营商环境、研发补贴与国有企业实质性创新

陈西婵; 陈艳; 罗正英; 姜钧乐

doi:10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2024.02.016

PDF(1130 KB)

科研管理 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (2) : 155-164. DOI: 10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2024.02.016

营商环境、研发补贴与国有企业实质性创新

陈西婵 ¹ ,
陈艳 ² ,
罗正英 ²^,³ ,
姜钧乐 ⁴

作者信息 +

Business environment, R&D subsidies, and substantive innovation in state-owned enterprises

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

在中国政府研发补贴持续加大的同时,企业创新产出数量可观但是质量低下,如何更好地实现实质性创新?本文选取沪深A股上市的“战略性新兴产业”中93家国有企业作为观测对象,通过固定效应模型进行实证检验。发现:(1)尽管研发补贴对于企业创新产出具有正向的促进作用。但企业为了获得研发补贴,更倾向于选择研发周期较短的策略性创新。因此,单纯增加补贴规模并不能提高实质性创新的产出。(2)与事前研发补贴相比,事后研发补贴的方式更有利于促进创新。(3)营商环境通过风险预期和盈利预期促进企业实质性创新。在创新收益风险低的高端装备制造企业中、竞争性较高的行业中和较完善的法制环境中,研发补贴能够促进企业实质性创新;而在由因官员变更带来创新预期收益不稳定的政务环境中,研发补贴不能促进企业实质性创新。这些结果揭示了营商环境是研发补贴助推企业实质性创新的条件及其作用机理,理清了研发补贴和营商环境两种政府行为对企业创新产出的不同影响结果,对研发补贴如何更有效地解决“卡脖子”难题具有启示意义。

Abstract

Although the Chinese government's R&D subsidies continue to increase, enterprises' innovation output is considerable in quantity and low in quality. How to better achieve substantive innovation and solve the problem of "stranglehold"? Ninety-three state-owned enterprises in strategic emerging industries listed in Shanghai and Shenzhen A-shares from 2010 to 2017 were selected as the observation objects, and the fixed effect model was used for an empirical test. It was found from this study that: (1) R&D subsidies can promote enterprise innovation, but enterprises are more inclined to choose strategic innovation rather than substantive innovation. The increase in the scale of subsidies cannot solve the problem of "stranglehold". (2) Ex post R&D subsidies are more conducive to promoting innovation than ex post R&D subsidies. (3) The business environment promotes substantive innovation through risk expectation and profit expectation. In high-end equipment manufacturing industry with low risk of innovation return, competitive industry with high premium of innovative products and legal environment with stable expectation of innovation return, R&D subsidies can promote substantive innovation of enterprises. And in a government environment where the expected benefits of innovation are unstable due to official changes, R&D subsidies do not promote substantive innovation. It revealed further that the business environment is the condition and mechanism for R&D subsidies to promote the substantive innovation of enterprises. It clarified the impact of two kinds of government actions, namely granting R&D subsidies and optimizing business environment, on enterprises' innovation output. This research has policy implications for R&D subsidies to more effectively solve the problem of "stranglehold".

导出引用

陈西婵, 陈艳, 罗正英, 等. 营商环境、研发补贴与国有企业实质性创新[J]. 科研管理. 2024, 45(2): 155-164 https://doi.org/10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2024.02.016

Chen Xichan, Chen Yan, Luo Zhengying, et al. Business environment, R&D subsidies, and substantive innovation in state-owned enterprises[J]. Science Research Management. 2024, 45(2): 155-164 https://doi.org/10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2024.02.016

中图分类号： F273.1;F812.42

参考文献

列表( 原文顺序 | 文献年度倒序 | 文中引用次数倒序 ) 可视化分析

[1]	BOEING P. The allocation and effectiveness of China's R&D subsidies: Evidence from listed firms[J]. Research Policy, 2016, 45(9):1774-1789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.05.007 https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0048733316300816 本文引用 [1]

[2]

, GUO

, LE-NGUYEN

, et al. The impact of government subsidies and enterprises' R&D investment:A panel data study from renewable energy in China[J]. Energy Policy, 2016, 89:106-113.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.11.009

https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0301421515301853

本文引用 [1]

