科研管理 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (2): 170-180.DOI: 10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2025.02.017

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

创造力评价一致性对越轨创新的影响机制研究

王永伟1,刘雨展2,王嘉豪1,耿森1   

  1. 1.河南财经政法大学管理学部,河南 郑州450046;
    2.北京邮电大学经济管理学院,北京100876

  • 收稿日期:2023-08-02 修回日期:2024-12-11 出版日期:2025-02-20 发布日期:2025-02-11
  • 通讯作者: 刘雨展
  • 基金资助:
    教育部人文社科规划基金项目:“科技型中小企业员工越轨创新行为的前因与后果:一项追踪的研究”(22YJA630094,2023.01—2025.12);河南省哲学社会科学一般项目:“河南省‘专精特新’企业越轨创新前因及后果研究”(2022BJJ021,2022.09—2025.06)。

Research on the influence mechanism of creativity assessment consistency on bootleg innovation

Wang Yongwei1, Liu Yuzhan2, Wang Jiahao1, Geng Sen2   

  1. 1. Faculty of Management, Henan University of Economics and Law, Zhengzhou 450046, Henan, China; 
    2. School of Economics and Management, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing 100876, China
  • Received:2023-08-02 Revised:2024-12-11 Online:2025-02-20 Published:2025-02-11

摘要:     越轨创新作为非正式创新的重要形式,为企业发展提供了新动能,然而现有研究未从创新过程视角系统揭示其形成机制。本文基于创新过程理论,通过多项式回归和响应面分析技术,探讨领导-下属创造力评价匹配对越轨创新行为多维度的影响机制和情境。基于对340份领导-下属配对数据分析发现:(1)领导-下属创造力评价匹配越不一致,对违命创新影响越强,但对私下创新无显著影响;(2)相比于“创造力员工自评低-创造力领导他评低”,“创造力员工自评高-创造力领导他评高”对私下创新的正向影响更强,但对违命创新无显著影响;(3)相比于“创造力员工自评低-创造力领导他评高”,“创造力员工自评高-创造力领导他评低”对私下创新和违命创新的正向影响都更强;(4)突破性创新投入在领导-下属创造力评价匹配和私下创新、违命创新之间起到中介作用;(5)员工悖论思维能够正向调节突破性创新投入和私下创新、违命创新之间的关系。研究结论从创新过程视角为揭示越轨创新的形成机理提供更加全面的理解,并为组织正确引导和管理越轨创新以赋能企业创新提供理论指导。

关键词: 员工创造力, 突破性创新投入, 悖论思维, 越轨创新, 响应面分析

Abstract:      Bootleg innovation can bring revolutionary innovation outcomes to businesses, but it also has high difficulty and high uncertainty characteristics. Therefore, exploring the internal mechanisms of bootleg innovation helps corporate managers guide and manage it more effectively, maximizing its positive effects. Existing research has confirmed that employee creativity is a predictive variable for bootleg innovation, but have not truly delved into the intrinsic dynamics of bootleg innovation from the perspective of the creative process, resulting in an incomplete understanding of it.Considering that individual innovation is a social interactive process, this study incorporated both self-assessment of creative employees and leader-assessment of creativity into the theoretical framework. It employed the polynomial regression analysis and response surface analysis techniques to investigate the relationship between leader-subordinate creativity assessment matching and bootleg innovation, as well as to further explore the mediating effect of breakthrough innovation engagement and the moderating role of paradox mindset. Utilizing a questionnaire survey method, this study collected paired data from leaders and subordinates in tech companies in Beijing, Guangzhou, Zhengzhou, and other locations, and the relevant hypotheses were tested through correlation analysis and multiple regression models on the survey data using SPSS 22.0.Our results showed the following conclusions: (1) the greater inconsistent the leader-subordinate creativity assessment match is, the stronger the impact on creative deviance, but has no significant impact on bootleg innovation; (2) compared with "low employee creativity self-assessment-low employee creativity leader-assessment", "high employee creativity self-assessment-high employee creativity leader-assessment" has a stronger positive impact on bootleg innovation, but no significant influence in creative deviance; (3) compared with "low employee creativity leader-assessment-high employee creativity leader-assessment", "high employee creativity leader-assessment-low employee creativity leaderassessment" has a strong positive impact on both bootleg innovation and creative deviance; (4) breakthrough innovation engagement plays an mediating role between leader-subordinate creativity evaluation fit and bootleg innovation as well as creative deviance; (5) employee paradox mindset can positively moderate the relationship between breakthrough innovation engagement and bootleg innovation as well as creative deviance.By adopting a matching perspective, this study has enhanced the comprehension of the intrinsic mechanisms of bootleg innovation and confirmed that there are differences in the drivers of various types of bootleg innovation, complementing the nomological network of bootleg innovation. Furthermore, based on the creative process perspective, this study verified the mediating role of breakthrough innovation engagement and the moderating effect of the paradox mindset, revealing the internal influence mechanisms and contexts of bootleg innovation behavior. The study will also provide managerial implications for corporate executives: on the one hand, managers should effectively utilize creativity assessment tools to construct contexts that can trigger bootleg innovation and fully stimulate employees′ innovative potential; on the other hand, managers should also provide effective supervision, intervention, and support for the creative process of employees, focusing on cultivating a paradox mindset to ensure the smooth implementation of bootleg innovation. 

Key words: employee creativity, breakthrough innovation engagement, paradox mindset, bootleg innovation, response surface analysis