中资企业突破科技封锁实现竞争力提升的路径研究——基于国际创业战略演化视角

葛宝山, 赵丽仪

科研管理 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (6) : 105-115.

PDF(1974 KB)
PDF(1974 KB)
科研管理 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (6) : 105-115. DOI: 10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2024.06.011

中资企业突破科技封锁实现竞争力提升的路径研究——基于国际创业战略演化视角

作者信息 +

Research on the path of Chinese enterprises to break through the scientific and technological blockade and enhance their competitiveness: A study based on the evolution of international entrepreneurial strategies

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

随着中国崛起,尤其在高精尖领域取得重大突破,以美国为首的西方国家在国际市场对中资企业实施更严格的科技封锁。面对严峻的国际形势和内在发展需求的双重压力,中资企业如何提升国际竞争力已然成为学术界和实践界共同关注的议题。立足战略演化视角,本文选取2家典型的中资企业为研究对象。研究发现:(1)企业竞争力提升受国际创业战略形成与演化过程的重要影响;(2)为抓住新发展机遇,中资企业所采取的国际创业战略内涵愈发丰富,从专注于特定地区或细分行业的全球利基战略,逐渐转化为专注主营业务发展并追求技术精湛的精一战略,最终演化为旨在全球利基市场隐蔽式发展的隐形精一战略;(3)在国际创业战略演化的影响下,中资企业竞争力实现“国际市场竞争力—国际制造竞争力—国际技术竞争力”的全面升级。本文不仅深化了中国情境下的竞争力相关理论,还拓展了国际创业战略的适用情境和边界,对中资企业在国际市场上突破技术封锁并获得可持续发展具有重要的实践启示。

Abstract

With the rise of China, especially the major breakthroughs in the field of high-technology, the western countries led by the USA have continuously upgraded their technology blockade against Chinese enterprises in the international market.In face of the dual pressure of severe international situation and internal development needs, how to enhance the international competitiveness of Chinese enterprises has become a common concern for the academic and practical circles. Based on the perspective of strategic evolution, this paper selected two typical Chinese enterprises as research objects.

The research found that: the formation and evolution of international entrepreneurial strategies have a significant impact on the competitiveness of enterprises. In order to seize the development opportunities, the international entrepreneurial strategy adopted by Chinese enterprises is quietly changing. The initial global niche strategy focusing on specific regions or segmented industries, has been gradually transformed into the niche strategy focusing on the main business and pursuing exquisite technology, and finally into the hidden niche strategy aiming at the hidden development in the global niche market. Under the influence of the evolution of international entrepreneurial strategy, the competitiveness of Chinese enterprises presents an overall upgrading of "international market competitiveness -international manufacturing competitiveness-international technical competitiveness".

The theoretical contributions of this paper are as follows: first, from the perspective of strategic evolution,this paper proposed a dynamic evolutionary path for Chinese enterprises to break through the barriers built by the West and achieve the improvement of competitiveness. The research conclusion has not only deepened the competitiveness theory in the Chinese context, but also made up for the lack of dynamic evolutionary process analysis in the existing competitiveness research. Second, based on the international entrepreneurship theory and the strategic management theory, this paper analyzed the choice of the international entrepreneurial strategy of Chinese enterprises under the background of anti-globalization, and proposed a new strategic measure of hidden niche strategy. On the one hand, the research conclusion has enriched the applicable situation of international entrepreneurial strategy; On the other hand, it has clarified the connotation and implementation path of the international entrepreneurial strategy of Chinese enterprises in the new era, thus proposing an original strategic concept that conforms to the international development of Chinese enterprises. Third, from the perspective of process, this paper has refined evolution laws of international entrepreneurial strategies, and clarified the evolutionary process and results. The research conclusion has not only fully presented the dynamic evolutionary process of international entrepreneurial strategies of Chinese enterprises, but also revealed the underlying logic of the formation and evolution of international entrepreneurial strategies, thus promoting the research on the dynamic evolution of international entrepreneurial strategies from the theoretical level.

The management implications of this paper are as follows:First, from the national level, China should encourage small-and medium-sized enterprises with the characteristics of specialization, refinement, differentiation and innovation (SRDI enterprises) to carry out international cooperation on production capacity with the "Silk Road Economic Belt and the 21st-Century Maritime Silk Road(the Belt and Road)" countries to empowering the SRDI enterprises to develop internationally, and helps the SRDI enterprises to seize the "new track" of global segmented industries, so as to improve the international competitiveness of China's manufacturing industry. Second, from the industrial level, the industrial development of the "Belt and Road" countries is uneven, and China and the "Belt and Road" countries can form complementary industrial advantages. China needs to promote SRDI enterprises to continue to exert efforts in various segmented technology fields, thereby promoting rationalization of the industrial layout. Third, from the perspective of enterprises, Chinese enterprises should adhere to the "hidden niche strategy" and accelerate the internationalization process of enterprises with the help of the window of international entrepreneurial opportunities brought by the "Belt and Road". Chinese enterprises should find a balance between the global market segment and their own capabilities, strive to find niche market in the "Belt and Road" countries, integrate local resources of the "Belt and Road" countries by establishing an international entrepreneurial network interwoven with strong and weak relationships with governments, industry leaders and other entities, and make the main products more suitable for the needs of local market segmented through localization, and gradually achieve the improvement of international technological competitiveness of enterprises.

关键词

中资企业 / 企业竞争力 / 隐形精一战略 / 演化过程

Key words

Chinese enterprise / enterprise competitiveness / hidden niche strategy / evolution process

引用本文

导出引用
葛宝山, 赵丽仪. 中资企业突破科技封锁实现竞争力提升的路径研究——基于国际创业战略演化视角[J]. 科研管理. 2024, 45(6): 105-115 https://doi.org/10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2024.06.011
Ge Baoshan, Zhao Liyi. Research on the path of Chinese enterprises to break through the scientific and technological blockade and enhance their competitiveness: A study based on the evolution of international entrepreneurial strategies[J]. Science Research Management. 2024, 45(6): 105-115 https://doi.org/10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2024.06.011
中图分类号: F270.3   

参考文献

[1]
CAVUSGIL S T, KNIGHT G. The born global firm: An entrepreneurial and capabilities perspective on early and rapid internationalization[J]. Journal of International Business Studies, 2015, 46(1): 3-16.
[2]
原长弘, 章芬, 姚建军, 等. 政产学研用协同创新与企业竞争力提升[J]. 科研管理, 2015, 36(12):1-8.
YUAN Changhong, ZHANG Fen, YAO Jianjun, et al. Collaborative innovation of GIURU and firm competitiveness improvement[J]. Science Research Management, 2015, 36(12):1-8.
[3]
CHURSIN A, VLASOV Y, MAKAROV Y. Innovation as a basis for competitiveness[M]. Berlin: Springer, 2016.
[4]
LI G, WANG X, SU S, et al. How green technological innovation ability influences enterprise competitiveness: Green technological innovation ability, product differentiation and enterprise competitiveness[J]. Technology in Society, 2019, 59(11):101136.
[5]
张进财, 左小德. 企业竞争力评价指标体系的构建[J]. 管理世界, 2013(10):172-173.
ZHANG Jincai, ZUO Xiaode. Construction of the evaluation index system for enterprise competitiveness[J]. Journal of Management World, 2013(10):172-173.
[6]
周小刚, 陈水琳, 李丽清. 大数据能力、技术创新与人力资源服务企业竞争力关系研究[J]. 管理评论, 2021, 33(7):81-91.
ZHOU Xiaogang, CHEN Shuilin, LI Liqing. Research on the relationship among big data capacity, technological innovation and competitiveness of human resource service enterprises[J]. Management Review, 2021, 33(7):81-91.
[7]
金碚, 龚健健. 经济走势、政策调控及其对企业竞争力的影响:基于中国行业面板数据的实证分析[J]. 中国工业经济, 2014(3):5-17.
JIN Bei, GONG Jianjian. The influence of economic growth and policy adjustment on enterprise competitiveness: Empirical analysis on China's industrial panel data[J]. China Industrial Economics, 2014(3):5-17.
[8]
AMIR E, KAMA I, LIVNAT J. Conditional versus unconditional persistence of RNOA components: Implications for valuation[J]. Review of Accounting Studies, 2011, 16(2): 302-327.
[9]
KRAUS P, STOKES P, TARBA S Y, et al. The ambidextrous interaction of RBV-KBV and regional social capital and their impact on SME management[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2022, 142: 762-774.
[10]
SIMON H. Hidden champions of the twenty-first century: Success strategies of unknown world market leaders[M]. New York: Springer, 2009.
[11]
AUDRETSCH D B, LEHMANN E E, SCHENKENHOFER J. A context-choice model of niche entrepreneurship[J]. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 2021, 45(5): 1276-1303.
Entrepreneurship research has gravitated towards a singular focus on the Silicon Valley model as the standard model of entrepreneurship. By contrast, some entrepreneurship scholars have more recently suggested embracing entrepreneurship as diverse and colorful. We build on this latter stream of literature by analyzing the diversity of entrepreneurship from complementary institutional arrangements inherent in national economies. Drawing from Robert’s (2004) model of complementarities between context and organizational choice variables, we analyze the contextualization of diverging entrepreneurship models. Our findings indicate that some economies are complementary to a specialized niche strategy, while others instead promote a scalable mass-market manifestation of entrepreneurship.
[12]
AUDRETSCH D B, LEHMANN E E, SCHENKENHOFER J. Internationalization strategies of hidden champions: Lessons from Germany[J]. Multinational Business Review, 2018, 26(1):2-24.
In contrast to the predictions from the family business and the small- and medium-sized enterprise internationalization literatures, Hidden Champions are world-market leaders exhibiting a high share of exports. The purpose of this study is to analyze their strategy of internationalization of Hidden Champions in Germany and find that the international success and strong, sustained performance emanates from their product type, enabling to successfully pursue a niche strategy for differentiated premium products.
[13]
葛宝山, 赵丽仪. 创业导向、精一战略与隐形冠军企业绩效[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2022, 44(2):117-135.
GE Baoshan, ZHAO Liyi. Entrepreneurial orientation, niche strategy and performance of hidden champion enterprises[J]. Foreign Economics & Management, 2022, 44(2):117-135.
[14]
曾宇, 彭华涛. 专利战略对国际创业的影响机理:基于海尔与华为的双案例研究[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2019(5):68-76.
ZENG Yu, PENG Huatao. The influence mechanism of patent strategy on international entrepreneurship: A two-case study based on Haier and Huawei[J]. Forum on Science and Technology in China, 2019(5):68-76.
[15]
REUBER A R, KNIGHT G A, LIESCH P W, et al. International entrepreneurship: The pursuit of entrepreneurial opportunities across national borders[J]. Journal of International Business Studies, 2018, 49(4): 395-406.
[16]
SHORT J C, KETCHEN JR D J, SHOOK C L, et al. The concept of “opportunity” in entrepreneurship research: Past accomplishments and future challenges[J]. Journal of Management, 2010, 36(1): 40-65.
Opportunity is a central concept within the entrepreneurship field, and there is now a critical mass of literature centered on the concept. The authors seek to make two main contributions to this literature. First, we provide a detailed review of research on the opportunity concept and the processes surrounding it, highlighting extant insights and future needs. Second, we describe ways that the entrepreneurship literature’s insights about the opportunity concept could be enhanced by research in other fields, both inside and outside business-related domains.
[17]
蔡莉, 鲁喜凤, 单标安, 等. 发现型机会和创造型机会能够相互转化吗?:基于多视角的研究[J]. 管理世界, 2018, 34(12): 81-94+194.
CAI Li, LU Xifeng, SHAN Biaoan, et al. Does discovery opportunity and creation opportunity transform into each other? Based on multi-actors perspective[J]. Journal of Management World, 2018, 34(12): 81-94+194.
[18]
MITCHELL R K, BUSENITZ L, LANT T, et al. Toward a theory of entrepreneurial cognition: Rethinking the people side of entrepreneurship research[J]. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 2002, 27(2): 93-104.
The failure of past “entrepreneurial personality”—based research to clearly distinguish the unique contributions to the entrepreneurial process of entrepreneurs as people, has created a vacuum within the entrepreneurship literature that has been waiting to be filled. Recently, the application of ideas and concepts from cognitive science has gained currency within entrepreneurship research, as evidenced by the growing accumulation of successful studies framed in entrepreneurial cognition terms. In this article we reexamine “the people side of entrepreneurship” by summarizing the state of play within the entrepreneurial cognition research stream, and by integrating the five articles accepted for publication in this special issue into this ongoing narrative. We believe that the constructs, variables, and proposed relationships under development within the cognitive perspective offer research concepts and techniques that are well suited to the analysis of problems that require better explanations of the contributions to entrepreneurship that are distinctly human.
[19]
ALVAREZ S A, BARNEY J B. Discovery and creation: Alternative theories of entrepreneurial action[J]. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 2007, 1(1-2): 11-26.
[20]
HSIEH R M, KELLEY D J. The role of cognition and information access in the recognition of innovative opportunities[J]. Journal of Small Business Management, 2016, 54: 297-311.
[21]
NAMBISAN S, SIEGEL D, KENNEY M. On open innovation, platforms, and entrepreneurship[J]. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 2018, 12(3): 354-368.
[22]
王冰, 毛基业. 传统企业如何通过内部创业实现数字化转型?:基于资源匹配的战略演化视角[J]. 管理评论, 2021, 33(11):43-53.
WANG Bing, MAO Jiye. How do traditional enterprises realize digital transformation through internal entrepreneurship? A strategic evolution perspective based on resource matching[J]. Management Review, 2021, 33(11):43-53.
[23]
JOHANSON J, VAHLNE J E. The uppsala internationalization process model revisited: From liability of foreignness to liability of outsidership[J]. Journal of International Business Studies, 2009, 40(9):1411-1431.
[24]
鲁若愚, 周阳, 丁奕文, 等. 企业创新网络:溯源、演化与研究展望[J]. 管理世界, 2021, 37(1):217-233+14.
LU Ruoyu, ZHOU Yang, DING Yiwen, et al. Enterprise innovation network: Tracing, evolution and research prospect[J]. Journal of Management World, 2021, 37(1):217-233+14.
[25]
VRONTIS D, BASILE G, ANDREANO M S, et al. The profile of innovation driven Italian SMEs and the relationship between the firms' networking abilities and dynamic capabilities[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2020, 114: 313-324.
[26]
BEMBOM M, SCHWENS C. The role of networks in early internationalizing firms: A systematic review and future research agenda[J]. European Management Journal, 2018, 36(6):679-694.
[27]
PRASHANTHAM S, YOUNG S. Post-entry speed of international new ventures[J]. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practices, 2011, 35(2):275-292.
[28]
EVERS N, O'GORMAN C. Improvised internationalization in new ventures: The role of prior knowledge and networks[J]. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 2011, 23(7-8):549-574.
[29]
KONTINEN T, OJALA A. Network ties in the international opportunity recognition of family SMEs[J]. International Business Review, 2011, 20(4):440-453.
[30]
SIGFUSSON T, CHETTY S. Building international entrepreneurial virtual networks in cyberspace[J]. Journal of World Business, 2013, 48(2):260-270.
[31]
WEERAWARDENA J, MORT G S, LIESCH P W. Capabilities development and deployment activities in born global B-to-B firms for early entry into international markets[J]. Industrial Marketing Management, 2019, 78: 122-136.
[32]
BREUNIG K J, KVÅLSHAUGEN R, HYDLE K M. Knowing your boundaries: Integration opportunities in international professional service firms[J]. Journal of World Business, 2014, 49(4):502-511.
[33]
EISENHARDT K M. Building theories from case study research[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1989, 14(4):532-550.
[34]
何佳讯, 葛佳烨, 张凡. 中国学者管理学研究的世界贡献:国际合作、前沿热点与贡献路径:基于世界千种管理学英文期刊论文(2013-2019年)的定量分析[J]. 管理世界, 2021, 37(9):36-67.
HE Jiaxun, GE Jiaye, Zhang Fan. The world contribution of Chinese scholars to management research from the perspective of international collaborations, frontier hotspots and contribution approaches: A quantitative analysis based on a thousand of international English management journals (2013-2019) [J]. Journal of Management World, 2021, 37(9):36-67.

基金

国家自然科学基金项目:“我国隐形冠军企业机会-资源一体化创业过程及机理研究”(71972083,2019.08.31—2023.12.31)
国家自然科学基金重大项目:“创新驱动创业的重大理论与实践问题研究”(72091310)
课题一“数字经济下的创新驱动创业的基础理论”(72091315,2020.12.02—2025.12.31)

PDF(1974 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/