企业技术知识基础多元度对创新绩效的影响—基于中国电子信息企业的实证分析

科研管理 ›› 2015, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (5): 1-9.

• 论文 • 下一篇

企业技术知识基础多元度对创新绩效的影响—基于中国电子信息企业的实证分析

刘岩¹, 蔡虹¹, 向希尧²

1. 西安交通大学管理学院, 陕西西安 710049;
2. 西安理工大学经济与管理学院, 陕西西安 710048

收稿日期:2013-08-09 修回日期:2014-10-17 出版日期:2015-05-25 发布日期:2015-05-19
通讯作者: 刘岩(1986-),女(汉),青海西宁人,博士研究生,研究方向为技术创新与知识管理。
作者简介:蔡虹(1954-),女(汉),湖北武汉人,教授,博士生导师,研究方向为技术经济与科技管理。
向希尧(1981-),男(汉),湖南津市人,讲师,研究方向为技术创新与科技政策。
基金资助:
高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金资助课题"基于社会网络的基础科学与技术创新协同演化的机理研究"(20110201110017,2012.1-2014.12);国家自然科学基金项目"企业技术创新专有性的理论与实证研究"(71272137,2013.1-2016.12)。

The influence of technological variety of knowledge base on the innovative performance: A test in Chinese electrical & electronic industry

Liu Yan¹, Cai Hong¹, Xiang Xiyao²

1. School of Management, Xi'an Jiao Tong University, Xi'an 710049, Shaanxi, China;
2. School of Economics and Management, Xi'an University of Technology, Xi'an 710048, Shaanxi, China

Received:2013-08-09 Revised:2014-10-17 Online:2015-05-25 Published:2015-05-19

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 基于54家中国电子信息企业2001年至2011年的数据,利用面板数据模型,研究了企业技术知识基础多元度与创新绩效之间的关系,并考察了企业知识吸收能力对二者间关系的影响。研究发现企业技术知识基础相关多元度与技术创新绩效正相关;而技术知识基础非相关多元度与企业技术创新绩效间呈倒U型关系。同时,企业吸收能力对技术知识基础多元度与企业技术创新绩效之间的关系有显著的调节作用。

关键词: 技术知识基础, 吸收能力, 技术创新绩效, 专利

Abstract: Based on the data of 54 firms from the Chinese electrical & electronic industry from 2001 to 2011, and using the panel data model, this paper examines the relationship between variety of the knowledge base, absorptive capacity and the innovative performance. The results show the related variety of knowledge base has a significant positive influence on firms' innovative performance, while a U-shaped relationship is found between the unrelated variety of knowledge base and innovative performance. And the absorptive capacity has a significant meditative effect on the relationship between variety of knowledge base and the firms' innovative performance.

Key words: knowledge base, absorptive capacity, innovative performance, patent

中图分类号:

F273.1

刘岩, 蔡虹, 向希尧. 企业技术知识基础多元度对创新绩效的影响—基于中国电子信息企业的实证分析[J]. 科研管理, 2015, 36(5): 1-9.

Liu Yan, Cai Hong, Xiang Xiyao. The influence of technological variety of knowledge base on the innovative performance: A test in Chinese electrical & electronic industry[J]. Science Research Management, 2015, 36(5): 1-9.

参考文献

[1] Cohen, W., Levinthal. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation [J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1990, 35: 128-152. [2] Kogut, B., Zander, U. Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology [J]. Organization Science, 1992, 3:383-397. [3] Jaffe, A. B. Characterizing the technological position of firms, with application to quantifying technological opportunity and research spillovers [J]. Research Policy, 1989, 18: 87-97. [4] Pisano, G. Learning-before-doing in the development of new process technology [J]. Research Policy, 1996, (25):1097-1119. [5] Lin, B. W., Chen, C. J., Wu, H. L. Patent portfolio diversity, technology strategy, and firm value[J] IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 2006, 53(1): 17-26. [6] Quintana-Garica, C., Benavides-Velasco, C. A. Innovative competence, exploration and exploitation: The influence of technological diversification [J]. Research Policy, 2008, 37: 492-507. [7] Cantwell, J., Piscitello, L. Accumulating technological competence:Its changing impact on corporate diversification and internationalization [J]. Industrial and Corporate Change, 2000, 9: 21-51. [8] Zhang, J., Baden-Fuller, C. The influence of technological knowledge base and organizational structure on technology collaboration [J]. Journal of Management Studies, 2010, 47 (4): 679-704. [9] Chen, Y. S., Chang, K. C. Using the entropy-based patent measure to explore the influences of related and unrelated technological diversification upon technological competences and firm performance [J]. Scientometrics , 2012, 90: 825-841. [10] Barney, J. B. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage [J]. Journal of Management, 1991, 17: 99-120. [11] Prahalad, C. K., Hamel, G. The core competence of the corporation [J]. Harvard Business Review, 1990, 68: 79-91. [12] Leten, B., Belderbos, R., Van Looy, B. Technological diversification, coherence, and performance of firms [J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2007, 24: 567-579. [13] Chen, Y. S., Chang, K. C. Using the entropy-based patent measure to explore the influences of related and unrelated technological diversification upon technological competences and firm performance [J]. Scientometrics , 2012, 90: 825-841. [14] Krafft, J., Quatraro, F. and Saviotti, P.P. The knowledge-base evolution in biotechnology: A social network analysis [J]. Economics of Innovative and New Technology, 2011, 20(5): 445-475. [15] George, G., Kotha R., Zheng Y.F.. Entry into insular domains: A longitudinal study of knowledge structuration and innovation in biotechnology firms [J]. Journal of Management Studies, 2008, 45(8): 1448-1474. [16] Yayavaram, S, Ahuja. Decomposability in knowledge structures and its impact on the usefulness of inventions and knowledge-base malleability [J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2008, 53: 333-362. [17] Miller, D.J. Technological diversity, related diversification, and firm performance. [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2006, 27: 601-619. [18] Ahuja, G., Katila, R. Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms: A longitudinal study [J]..Strategic Management Journal, 2001, 22: 197-220. [19] Rothaermel, F.T., Deeds, D.L. Exploration and exploitation alliances in biotechnology: A system of new product development [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2004, 25(3): 201-221. [20] Mukherji, N, Silberman, J. Absorptive capacity, knowledge flows, an innovation in US. metropolitan areas [J]. Journal of Regional Science, 2013, 53(3): 392-417. [21] Volberda, H.W., Foss, N.J., Lyles, M.A. Perspective-absorbing the concept of absorptive capacity: How to realize Its potential in the organization field [J]. Organization Science, 2010, 21 (4): 931-951. [22] Cameron, A.C., Trivedi, P. Regression analysis of count data [M]: Cambridge University Press, 2013. [23] Li, J.J., Poppo, Zhou. Do managerial ties in China always produce value? Competition, uncertainty, and domestics vs. foreign firms [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2008, 29: 238-400.

企业技术知识基础多元度对创新绩效的影响—基于中国电子信息企业的实证分析

The influence of technological variety of knowledge base on the innovative performance: A test in Chinese electrical & electronic industry

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	蒋启蒙, 朱雪忠, 滕子优. 技术锁定述评：知识框架与未来展望[J]. 科研管理, 2023, 44(6): 17-28.
[2]	杨湘浩叶旭刘云王小黎. 专利商业化中隐性知识共享动态演化博弈研究[J]. 科研管理, 2023, 44(6): 154-164.
[3]	俞荣建赵一智项丽瑶. 芯片技术国际依赖网络结构及其演化[J]. 科研管理, 2023, 44(5): 70-84.
[4]	陈凌云, 罗倩, 钱海荣, 王楠. 渐进式跨国并购与知识转移效果的关系研究——以鸣志电器为例[J]. 科研管理, 2023, 44(5): 105-112.
[5]	王丽平赵丽洁. 数字经济下专利池对扩展适应的影响机制研究[J]. 科研管理, 2023, 44(5): 166-173.
[6]	苏世彬陈玉琼李广培. 专利风险感知对技术创业绩效影响研究——基于组织控制与机会识别的中介作用[J]. 科研管理, 2023, 44(3): 112-122.
[7]	黄宗琪, 乔永忠. 基于审查效率的高收益专利审查周期影响因素研究[J]. 科研管理, 2023, 44(3): 133-141.
[8]	张玉蓉吴文飞. 标准必要专利FRAND许可费确定的影响因素实证研究[J]. 科研管理, 2023, 44(2): 146-155.
[9]	张运生, 赖流滨. 专利联盟对遭受联盟伙伴专利诉讼的影响机制[J]. 科研管理, 2022, 43(9): 149-158.
[10]	任培民赵树然姜文远. 基于结构方程-组套索的复杂专利组合测度研究[J]. 科研管理, 2022, 43(9): 159-168.
[11]	李静怡刘瑶孙潇菲. 海外研发中心促进母公司创新绩效了吗？[J]. 科研管理, 2022, 43(8): 148-156.
[12]	张米尔任腾飞刘喜美. 技术内卷的测度：方法研究与案例分析[J]. 科研管理, 2022, 43(7): 45-52.
[13]	杨阳刘文飞丁堃. 高校专利技术转移绩效评价指标构建及实证[J]. 科研管理, 2022, 43(7): 189-199.
[14]	张爽陈晨. 创新氛围对创新绩效的影响——知识吸收能力的中介作用[J]. 科研管理, 2022, 43(6): 113-120.
[15]	张雪张志强. 专利知识吸收和扩散演化规律及影响研究[J]. 科研管理, 2022, 43(6): 160-169.