[3]	黎文靖, 郑曼妮. 实质性创新还是策略性创新?宏观产业政策对微观企业创新的影响[J]. 经济研究, 2016, 51(4):60-73. LI Wenjing, ZHENG Manni. Is it substantive innovation or strategic innovation? Impact of macroeconomic policies on micro-enterprises' innovation[J]. Economic Research Journal, 2016, 51(4):60-73. 本文引用 [3]

[4]	袁胜军, 俞立平, 钟昌标, 等. 创新政策促进了创新数量还是创新质量?:以高技术产业为例[J]. 中国软科学, 2020(3):32-45. YUAN Shengjun, YU Liping, ZHONG Changbiao, et al. Does the innovation policy promote innovation quantity or innovation quality?[J]. China Soft Science, 2020(3):32-45. 本文引用 [1]

[5]	安同良, 周绍东, 皮建才. R&D补贴对中国企业自主创新的激励效应[J]. 经济研究, 2009, 44(10):87-98,120. AN Tongliang, ZHOU Shaodong, PI Jiancai. The simulating effect of R&D subsidies on independent innovation of Chinese enterprises[J]. Economic Research Journal, 2009, 44(10):87-98,120. 本文引用 [1]

[6]	ARENA M P, JULIO B. The effects of securities class action litigation on corporate liquidity and investment policy[J]. Journal of Financial & Quantitative Analysis, 2015. 本文引用 [1]

[7]

魏下海, 董志强, 张永璟. 营商制度环境为何如此重要?:来自民营企业家“内治外攘”的经验证据[J]. 经济科学, 2015(2):105-116.

WEI

Xiahai

, DONG

Zhiqiang

, ZHANG

Yongjing

. Why is the business environment so important? Empirical evidence from private entrepreneurs' "internal control and external resistance"[J]. Economic Science, 2015(2):105-116.

本文引用 [1]

[8]	汪琼, 李栋栋, 王克敏. 营商“硬环境”与公司现金持有:基于市场竞争和投资机会的研究[J]. 会计研究, 2020(4):88-99. WANG Qiong, LI Dongdong, WANG Kemin. Transport infrastructure and corporate cash holding: Perspectives from market competition and investment opportunities[J]. Accounting Research, 2020(4):88-99. 本文引用 [1]

[9]	夏后学, 谭清美, 白俊红. 营商环境、企业寻租与市场创新:来自中国企业营商环境调查的经验证据[J]. 经济研究, 2019, 54(4):84-98. XIA Houxue, TAN Qingmei, BAI Junhong. Business environment, enterprise rent-seeking and market innovation: Evidence from the China enterprise survey[J]. Economic Research Journal, 2019, 54(4):84-98. 本文引用 [2]

[10]

马骆茹, 朱博恩. 需求波动、营商环境与企业的研发行为:以长三角和珠三角为例[J]. 北京工业大学学报(社会科学版), 2017, 17(2):47-57.

Luoru

, ZHU

Boen

. Demand volatility, business environment and firm's R&D behavior: Evidence from Yangtze River Delta and Pearl River Delta[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Technology(Social Sciences Edition), 2017, 17(2):47-57.

本文引用 [2]

[11]	王永进, 冯笑. 行政审批制度改革与企业创新[J]. 中国工业经济, 2018(2):24-42. WANG Yongjin, FENG Xiao. The reform of administration approval system and firms' innovation[J]. China Industrial Economics, 2018(2):24-42. 本文引用 [2]

[12]	姜钧乐. 政府研发补贴与国有企业创新产出[D]. 苏州: 苏州大学, 2020. JIANG Junle. Government R&D subsidies and innovation output of state-owned enterprises[D]. Suzhou: Soochow University, 2021. 本文引用 [2]

[13]	沈珍珠. 代理成本与企业技术创新产出[D]. 杭州: 杭州电子科技大学, 2021. SHEN Zhenzhu. R&D subsidies,agency costs and scientific and technological innovation output of enterprises[D]. Hangzhou: Hangzhou Dianzi University, 2021. 本文引用 [1]

[14]	王砾, 孔东民, 代昀昊. 官员晋升压力与企业创新[J]. 管理科学学报, 2018, 21(1):111-126. WANG Li, KONG Dongmin, DAI Yunhao. Politicians' promotion pressure and firm innovation[J]. Journal of Management Sciences in China, 2018, 21(1):111-126. 本文引用 [1]

[15]	杨洋, 魏江, 罗来军. 谁在利用政府补贴进行创新?:所有制和要素市场扭曲的联合调节效应[J]. 管理世界, 2015(1):75-86+98+188. YANG Yang, WEI Jiang, LUO Laijun. Who innovate from the government subsidies? The joint moderate effects of the ownership and the factor market distortions[J]. Journal of Management World, 2015(1):75-86+98+188. 本文引用 [2]

[16]	王刚刚, 谢富纪, 贾友. R&D补贴政策激励机制的重新审视:基于外部融资激励机制的考察[J]. 中国工业经济, 2017(2):60-78. WANG Ganggang, XIE Fuji, JIA You. Reconsider incentive mechanism of R&D subsidy policy:Based on exploration for external financing incentive mechanism[J]. China Industrial Economics, 2017(2):60-78. 本文引用 [1]

[17]	龙小宁, 王俊. 中国专利激增的动因及其质量效应[J]. 世界经济, 2015, 38(6):115-142. LONG Xiaoning, WANG Jun. The motivation and quality effect of patent surge in China[J]. The Journal of World Economy, 2015, 38(6):115-142. 本文引用 [1]

[18]	夏后学, 谭清美. 简政放权与政府补贴如何影响技术创新[J]. 财贸经济, 2017, 38(5):129-146. XIA Houxue, TAN Qingmei. The effect of decentralization and government allowance on the enterprise technology innovation[J]. Finance & Trade Economics, 2017, 38(5):129-146. 本文引用 [1]

[19]	史宇鹏, 顾全林. 知识产权保护、异质性企业与创新:来自中国制造业的证据[J]. 金融研究, 2013(8):136-149. SHI Yupeng, GU Quanlin. Intellectual property protection, heterogeneous firms and innovation: Evidence from China's manufacturing[J]. Journal of Financial Research, 2013(8):136-149. 本文引用 [1]

[20]

许志端, 阮舟一龙. 营商环境、技术创新和企业绩效:基于我国省级层面的经验证据[J]. 厦门大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2019(05):123-134.

Zhiduan

, RUAN

Zhouyilong

. Business environment, technological innovation and firm performance: Based on empirical evidence at provincial level in China[J]. Journal of Xiamen University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2019(05): 123-134.

本文引用 [1]

[21]	张菀洺, 杨广钊. 营商环境对民营企业竞争力的影响[J]. 财贸经济, 2022, 43(10):119-133. ZHANG Wanming, YANG Guangzhao. The impact of business environment on the competitiveness of private enterprises[J]. Finance and Trade Economics, 2022, 43(10):119-133. 本文引用 [1]

[22]

杨海生, 陈少凌, 罗党论, 等. 政策不稳定性与经济增长:来自中国地方官员变更的经验证据[J]. 管理世界, 2014(9):13-28.

YANG

Haisheng

, CHEN

Shaoling

, LUO

Danglun

, et al. Between the policy instability and the economic growth: The empirical evidence from China's change in her local officers[J]. Journal of Management World, 2014(9):13-28.

本文引用 [1]

[23]	申宇, 傅立立, 赵静梅. 市委书记更替对企业寻租影响的实证研究[J]. 中国工业经济, 2015(9):37-52. SHEN Yu, FU Lili, ZHAO Jingmei. The impact of municipal party secretaries's turnover on enterprise rent-seeking: An empirical study[J]. China Industrial Economics, 2015(9):37-52. 本文引用 [1]

[24]	TAN R R, CAYAMANDA C D, AVISO K B. P-graph approach to optimal operational adjustment in polygeneration plants under conditions of process inoperability[J]. Applied Energy, 2014, 135, (C), 402-406. 本文引用 [1]

[25]	吴超鹏, 唐菂. 知识产权保护执法力度、技术创新与企业绩效:来自中国上市公司的证据[J]. 经济研究, 2016, 51(11):125-139. WU Chaopeng, TANG Di. Intellectual property rights enforcement, corporate innovation and operating performance: Evidence from China's listed companies[J]. Economic Research Journal, 2016, 51(11):125-139. 本文引用 [1]

[26]	王小鲁, 樊纲, 余文静. 中国分省份市场化指数报告(2016)[M]. 北京: 社会科学文献出版社, 2017. WANG Xiaolu, FAN Gang, YU Wenjing. Chinese provincial marketization index report(2016)[M]. Beijing: Social Sciences Academic Press(China), 2017. 本文引用 [1]