科研管理 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (10): 56-68.DOI: 10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2024.10.006

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

多主体参与的创新联合体稳定策略研究

马宗国1,蒋依晓2   

  1. 1.广东财经大学工商管理学院,广东 广州510320;
    2.山东师范大学商学院,山东 济南250358
  • 收稿日期:2023-06-19 修回日期:2024-07-11 出版日期:2024-10-20 发布日期:2024-10-11
  • 通讯作者: 蒋依晓
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金重点项目:“基于研究联合体的国家自主创新示范区产业转型升级”(21AGL035,2021.09—2024.12)。

Research on the stable strategy of innovation consortium with multi-agent participation

Ma Zongguo1, Jiang Yixiao2   

  1. 1. School of Business Administration, Guangdong University of Finance and Economics, Guangzhou 510320, Guangdong, China;
    2. Business School, Shandong Normal University, Jinan 250358, Shandong, China
  • Received:2023-06-19 Revised:2024-07-11 Online:2024-10-20 Published:2024-10-11

摘要:     创新联合体作为新型举国体制微观化成果,成为我国应对科技创新发展形势、构建融通创新体系和支撑产业高质量发展的重要载体。本研究基于创新联合体多主体参与模型,考虑在中央政府考核监管和公共研究组织知识创造作用下的产业链领军企业、产业链配套企业和地方政府的策略选择,构建三方演化博弈模型,求解不同情况下的演化稳定策略组合,利用李雅普诺夫第一法则分析了演化策略组合的稳定性,并运用Matlab 2022b对博弈主体在不同参量变化下的策略选择进行了仿真分析。研究结果表明:(1)产业链领军企业是影响创新联合体组建的关键内驱力,对于产业链领军企业而言,不主导创新时的招致损失和协同创新成本是影响其演化博弈结果的关键因素;(2)产业链配套企业作为创新联合体体系化创新力量,对地方政府补贴敏感度高于产业链领军企业,当产业链领军企业主导创新和地方政府补贴的概率越高,产业链配套企业越倾向加入创新联合体;(3)地方政府的支持是创新联合体前期组建的基础引领动力,中央政府对地方政府的资金倾斜力度会对地方政府演化稳定策略产生显著积极影响。最后,本文提出如下对策建议:提供精细化政策保障,增强产业链领军企业主导创新能力;实施针对性补贴支持,激发产业链配套企业内生创新动力;搭建融通合作平台,增强产业链创新活力。通过将创新联合体的关键参与主体及其相应功能定位和主体策略选择演化过程作为研究主线,进一步丰富了组建创新联合体的理论研究,系统聚焦创新联合体微观主体的策略,为创新联合体的稳定运行提供实践启示。

关键词: 创新联合体, 稳定策略, 领军企业, 三方演化博弈, 仿真分析

Abstract:    Innovation consortium, representing a micro-level achievement of the new national system, has become a crucial way for China to respond to scientific and technological innovations, promote the integrated innovation and support high-quality industrial development. This paper, based on the multi-agent participation model of innovation consortium, after considering the strategic choices of leading enterprises, supporting enterprises, and government supervision departments, constructed a tripartite evolutionary game model, and solved the stable equilibrium point of each game player′s strategic choice. The stability of the strategy combination was analyzed with the Lyapunov′s first method, and Matlab 2022b was used for simulation analysis to verify the influence of each decision variable on the strategy choice of different players. The results showed that: first of all, the leading enterprises in the industrial chain are the key driving forces affecting the formation of innovation consortium. For the leading enterprises, the incurred loss and cost of collaborative innovation when they do not lead innovation in the innovation consortium are the key factors influencing the evolutionary game results. Secondly, the supporting enterprises in the industrial chain, as the systemic innovation subjects of innovation consortium, are more sensitive to government subsidies than the leading enterprises. With the higher probability of local government subsidies and the leading enterprises of leading innovation, they are more inclined to join the cooperation of innovation consortium. Moreover, the support of local government is the basic guiding force for the formation of innovation consortia in the early stage, and the central government′s funding preference for local governments will have a positive impact on the evolution stable strategy of local governments. Finally, this paper proposed the following countermeasures: refined policies should be provided to enhance the leading innovation capabilities of the industrial chain leading enterprises; targeted subsidy should be implemented to stimulate the endogenous innovation drive of the industrial chain supporting enterprises; and integrated cooperation platforms should be established to bolster the innovation vitality of the industrial chain. Key participating entities of the innovation consortium and their corresponding functional orientations, as well as the evolutionary process of their strategic choices should be taken as the main research line to enrich the theoretical research on the formation of innovation consortia. Moreover, focuses systematically on the strategies of micro-entities in the innovation consortium will offer more practical insights into the maintenance of stability.

Key words: innovation consortium, stable strategy, leading enterprise, three-party evolutionary game, simulation analysis