科研管理 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (11): 1-13.DOI: 10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2024.11.001

• 论文 •    下一篇

中国经济高速增长与创新驱动不足并存之谜——基于地方经济增长目标设定的解释

潘爽   

  1. 江西财经大学会计学院,江西 南昌330013
  • 收稿日期:2023-07-09 修回日期:2024-07-10 出版日期:2024-11-20 发布日期:2024-11-12
  • 通讯作者: 潘爽
  • 基金资助:
    江西省社科基金青年项目:“数字经济推动我省制造业企业绿色发展的路径研究”(23YJ24,2023.06—2025.06)。

Mysterious coexistence of rapid economic growth and insufficient innovation drive in China: An explanation based on setting of local economic growth targets

Pan Shuang   

  1. School of Accountancy, Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, Nanchang 330013, Jiangxi, China
  • Received:2023-07-09 Revised:2024-07-10 Online:2024-11-20 Published:2024-11-12

摘要:     中国经济发展过程中经济高速增长与创新驱动不足并存的现象一直以来都是研究中国经济的关键话题。本文利用2003—2018年城市面板数据,通过多元线性回归分析方法从经济增长目标设定的视角解释这一现象。研究发现:(1)经济增长目标以及层层加码会显著抑制区域创新水平提升,从创新的分类来看,对实质性创新呈现显著的抑制作用而对策略性创新专利是显著的促进作用,能够解释为何专利数量连年递增而经济创新驱动力却严重不足。结论经过一系列稳健性检验和双重差分法处理内生性后依然成立;(2)进一步分析表明,经济增长目标以及层层加码与创新水平呈现出先抑制后促进的U型非线性特征,且实质性创新也符合这一特征,而策略性创新相反呈现倒U型特征;(3)机制分析表明,经济增长目标以及层层加码主要通过提升城市的土地财政依赖度和降低环境规制强度来抑制城市创新水平提升;(4)拓展性分析中,考虑官员特征的拓展性分析发现官员任期较长以及在官员更替期间的样本中,经济增长目标及层层加码的作用更显著。考虑市场条件的拓展性分析发现在市场化水平低的地区以及市场分割程度较高的地区经济增长目标及层层加码的作用更显著。本文的研究拓展了经济增长目标负外部性研究以及城市创新影响因素的相关研究,有助于理解政府增长目标以及官员特征等因素对城市创新的影响,从而为提升经济创新驱动力提供一定的经验证据和政策启示。

关键词: 经济增长目标, 层层加码, 城市创新, 非线性特征

Abstract: The coexistence of high-speed economic growth and insufficient innovation drive in the process of China′s economic development has always been a key topic for studying the Chinese economy. This paper used the urban panel data from 2003-2018 to explain this phenomenon from the perspective of economic growth target setting through multiple linear regression analysis. The study found that: (1) Economic growth target and topdown amplification significantly inhibit the improvement of regional innovation, while it shows a significant inhibitory effect on substantive innovation and a significant promoting effect on strategic innovation patents from the perspective of innovation classification; (2) Further analysis showed that economic growth target and innovation levels exhibit a U-shaped nonlinear characteristic, and substantive innovation also conforms to this characteristic, while strategic innovation on the contrary exhibits an inverted U-shaped characteristic; (3) The analysis of mechanisms indicated that economic growth targets and top-down amplification mainly suppress the improvement of urban innovation level by increasing the city′s land fiscal dependence and reducing the intensity of environmental regulations; (4) In the expansion analysis, through considering the characteristics of officials, it was found that the effects of economic growth target and top-down amplification are more significant in samples with longer official tenure and during the period of official turnover. The expansion analysis which considers market conditions found that the role of economic growth target and top-down amplification is more significant in regions with low levels of marketization and high levels of market segmentation. This paper has broadened the scope of research on the negative externalities associated with economic growth objectives and the influencing factors of urban innovation. It will aid in better understanding the influence of government growth target and official characteristics on urban innovation, thereby offering empirical evidence and policy insights to boost the driving force of economic innovation.

Key words: economic growth target, top-down amplification, urban innovation, nonlinear characteristics