科研管理 ›› 2011, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (1): 105-110 .

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

辽宁省级部门绩效评估模型及实证研究/FONT

  刘志刚,胡税根,刘静   

  1.   (浙江大学 公共管理学院,浙江 杭州310005)
  • 收稿日期:2010-01-01 修回日期:2010-09-01 出版日期:2011-01-27 发布日期:2011-04-12

The performance evaluation model and its demonstration of Liaoning provincial department

  Liu Zhigang, Hu Shuigen, Liu Jing   


  1. (School of Public Administration, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 31002, China)
  • Received:2010-01-01 Revised:2010-09-01 Online:2011-01-27 Published:2011-04-12

摘要:     摘要:全面展开对特定层级、特定部门和特定项目绩效评估的研究和探索,是当前深化我国公共部门绩效评估活动的一个战略重点,也是建立符合我国国情的绩效评估体系的必经阶段和关键环节。本文运用平衡计分卡、360度反馈评价、关键绩效指标等方法和工具,构建了公共部门绩效评估指标体系。以辽宁省级部门为例,通过仅有产出的多目标DEA模型进行实证分析,证明该体系适用于我国公共部门绩效评估。同时运用数量性方法对我国当前公共部门绩效评估中存在的指标体系设定、评估主体作用和影响结果因素等方面问题进行了规律性的探讨,提出了设定科学的评估标准、发挥外部评估作用和增强评估结果客观公正性三个方面的结论和建议。  

关键词: 绩效评估, 省级部门, 数据包络分析

Abstract:     Abstract: Research and exploration of performance evaluation at specific levels, departments and projects in all round way is a strategic focus for deepening the performance evaluation of public sectors in China, which is also the necessary and crucial stage for establishing the performance evaluation system based on China’s current national conditions. With the methods of balance score card, 360-degree feedback assessment, key performance indicators and others, the index system for public sectors performance evaluation is built. And by taking Liaoning provincial department as an example, the only output multi-objective analysis of DEA model is used to empirically prove that the system is suitable for China’s public sectors performance assessment. At the same time, quantitative methods are employed to discuss many problems, which exist regularly in current public sectors performance evaluation, such as the index system settings, the role of evaluation main body, and the factors affecting the results. In conclusions and recommendations, three points are emphasized, that is, setting scientific standards for assessment, playing the role of external evaluation, and enhancing the objectivity of the assessment results.  

Key words: performance evaluation, provincial department, DEA

中图分类号: