共享出行平台运营模式创新路径选择研究

doi:10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2024.09.019

科研管理 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (9): 184-192.DOI: 10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2024.09.019

• 论文 • 上一篇

共享出行平台运营模式创新路径选择研究

鲁锦涛¹,郭娅珍^1,2,林文芳³

1.太原科技大学经济与管理学院，山西太原030024；
2.晋中信息学院经济与管理学院，山西晋中030800；
3.西安电子科技大学经济与管理学院，陕西西安710126

收稿日期:2023-05-05 修回日期:2024-05-24 出版日期:2024-09-20 发布日期:2024-09-10
通讯作者: 鲁锦涛
基金资助:
山西省政府重大决策咨询课题：“数字经济赋能山西加快新质生产力形成的路径和对策研究”（ZB20240101,2024.04—2024.09）；教育部人文社会科学研究一般项目：“道德决策过程模型下消费者感知平台算法责任缺失的结构测量、传导机制与边界条件”（23YJA630067,2023.10—2026.10）。

Research on the path selection of the operation mode innovation of ridesharing platforms

Lu Jintao¹, Guo Yazhen^1,2, Lin Wenfang³

1. School of Economics and Management, Taiyuan University of Science and Technology, Taiyuan 030024, Shanxi, China;
2. School of Economics and Management, Jinzhong College of Information, Jinzhong 030800, Shanxi, China;
3. School of Economics and Management, Xidian University, Xi′an 710126, Shaanxi, China

Received:2023-05-05 Revised:2024-05-24 Online:2024-09-20 Published:2024-09-10
Supported by:
Youth Project of China’s National Social Science Foundation;Program for the Philosophy and Social Sciences Key Research Base of Higher Education Institutions of Shanxi (PSRB);Program for the Innovative Talents of Higher Education Institutions of Shanxi (PTIT);Special Project for Science and Technology Strategy Research of Shanxi Province

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 运营模式创新是共享出行平台有效突破平台运营中隐私泄露、责任缺失、盈利不足等现实困境，实现可持续创新和发展的关键路径。然而，现有研究对如何选择共享出行平台运营模式创新的路径未能提供科学的理论依据和系统化的解决方案。本文综合运用扎根理论、灰色关联分析法和NK模型，分析了共享出行平台运营模式的构成要素及其创新的演进阶段和最优路径。研究发现：（1）共享出行平台运营模式的构成要素包含了营销战略、核心资源、伙伴网络、客户关系、关键业务、科技向善、ESG发展理念和盈利模式。（2）共享出行平台运营模式创新经历了资源主导型创新、业务开拓型创新、科技驱动型创新和责任导向型创新四个演进阶段。（3）最优的创新路径是在“核心资源”创新的基础上，融合平台“关键业务”创新，考虑“科技向善”创新，最终实现“ESG发展理念”创新。本研究为共享出行平台企业优化运营模式创新路径提供理论指导，也为推进多主体协同创新提供有益参考。

关键词: 共享出行平台, 运营模式创新, NK模型, ESG理念

Abstract: Operation mode innovation is critical for ridesharing platforms to effectively conquer practical challenges, such as privacy leaks, lack of corporate social responsibility, and insufficient profitability, so as to achieve sustainable innovation and development. However, previous studies cannot provide sufficient scientific theoretical basis and systematic solutions for choosing the optimal path of the operation mode innovation of ridesharing platforms. Comprehensively using the grounded theory, grey relational analysis method, and the NK model, this study analyzed the components of the operation mode as well as the evolutionary stages and optimal paths of operation mode innovation of ridesharing platforms. The findings of this study are as follows: (1) the components of the ridesharing platform′s operation mode encompass marketing strategy, core resources, partner networks, customer relationship, key business, science and technology for social good, ESG development concept, and profit model; (2) the operation mode innovation of ridesharing platforms has experienced four evolutionary stages: resource-led innovation, task-pioneering innovation, technology-driven innovation, and responsibility-oriented innovation; and (3) based on the innovation of core resources, the optimal innovation path is to integrate with the critical business innovation of the platform and then consider "science and technology for social good" innovations, thus ultimately realizing the innovation of the ESG development concepts. This study will provide some theoretical guidance for the ridesharing platform enterprises to optimize the operation mode innovation path and offer practical insights into promoting multiple-subject collaborative innovation simultaneously.

Key words: ridesharing platform, operation mode innovation, NK model, ESG concept

鲁锦涛郭娅珍林文芳. 共享出行平台运营模式创新路径选择研究[J]. 科研管理, 2024, 45(9): 184-192.

Lu Jintao, Guo Yazhen, Lin Wenfang. Research on the path selection of the operation mode innovation of ridesharing platforms[J]. Science Research Management, 2024, 45(9): 184-192.

参考文献

[1] BARDHI F, ECKHARDT G M. Access-based consumption: The case of car sharing [J]. Journal of Consumer Research, 2012, 39(4): 881-898.
[2] 余航, 田林, 蒋国银, 等. 共享经济: 理论建构与研究进展 [J]. 南开管理评论, 2018, 21(6): 37-52.
YU Hang, TIAN Lin, JIANG Guoyin, et al. Sharing economy: Theory and research agenda [J]. Nankai Business Review, 2018, 21(6): 37-52.
[3] LIU Z, MA L, ZHU Y, et al. An investigation on responsible innovation in the emerging shared bicycle industry: Case study of a Chinese firm [J]. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 2019, 5(3): 42.
[4] 闫强, 胡承蓉, 张乐. 共享经济中消费者信任影响因素实证研究 [J]. 科研管理, 2020, 41(10): 202-209.
YAN Qiang, HU Chengrong, ZHANG Le. An empirical research on the factors influencing consumer trust in the sharing economy [J]. Science Research Management, 2020, 41(10): 202-209.
[5] BELK R. You are what you can access: Sharing and collaborative consumption online [J]. Journal of Business Research, 2014, 67(8): 1595-1600.
[6] 徐琪, 吴翠, 陈啟. 共享平台下供应链闲置资源动态优化配置策略 [J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(9): 86-92.
XU Qi, WU Cui, CHEN Qi. Dynamic optimal allocation strategy of idle resources supply chain on shared platform [J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2021, 30(9): 86-92.
[7] 严子淳, 李欣, 王伟楠. 数字化转型研究: 演化和未来展望 [J]. 科研管理, 2021, 42(4): 21-34.
YAN Zichun, LI Xi, WANG Weinan. A research on digital transformation: Its evolution and future prospects [J]. Science Research Management, 2021, 42(4): 21-34.
[8] 陈喜群. 网约共享出行研究综述 [J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(5): 77-90.
CHEN Xiqun. Review of app-based ridesharing mobility research [J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2021, 21(5): 77-90.
[9] TIAN X, WANG Y, SHI Y. Research on risk management and profitability of bike sharing business model international conference on financial management and economic transition [C]. 2021 International Conference on Financial Management and Economic Transition. Atlantis Press, 2021: 110-116.
[10] BANERJEE S, JOHARI R, RIQUELME C. Dynamic pricing in ridesharing platforms [J]. ACM SIGecom Exchanges, 2016, 15(1): 65-70.
[11] 贺石昊, 孙海尧. 共享经济企业的平台社会责任研究——基于滴滴出行的案例研究 [J]. 科技和产业, 2020, 20(10): 8-15.
HE Shihao, SUN Hairao. Research on platform social responsibility of sharing economy enterprises: A case study based on Didi [J]. Science Technology and Industry, 2020, 20(10): 8-15.
[12] DURAN-RODAS D, VILLENEUVE D, WULFHORST G. Bike-sharing: The good, the bad, and the future: An analysis of the public discussion on twitter [J]. European Journal of Transport & Infrastructure Research, 2020, 20(4): 38-58.
[13] PROTHERO A, DOBSCHA S, FREUND J, et al. Sustainable consumption: Opportunities for consumer research and public policy [J]. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 2011, 30(1): 31-38.
