企业技术知识基础多元度对创新绩效的影响&mdash;基于中国电子信息企业的实证分析

科研管理 ›› 2015, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (5) : 1-9.

论文

企业技术知识基础多元度对创新绩效的影响—基于中国电子信息企业的实证分析

刘岩¹, 蔡虹¹, 向希尧²

作者信息 +

The influence of technological variety of knowledge base on the innovative performance: A test in Chinese electrical & electronic industry

Liu Yan¹, Cai Hong¹, Xiang Xiyao²

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

基于54家中国电子信息企业2001年至2011年的数据,利用面板数据模型,研究了企业技术知识基础多元度与创新绩效之间的关系,并考察了企业知识吸收能力对二者间关系的影响。研究发现企业技术知识基础相关多元度与技术创新绩效正相关;而技术知识基础非相关多元度与企业技术创新绩效间呈倒U型关系。同时,企业吸收能力对技术知识基础多元度与企业技术创新绩效之间的关系有显著的调节作用。

Abstract

Based on the data of 54 firms from the Chinese electrical & electronic industry from 2001 to 2011, and using the panel data model, this paper examines the relationship between variety of the knowledge base, absorptive capacity and the innovative performance. The results show the related variety of knowledge base has a significant positive influence on firms' innovative performance, while a U-shaped relationship is found between the unrelated variety of knowledge base and innovative performance. And the absorptive capacity has a significant meditative effect on the relationship between variety of knowledge base and the firms' innovative performance.

导出引用

刘岩, 蔡虹, 向希尧. 企业技术知识基础多元度对创新绩效的影响—基于中国电子信息企业的实证分析[J]. 科研管理. 2015, 36(5): 1-9

Liu Yan, Cai Hong, Xiang Xiyao. The influence of technological variety of knowledge base on the innovative performance: A test in Chinese electrical & electronic industry[J]. Science Research Management. 2015, 36(5): 1-9

中图分类号： F273.1

参考文献

[1] Cohen, W., Levinthal. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation [J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1990, 35: 128-152. [2] Kogut, B., Zander, U. Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology [J]. Organization Science, 1992, 3:383-397. [3] Jaffe, A. B. Characterizing the technological position of firms, with application to quantifying technological opportunity and research spillovers [J]. Research Policy, 1989, 18: 87-97. [4] Pisano, G. Learning-before-doing in the development of new process technology [J]. Research Policy, 1996, (25):1097-1119. [5] Lin, B. W., Chen, C. J., Wu, H. L. Patent portfolio diversity, technology strategy, and firm value[J] IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 2006, 53(1): 17-26. [6] Quintana-Garica, C., Benavides-Velasco, C. A. Innovative competence, exploration and exploitation: The influence of technological diversification [J]. Research Policy, 2008, 37: 492-507. [7] Cantwell, J., Piscitello, L. Accumulating technological competence:Its changing impact on corporate diversification and internationalization [J]. Industrial and Corporate Change, 2000, 9: 21-51. [8] Zhang, J., Baden-Fuller, C. The influence of technological knowledge base and organizational structure on technology collaboration [J]. Journal of Management Studies, 2010, 47 (4): 679-704. [9] Chen, Y. S., Chang, K. C. Using the entropy-based patent measure to explore the influences of related and unrelated technological diversification upon technological competences and firm performance [J]. Scientometrics , 2012, 90: 825-841. [10] Barney, J. B. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage [J]. Journal of Management, 1991, 17: 99-120. [11] Prahalad, C. K., Hamel, G. The core competence of the corporation [J]. Harvard Business Review, 1990, 68: 79-91. [12] Leten, B., Belderbos, R., Van Looy, B. Technological diversification, coherence, and performance of firms [J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2007, 24: 567-579. [13] Chen, Y. S., Chang, K. C. Using the entropy-based patent measure to explore the influences of related and unrelated technological diversification upon technological competences and firm performance [J]. Scientometrics , 2012, 90: 825-841. [14] Krafft, J., Quatraro, F. and Saviotti, P.P. The knowledge-base evolution in biotechnology: A social network analysis [J]. Economics of Innovative and New Technology, 2011, 20(5): 445-475. [15] George, G., Kotha R., Zheng Y.F.. Entry into insular domains: A longitudinal study of knowledge structuration and innovation in biotechnology firms [J]. Journal of Management Studies, 2008, 45(8): 1448-1474. [16] Yayavaram, S, Ahuja. Decomposability in knowledge structures and its impact on the usefulness of inventions and knowledge-base malleability [J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2008, 53: 333-362. [17] Miller, D.J. Technological diversity, related diversification, and firm performance. [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2006, 27: 601-619. [18] Ahuja, G., Katila, R. Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms: A longitudinal study [J]..Strategic Management Journal, 2001, 22: 197-220. [19] Rothaermel, F.T., Deeds, D.L. Exploration and exploitation alliances in biotechnology: A system of new product development [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2004, 25(3): 201-221. [20] Mukherji, N, Silberman, J. Absorptive capacity, knowledge flows, an innovation in US. metropolitan areas [J]. Journal of Regional Science, 2013, 53(3): 392-417. [21] Volberda, H.W., Foss, N.J., Lyles, M.A. Perspective-absorbing the concept of absorptive capacity: How to realize Its potential in the organization field [J]. Organization Science, 2010, 21 (4): 931-951. [22] Cameron, A.C., Trivedi, P. Regression analysis of count data [M]: Cambridge University Press, 2013. [23] Li, J.J., Poppo, Zhou. Do managerial ties in China always produce value? Competition, uncertainty, and domestics vs. foreign firms [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2008, 29: 238-400.