识沉淀复用、工业APP创新应用等不同视角全面分析了我国制造企业工业互联网平台应用水平与效能效益,为制造企业、平台服务商、行业组织、政府等相关方开展工业互联网平台应用推广、科学评价平台应用成效提供了有益的借鉴。
LI Jun, ZHOU Yong, QIU Junjiang, et al. Construction and practice on evaluation system of industrial internet platform application for manufacturing enterprises[J]. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 2021, 27(7): 1843-1859.
[8]
王炳成, 孙玉馨, 张士强, 等. 数字平台生态嵌入对商业模式创新的影响研究:基于资源编排理论的视角[J]. 研究与发展管理, 2024, 36(2): 101-112.
WANG Bingcheng, SUN Yuxin, ZHANG Shiqiang, et al. Impact of digital platform ecological embeddedness on business model innovation: Based on the resource orchestration theory[J]. R&D Management, 2024, 36(2): 101-112.
[9]
LU Y, RAMAMURTHY K. Understanding the link between information technology capability and organizational agility: An empirical examination[J]. MIS Quarterly, 2011, 35(4): 931-954.
Information technology is generally considered an enabler of a firm’s agility. A typical premise is that greater IT investment enables a firm to be more agile. However, it is not uncommon that IT can also hinder and sometimes even impede organizational agility. We propose and theorize this frequently observed but understudied IT–agility contradiction by which IT may enable or impede agility. We develop the premise that organizations need to develop superior firm-wide IT capability to successfully manage their IT resources to realize agility. We refine the conceptualization and measurement of IT capability as a latent construct reflected in its three dimensions: IT infrastructure capability, IT business spanning capability, and IT proactive stance. We also conceptualize two types of organizational agility: market capitalizing agility and operational adjustment agility. We then conduct a matched-pair field survey of business and information systems executives in 128 organizations to empirically examine the link between a firm’s IT capability and agility. Business executives responded to measurement scales of the two types of agility and organizational context variables, and IS executives responded to measurement scales of IT capabilities and IS context variables. The results show a significant positive relationship between IT capability and the two types of organizational agility. We also find a significant positive joint effect of IT capability and IT spending on operational adjustment agility but not on market capitalizing agility. The findings suggest a possible resolution to the contradictory effect of IT on agility: while more IT spending does not lead to greater agility, spending it in such a way as to enhance and foster IT capabilities does. Our study provides initial empirical evidence to better understand essential IT capabilities and their relationship with organizational agility. Our findings provide a number of useful implications for research and managerial practices.
[10]
CLAUSS T, ABEBE M, TANGPONG C, et al. Strategic agility, business model innovation, and firm performance: An empirical investigation[J]. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 2021, 68(3): 767-784.
[11]
DOZ Y L, KOSONEN M. Embedding strategic agility: A leadership agenda for accelerating business model renewal[J]. Long Range Planning, 2010, 43(2-3): 370-382.
[12]
张镒, 刘人怀. 互补性资产、平台领导力对双元创新的影响:基于环境复杂性的调节作用[J]. 管理评论, 2020, 32(10): 158-169.
ZHANG Yi, LIU Renhuai. Research on the impact of complementary assets and platform leadership on ambidextrous innovation: Moderating effect of environmental complexity[J]. Management Review, 2020, 32(10): 158-169.
[13]
TAO F, ZHANG Y P, CHENG Y, et al. Digital twin and blockchain enhanced smart manufacturing service collaboration and management[J]. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 2022, 62: 903-914.
[14]
GFRERER A, HUTTER K, FULLER J, et al. Ready or not: Managers' and employees' different perceptions of digital readiness[J]. California Management Review, 2021, 63(2): 23-48.
Shared beliefs on digital readiness among management and employees are a precursor to successfully guide and implement organizational change. There is, however, little examination of how digital knowledge and skills are distributed among managers and employees, or whether their perceptions of digital readiness systematically differ. The findings of a survey of the banking industry reveal that, while there are similar perceptions of attitude and empowerment toward change, perceptions of individual readiness, competences, and innovation barriers differ significantly. This research advances the framework of change readiness toward digital readiness with theoretical as well as practical implications for digital transformation management.
[15]
PIROLA F, CIMINI C, PINTO R. Digital readiness assessment of Italian SMEs: A case-study research[J]. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 2019, 31(5): 1045-1083.