[14] 蒋国银, 陈玉凤, 匡亚林. 共享经济平台数据治理: 框架构建、核心要素及优化策略 [J]. 情报杂志, 2021, 40(8): 71-80.
JIANG Guoyin, CHEN Yufeng, KUANG Yalin. Data governance of sharing economy platform: Framework construction, Core elements and optimization strategy [J]. Journal of Intelligence, 2021, 40(8): 71-80.
[15] LONG T B, VAN WAES A. When bike sharing business models go bad: Incorporating responsibility into business model innovation [J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021, 297: 126679.
[16] 刘凯宁, 樊治平, 于超. 基于NK模型的商业模式创新路径选择 [J]. 管理学报, 2017, 14(11): 1650-1661.
LIU Kaining, FAN Zhiping, YU Chao. A method for selecting business model innovation path based on NK model [J]. Chinese Journal of Management, 2017, 14(11): 1650-1661.
[17] GRIECO C. Innovating the innovated: Business model innovation process in sharing economy companies [J]. Creativity and Innovation Management, 2021, 30(4): 860-871.
[18] 洪志生, 薛澜, 周源. 战略性新兴产业运营模式创新类型及策略研究 [J]. 科技进步与对策, 2015, 32(13): 52-58.
HONG Zhisheng, XUE Lan, ZHOU Yuan. Study on operating model innovation in strategic emerging industries and its institutional environment [J]. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 2015, 32(13): 52-58.
[19] 孙楚, 曾剑秋. 共享经济时代商业模式创新的动因与路径——价值共创的视角 [J]. 江海学刊, 2019(2): 102-108+254.
SUN Chu, ZENG Jianqiu. The motivation and path of business model innovation in the era of sharing economy: From the perspective of value cocreation [J]. Jianghai Academic Journal, 2019(2): 102-108+254.
[20] 孙凯, 王振飞, 鄢章华. 共享经济商业模式的分类和理论模型——基于三个典型案例的研究 [J]. 管理评论, 2019, 31(7): 97-109.
SUN Kai, WANG Zhenfei, YAN Zhanghua. Classification and theoretical models of sharing economy business models: Based on studies of three typical cases [J]. Management Review, 2019, 31(7): 97-109.
[21] 杨学成, 涂科.共享经济背景下的动态价值共创研究——以出行平台为例 [J]. 管理评论, 2016, 28(12): 258-268.
YANG Xuecheng, TU Ke. Research on the dynamic value co-creation in the sharing economic background: A case study of the travel platform [J]. Management Review, 2016, 28(12): 258-268.
[22] 宋伟. 滴滴产品发展战略研究 [D]. 北京：中国石油大学, 2019.
SONG Wei. Research on the development strategy of Didi Dache [D]. Beijing: China University of Petroleum, 2019.
[23] 杜怿平. 我国共享单车企业的经营管理模式创新及盈利模式探索 [J]. 科技管理研究, 2017, 37(15): 225-229.
DU yiping. Management model innovation and business model exploration of bicycle-sharing corporations in China [J]. Science and Technology Management Research, 2017, 37(15): 225-229.
[24] 李安民. 中国电信运营商商业模式创新的内涵分析 [J]. 电信科学, 2008(5): 78-82.
LI Anmin. Connotation analysis of business model innovation of Chinese telecom operators [J]. Telecommunication Science, 2008(5): 78-82.
[25] 肖瑶. 数字贸易背景下跨境电商平台运营模式分析——基于“第三方平台”和“自营平台”的对比 [J]. 长江大学学报(社会科学版), 2020, 43(1):95-99+108.
XIAO Yao. Analysis on the operation mode of cross-border e-commerce platform under the background of digital trade based on the comparison of “third-party platform” and “proprietary platform” [J]. Journal of Yangtze University (Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 43(1): 95-99+108.
[26] 蒋贵艳. 双边市场视角下共享出行平台定价问题研究 [D]. 长沙：湖南大学,2018.
