科研管理 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (11): 1-7.

• •    下一篇

负责任创新:实践与理论分析

赵庆1,余梅1,李京1,蒙昱竹2,肖小虹1   

  1. 1.贵州财经大学 工商管理学院,贵州 贵阳550025;
    2. 贵州财经大学大数据应用与经济学院,贵州 贵阳550025

  • 收稿日期:2021-04-27 修回日期:2021-09-12 出版日期:2021-11-20 发布日期:2021-11-15
  • 通讯作者: 肖小虹
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金项目(20BGL199)。

Responsible innovation: The practice and theoretical analysis

Zhao Qing1, Yu Mei1, Li Jing1, Meng Yuzhu2, Xiao Xiaohong1   

  1. 1. School of Business Administration, Guizhou University of Finance and Economics, Guiyang 550025, Guizhou, China; 2. School of Big Data Application and Economics, Guizhou University of Finance and Economics, Guiyang 550025, Guizhou, China)

  • Received:2021-04-27 Revised:2021-09-12 Online:2021-11-20 Published:2021-11-15

摘要: 大多数研究一直追求负责任创新趋善而行的普遍价值,而对责任理应更“宽”的框架讨论不足。在“新发展阶段”,理论界对负责任创新的重要命题,即谁对创新负责任、创新要对谁负责任以及负什么责任应准确认识。本文总结已有的研究和实践,构建了内含创新主体、价值主体、创新客体、创新理念和政策的机理框架,用以阐释负责任创新的理论逻辑。研究结论指出,应以国家战略的首位价值主体为导向,发展新的创新理念,促进负责任创新动力机制形成;建构由政府、党派、民众、用户和社区共同组成的创新生态系统;注重探索新型举国体制,充分发挥“有为”政府和“有效”市场的作用,推动企业社会责任观念和行动的转变;完善自主可控的创新链,形成大国间“均势”的创新安全新格局。

关键词: 负责任创新, 创新主体, 企业社会责任, 举国体制

Abstract:    In the strategy of innovation and development, we should not only focus on the promotion of faster and more efficient innovation practice in various forms, but also encourage to take a more forward-looking and introspective way, that is, the responsible innovation (RI) strategy. It is an elementary proposition that scholars should clarify in "the new stage of development in China", who is responsible for innovation? Who is innovation responsible for and what responsibility? This is the core of China′s challenge of "kicking the ladder". The RI strategy should make innovation subjects of responsible for the interests of the state (our country-China), enterprises and people at each innovation stage, break the "Decoupling" risk, and maintain the advantages of enterprises (including state-owned enterprises and private enterprises) in global competition. According to the new proposal in the study, we emphasize that the implementation of RI strategy needs to build new concepts and policies at first; give completed play to the essential functions of the government in leading and promoting the formulation and implementation of RI industrial policies, and pay special attention to actively exploring new models of the national industrial systems; give full consider to the leading role of enterprises and market decisions; maintain and consolidate the channel to absorb the worldwide knowledge spillover; to build an independent and controllable innovation chain and form a new pattern of scientific and technological security among the major countries.Whether it is the experience that has created many economic miracles in the past, or the performance in this new coronal crisis, the strategy of responsible innovation has shown its advantages in economic growth, national security, economic security, human health, and environmental optimization. The implementation of such strategies was one of the reasons for the success of the first-mover countries, which, following the implementation of responsible innovation strategies with a country-specific character, not only had a tendency to "kick down the ladder", but were also committed to requiring the latter countries to assume responsibility for innovation for all humankind. This should cause our vigilance, but also gives us many important enlightenments, that is, China should also promote responsible innovation at the level of national strategy, and implement in the actual action of enterprises and industries, so that it can become a successful development of economic strategy.More importantly, this strategy is attributed to the national strategy that China urgently needs to establish, which helps us to accurately grasp the successful experience of the past and reduce or even avoid the possibility of failure in the global innovation chain in the new stage of development. We further put forward that the discussion on responsibility is still relatively narrow, especially the lack of in-depth discussion on innovation subjects. This article argues that the discussion of more value subjects should be included, such as the state, local governments, industries, and other value subjects. Therefore, responsible innovation opens a new research perspective and clues for the theory and practice of corporate social responsibility, and expands the original understanding of enterprises, "society" and "responsibility". However, what is the relationship between CSR and responsible innovation, whether CSR should be included in the framework of responsible innovation, which need to be more in-depth verification and summary.

Key words:  responsible innovation, innovation subject, corporate social responsibility, national system