科研管理

科研管理 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (10): 258-267.

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

跨界合作网络与专利产出的性别差异：基于中科院科研人员调查的实证研究

秦佩恒1,洪志生1,赵兰香1，2   

  1. 1中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院，北京100190；
    2中国科学院大学公共政策与管理学院，北京100049
  • 收稿日期:2019-11-17 修回日期:2020-06-24 出版日期:2020-10-20 发布日期:2020-10-19
  • 通讯作者: 赵兰香
  • 基金资助:
    中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院院长青年基金A类：“创新过程中的性别差异及其影响因素”（Y8X1141Q01, 2018.06—2020.12）；中国科学院国际合作局对外合作重点项目：“女性潜能拓展：面向科技成果转移转化带来的挑战”（E0X06016, 2018.01—2020.12）。

Boundary-spanning collaboration and patent productivity:A study based on gender differences

 Qin Peiheng1, Hong Zhisheng1, Zhao Lanxiang1,2   

  1.  1.Institutes of Science and Development, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China; 
    2.School of Public Policy and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
  • Received:2019-11-17 Revised:2020-06-24 Online:2020-10-20 Published:2020-10-19
  • Supported by:
     

摘要： 本文以中科院所属研究院所科研人员为主要调查对象，从跨界合作网络的视角出发，分析专利产出性别差异的社会网络机制。研究主要有3个发现：1.女性科研人员跨界合作网络规模和网络关系强度上均存在明显的欠缺；2.与企业界、其他学科领域合作网络规模和网络关系强度上的欠缺是影响专利产出性别差异的重要因素，而且网络关系强度的影响作用要大于网络规模的影响；3.性别对于跨界合作网络与专利产出关系的调节作用并不显著，即在拥有相同网络规模和网络关系强度的情况下，女性从与各类合作网络关系中获得专利产出回报的可能性与男性并无显著区别。与男性同事相比，女性的专利产出会更多地受到其他因素的影响，如职业早期的企业工作经历、单位组织的知识产权培训等。最后，在结果讨论的基础上提出在学术成果商业化新趋势下减少科技领域性别差异的政策建议。

 

关键词: 跨界合作网络, 性别差异, 专利产出, 网络规模, 网络关系强度

Abstract:

 With the increasingly contribution of S&T to the economy development, the gender disparity in patent productivity and its influencing factors have attracted more and more attention as the low patent productivity of female researchers would enlarge the gender gap in scientific field and affect the innovation efficiency of the society. Based on a survey of researchers from institutes of CAS conducted in 2018, this study focuses on the collaboration network size and ties strength of researchers to understand the gender gap in patent productivity using variance analysis and regression analysis. The results show that:
Firstly, compared to male researchers, female researchers are at a disadvantage both of collaboration network size and ties strength. Specifically, female researchers have fewer collaborators from industries, government departments, other research institutes and interdisciplinary fields, and the communication frequency with partners of female researchers is lower than that of male researchers.
Secondly, the disadvantages at collaboration network size and ties strength are important reasons for the gender difference of patent productivity, but not all types of network deficiency have an impact on female patent productivity. The deficiency of collaboration network size and ties strength with industries and interdisciplinary fields are the key factors affecting female researcher′s patent productivity. Besides, compared with network size, it seems that ties strength has a greater influence on patent productivity. This means that the female researchers not only need more partners from industries and interdisciplinary fields, more importantly, they need to establish a relatively close communication mechanism with those partners.
Thirdly, gender does not play an obvious role in regulating the collaboration network and patent productivity as there is no significant difference in the return of collaboration network between male and female researchers in this research. In other words, it means that there is no obvious network return deficiency caused by gender bias in the famous research institutions of CAS. 
The limitation of this study is that, due to the researchers investigated mostly are from CAS, the universality of the conclusion is still worth further discussion. Previous explanations of "the puzzle of academic productivity" suggested that women are far from top research institutes might be one of the reasons of the gender difference in academic productivity, while in this study, the influence of institute′s reputation has been excluded. For the research groups in China′s well-known scientific institutes, they tend to follow the norms of "universalism" of the scientific community. The "return deficiency" of social networks caused by gender bias is not obvious, but the situation may be different considering all the researchers at the national level. 
However, the findings of this study are still of some implications for the gender policy in the S&T in China. First of all, it′s recognized that lack of social network and resources of female researchers is an important reason for their low innovation output, such as patents. It′s precisely because of their lack of social network and resources that they are more rely on formal organizational support or formal work experience. As shown in this study, the supports from institutes and early industry work experience have greater influence on female researcher′s patent productivity than that of male researchers. Therefore, the institutes should play an important role in improving the female researchers′ collaboration network through building platforms which providing learning, training and information resources, and creating opportunities for their cooperation with the industries and interdisciplinary fields. 

Key words: boundary-spanning collaboration, gender differences, patent productivity, network size, network ties strength

中图分类号: