数字创新生态可供性影响跨界创新的组态研究

赵艺璇; 余江; 彭密香; 韩进

doi:10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2024.12.014

PDF(263 KB)

科研管理 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (12) : 133-141. DOI: 10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2024.12.014

论文

数字创新生态可供性影响跨界创新的组态研究

赵艺璇^1,2,3，余江^4,5，彭密香⁶，韩进⁷

作者信息 +

Research on the configuration of the impact of digital innovation ecosystem affordance on cross-industry innovation

Zhao Yixuan^1,2,3, Yu Jiang^4,5, Peng Mixiang⁶, Han Jin⁷

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

处于边缘生态位的非核心企业，如何利用数字创新生态组织赋能扭转边缘地位，实现跨界创新发展，是广泛汇聚企业力量，发展新质生产力的重要理论与现实议题。然而，现有研究多关注数字技术对跨界创新的作用效应，缺乏关注基于数字技术所形成的数字创新生态组织可供性的影响效应。研究基于可供性理论与“架构－战略－环境”组织理论经典框架，运用fs/QCA分析方法探究数字创新生态可供性赋能非核心企业实现跨界创新的多重路径。研究发现：数字创新生态组织能够为企业战略愿景的实现提供行动潜能，但处于生态边缘的非核心企业仅借助单一维度可供性难以实现跨界创新，需叠加利用数字技术架构可供性、数字创新生态环境可供性和数字创新战略多维策略，支撑非核心企业挖掘跨行业技术嫁接潜能，并转化为有效行动进而实现跨界创新目标，包括：数字分布可供性（离散知识型、动态联盟型）与数字重组可供性（错位重组型、裂变重组型）两类主导逻辑及4条细分路径。研究结论贡献于数字创新生态可供性与跨界创新研究的理论融合，为明晰非核心企业实现跨行业创新跃升提供实践启示。

Abstract

How to use digital innovation ecological organizations to empower non-core enterprises in marginal ecological niches to reverse their marginal status and achieve cross-industry innovation development is an important theoretical and practical issue for widely gathering enterprise strength and developing new quality productivity. However, existing research mostly focused on the impact of digital technology on cross-border innovation, lacking attention to the affordance of digital innovation ecosystem organizations formed on digital technology. Based on the classic framework of affordance theory and the "architecture, strategy, environment" organizational theory, this study used the fs/QCA analysis method to explore the multiple paths through which the affordance of digital innovation ecology empowers non-core enterprises to achieve cross-industry innovation. The research found that digital innovation ecosystem organizations can provide action potential for the realization of corporate strategic visions, but non-core enterprises on the edge of the ecosystem cannot achieve cross-industry innovation solely through a single dimension of affordance. It is necessary to combine the availability of digital technology architecture, the availability of the digital innovation ecosystem environment, and the multidimensional strategy of digital innovation strategy to support non-core enterprises in exploring the potential of cross-industry technology grafting and transforming it into effective actions to achieve cross-industry innovation goals, including two dominant logics and four sub-paths: digital distribution availability (discrete knowledge type, dynamic alliance type) and digital recombination availability (dislocation recombination type, fission recombination type). The research conclusion will contribute to the theoretical integration of the affordance of digital innovation ecology and cross-industry innovation research, and provide practical inspiration for non-core enterprises to achieve cross-industry innovation leap.

导出引用

赵艺璇, 余江, 彭密香, 韩进. 数字创新生态可供性影响跨界创新的组态研究[J]. 科研管理. 2024, 45(12): 133-141 https://doi.org/10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2024.12.014

Zhao Yixuan, Yu Jiang, Peng Mixiang, Han Jin. Research on the configuration of the impact of digital innovation ecosystem affordance on cross-industry innovation[J]. Science Research Management. 2024, 45(12): 133-141 https://doi.org/10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2024.12.014

参考文献

[1] 王涛.跨界融合情境下组织间合作如何实现价值共创——基于界面管理的视角[J].经济与管理研究, 2021, 42(08): 111-123.
[2] SZALAVETZ A. Transition to electric vehicles in Hungary: A devastating crisis or business as usual?[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2022, 184:122029.
[3] KOHLI R, MELVILLE N P. Digital innovation: A review and synthesis[J]. Information Systems Journal, 2019, 29(1): 200-223.
[4] LYNG H B, BRUN E C. Making your knowledge mine: The integration of external knowledge in cross-industry innovation[J]. International Journal of Innovation Management, 2020, 24(05): 2050050.
[5] 张超, 陈凯华, 穆荣平.数字创新生态系统: 理论构建与未来研究[J].科研管理, 2021, 42(03): 1-11.
[6] 马鸿佳, 林樾, 肖彬.数字创业生态系统中多主体互动对数字创业绩效的影响——基于fsQCA方法的研究[J].研究与发展管理, 2022, 34(03): 41-53.
[7] CHAE B K. A General framework for studying the evolution of the digital innovation ecosystem: The case of big data[J]. International Journal of Information Management, 2019, 45: 83-94.
[8] WANG K H, UMAR M, AKRAM R, et al. Is technological innovation making world “Greener”? An evidence from changing growth story of China[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2021, 165: 120516.
[9] 魏江, 赵雨菡.数字创新生态系统的治理机制[J].科学学研究, 2021, 39(06): 965-969.
[10] XIE X, WANG H. How can open innovation ecosystem modes push product innovation forward? An fsQCA analysis[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2020, 108: 29-41.
[11] 杜运周, 李佳馨, 刘秋辰, 等.复杂动态视角下的组态理论与QCA方法: 研究进展与未来方向[J].管理世界, 2021, 37(03):180-197+12-13.
[12] CILLIERS P. Knowing complex systems [J]. Managing Organisational Complexity: Philosophy, Theory, Application, IAP, Connecticut, 2005: 7-19.
[13] SANTOS F M, EISENHARDT K M. Organizational boundaries and theories of organization[J]. Organization Science, 2005, 16(5): 491-508.
[14] FARJOUN M. Beyond industry boundaries: Human expertise，diversification and resource-related industry groups[J]. Organization Science，1994, 5(2): 185-199.
[15] 陈艳莹, 吴龙. 新企业进入对制造业在位企业利润率的影响——基于逃离竞争效应及其异质性的视角[J].中国工业经济, 2015(08): 50-65.
[16] DINGLER A, ENKEL E. Socialization and innovation: Insights from collaboration across industry boundaries[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change，2016, 109: 50-60.
[17] BURGELMAN R A, GROVE A S. Let chaos reign，then rein in chaos—repeatedly: Managing strategic dynamics for corporate longevity[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2007, 28(10): 965-979.
[18] GEELS F W. Reconceptualising the co-evolution of firms-in-industries and their environments: Developing an inter-disciplinary Triple Embeddedness Framework[J]. Research Policy, 2014, 43(2): 261-277.
[19] SUSENO Y, LAURELL C, SICK N. Assessing value creation in digital innovation ecosystems: A Social Media Analytics approach[J]. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 2018, 27(4): 335-349.
[20] PINHEIRO R, FRIGOTTO M L, YOUNG M. Towards resilient organizations and societies: A cross-sectoral and multi-disciplinary perspective [M]. Springer Nature, 2022.
[21] 王倩, 柳卸林.企业跨界创新中的价值共创研究: 基于生态系统视角[J].科研管理, 2023, 44(04): 11-18.
[22] BRUNSWICKER S, HUTSCHEK U. Crossing horizons: Leveraging cross-industry innovation search in the front-end of the innovation process[J]. International Journal of Innovation Management, 2010, 14(04): 683-702.
[23] GASSMANN, O., ZESCHKY, M., WOLFF, T., et al., Crossing the industry-line: breakthrough innovation through cross-industry alliances with ‘non-suppliers’[J]. Long Range Planning, 2010, 43(5-6), 639-654.
[24] ZHANG W, LIU X, WANG D, et al. Digital economy and carbon emission performance: Evidence at China’s city level.[J] Energy Policy, 2022, 165: 112927.
[25] 时代, 李金生. 企业跨界行为如何提升新产品开发绩效？[J/OL]. 科学学研究, 2023: 1-17. https://doi.org/10.16192/j.cnki.1003-2053.20230615.002.
