PDF(1093 KB)
PDF(1093 KB)
PDF(1093 KB)
数字信息平台赋能企业合作创新路径研究
Research on the cooperative innovation path of enterprises empowered by digital information platform
数字经济背景下,数字信息平台如何赋能企业合作创新成为亟待解决的重要问题。本文以华东地区536家制造企业为研究对象,遵循“数字信息平台应用能力-组织间信任-企业合作创新绩效”研究脉络,使用结构方程模型分析法探究数字信息平台赋能企业合作创新的作用机制与实现路径。研究发现,数字信息平台具有搜索与惩戒能力,搜索能力与惩戒能力均能提升企业合作创新绩效,且惩戒能力对企业合作创新绩效的提升效应更大。进一步,组织间计算信任在数字信息平台的搜索能力与惩戒能力对企业合作创新绩效的影响中起到线性中介作用,而组织间关系信任在数字信息平台的搜索能力与惩戒能力对企业合作创新绩效的影响中起到先增强后减弱的非线性中介作用。本文为“创新网络情境下数字信息平台赋能企业合作创新”提供清晰路径,打开微观赋能过程“黑箱”,在一定程度上深化了数字可供性理论,丰富了数字创新网络下开放式创新理论与组织间信任理论,为数字信息平台建设和企业信任管理提供实践指导。
In the digital economy, understanding how digital information platforms empower enterprise collaborative innovation is a critical problem to be solved urgently. This paper investigated 536 manufacturing enterprises in eastern China, by adhering to the research framework of "digital information platform -- inter-organizational trust -- enterprise cooperative innovation performance", and using the Structural Equation Modeling (SEM), and explored the mechanisms and pathways through which digital information platforms empower enterprise cooperative innovation. The findings indicated that the digital information platforms possess search and sanctioning capabilities, both of which can enhance the performance of enterprise collaborative innovation, with sanctioning capabilities having a greater effect on improving collaborative innovation performance. Furthermore, both computing trust and relationship trust between organizations mediate the relationship between the application capability of digital information platforms and cooperative innovation performance, although their effects differ. This paper will provide a comprehensive framework for understanding how digital information platforms empower enterprise innovation within innovation networks. By uncovering the mediating effects of inter-organizational trust, this study has demystified the micro-processes of enterprise cooperative innovation empowered by the digital information platforms, contributing to the theory of digital affordance and enriching theories of open innovation and inter-organizational trust within cooperative innovation networks. Additionally, it will offer some theoretical guidance for the construction of digital information platforms and the management of enterprise trust.
digital information platform / cooperative innovation / inter-organizational trust
| [1] |
刘洋, 董久钰, 魏江. 数字创新管理:理论框架与未来研究[J]. 管理世界, 2020, 36(7):198-217+219.
|
| [2] |
王永贵, 刘菲. 信任有助于提升创新绩效吗:基于B2B背景的理论探讨与实证分析[J]. 中国工业经济, 2019(12):152-170.
|
| [3] |
This study conducts an investigation of interorganizational trust and its positive and negative effects. We consider how positive and negative effects operate differently under two types of uncertainties—buyer dependence and market instability. Trust is studied in the buyer–supplier relationship (BSR) context from the buyer’s perspective. The analysis is conducted based on survey data and secondary archival data from a sample of 133 BSRs. Results show that trust follows an inverted- U shape with performance. There is a point at which the negative effects of trust offset its benefits, and beyond that point, performance declines. The results also suggest that the positive and negative effects of trust become more pronounced when buyers are highly dependent on suppliers or when environmental uncertainty surrounding buyers is low. Trust’s negative effects are more severe for those buyers that are highly dependent and operate in stable markets.
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
宋晓晨, 毛基业. 基于区块链的组织间信任构建过程研究:以数字供应链金融模式为例[J]. 中国工业经济, 2022(11):174-192.
|
| [7] |
佘楷文, 申宇, 赵绍阳. 大数据对银行信贷行为的影响:来自数字社会信用平台的证据[J]. 经济研究, 2024, 59(3):147-165.
