科研管理

科研管理 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (8): 135-144.DOI: 10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2024.08.014

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

技术调适与制度重塑：公共资源交易平台监管的差异性研究

马文娟1,薄晓营2,王丛虎3   

  1. 1.中共浙江省委党校（浙江行政学院）浙江发展战略研究院，浙江 杭州311121；
    2.保定理工学院经济学院，河北 保定071000；
    3.中国人民大学公共管理学院，北京10087

  • 收稿日期:2023-04-10 修回日期:2023-11-08 出版日期:2024-08-20 发布日期:2024-08-08
  • 通讯作者: 王丛虎
  • 基金资助:
    全国党校（行政学院）系统社科规划一般课题：“公共数据授权运营的适应性监管机制构建研究”（2024DXXTYB024）；国家自然科学基金面上项目：“统一平台运行下公共资源交易腐败治理机制：模型检验及实现路径”（72274199）；国家社会科学基金重点项目：“坚持不敢腐、不能腐、不想腐一体推进研究：本土理论、成效评价及策略提升”（23AZD079）。

Technological adaptation and institutional reshaping: A study of the differences in regulation of public resource trading platforms

Ma Wenjuan1, Bo Xiaoying2, Wang Conghu3   

  1. 1. Zhejiang Development Strategy Research Institute (Zhejiang Institute of Administration), 
    Party School of Zhejiang Provincial Committee of the Communist Party of China, Hangzhou 311121, Zhejiang, China;
    2. School of Economics, Baoding University of Technology, Baoding 071000, Hebei, China;
    3. School of Public Administration and Policy, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China
  • Received:2023-04-10 Revised:2023-11-08 Online:2024-08-20 Published:2024-08-08

摘要：    条块分割的碎片化问题是长期困扰公共资源交易领域监管活动顺利推进的现实阻力。实践从技术调适和制度重塑两条路径对政府监管的碎片化问题作出了积极回应，但已有研究对不同治理路径的差异性测量与解释、技术调适与制度重塑的互动机制等关键问题尚未予以清晰的回答。本研究以整体性治理和注意力分配为理论视角，以我国公共资源交易平台监管改革为研究对象，运用阻力与意愿的约束分析方法探究实践形成不同治理思路的适用场景与治理差异。研究发现：监管策略的选择不是单一类型，而是多种策略共同发挥作用；实践形成不同治理思路的重要原因是他们在进行策略选择时出于改革阻力与改革意愿的考虑进行注意力分配的选择结果；监管策略选择遵循治理主体-治理手段-治理规则的推进顺序，蕴含着技术调适与制度重塑的组合理念。研究结论丰富了监管策略选择的过程机制研究，为提升我国公共资源交易平台监管效能提供了理论指导与政策建议。

关键词: 公共资源交易平台监管, 整体性治理, 注意力分配, 技术调适, 制度重塑

Abstract:    The issue of fragmentation has long been a real obstacle to the smooth progress of regulatory activities in the field of public resource trading platforms. Practice has responded positively to the fragmentation of government regulation through two paths: technological adaptation and institutional reshaping. However, there have been studies that have not provided clear answers to key issues such as the measurement and interpretation of differences in different governance paths, and the interaction mechanism between technological adaptation and institutional reshaping.This study takes holistic governance and attention distribution as theoretical perspectives, and takes the regulatory reform of public resource trading platforms in China as the research object. The constraint analysis method of resistance and willingness is used to explore the applicable scenarios and governance differences of different governance ideas formed in practice.The article finds that the choice of regulatory strategies is not a single type, but rather a combination of multiple strategies that work together; The important reason for the formation of different governance ideas in practice is their choice of attention allocation due to the consideration of reform resistance and willingness when making strategic choices; The selection of regulatory strategies follows the order of governance entities, governance means, and governance rules, which contains a combination of technological adaptation and institutional reshaping.The research conclusion enriches the research on the process and mechanism of regulatory strategy selection, providing theoretical guidance and policy recommendations for improving the regulatory efficiency of public resource trading platforms in China.

Key words: the regulation of public resource trading platforms, holistic governance, attention distribution, technological adaptation, institutional reshaping