Given the challenges that Industry 4.0 poses, the purpose of this paper is to propose a comprehensive assessment model suitable for evaluating small- and medium-size enterprises’ (SMEs) digital readiness levels, discuss the results of an assessment of 20 manufacturing SMEs using the proposed model and highlight priorities needed to undertake a successful journey towards Industry 4.0.
[16]
PAULI T, FIELT E, MATZNER M. Digital industrial platforms[J]. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 2021, 63(2): 181-190.
[17]
CLAUSS T. Measuring business model innovation: Conceptualization, scale development, and proof of performance[J]. R & D Management, 2017, 47(3): 385-403.
[18]
MULLER J M. Business model innovation in small-and medium-sized enterprises: Strategies for industry 4.0 providers and users[J]. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 2019, 30(8): 1127-1142.
Industry 4.0 is expected to significantly transform industrial value creation. However, research on business models affected through Industry 4.0, and on small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), remains scarce. In response, the purpose of this paper is to address both aspects, further elaborating on the role that SMEs can take toward Industry 4.0 as provider or user.
[19]
BARLETTE Y, BAILLETTE P. Big data analytics in turbulent contexts: Towards organizational change for enhanced agility[J]. Production Planning & Control, 2020, 31(8-9): 1-18.
[20]
URBINATI A, BOGERS M, CHIESA V, et al. Creating and capturing value from big data: A multiple-case study analysis of provider companies[J]. Technovation, 2019, 84-85(6-7): 21-36.
[21]
王炳成, 张玉香, 崔梦洁. 数字化交互对商业模式创新的影响研究[J]. 科研管理, 2024, 45(6): 136-145.
WANG Bingcheng, ZHANG Yuxiang, CUI Mengjie. Research on the impact of digital interaction on business model innovation[J]. Science Research Management, 2024, 45(6): 136-145.
[22]
陈一华, 张振刚, 黄璐. 制造企业数字赋能商业模式创新的机制与路径[J]. 管理学报, 2021, 18(5): 731-740.
摘要
基于数字化和商业模式创新文献,探究制造企业数字赋能商业模式创新的作用机制和路径。通过格力电器成功构建数字商业模式的案例研究发现:①数字赋能商业模式创新的作用机制可分为连接赋能、管控赋能和解释赋能3种;②数字赋能商业模式创新的路径是连接、管控和解释赋能分别有助于构建互补导向、效率导向和新颖导向数字商业模式;③数字商业模式与数字制造模式存在相互依赖性,即两者之间存在一致的数字赋能策略。
CHEN Yihua, ZHANG Zhengang, HUANG Lu. Exploring the mechanisms and paths of manufacturing digital enablement on business model innovation[J]. Chinese Journal of Management, 2021, 18(5): 731-740.
Based on existing literature of digitalization and business model innovation, this study aims to explore the effect mechanisms and innovation paths of digital enablement on business model innovation. Eying on Gree’s successful digital business model, this study finds that the digital enablement on business model innovation can be divided into three primary dimensions, namely, connectivity enablement, control enablement, and interpretational enablement. The paths to digitally-enabled business model innovation are respectively using connectivity, control and interpretation to create complementarity-oriented digital business model, efficiency-oriented digital business model and novelty-oriented digital business model. Digital business model and digital manufacturing model are interdependent, that is, there are consistent digital enabling strategies between them.
[23]
RADENKOVIC M, BOGDANOVIC Z, DESPOTOVIC-ZRAKIC M, et al. Assessing consumer readiness for participation in IOT-based demand response business models[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2020, 150(1): 1-15.
[24]
WARNER K S R, WAGER M. Building dynamic capabilities for digital transformation: An ongoing process of strategic renewal[J]. Long Range Planning, 2019, 52(3): 326-349.
[25]
CHEN X, SIAU K. Business analytics/business intelligence and IT infrastructure: Impact on organizational agility[J]. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing, 2020, 32(4): 138-161.
[26]
HOONSOPON D, PURIWAT W. Organizational agility: Key to the success of new product development[J]. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 2021, 68(6): 1722-1733.
[27]
张镒, 刘人怀, 陈海权. 商业生态系统中的平台领导力影响因素:基于扎根理论的探索性研究[J]. 南开管理评论, 2020, 23(3): 28-38.
ZHANG Yi, LIU Renhuai, CHEN Haiquan. Research on influencing factors of platform leadership in business ecosystem[J]. Nankai Business Review, 2020, 23(3): 28-38.
[28]
GHASEMAGHAEI M. Are firms ready to use big data analytics to create value? The role of structural and psychological readiness[J]. Enterprise Information Systems, 2019, 13(5): 650-674.
[29]
HARRIS G, YARBROUGH A, ABERNATHY D, et al. Manufacturing readiness for digital manufacturing[J]. Manufacturing Letters, 2019, 22(10): 16-18.
[30]
BUTSCHAN J, HEIDENREICH S, WEBER B, et al. Tackling hurdles to digital transformation: The role of competencies for successful industrial internet of things (iIOT) implementation[J]. International Journal of Innovation Management, 2019, 23(4): 1-34.

基金

国家社会科学基金重大项目:“我国市场导向的绿色技术创新体系构建研究”(20&ZD059,2021—2024)

PDF(1901 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/