JIANG Guiyan. Research on pricing problem of shared travel platform from the perspective of two-sided markets [D]. Changsha: Hunan University, 2018.
[27] 程宣梅, 朱述全, 陈侃翔, 等. 共享经济视角下企业市场进入的内在机制研究——一项基于共享出行行业的定性比较分析 [J]. 南开管理评论, 2021: 1-18.
CHENG Xuanmei, ZHU Shuquan, CHNE Kanxiang, et al. Study on the internal mechanism of firms’ market entry from the perspective of sharing economy: A crisp set qualitative comparative analysis based on ridesharing industry [J]. Nankai Business Review, 2021: 1-18.
[28] 李要星, 向坚持, 刘亮明. 乘客视角的滴滴出行运营模式研究 [J]. 经济师, 2018(3): 55-57.
LI Yaoxing, XIANG Jianchi, LIU Liangming. Research on Didi travel operation mode from the perspective of passengers [J]. China Economist, 2018(3): 55-57.
[29] 卢珂, 周晶, 徐媛. 移动出行平台的系统结构分析及运营模式研究 [J]. 系统科学学报, 2018, 26(1): 74-77.
LU Ke, ZHOU Jin, XU Yuan. The system structure analysis and operation mode research of mobile travel platform [J]. Journal of Systems Science, 2018, 26(1): 74-77.
[30] 周南南, 李昊宁. 共享出行的运营模式与核算探讨 [J]. 调研世界, 2021(8): 60-73.
ZHOU Nannan, LI Haoning. Discussion on operation mode and accounting of shared travel [J]. The World of Survey and Research, 2021(8): 60-73.
[31] 李志胜, 曾雄旺, 唐学思. 共享汽车O2O运营的风险及其防控 [J]. 商业会计, 2019(16): 101-103.
LI Zhisheng, ZENG Xiongwang, TANG Xuesi. Risks of O2O operation of shared cars and their prevention and control [J]. Commercial Accounting, 2019(16): 101-103.
[32] 彭城瀚. 苏宁云商资产运营模式与财务战略匹配性研究 [D]. 云南大学, 2018.
PENG Chenghan. The matching between asset operation model and financial strategy of Suning commerce [D]. Yunnan University, 2018.
[33] 李希. 阿米巴经营模式的组织结构及其运行机制研究 [D]. 暨南大学, 2020.
LI Xi. Research on the organizational structure and operating mechanism of Amoeba's management model [D]. Jinan University, 2020.
[34] 王凌瑜. 优酷网运营模式优化研究 [D]. 大连海事大学, 2019.
WANG Linyu. Research on optimization of operation mode of YouKu [D]. Dalian Maritime University, 2019.
[35] 李高广, 吕廷杰. 电信运营商移动互联网运营模式研究 [J]. 北京邮电大学学报(社会科学版), 2008(03): 29-33.
LI Gaoguang, LV Tingjie. On telecom operator's operation model of mobile internet [J]. Journal of Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications(Social Sciences Edition), 2008(03): 29-33.
[36] 赵向龙. 我国大宗商品交易平台的运营模式研究 [D]. 上海工程技术大学, 2015.
ZHAO Xianglong. The research of operation model of our country commodity trading platform [D]. Shanghai University Of Engineering Science, 2015.
[37] 欧国立, 张瑞琪, 王兴婧. 共享单车经营模式的发展路径 [J]. 长安大学学报(社会科学版), 2019, 21(4): 70-81.
OU Guoli, ZHANG Ruiqi, WANG Xingjing. Development path of sharing bicycle business model [J]. Journal of Chang’an University (Social Science Edition), 2019, 21(4): 70-81.
[38] 李璐璐. 共享单车运营模式和策略研究 [J]. 市场研究, 2018(2): 27-29.
LI Lulu. Study on operation mode and strategy of shared bicycle [J]. Marketing Research, 2018(2): 27-29.
[39] 刘妤. 移动互联网下共享单车“拟合型”创新模式研究 [J]. 攀枝花学院学报, 2017, 34(4): 28-32.
LIU Shu. The research on “fit type” innovation model of sharing bike in the context of mobile internet [J]. Journal of Panzhihua University, 2017, 34(4): 28-32.
[40] 郝雅立, 温志强. 共建共治共享: 大数据支持下共享单车智能化治理路径 [J]. 管理评论, 2019, 31(1): 249-254.
HAO Yali, WEN Zhiqiang. Governing and sharing: Intelligent management path of sharing bike by big data supporting [J]. Common Construction, 2019, 31(1): 249-254.
