科研管理

科研管理 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (4): 35-45.

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

数字经济、创新环境与城市创新能力

韩璐1，陈松1，梁玲玲2   

  1. 1.同济大学经济与管理学院，上海200092；
    2.上海应用技术大学经济与管理学院，上海201418

  • 收稿日期:2020-12-15 修回日期:2021-03-27 出版日期:2021-04-20 发布日期:2021-04-19
  • 通讯作者: 陈松
  • 基金资助:
    中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金（22120200330，2020.08—2021.07）。

Digital economy, innovation environment and urban innovation capabilities

Han Lu1, Chen Song1, Liang Lingling2   

  1. 1. School of Economics and Management, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China; 
    2. School of Economics and Management, Shanghai Institute of Technology, Shanghai 201418, China
  • Received:2020-12-15 Revised:2021-03-27 Online:2021-04-20 Published:2021-04-19

摘要： 为了从城市层面定量验证数字经济对城市创新能力的赋能作用，基于2011—2016年286个主要地级市的样本数据，运用固定效应模型和分位数回归模型实证分析了数字经济对城市创新能力的影响以及人才集聚和金融发展的调节作用。这一结论在剔除特殊城市样本，选取历史数据作为工具变量，更换被解释变量等稳健性检验后仍然成立。研究表明：数字经济能够显著提升城市创新能力，对于创新能力越高的城市，数字经济对城市创新能力的赋能作用越明显，从而导致城市间创新能力差距扩大；创新环境（人才集聚和金融发展）在数字经济与城市创新能力二者关系中发挥了正向调节作用，即在人才集聚程度或金融发展水平较高的城市，数字经济对城市创新能力的赋能作用更为明显。政府应以人才集聚和金融发展为抓手，加速城市数字化转型与创新；此外，应重视数字经济会扩大城市间创新能力差距这一现象,在促进数字经济驱动城市创新发展过程中，加强城市间帮扶与合作，避免发展不平衡。

关键词: 数字经济, 城市创新能力, 创新环境, 人才集聚, 金融发展

Abstract: The implementation of national innovation strategy is based on the improvement of urban innovation capability. The rise of digital economy has brought new opportunities for improving urban innovation capability. However, the existing research on digital technology mainly focuses on the enterprise-level from micro perspectives. Few studies have researched the relationship between digital economy and urban innovation capability from the macro perspective yet. And researchers have not explored the influence of innovation environment (such as talent aggregation and financial development) on the relationship. What′s more, the research methods only stuck on explanatory theory analysis, and the research conclusions lack the support of empirical analysis. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to investigate the relationship between digital economy and urban innovation capability from the perspective of urban level, and the moderating effect of talent aggregation and financial development as well.This paper used panel data of prefecture level cities in China from 2011-2016. Fixed effect model and quantile regression model were used to test the hypothesis. The results show that the digital economy can significant urban innovation capability, which is moderated by talent agglomeration and financial development. Specifically, in cities with high level of talent aggregation or financial development, the empowering effect of digital economy on urban innovation capability is stronger. The relationship between digital economy and urban innovation capability is positively moderated by talent aggregation and finical development. Further heterogeneity investigation shows that the contribution of digital economy to urban innovation is more obvious in cities with high innovation level, and the digital economy may expand the gap of innovation capability between cities. In order to resolve the problem of endogeneity caused by sampling selection bias, simultaneous causality, and omitted variable, three methods were adopted to examine the robustness， including the method for eliminating special sample, the instrument tool method of historical data and the method for replacing development variable, and the robust test showed that the results are positive.The contributions of this paper cover the following areas. First, it reveals the significant positive effect of digital economy on urban innovation capability, and the application of digital technology will expand the gap of innovation capability between cities, providing empirically evidences of the digital economy empowering urban innovation capability at the city level. Second, this paper enriches the research contents of relationship between digital innovation and urban innovation. We examined the moderation function of talent aggregation or financial development on the relationship between digital economy and urban innovation capability. The research shows that talent aggregation and financial development have a catalytic effect on the relationship. Finally, the conclusions provide some enlightenments for policy makers to take advantage of digital economy, such as paying attention to the fact that the digital economy may lead to the bigger gap of innovation capability between cities, and increasing investment to digital infrastructure and R&D activities. It is suggested that local government should take talent aggregation and financial development as important starting points to accelerate digital technology-enabled innovation.

Key words: digital economy, urban innovation capability, innovation environment, talent aggregation, financial development