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
The purpose of this paper is to explore the influence of organizational commitment and trust on knowledge sharing and on knowledge utilization. Also, the study aims to examine the influence of knowledge sharing on knowledge utilization.
|
| [10] |
蔡双立, 马洪梅. 开放式创新、独占机制与创新绩效:鱼和熊掌如何兼得?[J]. 南开经济研究, 2023(5):56-73.
|
| [11] |
Rapid and pervasive digitization of innovation processes and outcomes has upended extant theories on innovation management by calling into question fundamental assumptions about the definitional boundaries for innovation, agency for innovation, and the relationship between innovation processes and outcomes. There is a critical need for novel theorizing on digital innovation management that does not rely on such assumptions and draws on the rich and rapidly emerging research on digital technologies. We offer suggestions for such theorizing in the form of four new theorizing logics, or elements, that are likely to be valuable in constructing more accurate explanations of innovation processes and outcomes in an increasingly digital world. These logics can open new avenues for researchers to contribute to this important area. Our suggestions in this paper, coupled with the six research notes included in the special issue on digital innovation management, seek to offer a broader foundation for reinventing innovation management research in a digital world.
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
冯楠, 任彬彬, 黄梓宸, 等. 数字经济下工业互联网平台信息共享激励机制研究[J]. 北京交通大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 21(2):1-13.
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
洪茹燕, 郭斌, 于永海. 组织间信任:收益机制、情境限制及调节策略[J]. 重庆大学学报(社会科学版), 2020, 26(6):94-106.
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
A conceptual challenge in exploring the role of trust in interorganizational exchange is translating an inherently individual-level concept—trust—to the organizational-level outcome of performance. We define interpersonal and interorganizational trust as distinct constructs and draw on theories of interorganizational relations to derive a model of exchange performance. Specifically, we investigate the role of trust in interfirm exchange at two levels of analysis and assess its effects on negotiation costs, conflict, and ultimately performance. Propositions were tested with data from a sample of 107 buyer-supplier interfirm relationships in the electrical equipment manufacturing industry using a structural equation model. The results indicate that interpersonal and interorganizational trust are related but distinct constructs, and play different roles in affecting negotiation processes and exchange performance. Further, the hypotheses linking trust to performance receive some support, although the precise nature of the link is somewhat different than initially proposed. Overall, the results show that trust in interorganizational exchange relations clearly matters.
|
| [28] |
黄中伟, 王宇露. 位置嵌入、社会资本与海外子公司的东道国网络学习:基于123家跨国公司在华子公司的实证[J]. 中国工业经济, 2008(12):144-154.
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
李玲. 技术创新网络中企业间依赖、企业开放度对合作绩效的影响[J]. 南开管理评论, 2011, 14(4):16-24.
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
When we trust someone, it is because we believe there is something about his or her behaviour that makes it predictable. From a control perspective, it means that their behaviour is subject to some type of control mechanism. Building on this connection, we argue that trust and control are closely related and, in fact, that different forms of trust are associated with different types of control. We present a model explaining the control mechanisms associated with three different forms of trust commonly proposed in the literature. Based on a three-year study of the Canadian HIV/AIDS treatment domain, we then explore in more detail the dynamics of identification-based trust and normative control. Our findings reveal the discursive foundations of generating identification-based trust
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
Poor payment discipline has been a constant problem faced by European companies and has only deteriorated with the current global economic crisis. Even though new legislation has been adopted several times on the European level, the situation has not changed in favor of improved payment discipline. This research aims to determine the correlation between ethical culture of the company and how it influences its payments.
|
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
|
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
The authors examine three governance mechanisms according to how well they mitigate opportunism in marketing channels. Using the U.S. hotel industry as the research context, the authors investigate how opportunism is limited by (1) ownership, (2) investment in transaction-specific assets, and (3) norms of relational exchange. They also investigate how various combinations of these governance mechanisms affect opportunistic behavior in hotel channels. Overall, the results generally support emphasizing relational norms in managing opportunism in marketing channels. The results also indicate that opportunism can be exacerbated when ownership or investments in transaction-specific assets are accentuated as governance mechanisms.
|
| [43] |
金杨华, 施荣荣, 吴波, 等. 产业集群赋能平台从何而来:功能开发与信任构建共演的视角[J]. 管理世界, 2023, 39(5):127-145.
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
