制造业生态创新网络构建及进化逻辑

李鑫, 魏姗, 李惠娟

科研管理 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (1) : 74-83.

PDF(1438 KB)
PDF(1438 KB)
科研管理 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (1) : 74-83. DOI: 10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2024.01.008

制造业生态创新网络构建及进化逻辑

作者信息 +

Construction and evolutionary logic of the manufacturing eco-innovation network

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

构建生态创新网络是全球化和绿色化持续推进背景下企业保持全球竞争力、走向高质量发展之路的有效途径。本文从创新协作网络和创新生态系统两种理论观点出发,以生态创新网络为研究对象,分析其内涵、特征并基于创新三螺旋理论构建生态创新网络模型。同时,结合超循环理论探讨生态创新网络的进化逻辑,为制造业企业生态创新网络的构建和绿色高效发展提供有价值的借鉴。研究发现:生态创新网络包括政府、大学和企业三类主体,三类主体在生态创新领域的螺旋交互形成正向的生态创新格局;创新协作网络和创新生态系统两大模块分别侧重绿色技术知识共享和可持续发展综合商业模式构建;内部网络(政治网络、科学网络、产业网络等)和外部网络(金融网络、中介网络、专业网络等)共同维持生态创新网络的平稳运行。同时生态创新网络具有开放性、生态化、高效率、动态性的特征。生态创新网络遵循从反应循环到催化循环再到超循环的进化逻辑。创新协作网络和创新生态系统作为重要的催化循环在网络中的联合演化、共生耦合推动形成生态创新网络的超循环,而相关管理机制催化生态创新网络从反应循环、催化循环到超循环的进化,并持续推进生态创新网络的优化升级,形成更大范围、更高效率的网络结构。研究结论丰富了制造业生态创新网络的理论体系,并为新形势下制造业企业创新发展路径提供有益借鉴。

Abstract

Under the new background of institutional opening up, the proposition of China's goals of carbon peaking and carbon neutrality and its high-quality development goals determine that the construction of the eco-innovation network is imperative. The eco-innovation network is conducive to the cooperation between different enterprises to carry out green R&D activities and is crucial for manufacturing enterprises to integrate and use the complex ecosystem of environmental protection technologies. From the two theoretical perspectives of innovation collaboration network and innovation ecosystem, this paper took the eco-innovation network as the research object, analyzed its connotation and characteristics, and constructed an ecological innovation network model based on the triple helix theory of innovation. Then, the evolutionary logic of the eco-innovation network was discussed based on the hyper-cycle theory, which provides a valuable reference for the construction of the ecological innovation network of manufacturing enterprises and for the green and efficient development.

The main conclusions of this research include the following aspects:

First, the eco-innovation network is an informal organization based on open innovation, with green ecology as the core, which aims to tap the advantages of all parties to achieve efficient ecological innovation and improve the organization's environmental benefits and sustainable development capabilities.

Second, the eco-innovation network includes three types of subjects: government, university, and enterprise. The three types of subjects are the key components of the eco-innovation network, and their spiral interaction in the field of eco-innovation forms a positive ecological innovation pattern; The innovation collaboration network and innovation ecosystem jointly form two supporting modules of the eco-innovation network, which are controlled by universities and core enterprises respectively. The innovation collaboration network is committed to the creation of clean and green production technologies and knowledge sharing; The innovation ecosystem focuses on building a comprehensive business model and management model for sustainable development. The eco-innovation network includes internal network (political network, scientific network, industrial network, etc.) and external network (financial network, intermediary network, professional network, etc.). The internal network is a strong relationship network formed by the three core subjects, leading the operation of the ecological innovation network; The external network is a kind of auxiliary weak relationship network, which mainly serves the smooth operation of the internal network.

Third, the eco-innovation network is open, ecological, efficient and dynamic. The open feature reflects the fuzzy boundary characteristics of the eco-innovation network, which is conducive to the environmental adaptation and extension of the eco-innovation network; the ecological feature reflects that the core objective of the eco-innovation network is to increase the value of eco-innovation, aiming to promote the research, development, production, and application of eco-innovation products; the efficient feature reflects the high-efficiency use of eco-innovation resources and more output of eco-innovation products by the eco-innovation network; the dynamic feature reflects the organizational flexibility of the eco-innovation network, which is conducive to the adjustment of its organizational structure and the relationship between its members.

