品牌社区成员冲突对知识分享意愿的影响研究

doi:10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2024.04.020

科研管理 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (4): 185-192.DOI: 10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2024.04.020

• 论文 • 上一篇

品牌社区成员冲突对知识分享意愿的影响研究

张音¹,郑海东¹，张千惠²，孙晓辉¹

1.中国石油大学（华东）经济管理学院，山东青岛266555；
2.广州集泰化工股份有限公司，广东广州510700

收稿日期:2023-08-18 修回日期:2024-01-30 出版日期:2024-04-20 发布日期:2024-04-07
通讯作者: 张音
基金资助:
山东省自然科学基金面上项目:“虚拟品牌社区成员间冲突对品牌契合的影响机制研究”（ZR2022MG049，2023—2025）；中央高校基本科研业务费专项（中国石油大学（华东）“哲学社会科学青年学者托举计划”基金）资助（22CX04003B，2022—2026）。

Research on the impact of conflicts among members of brand communities on their knowledge sharing willingness

Zhang Yin¹, Zheng Haidong¹, Zhang Qianhui², Sun Xiaohui¹#br#

1. School of Economics and Management, China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao 266555, Shandong, China;
2. Guangzhou Jointas Chemical Co., Ltd., Guangzhou 510700, Guangdong, China

Received:2023-08-18 Revised:2024-01-30 Online:2024-04-20 Published:2024-04-07

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 品牌社区成员间知识分享是保证社区存续的基础,但冲突等不良互动行为对知识分享的影响仍有待考察。本研究借鉴公平理论，构建品牌社区成员间认知和情感冲突对知识分享意愿的影响机制模型，并通过系列实验检验了上述模型。研究发现：（1）认知和情感冲突均负面影响社区成员知识分享意愿，社区成员互动公正感知完全中介上述关系；（2）社区成员赞同负向调节社区冲突与互动公正感知的关系；（3）相比于品牌无响应，品牌响应能够更加有效地降低互动公正感知对知识分享意愿的影响程度，但不同响应方式的调节效应强弱并无差异。本研究丰富和发展了有关在线社区知识分享前因、在线冲突及冲突管理的研究，同时为品牌社区的管理提供了实践启示。

关键词: 品牌社区, 冲突, 知识分享, 互动公正感知

Abstract: Knowledge sharing among members of brand communities is the foundation for their survival, but the impact of negative interactions such as conflicts on knowledge sharing has yet to be studied. This research drew on the equity theory to construct a model of the impact mechanism of cognitive and emotional conflicts on their willingness to share knowledge among brand community members, and tested the aforementioned model through a series of experiments. The research found that: (1) Cognitive and emotional conflicts both negatively affect the members′ willingness to share knowledge, and the perception of interactional justice among community members completely mediates the above relationships; (2) Community members agree on the negative regulation of the relationship between community conflicts and the perception of interactional justice; (3) Compared with no brand response, brand response can more effectively reduce the impact of interactional justice perception on the willingness to share knowledge, but there is no difference in the strength of the moderating effects of different response methods. This study has enriched and developed the research on the antecedents of knowledge sharing in virtual communities, online conflict and conflict management, while providing practical implications for the management of brand communities.

Key words: brand community, conflict, knowledge sharing, perception of interactive justice

张音, 郑海东, 张千惠, 孙晓辉. 品牌社区成员冲突对知识分享意愿的影响研究[J]. 科研管理, 2024, 45(4): 185-192.

Zhang Yin, Zheng Haidong, Zhang Qianhui, Sun Xiaohui. Research on the impact of conflicts among members of brand communities on their knowledge sharing willingness[J]. Science Research Management, 2024, 45(4): 185-192.

