科研管理 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (2): 165-175.DOI: 10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2024.02.017

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于科学的企业外部治理全过程模型研究

方帅1,李欣融2,3,雷家骕3   

  1. 1.中国地质大学(北京)经济管理学院,北京100083;
    2.中国科学技术发展战略研究院博士后科研工作站,北京100038;
    3.清华大学经济管理学院,北京100084
  • 收稿日期:2022-07-06 修回日期:2023-07-17 出版日期:2024-02-20 发布日期:2024-01-23
  • 通讯作者: 李欣融
  • 基金资助:
     国家自然科学基金项目:“科学驱动的产业创新:案例、理论与政策研究”(L2124026, 2022.01—2024.01);中央高校基本科研业务费资助项目:“基于科学的创新企业违规的驱动因素和机制研究”(2-9-2023-042,2024.01—2026.11)。

Research on the whole process model of external governance of science-based firms

Fang Shuai1, Li Xinrong2,3, Lei Jiasu3   

  1. 1. School of Economics and Management, China University of Geosciences Beijing, Beijing 100083, China;
    2. Postdoctoral Research Workstation, Chinese Academy of Science and Technology for Development, Beijing 100038, China;
    3. School of Economics and Management, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
  • Received:2022-07-06 Revised:2023-07-17 Online:2024-02-20 Published:2024-01-23
  • Supported by:


摘要:     基于科学的企业是由科学家主导或参与创建,从事基础科学研究,通过基础科学成果的应用开发和商业转化获取经济利益,并在此过程中做出补充性科学研究的企业。针对基于科学的企业外部治理的研究呈现碎片化特征,有必要对现有研究进行系统性梳理和回顾。通过对相关文献检索和分析发现,由于基于科学的企业其特殊性,其外部治理框架相较于传统企业呈现出独特的外部治理视角:主要围绕传统的外部治理元素(政府规制、资本市场)和独特的外部治理元素(科技教育界行规)展开,因此本文着重深入关注这三类治理元素及其治理机制,以政府规制、资本市场、科技教育界行规为逻辑框架,对基于科学的企业外部治理机制涉及的元素、过程、治理效果及理论机制进行分析,全面回顾和总结了基于科学的企业外部治理研究现状和相关主题内容,归纳整合了基于科学的企业外部治理机制的全过程模型,并指出了未来的研究方向。本文丰富和拓展了基于科学的企业外部治理研究框架,为启发中国情境下基于科学的企业的外部治理理论与实践提供借鉴。

关键词: 基于科学的企业, 外部治理, 政府规制, 资本市场, 科技教育界行规

Abstract:      Science-based enterprises are those that are led or founded by scientists, which mainly conduct basic science research, obtain economic benefits through commercialization and application of their scientific achievements, and carry out complementary scientific research as a by-product of scientists′ research activities. With science-based enterprises playing an important role in promoting the development of innovation in industrial fields and even causing a paradigm shift in social and economic domains, it has triggered extensive discussions on the external corporate governance of science-based enterprises. However, due to lack of systematic literature review on external corporate governance of science-based enterprises, the research is fragmented, which brings challenges to the development of relevant research, understanding of theoretical explanation mechanism and boundary conditions, and interpretation of external corporate governance of science-based enterprises in the Chinese context. For this reason, it is necessary to conduct a comprehensive literature review of the research. Through the search and analysis of relevant literature, the traditional external corporate governance mechanisms include legal systems, control markets, external auditors, stakeholder governance, media governance, and rating agency governance. However, compared with traditional enterprises, science-based enterprises have a unique external governance framework due to their own particularity, focusing on both traditional external governance elements (government regulation, capital market) and unique external governance elements (industry rules of science and technology education). Based on a logical framework, this paper analyzed the factors, procedures, outcomes, and theoretical mechanisms involved in the external governance of science-based enterprises, comprehensively reviewed the current research status, constructed the entire process model, and highlighted the future research directions for science-based corporate external governance. In conclusion, we found that (1) government regulation does not always play a positive role in encouraging innovation agents to participate in the governance of science-based enterprises; whether it has a positive effect on science-based enterprises depends on property rights regulations, control rights regulations and specific revenue sharing plans; (2) in terms of capital markets, acquisition by large firms is one of the best ways for science-based enterprises to exit; large firms prefer to buy promising science-based enterprises rather than invest in internal scientific R&D capabilities. However, the degree of information asymmetry and the level of complementarity of the specialized assets determine whether the purchase of science-based enterprises by large firms is favorable to both parties; (3) in terms of the regulations of the science and technology education community, the commercialization attitude of the science and technology education community towards the scientific results, the technology transfer office of the university, the formal and informal rules of the university, the science and technology entrepreneurship training of the university, and the infrastructure resources of the university (including science parks and proof of concept centers) are important external governance mechanisms for science-based enterprises. Multiple external elements interact together to influence the external governance effect of science-based enterprises. The effectiveness of external governance of science-based firms is influenced by the interactions of several external factors. This study has enriched and expanded the research framework of science-based corporate external governance, and will further provide theoretical and managerial implications for the science-based corporate external governance in the Chinese context.

Key words: science-based firm, external governance, government regulation, capital market, industry rules of science and technology education