Fourth, the eco-innovation network follows the evolutionary logic from the reaction cycle to the catalytic cycle and then to the hypercycle. The joint evolution and symbiotic coupling of innovation collaboration networks and innovation ecosystems, as important catalytic cycles in the network, promote the formation of the hypercycle of the eco-innovation network, while the relevant management mechanisms catalyze the evolution of the eco-innovation network from the reaction cycle, the catalytic cycle to the hypercycle, and continue to promote the optimization and upgrading of the eco-innovation network, forming a wider and more efficient network structure.

Finally, the paper put forward relevant policy recommendations. For example, we should correctly understand the triple helix development pattern of government, university, and enterprise in the eco-innovation network, and pay attention to the formation of an eco-innovation consortium guided by governments, supported by universities and driven by enterprises; we should focus on building two modules of innovation collaboration network and innovation ecosystem in advance; we should pay attention to the relationship between the internal network and the external network in the eco-innovation network, and cultivate good conditions for the construction of the eco-innovation network through the selection and arrangement of the system and the cultivation of organizational practices and culture; and we should also focus on the creation and optimization of the management mechanism within the organization, and promote the evolution of the eco-innovation network.

关键词

制度型开放 / 创新协作网络 / 创新生态系统 / 创新三螺旋 / 超循环理论

Key words

institutional opening / innovation collaboration network / innovation ecosystem / innovation triple helix / hypercycle theory

引用本文

导出引用
李鑫, 魏姗, 李惠娟. 制造业生态创新网络构建及进化逻辑[J]. 科研管理. 2024, 45(1): 74-83 https://doi.org/10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2024.01.008
Li Xin, Wei Shan, Li Huijuan. Construction and evolutionary logic of the manufacturing eco-innovation network[J]. Science Research Management. 2024, 45(1): 74-83 https://doi.org/10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2024.01.008
中图分类号: F204   