参考文献

[1]Liao J, Dong X, Guo Y.Examining knowledge contribution in firm- versus consumer-hosted virtual brand community [J].Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 2020, 41(3):1-12
[2]赵欣, 张之光, 向希尧.专业虚拟社区研究综述与知识创造模型构建[J].科研管理, 2018, 39(11):132-145
[3]沈校亮, 厉洋军.虚拟品牌社区知识贡献意愿研究:基于动机和匹配的整合视角[J].管理评论, 2018, 30(10):82-94
[4]周涛, 王超.开源软件社区用户知识贡献行为研究[J].科研管理, 2020, 41(02):202-209
[5]Fang C, Zhang J.Users' continued participation behavior in social Q&A communities: A motivation perspective[J].Computers in Human Behavior, 2019, 92(3):87-109
[6]Chen L, Baird A, Straub D.Why do participants continue to contribute? Evaluation of usefulness voting and commenting motivational affordances within an online knowledge community[J].Decision Support System, 2019, 118(3):21-32
[7]范钧, 林东圣.社区支持、知识心理所有权与外向型知识共创[J].科研管理, 2020, 41(07):1-10
[8]刘鑫, 李小玉, 薛有志.职能背景、团队冲突与企业创新[J].科学学研究, 2020, 38(2):357-372
[9]Kriesberg L.Constructive conflicts: From escalation to resolution[M].Rowman&Littlefield, 2007.
[10]Bradley B H, Anderson H J, Baur J E, Klotz A C.When conflict helps: Integrating evidence for beneficial conflict in groups and teams under three perspectives[J].Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 2015, 19(4):243-254
[11]Dineva D, Breitsohl J, Garrod B, Megicks P.Consumer Responses to Conflict-Management Strategies on Non-Profit Social Media Fan Pages[J].Journal of Interactive Marketing, 2020, 52(4):118-136
[12]Mooney A C, Holahan P J, Amason A C.Don't take it personally: Exploring cognitive conflict as a mediator of affective conflict[J].Journal of management studies, 2007, 44(5):733-758
[13]Bacile T J, Wolter J S, Allen A M, et al.The Effects of Online Incivility and Consumer-to-Consumer Interactional Justice on Complainants, Observers, and Service Providers During Social Media Service Recovery[J].Journal of Interactive Marketing, 2018, 44(4):60-81
[14]Colliander J, Wien A H.Trash talk rebuffed: consumers' defense of companies criticized in online communities[J].European Journal of Marketing, 2013, 47(10):1733-1757
[15]Parayitam S, Dooley R S.The interplay between cognitive-and affective conflict and cognition-and affect-based trust in influencing decision outcomes[J].Journal of Business Research, 2009, 62(8):789-796
[16]Voorhees C M, Brady M K.A service perspective on the drivers of complaint intentions[J].Journal of Service Research, 2005, 8(2):192-204
[17]Chou E Y, Lin C Y, Huang H C.Fairness and devotion go far: Integrating online justice and value co-creation in virtual communities[J].International Journal of Information Management, 2016, 36(1):60-72
[18]Rupp D E, Spencer S.When customers lash out: the effects of customer interactional injustice on emotional labor and the mediating role of discrete emotions[J].The Journal of applied psychology, 2006, 91(4):971-978
[19]Strizhakova Y, Tsarenko Y, Ruth J A.I’m mad and I can’t get that service failure off my mind” coping and rumination as mediators of anger effects on customer intentions[J].Journal of Service Research, 2012, 15(4):414-429
[20]Husemann K C, Ladstaetter F, Luedicke M K.Conflict culture and conflict management in consumption communities[J].Psychology & Marketing, 2015, 32(3):265-284
[21]Wolter J S, Bacile T J, Xu P.How Online Incivility Affects Consumer Engagement Behavior on Brands’ Social Media [J].Journal of Service Research, 2022, 26(1):103-109
[22]Surachartkumtonkun J N, Grace D, Ross M.Unfair customer reviews: Third-party perceptions and managerial responses [J].Journal of Business Research, 2021, 132(8):631-640
[23]Lind E A, Kray L, Thompson L.Primacy effects in justice judgments: Testing predictions from fairness heuristic theory[J].Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 2001, 85(2):189-210
[24]Kim M, Kim J.The effects of perceived online justice on relational bonds and engagement intention: Evidence from an online game community[J].Computers in Human Behavior, 2018, 84(7):410-419
[25]贺爱忠, 易婧莹.虚拟品牌社区类社会互动对价值共创互动行为的影响研究[J].软科学, 2019, 33(09):108-112
[26]Schaefers T, Schamari J.Service recovery via social media: The social influence effects of virtual presence[J].Journal of Service Research, 2016, 19(2):192-208
[27]Zhou Z, Zhan G, Zhou N.How does negative experience sharing influence happiness in online brand community? A dual-path model[J].Internet Research:Electronic Networking Applications and Policy, 2019, 30(2):575-590
[28]Do D K X, Rahman K, Robinson L J.Determinants of negative customer engagement behaviours[J].Journal of Services Marketing, 2019, 34(2):117-135
[29]Bacile T J.Digital customer service and customer-to-customer interactions: investigating the effect of online incivility on customer perceived service climate[J].Journal of Service Management, 2020, 31(3):441-464
[30]Breitsohl J, Roschk H, Feyertag C.Consumer brand bullying behaviour in online communities of service firmsService business development[M].Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden,, 2018, :-
[31]Maxham III J G, Netemeyer R G.Modeling customer perceptions of complaint handling over time: the effects of perceived justice on satisfaction and intent[J].Journal of retailing, 2002, 78(4):239-252
[32]沙振权, 朱玲梅.虚拟品牌社区中知识分享对社区推广的影响研究——基于社会资本视角[J].营销科学学报, 2015, 11(04):77-90
[33]Zhao X，Lynch J，Chen Q.Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis[J].Journal of Consumer Research, 2010, 37(2):197-206
[34]Armstrong C, Kulczynski A, Brennan S.For all to see: social risk and observable complaining on Facebook[J].European Journal of Marketing, 2021, 56(1):31-71
[35]Jehn K A.A Qualitative Analysis of Conflict Types and Dimensions in Organizational Groups[J].Administrative Science Quarterly, 1997, 42(3):530-557
[36]Badke‐Schaub P, Goldschmidt G, Meijer M.How does cognitive conflict in design teams support the development of creative ideas?[J].Creativity and Innovation Management, 2010, 19(2):119-133
[37]Dineva D, Breitsohl J.Managing trolling in online communities: an organizational perspective[J].Internet Research, 2022, 32(1):292-311
[38]Chandrasapth K, Yannopoulou N, Schoefer K, Licsandru T C, Papadopoulos T.Conflict in online consumption communities: a systematic literature review and directions for future research[J].International Marketing Review, 2021, 38(5):900-926

品牌社区成员冲突对知识分享意愿的影响研究

Research on the impact of conflicts among members of brand communities on their knowledge sharing willingness

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	杨培培, 柳卸林. 制度逻辑视角下的《中长期科技规划》实施机制探究[J]. 科研管理, 2023, 44(8): 119-128.
[2]	刘沐洋, 郁培丽, 杨淼. 颠覆性创新合法性动态演化研究——“滴滴出行”案例[J]. 科研管理, 2022, 43(8): 21-31.
[3]	董竹张欣. 分析师乐观偏差与企业研发投入——基于利益冲突和信息透明度的实证研究[J]. 科研管理, 2022, 43(7): 181-188.
[4]	杨楠. 顾客参与价值共创与品牌形象塑造的关系研究[J]. 科研管理, 2021, 42(5): 87-93.
[5]	李海马丽于然. 知识更新对员工创造力的影响[J]. 科研管理, 2021, 42(10): 182-190.
[6]	皮圣雷丁铭铭. 知识分享与C2C网络位置：评价机制的调节作用[J]. 科研管理, 2020, 41(6): 210-218.
[7]	戴万亮苏琳杨皎平. 心理所有权、知识分享与团队成员创新行为——同事间信任的跨层次调节作用[J]. 科研管理, 2020, 41(12): 246-256.
[8]	高中华赵晨吴春波. 交互过程视角下知识分享报酬的影响机制研究[J]. 科研管理, 2019, 40(9): 159-169.
[9]	刘丰军，林正奎，赵娜. 在线知识社区协作冲突影响因素研究—以Wikipedia为例[J]. 科研管理, 2019, 40(3): 153-162.
[10]	杨震宁白春叶. 跨国技术战略联盟的信任、冲突与联盟稳定[J]. 科研管理, 2018, 39(7): 34-42.
[11]	谢庆红，王嘉馨，江柱忠. 渠道冲突后第三方介入对关系修复的影响[J]. 科研管理, 2018, 39(12): 162-170.
[12]	罗双玲麻佩王瑞新夏昊翔. 一个维基百科编辑冲突动力学模型[J]. 科研管理, 2017, 38(11): 18-26.
[13]	陈岩，张斌，翟瑞瑞. 国有企业债务结构对创新的影响—是否存在债务融资滥用的经验检验[J]. 科研管理, 2016, 37(4): 16-26.
[14]	付晓蓉，Tang Thuong Phat，谢庆红. 长期关系中渠道冲突对企业创新能力的影响研究[J]. 科研管理, 2016, 37(3): 59-67.
[15]	曹科岩, 窦志铭. 组织创新氛围、知识分享与员工创新行为的跨层次研究[J]. 科研管理, 2015, 36(12): 83-91.