科研管理

科研管理 ›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (2): 38-45.

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

所有制视角下服务资源、动态能力和竞争优势：基于中国科技服务业的实证研究

王婧1,吴贵生2,汪涛1   

  1. 1北京理工大学管理与经济学院，北京100081； 2 清华大学技术创新研究中心，北京100084
  • 收稿日期:2016-09-27 修回日期:2017-01-18 出版日期:2018-02-20 发布日期:2018-02-02
  • 通讯作者: 王婧
  • 基金资助:

    教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目中国服务创新轨道理论，资助号10JJD630008;“行政体制情境下中国创新政策协调研究”( 71573014，2015.1-2018.12);科技部创新体系建设办公室专项“产业创新模式与激励政策研究”(2013cxb24, 2013.7-2014.6)。

Service resources, dynamic capabilities and competitive advantage from the perspective of ownership:An empirical study based on China’s science and technology industry 

Wang Jing1, Wu Guisheng2, Wang Tao1   

  1. 1. School of Management and Economics, Beijing Institute and Technology, Beijing 100081, China;
    2. Research Center for Technological Innovation, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
  • Received:2016-09-27 Revised:2017-01-18 Online:2018-02-20 Published:2018-02-02

摘要： 目前，中国正面临从计划经济向市场经济转型，产权制度成为制约科技服务业竞争力的重要因素。本研究在回收全国1150份有效问卷的基础上，针对不同所有制科技服务机构的资源、动态能力和竞争优势构建了关系模型，并进行了实证分析，旨在探讨不同所有制下服务资源、动态能力和竞争优势间传导机制、影响路径以及彼此间的差异。研究表明：所有制对不同类型服务机构资源、动态能力和竞争优势的影响路径和传导机制存在差异，并且在不同所有制下动态能力均起到部分中介作用，中介作用的强度从大到小依次是国有企业、民营企业、事业单位。因此，可以发现，在当前产权制度下，各类机构的竞争力均受到限制且影响机制各异，分别采取相应措施提高科技服务机构的动态能力有助于提高服务机构的竞争优势。

关键词: 所有制, 服务资源, 动态能力, 竞争优势, 科技服务业

Abstract: Abstract: At present, China is facing a transition from a planned economy to market economy, during which property rights system has become the key bottleneck that restricts the development of science and technology service industry in their competitiveness, so how to stimulate the competitive advantage of organizations become an important task in science and technology system reform. Based on 1150 valid questionnaires, we constructed the model reflecting the relationship among the service resources, dynamic capabilities and competitive advantage according to different system of ownership, and we carried on the empirical analysis aiming to discuss their different transmission mechanisms and impact paths under the different system of ownership. This study shows that the ownership has impact on regulating the relationship among resources, dynamic capability and competitive advantage, and the dynamic capability plays a partial intermediary role in all these organizations. The strength of the intermediary role from large to small in turn is state-owned enterprises, private enterprises, independent public institutions. This article believes that under the current property rights system, the competitiveness of all kinds of institutions are limited in their development. And improving the dynamic ability of the organizations in science and technology services industry would help improve the competitive advantage.

Key words: ownership, service resources, dynamic capability, competitive advantage, science and technology