[26] ENKEL E, MEZGER F. Imitation processes and their application for business model innovation: An explorative study[J]. International Journal of Innovation Management, 2013, 17(01): 1340005.
[27] FAEROEVIK K H, MAEHLE N. The outcomes of cross-industry innovation for small and medium sized enterprises[J]. Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship, 2022: 1-30.
[28] HAUGE E S, KYLLINGSTAD N, MAEHLE N, et al. Developing cross-industry innovation capability: Regional drivers and indicators within firms[J]. European Planning Studies, 2017, 25(3): 388-405.
[29] RUSSO A, VURRO C. Cross-boundary ambidexterity: Balancing exploration and exploitation in the fuel cell industry[J]. European Management Review, 2010, 7(1): 30-45.
[30] 王雪原, 黄佳赛.不同情境制造企业跨界技术创新行为与作用逻辑[J].科学学研究, 2023, 41(04): 744-756.
[31] BELTAGUI A, ROSLI A, CANDI M. Exaptation in a digital innovation ecosystem: The disruptive impacts of 3D printing[J]. Research Policy, 2020, 49(1): 103833.
[32] LEWIN R. Complexity: Life at the edge of chaos [M]. University of Chicago Press, 1999.
[33] YOO Y, HENFRIDSSON O, LYYTINEN K. Research commentary—the new organizing logic of digital innovation: An agenda for information systems research[J]. Information Systems Research, 2010, 21(4): 724-735.
[34] CIRIELLO R F, RICHTER A, SCHWABE G. Digital innovation[J]. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 2018, 60: 563-569.
[35] FICHMAN R G, DOS SANTOS B L, ZHENG Z. Digital innovation as a fundamental and powerful concept in the information systems curriculum[J]. MIS Quarterly, 2014, 38(2): 329-A15.
[36] 金姝彤, 王海军, 陈劲, 等.模块化数字平台对企业颠覆性创新的作用机制研究——以海尔COSMOPlat为例[J].研究与发展管理, 2021, 33(06): 18-30.
[37] 宁连举, 刘经涛, 肖玉贤, 等.数字创新生态系统共生模式研究[J].科学学研究, 2022, 40(08): 1481-1494.
[38] BALDWIN C Y. Bottlenecks, modules and dynamic architectural capabilities [C]. Harvard Business School Finance Working Paper, 2015, 15-028.
[39] 王节祥, 陈威如, 江诗松, 等.平台生态系统中的参与者战略：互补与依赖关系的解耦[J].管理世界, 2021, 37(02): 126-147+10.
[40] 谭劲松, 宋娟, 王可欣, 等.创新生态系统视角下核心企业突破关键核心技术“卡脖子”——以中国高速列车牵引系统为例[J/OL].南开管理评, 2023: 1-28. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/12.1288.f.20220311.1333.002.html
[41] BERTELLO A, DE BERNARDI P, FERRARIS A, et al. Shedding lights on organizational decoupling in publicly funded R&D consortia: An institutional perspective on open innovation[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2022, 176: 121433.
[42] 柳卸林, 魏江, 戎珂. 专稿: 数字时代的创新生态[J].科学学研究, 2021, 39(06): 961.DOI:10.16192/j.cnki.1003-2053.2021.06.001.
[43] CHEN H, TIAN Z. Environmental uncertainty, resource orchestration and digital transformation: A fuzzy-set QCA approach[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2022, 139: 184-193.
[44] MILES R E, SNOW C C, MEYER A D, et al. Organizational strategy, structure, and process[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1978, 3(3): 546-562.
[45] LENZ R T. Environment，strategy，organization structure and performance: Patterns in one industry[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1980, 1(3): 209-226.
[46] WARD P T, BICKFORD D J, LEONG G K. Configurations of manufacturing strategy, business strategy, environment and structure[J]. Journal of Management, 1996, 22(4): 597-626.
[47] 单子丹, 曾燕红, 李慧敏, 等.数据资源如何重塑数字创新生态系统多主体竞合关系？——基于智能驾驶数字创新生态系统的解构与重组[J].研究与发展管理, 2022, 34(06): 79-91.
[48] JEMISON D B. The importance of boundary spanning roles in strategic decision‐making[J]. Journal of Management Studies, 1984, 21(2): 131-152.
[49] ZHU Z, ZHAO J, BUSH A A. The effects of e-business processes in supply chain operations: Process component and value creation mechanisms[J]. International Journal of Information Management, 2020, 50: 273-285.
[50] WU W, LIANG Z, ZHANG Q, et al. Coupling relationships and synergistic mechanisms between technology management capability and technological capability in product innovation: A simulation study[J]. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 2020, 32(9): 1098-1112.
[51] DE BERNARDI P, ALBERTO B, FRANCESCA R, et al. Business model innovation in SMEs engaging in innovation ecosystems. A decoupling perspective [C]. In ITAIS and MCIS 2019 Proceedings. Rome: ITHUM and ItAIS, 2019, 1-10.
[52] MILLIKEN F J. Three types of perceived uncertainty about the environment: State，effect, and response uncertainty[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1987, 12(1): 133-143.
[53] FISS P C. Building better causal theories: A fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2011, 54(2): 393-420.
[54] POORKAVOOS M, DUAN Y, EDWARDS J S, et al. Identifying the configurational paths to innovation in SMEs: A fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2016, 69(12): 5843-5854.
[55] RAGIN C C. Redesigning social inquiry: Fuzzy sets and beyond [M]. University of Chicago Press, 2009.
[56] ZAPADKA P, HANELT A, FIRK S. Digital at the edge–antecedents and performance effects of boundary resource deployment[J]. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 2022, 31(1): 101708.
[57] CARLILE P R. A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: Boundary objects in new product development[J]. Organization Science, 2022, 13(4): 442-455.
[58] VANDERHORN E, MAHAEVAN S. Digital Twin: Generalization, characterization and implementation[J]. Decision Support Systems, 2021, 145: 113524.
[59] DAVIS S J. An index of global economic policy uncertainty [C].National Bureau of Economic Research, 2016.
[60] BRUSONI S, PRENCIPE A. Unpacking the black box of modularity: Technologies，products and organizations[J]. Industrial and Corporate Change, 2001, 10(1): 179-205.
[61] ENGWALL M, KAULIO M, KARAKAYA E, et al. Experimental networks for business model innovation: A way for incumbents to navigate sustainability transitions?[J]. Technovation, 2021, 108: 102330.
[62] Aarikka-Stenroos, L., & Ritala, P. (2017). Network management in the era of ecosystems: Systematic review and management framework. Industrial Marketing Management, 67, 23-36.
[63] ADNER R, LIEBERMAN M. Disruption through complements[J]. Strategy Science, 2021, 6(1): 91-109.
[64] LINGENS B, MIEHé L, GASSMANN O. The ecosystem blueprint: How firms shape the design of an ecosystem according to the surrounding conditions[J]. Long Range Planning, 2021, 54(2): 02043.
[65] MOEEN M. Entry into nascent industries: Disentangling a firm’s capability portfolio at the time of investment versus market entry[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2017, 38(10): 1986-2004.
[66] GEBAUER H, FLEISCH E, LAMPRECHT C, et al. Growth paths for overcoming the digitalization paradox[J]. Business Horizons, 2020, 63(3): 313-323.
[67] PIEPPONEN A, RITALA P, KER?NEN J, et al. Digital transformation of the value proposition: A single case study in the media industry[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2022, 150: 311-325.
[68] 赵艺璇, 成琼文, 郭波武.创新生态系统情境下核心企业跨界扩张的实现机制——社会嵌入视角的纵向单案例分析[J].南开管理评论, 2022, 25(06): 52-65.
[69] LIU Y, DONG J, MEI L, et al. Digital innovation and performance of manufacturing firms: An affordance perspective[J]. Technovation, 2023, 119: 102458.

基金

国家自然科学基金重点项目：“数字技术创新机制、突破路径与政策体系研究”（NSFC 72334007，2024.01—2028.12）；国家社会科学基金一般项目：“智能制造企业参与国际标准制定对突破性创新的影响机制研究”(23BGL071)；江苏省重点统计项目：“创新生态系统驱动‘专精特新’中小企业培育研究”（JSTJ2024W006）；南京邮电大学引进人才科研启动基金项目：“数字生态系统中企业关键技术突破式创新的实现机制研究”(NYY224017)。