科研管理 ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (10): 62-70.DOI: 10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2023.10.007

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

支持创新的地方知识产权政策体系:基于创新系统与制度逻辑的分析

许可1,张亚峰2   

  1. 1.山东大学国际创新转化学院,山东青岛266237;
    2.中国科学院大学公共政策与管理学院(知识产权学院),北京100049
  • 收稿日期:2023-05-18 修回日期:2023-08-15 出版日期:2023-10-20 发布日期:2023-10-10
  • 通讯作者: 张亚峰
  • 基金资助:
    山东省社科规划研究项目:“数字经济影响山东专精特新企业绿色创新发展的机制与实现路径研究”(22DGLJ18,2022.08—2024.03)。

A local intellectual property policy system that supports innovation: An analysis based on the innovation system and institutional logics

Xu Ke1, Zhang Yafeng2   

  1. 1. School of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Shandong University, Qingdao 266237, Shandong, China; 
    2. School of Public Policy and Management/School of Intellectual Property, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

  • Received:2023-05-18 Revised:2023-08-15 Online:2023-10-20 Published:2023-10-10

摘要:    知识产权政策是支持创新的基础性条件,地方政策是国家政策的具体实践。从地方层面出发,以创新系统和制度逻辑理论为基础,建立包括经济和社会基础、创新要素和主体、知识产权管理机构和政策制定四个维度的地方知识产权政策体系分析框架。以深圳为例,从演进发展维度将其知识产权政策体系划分为初创期、完善期、成熟期和优化期四个阶段。研究发现,知识产权政策变迁滞后于经济发展,创新资源是地方知识产权政策体系演变的动力,知识产权政策体系在演进过程中呈现内部协同特征,知识产权政策多方位覆盖不断深化。针对地方知识产权政策体系的完善,提出:应通过技术预见与制度梳理应对政策滞后问题、应根据地方特色积极培育和争取各类创新资源、应提升政策与知识产权全链条的匹配度。以期为我国全面创新发展、创新型国家和知识产权强国建设提供有益参考。

关键词: 知识产权, 政策体系, 深圳经验

Abstract:    Intellectual property (IP) policies are fundamental conditions for supporting innovation, and local IP system is the practice of national IP system. By applying a local-level perspective, and integrating the theories of innovation system and institutional logics, a framework for analyzing local IP policy system was established, which includes four dimensions: economic and social foundation, innovation elements and entities, IP management institutions, and policy formulation. By taking Shenzhen as an example, the author of this paper divided its IP policy system into four stages from the perspective of evolutionary development: initial stage, improvement stage, maturity stage, and optimization stage. It was found through this study that changes in IP policies lag behind economic development, and innovative resources are the main driving force behind the evolution of local IP policy system. The IP policy system exhibits internal collaborative characteristics during the evolution process, and the multi-dimensional coverage of intellectual property policies continues to deepen. In response to the improvement of local IP policy system, it is proposed that:We should address the issue of policy lag through technological foresight and institutional review, actively cultivate and strive for various innovative resources based on local characteristics, and enhance the matching degree between policies and the entire IP chain, for providing useful references for China′s comprehensive innovative development, for helping China become an innovative country, and for the construction of China into an IP power.

Key words: intellectual property, policy system, Shenzhen experience