PDF(1254 KB)
PDF(1254 KB)
PDF(1254 KB)
平台领先企业实现价值生态商业模式创新的条件和路径研究
Research on the conditions and paths of platform leading enterprises to realize value ecological business model innovation
发挥工业互联网平台领先企业在实体经济转型升级过程中的重要作用,推进制造业产业集群的工业互联网转型,是推动高质量发展的重要战略支撑。选择华为和阿里为案例研究对象,通过程序性扎根理论方法,遵循“技术-组织-环境”(TOE)的研究框架,研究发现工业互联网平台领先企业依托跨行业跨领域工业互联网平台,在技术因素上发挥数字资产的超网络嵌入效应,构建生态共同体,在组织因素上对数字生态系统进行资源拼凑,形成数字化动态能力,在环境因素上推动数字创新创业生态的价值涌现,在上述三个层面条件因素协同作用下,制造业集群融通式成长,从而在价值生态层面实现商业模式创新。华为等非数字原生工业互联网平台领先企业“先裂变再聚变”、阿里等数字原生工业互联网平台领先企业“先聚变再裂变”实现价值生态商业模式创新。相关研究明晰了价值生态商业模式创新的理论内涵和外延,为数字经济与实体经济深度融合提供新的研究视角,为制造业高质量发展提供实践启示。
Giving full play to the important role of leading enterprises on the industrial internet platform in the transformation and upgrading of the real economy, and promoting the industrial internet transformation of manufacturing industrial clusters, is an important strategic support for promoting high-quality development. Taking Huawei and Ali as case studies, and following the research framework of "Technology-Organization-Environment" (TOE) through the procedural grounding theory, it was found in this paper that the leading enterprises of industrial internet platforms rely on cross-industry and cross-domain industrial internet platforms to play the super-network embedding effect of digital assets in technical factors, build an ecological community, and patch up resources of digital ecosystems in organizational factors to form digital dynamic capabilities. In the environmental factors, the value of digital innovation and entrepreneurship ecology emerges. Under the synergistic effect of the above three factors, manufacturing clusters grow in an inclusive way, thus realizing business model innovation at the value ecological level. Huawei and other leading enterprises of non-digital native industrial internet platform underwent "fission first and then fusion", while Ali and other leading enterprises of digital native industrial internet platform underwent "fusion first and then fission" to realize the innovation of value ecological business model. The related research has clarified the theoretical connotation and extension of the value eco-business model innovation, and provided a new research perspective for the deep integration of digital economy and real economy, thus offering practical enlightenment for the high-quality development of the manufacturing industry.
工业互联网平台领先企业 / TOE框架 / 价值生态商业模式创新
industrial internet platform leading enterprise / TOE framework / innovation of value ecological business models
| [1] |
王节祥, 陈威如, 龚奕潼, 等. 工业互联网平台构建中如何应对“个性与共性”矛盾?:基于树根互联的案例研究[J]. 管理世界, 2024, 40(1):155-180.
|
| [2] |
安筱鹏, 苏中, 安琳. 平台型技术创新:数字时代大国竞争制高点[J]. 发展研究, 2022, 39(3):26-34.
|
| [3] |
刘祎, 张镒, 解晓晴. 工业互联网平台资源重构机制研究:基于广度与深度的双重视角[J]. 经济与管理研究, 2024, 45(1):112-126.
|
| [4] |
朱国军, 周妙资. 智能制造核心企业如何通过创业孵化实现价值涌现:来自小米生态链企业的嵌入式案例研究[J]. 软科学, 2023, 37(5):77-86.
|
| [5] |
杨蕙馨, 宁萍. 平台边界选择与平台生态治理[J]. 社会科学辑刊, 2021(5):135-144.
淘宝网平台的纵向案例分析与讨论发现：在不同的平台生态治理目标下，平台可以通过市场边界选择和资源边界选择来激励和控制互补商行为，实现平台生态治理。市场边界选择包括进入基础服务市场、进入互补市场和市场分割等，平台应该尽量避免在稳定成长期之前进入互补市场。资源边界选择包括平台资源开放度和分销渠道开放度，一方面，应该将平台开放度的各个维度复合使用，形成各维度之间的协调和制衡；另一方面，平台调整资源获取门槛可能不适合平台稳定成长期的平台生态治理。
|
| [6] |
With firms increasingly relying on external knowledge resources for solving complex problems, the role of digital platforms, which make this external search efficient, has become significant. For such platforms, of which Kaggle is an example, a perennial challenge is to elicit high-quality solutions from their voluntary contributors. To this end, our work underscores the importance of platform-wide design decisions for the quality of solutions that the platform's users generate. We show that a social feature that offers reputational gain may lead to significant quality improvements. Therefore, we recommend that platforms should view such features more favorably and include them. In addition, our work also suggests that firms that are using digital platforms to engage with external knowledge sources should time their activities, keeping in mind platform-wide design changes given that such changes can directly impact the firm's surplus.
|
| [7] |
贾建林, 余芬, 樊霞. 平台型领导驱动科创企业战略创业的机制研究[J]. 科研管理, 2024, 45(2):30-38.
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
郭韬, 曹路苹, 李盼盼. 数字经济背景下资源交互能力对平台型企业商业模式创新影响机制的系统动力学分析[J/OL]. 系统工程:1-16[2024-03-20]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/43.1115.N.20240111.1017.002.html.
|
| [10] |
王福, 刘欣悦, 刘俊华, 等. 场景如何基于价值主导逻辑演变与企业动态能力进阶交互赋能商业模式创新:蒙草生态案例[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2023, 40(23):11-21.
场景能够基于价值主导逻辑演变与企业动态能力进阶交互赋能商业模式创新，但其机理不清、路径不明。综合运用案例研究与程序化扎根分析方法，发掘和提炼场景基于价值主导逻辑演变与企业动态能力进阶交互协同演化赋能商业模式创新的机理和路径。研究发现：①企业从“产品功能—服务效用—场景体验”的价值主导逻辑演变出发，通过“感知能力—整合能力—学习能力—创新能力”的企业动态能力进阶，识别市场机遇把握、个性定制驱动和场景体验赋能的价值创造动因；②在用户时空化的消费需求、消费习惯和消费偏好及其变化驱动下，价值主导逻辑演变利用场景驱动企业动态能力进阶，而企业动态能力进阶又借助场景刺激用户消费期望变革，进而激发价值主导逻辑演变；③价值主导逻辑演变与企业动态能力进阶交互形成离散化场景链，针对用户不同场景节点的消费期望，企业通过场景解构、改性和重构商业模式实现创新。
|
| [11] |
郝兴霖, 张樨樨. 平台型企业商业模式创新组态研究:基于共创生态视角[J]. 华东经济管理, 2024, 38(1):37-47.
|
| [12] |
顾丽敏, 张骁. 数字经济驱动企业商业模式创新的动因、机理与路径[J]. 南京社会科学, 2023(12):36-43.
|
| [13] |
王福, 何佳华, 刘俊华, 等. 场景链如何基于“人货场”主导逻辑演变赋能制造业商业模式生态化创新:福田汽车案例研究[J/OL]. 科技进步与对策:1-10 [2024-01-27].http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/42.1224.G3.20231030.0846.002.html.
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
李文博, 许秀玲, 宋吉祥. 超网络嵌入、边界拓展与集群企业知识学习绩效[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2021, 38(9):144-151.
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
陈剑, 黄朔, 刘运辉. 从赋能到使能:数字化环境下的企业运营管理[J]. 管理世界, 2020, 36(2):117-128+222.
|
| [19] |
依绍华, 梁威. 传统商业企业如何创新转型:服务主导逻辑的价值共创平台网络构建[J]. 中国工业经济, 2023(1):171-188.
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
王新新, 张佳佳. 价值涌现:平台生态系统价值创造的新逻辑[J]. 经济管理, 2021, 43(2):188-208.
|
| [22] |
魏江, 苏钟海, 刘洋. 新兴场域平台型企业制度创业过程机理研究[J]. 管理世界, 2023, 39(9):158-177.
|
| [23] |
任保平. 数实深度融合推动新型工业化的层次性及其实现机制与路径[J/OL]. 社会科学辑刊:1-9[2024-03-20].http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/21.1012.C.20240209.1732.005.html.
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