参考文献

[1]
IPCC. Climate change 2021: Summary for policymakers[R]. IPCC, 2021. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/sixth-assessment-report-working-group-i/.
[2]
CAMPOS P, BRAZDIL P, MOTA I. Comparing strategies of collaborative networks for R&D: An agent-based study[J]. Computational Economics, 2013(42):01-22.
[3]
DURUGBO C, AMANKWAH-AMOAH J, BUSINESS K. Global sustainability under uncertainty: How do multinationals craft regulatory policies?[J]. Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 2019(26): 1500-1516.
[4]
KLEWITZ J, HANSEN E G. Sustainability-oriented innovation of SMEs: A systematic review[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2014, 65(15):57-75.
[5]
FAGERBERG J. Innovation: A guide to the literature[M]//In: Fagerberg J, Mowery D C, Nelson R R (Eds.), Oxford Handbook of Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.
[6]
Al-ASHAAB A, FLORES M, DOULTSINOU A, et al. A balanced scorecard for measuring the impact of industry-university collaboration[J]. Production Planning and Control, 2011(22): 554-570.
[7]
孙永磊, 宋晶, 陈劲. 创新网络惯例的维度探索与测度研究[J]. 科研管理, 2020, 41(11):56-65.
SUN Yonglei, SONG Jing, CHEN Jin. Dimensional exploration and measurement research of network routines[J]. Science Research Management, 2020, 41(11):56-65.
[8]
冯立杰, 李雪, 王金凤. 创新网络架构特征组态对知识转移绩效的影响机制[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2023, 40(3):112-121.
FENG Lijie, LI Xue, WANG Jinfeng. Effect of features configuration of innovation network and knowledge transfer performance[J]. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 2023, 40(3):112-121.
[9]
李晓琳, 李星坛. 高水平推动京津冀协同创新体系建设[J]. 宏观经济管理, 2022(1):60-67.
LI Xiaolin, LI Xingtan. Promote the construction of Beijing, Tianjin, and Hebei collaborative innovation system at a high level[J]. Macroeconomic Management, 2022(1):60-67.
[10]
赵炎, 叶舟, 韩笑. 创新网络技术多元化、知识基础与企业创新绩效[J]. 科学学研究, 2022, 40(9):1698-1709.
摘要
在新一轮科技革命浪潮下,企业组建创新联合体成为大势所趋。合作创新网络中的多元化技术已经成为企业创新的关键外部资源,但关于创新网络技术多元化如何影响企业创新绩效的研究仍然缺乏,且现有研究往往忽略企业内外部资源的不同组合对企业创新绩效可能产生的差异性影响。文章融合社会网络理论、知识基础理论与动态能力理论,依据信息技术产业上市公司联合申请专利数据构建合作创新网络,采用面板数据随机效应负二项回归法,从个体网络视角分析创新网络技术多元化影响企业创新绩效的权变因素与内在机制,检验了一个被中介的调节效应模型。研究结果表明:创新网络技术多元化正向影响企业创新绩效;企业知识基础深度正向调节创新网络技术多元化与企业创新绩效的关系,而企业知识基础宽度的调节效应并不显著;企业知识基础深度对创新网络技术多元化与企业创新绩效关系的调节通过吸收能力的中介实现。研究结论对企业技术创新具有重要的理论及现实指导意义。
ZHAO Yan, YE Zhou, HAN Xiao. A study of technological diversity of innovation network, knowledge base and firm innovation performance[J]. Studies in Science of Science, 2022, 40(9):1698-1709.
Under the new wave of the Science and Technology Revolution, the formation of innovative consortiums among firms is a general trend. Diverse technologies in cooperative innovation networks have become key external resources for firm innovation. However, empirical studies about how technological diversity of innovation network influences firm’s innovation performance are still lacking. Besides, existing studies often ignore the possible different influences from different combinations of firm’s internal and external resources on the firm’s innovation performance. Combining the theories of social network, knowledge base and dynamic capability, this article constructed cooperative innovation networks with joint patent application data of listed companies in the information technology industry, used random-effect negative binomial regression analytical method of panel data, analyzed the contingency factor and inner mechanism of how technological diversity of innovation network influences firm’s innovation performance, and finally examined a mediated moderation model. The results show that technological diversity of innovation network positively affects firm’s innovation performance; firm’s knowledge depth positively moderates the relationships between technological diversity of innovation network and firm’s innovation performance, while the moderation effect of firm’s knowledge width is not significant; the moderation effect of firm’s knowledge depth on the relationships between technological diversity of innovation network and firm’s innovation performance is mediated by absorptive capacity. The conclusions of this study are of great theoretical and practical guiding significance to firms’ technological innovation.
[11]
傅首清. 区域创新网络与科技产业生态环境互动机制研究:以中关村海淀科技园区为例[J]. 管理世界, 2010(6):08-13+27.
FU Shouqing. Study on the interaction mechanism between regional innovation network and the ecological environment of science and technology industry:Taking Haidian science and technology park in Zhongguancun as an example[J]. Journal of Management World, 2010(6):08-13+27.
[12]
刘彬, 陈伟光. 制度型开放:中国参与全球经济治理的制度路径[J]. 国际论坛, 2022, 24(1):62-77+157-158.
LIU Bin, CHEN Weiguang. Opening-up: The institutional path for China's participation in global economic governance[J]. International Forum, 2022, 24(1):62-77+157-158.
[13]
FUSSLER C, JAMES P. Driving eco-innovation:A breakthrough discipline for innovation and sustainability[M]. London: Pitman Publishing, 1996.
[14]
DÍAZ-GARCÍA M C, SÁEZ-MARTÍNEZ F J. Eco-innovation:Insights from a literature review[J]. Innovation, 2015, 17(1): 06-23.
[15]
杨燕, 邵云飞. 生态创新研究进展及展望[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2011, 32(8):107-116.
YANG Yan, SHAO Yunfei. Review of eco-innovation study and its implications[J]. Science of Science and Management of S.& T., 2011, 32(8):107-116.
[16]
WICKI S, HANSEN E G. Green technology innovation:Anatomy of exploration processes from a learning perspective[J]. Business Strategy and the Environment, 2019, 28(6): 970-988.
[17]
LOUČANOVÁ E, NOSÁL'OVÁ M. Eco-innovation performance in Slovakia: Assessment based on ABC analysis of eco-innovation indicators[J]. BioResources, 2020, 15: 5355-5365.
[18]
POWELL W W, GRODAL S. Networks of innovators[M]//In: Fagerberg J, Mowery D C, Nelson R R (Eds.), Oxford Handbook of Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005:56-85.
[19]
王海军, 冯军政. 生态型产学研用协同创新网络构建与机制研究:模块化视角[J]. 软科学, 2017, 31(9):35-39.
WANG Haijun, FENG Junzheng. Ecological network construction and mechanism of firm-university-institute-user collaboration innovation:Modularity view[J]. Soft Science, 2017, 31(9):35-39.
[20]
胡悦, 马静, 陈菲, 等. 京津冀城市群生态创新联系及网络结构研究[J]. 城市问题, 2020(12):04-13.
HU Yue, MA Jing, CHEN Fei, et al. Research on ecological innovation connection and network structure of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration[J]. Urban Problems, 2020(12):04-13.
[21]
PACHECO D A, CATEN C S, JUNG C F, et al. Eco-innovation determinants in manufacturing SMEs: Systematic review and research directions[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 142: 2277-2287.
[22]
AHUJA G. Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2000, 45(3): 425-455.
To assess the effects of a firm's network of relations on innovation, this paper elaborates a theoretical framework that relates three aspects of a firm's ego network—direct ties, indirect ties, and structural holes (disconnections between a firm's partners)—to the firm's subsequent innovation output. It posits that direct and indirect ties both have a positive impact on innovation but that the impact of indirect ties is moderated by the number of a firm's direct ties. Structural holes are proposed to have both positive and negative influences on subsequent innovation. Results from a longitudinal study of firms in the international chemicals industry indicate support for the predictions on direct and indirect ties, but in the interfirm collaboration network, increasing structural holes has a negative effect on innovation. Among the implications for interorganizational network theory is that the optimal structure of interfirm networks depends on the objectives of the network members.
[23]
KLEIS L, NAULT B R, DEXTER A S. Producing synergy:Innovation, IT, and productivity[J]. Decision Sciences, 2014, 45(5): 939-969.
[24]
解学梅, 方良秀. 国外协同创新研究述评与展望[J]. 研究与发展管理, 2015, 27(4):16-24.
XIE Xuemei, FANG Liangxiu. Review and prospect of foreign collaborative innovation[J]. R&D Management, 2015, 27(4):16-24.
[25]
ZUBELTZU-JAKA E, ERAUSKIN-TOLOSA A, HERAS-SAIZARBITORIA I. Shedding light on the determinants of eco-innovation: A meta-analytic study[J]. Business Strategy and the Environment, 2018, 27:1093-1103.
[26]
曾德明, 韩智奇, 邹思明. 协作研发网络结构对产业技术生态位影响研究[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2015, 36(3): 87-95.
ZENG Deming, HAN Zhiqi, ZOU Siming. The structure of collaborative innovation networks and its impact on industry technological niche[J]. Science of Science and Management of S.& T., 2015, 36(3): 87-95.
[27]
MELE C, SPENA T R. Eco-innovation practices[J]. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 2015, 28:04-25.
