科研管理 ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (4): 85-92.

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于PSM-DID模型的高新技术企业认定效果评价

刘梓毓1,2,杜玉申1,2   

  1. 1.吉林大学数量经济研究中心,吉林 长春130012;
    2.吉林大学商学院,吉林 长春130012

  • 收稿日期:2020-10-29 修回日期:2021-04-26 出版日期:2023-04-20 发布日期:2023-04-12
  • 通讯作者: 杜玉申
  • 基金资助:
    教育部人文社会科学基金项目(16YJA630008)。

Evaluation of the recognition results of high-tech enterprises based on the PSM-DID Model

Liu Ziyu1,2, Du Yushen1,2   

  1. 1. Research Centre for Quantitative Economics, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, Jilin, China;
    2. Business School, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, Jilin, China
  • Received:2020-10-29 Revised:2021-04-26 Online:2023-04-20 Published:2023-04-12

摘要: 评估高新技术企业认定效果,是进一步落实与完善认定政策的依据,对推动高新技术企业的创新发展有着重要的现实意义。本文以2007年至2017年A股上市公司为研究样本,使用主成分分析法构建高新技术企业认定效果的测量指标,运用倾向得分匹配双重差分模型(PSM-DID模型)评估现行政策的实施效果。研究发现:(1)从平均处理效应来看,现行政策可以有效地提升企业的技术创新能力,而对技术成果转化能力不存在显著的影响;(2)从动态边际效应来看,现行政策对企业技术创新能力的提升作用先升后降,对技术成果转化能力不存在规律的影响;(3)从企业间异质性来看,现行政策对大规模、现金流充裕、运营能力较强、处于成长期的企业具有更好的激励效果。基于以上结果本文建议,政策制定者应遵循创新活动的内在规律,建立长效的考核机制;采用滚动考核的方式,增加对企业新增知识产权的要求;关注创新成果的商业价值,引导企业追求成果转化的财务绩效;出台配套政策对小企业及现金流匮乏的企业给予支持;根据企业的运营能力与所处的生命周期采取差异化的认定标准与扶植政策。

关键词: 高新技术企业, 技术创新, 技术成果转化, PSM-DID模型

Abstract:     Innovation is the primary driving force for development and the strategic underpinning for building a modernized economy. In order to encourage innovation and development of enterprises, the Chinese government issued the Measures for Administration of High-Tech Enterprise Recognition in April 2008, which granted the approved enterprises the qualification of high-tech enterprises, with which the enterprises could enjoy 10% income tax reduction. The evaluation of the recognition results of high-tech enterprises has important reference value for further implementation and improvement of policies, and has important practical significance for promoting the innovation and development of high-tech enterprises. Therefore, based on the research sample of A-share listed companies from 2007 to 2017, this paper uses the main component analysis method to construct the measurement index of the recognition results of high-tech enterprises, uses propensity score matching method to balance the systematic differences between the experimental group and the control group, and evaluates the implementation effect of the current policy by using the DID model.The study found that the current policy can improve the technological innovation ability of enterprises on the whole, but it has no significant influence on the ability to commercialize technological achievements. The results of dynamic marginal effect analysis show that the promotion effect of high-tech enterprise qualification on the technological innovation ability of enterprises increases first and then decreases, but there is no regular effect on the ability to commercialize technological achievements. The result of heterogeneity analysis shows that the current policy has better incentive effect on large scale, abundant cash flow, strong operation ability and growing enterprises.The policy implications of this paper include the following points. First of all, policy makers should follow the inherent rules of innovation activities, establish a long-term assessment mechanism, and moderately relax the assessment period for some industries with high innovation risk or long R&D cycle, so as to avoid strategic innovation in order to meet the policy requirements. In addition, the evaluation factor of "time to acquire intellectual property" should be added to the policy, so as to raise the requirement for new intellectual property of enterprises, and promote the continuous innovation input and output of enterprises. Also, policymakers should guide enterprises to pay attention to the commercial value of innovation results, add requirements on the financial performance of the commercialization of innovation results, and prevent the occurrence of speculation. What′s more, policymakers should enrich existing support policies for high-tech enterprises by offering direct subsidies for small firms′ innovation rather than ex post facto tax breaks. Besides, the government should build convenient financing platforms for high-tech enterprises, increase support for innovative projects with commercial value, and help high-tech enterprises to better balance R&D and innovation investment with capital liquidity. Also, policymakers should include operational capacity into the recognition standards, give appropriate policy preference to enterprises with strong operational capacity, give correct guidance to enterprises with weak operational capacity, and give full play to the incentive effect of policies. Finally, policymakers should adopt differentiated recognition standards and supporting policies according to the life cycle of enterprises.

Key words: high-tech enterprise, technological innovation, commercialization of technological achievement, PSM-DID model