[41] 韩焕法. 共享单车行业运营模式创新路径分析 [J]. 科技经济市场, 2017(10): 126-127.
HAN Huanfa. Analysis on innovation path of operation mode of shared bicycle industry [J]. Science & Technology Ecnony Market, 2017(10): 126-127.
[42] KIM S K, YEUN C Y. A versatile queuing system for sharing economy platform operations [J]. Mathematics, 2019, 7(11): 1005.
[43] 孟韬, 关钰桥, 董政. 共享经济商业模式分类及其发展路径研究 [J]. 财经问题研究, 2020(12): 40-49.
MENG Tao, GUAN Yuqiao, DONG Zheng. Research on the classification and development path of business model of sharing economy [J]. Research on Financial and Economic Issues, 2020(12): 40-49.
[44] LI D, JIA F, LIU G. How do bike-sharing platform companies overcome the operational challenge? A social exchange perspective [J]. Production Planning & Control, 2020: 1-17.
[45] 孙永波, 孙珲, 丁沂昕. 资源“巧”配与创业机会识别——基于资源编排理论 [J]. 科技进步与对策, 2021, 38(2): 19-28.
SUN Yongbo, SUN Hui, DING Yixin. Resource ingenuousness-configuration and entrepreneurial opportunity identification: Based on resource orchestration theory [J]. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 2021, 38(2): 19-28.
[46] 朱姗姗, 刘凤朝, 冯雪. 基于技术位的企业技术搜索策略研究 [J]. 科研管理, 2020, 41(4): 182-191.
ZHU Shanshan, LIU Fengchao, FENG Xue. A study of enterprises’ technology search strategies based on technology position [J]. Science Research Management, 2020, 41(4): 182-191.
[47] GLASER B G, STRAUSS A L, STRUTZEL E. The discovery of grounded theory; strategies for qualitative research [J]. Nursing Research, 1968, 17 (4): 364.
[48] ZHANG M, WANG J. Exploring the process of adaption of employee creativity: Based on Kauffman’s NK model [J]. International Journal of Enterprise Information Systems, 2016, 12(3): 18-37.
[49] 徐松鹤, 韩传峰, 孟令鹏, 等. 基于NK模型的突发事件应急管理组织系统适应性研究 [J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2017, 37(6): 1619-1629.
XU Songhe, HAN Chuanfeng, MENG Lingpeng, et al. Research on adaptive of emergency management organization system based on NK Model. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 2017, 37(6): 1619-1629.
[50] 唐建民, 黄菊. 基于适应度景观的组织知识创新绩效提升路径研究 [J]. 科技管理研究, 2016, 36(6): 181-186.
TANG Jianmin, HUANG Ju. Research on the path of organization knowledge innovation performance improvement based on the perspective of adaptive landscape [J]. Science and Technology Management Research, 2016, 36(6): 181-186.
[51] BAI C, KUSI-SARPONG S, SARKIS J. An implementation path for green information technology systems in the ghanaian mining industry [J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 164: 1105-1123.
[52] KULKARNI S, VERMA P, MUKUNDAN R. Performance landscape modeling in digital manufacturing firm [J]. Business Process Management Journal, 2019, 25(3): 533-552.
[53] 李香梅. 基于生态位的我国制造业绿色工艺创新路径演化研究 [D]. 哈尔滨：哈尔滨理工大学, 2014.
LI Xiangmei. Research on the path evolution of green process innovation in Chinese manufacturing industry based on niche [D]. Harbin: Harbin University of Science and Technology, 2014.

共享出行平台运营模式创新路径选择研究

Research on the path selection of the operation mode innovation of ridesharing platforms

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 1

编辑推荐

Metrics