– The purpose of this paper is to examine eco-innovation practices within project networks. Eco-innovation practices involve systematic series of actions that integrate resources to create value.
[28]
MARTINEZ M G, ZOUAGHI F, GARCIA M S, et al. Capturingvalue from alliance portfolio diversity: The mediating role of R&D human capital in high and low tech industries[J]. Technovation, 2017, 59(59): 55-67.
[29]
HEIL S, BORNEMANN T. Creating shareholder value via collaborative innovation:The role of industry and resource alignment in knowledge exploration[J]. R&D Management, 2018, 48(4): 394-409.
[30]
MOORE J F. Predators and prey:A new ecology of competition[J]. Harvard Business Review, 1993, 71(3):75-83.
[31]
NOORA A J, CHRISTOPHER M D, ODEH R J. Exploring network strategies for eco-innovation in manufacturing from a triple helix perspective[J]. Cleaner Logistics and Supply Chain, 2022, 100035.
[32]
BLOOM P N, DEES G. Cultivate your ecosystem[J]. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 2008, 6(1):47-53.
[33]
ESTRIN J. Closing the innovation gap: Reigniting the spark of creativity in a global economy[J]. Business Horizons, 2008, 51(5):513-514.
[34]
武建龙, 郝蒙晓, 黄静. “互联网+”环境下企业创新生态系统的构建研究:以蔚来新能源汽车为例[J]. 软科学, 2021, 35(5):70-77.
WU Jianlong, HAO Mengxiao, HUANG Jing. The construction of enterprise innovation ecosystem in the “Internet +” environment:The case study of NIO NEV[J]. Soft Science, 2021, 35(5):70-77.
[35]
GRANSTRAND O, HOLGERSSON M. Innovation ecosystems:A conceptual review and a new definition[J]. Technovation, 2020, 90-91, 102098.
[36]
JACOBIDES M G, CENNAMO C, GAWER A. Towards a theory of ecosystems[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2018, 39 (8):2255-2276.
[37]
FREEMAN C. Networks of innovators: A synthesis of research issues[J]. Research Policy, 1991(20): 499-514.
[38]
LEYDESDORFF L, ETZKOWITZ H. The triple helix as a model for innovation studies[J]. Science and Public Policy, 1998, 25: 195-203.
[39]
LEYDESDORFF L, MEYER M. Triple helix indicators of knowledge-based innovation systems: Introduction to the special issue[J]. Research Policy, 2006, 35(10): 1441-1449.
[40]
RANGA M, ETZKOWITZ H. Triple helix systems: An analytical framework for innovation policy and practice in the knowledge society[J]. Industry and Higher Education, 2013, 27(4):237-262.
This paper introduces the concept of Triple Helix systems as an analytical construct that synthesizes the key features of university–industry–government (Triple Helix) interactions into an ‘innovation system’ format, defined according to systems theory as a set of components, relationships and functions. Among the components of Triple Helix systems, a distinction is made between (a) R&D and non-R&D innovators; (b) ‘single-sphere’ and ‘multi-sphere’ (hybrid) institutions; and (c) individual and institutional innovators. The relationships between components are synthesized into five main types: technology transfer; collaboration and conflict moderation; collaborative leadership; substitution; and networking. The overall function of Triple Helix systems – knowledge and innovation generation, diffusion and use – is realized through a set of activities in the knowledge, innovation and consensus spaces. This perspective provides an explicit framework for the systemic interaction between Triple Helix actors that was previously lacking, and a more fine-grained view of the circulation of knowledge flows and resources within and among the spaces, helping to identify existing blockages or gaps. From a Triple Helix systems perspective, the articulation and the non-linear interactions between the spaces can generate new combinations of knowledge and resources that can advance innovation theory and practice, especially at the regional level.
[41]
杨震宁, 李东红, 范黎波. 身陷“盘丝洞”:社会网络关系嵌入过度影响了创业过程吗?[J]. 管理世界, 2013(12): 101-116.
YANG Zhenning, LI Donghong, FAN Libo. Caught in a “coiled silk hole”: Does the embeddedness of social network relationships affect the entrepreneurial process excessively?[J]. Journal of Management World, 2013(12): 101-116.
[42]
EIGEN M, SCHUSTER P. The hypercycle. A principle of natural self-organization. Part A: Emergence of the hypercycle[J]. Die Naturwissenschaften, 1977, 64(11): 541-565.

基金

全国统计科学研究项目:“双碳视域下运动式减碳的效应测度及纠偏策略研究”(2022LY039,2022.06—2024.06)

PDF(1438 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/