生产技术异质性、二氧化碳排放与绩效损失—基于共同前沿的国际比较

科研管理 ›› 2014, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (10): 41-48.

生产技术异质性、二氧化碳排放与绩效损失—基于共同前沿的国际比较

王群伟^1,2, 周鹏², 周德群²

1. 苏州大学商学院, 江苏苏州 215021;
2. 南京航空航天大学能源软科学研究中心, 江苏南京 211106

收稿日期:2013-05-09 修回日期:2014-03-20 出版日期:2014-10-25 发布日期:2014-10-23
作者简介:王群伟（1983-），男，江苏苏州人，苏州大学商学院副教授，研究方向：能源经济与二氧化碳减排政策。
周鹏（1978-），男，山东诸城人，南京航空航天大学能源软科学研究中心，教授，博士生导师，研究方向：可持续发展评价。
周德群（1963-），男，江苏盐城人，南京航空航天大学能源软科学研究中心，教授，博士生导师，研究方向：能源软科学。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金（71203151，71273005）；中国博士后基金（2012M510139，2013T60561）；江苏省社科基金（12GLC008）；教育部博士点基金（20123218110028）；江苏省高校哲学社会科学重点研究基地重大项目（2010JDXM012）。

Heterogeneity of production technology, carbon dioxide emission and performance lose: An international comparison based on meta-frontier

Wang Qunwei^1,2, Zhou Peng², Zhou Dequn²

1. Business School, Soochow University, Suzhou 215021, Jiangsu, China;
2. Research Center for Soft Energy Science, Nanjing University of Aeronautics & Astronautics, Nanjing 211106, Jiangsu, China

Received:2013-05-09 Revised:2014-03-20 Online:2014-10-25 Published:2014-10-23

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 考虑到二氧化碳排放国之间普遍存在的生产技术的异质性，本文利用共同前沿和非径向DEA方法提出了一种新的二氧化碳排放绩效评价指标，并实现了对二氧化碳排放绩效损失来源的分解。对58个国家和地区1995-2007年二氧化碳排放绩效及其损失状况的实证研究表明：以共同前沿为评价基准时各国各地区的二氧化碳排放绩效均不大于以组别前沿为参照时的情形，但显示了最佳生产技术条件了最大的绩效改善潜力；欧洲二氧化碳排放的绩效表现好于美洲和亚洲，同时，亚洲、欧洲和美洲的技术差距比呈现不同走势；生产技术差距和管理无效都是导致二氧化碳排放绩效损失的来源，并在总体上显示出后者明显高于前者的特征；尽管二氧化碳排放绩效在整体上已有所改善，但在现有的投入约束下潜在的二氧化碳强度约是实际数值的一半，减排任务依然艰巨。

关键词: 二氧化碳, 绩效分解, 生产技术, 共同前沿函数

Abstract: Considering the heterogeneity of production technology, this paper proposes a new CO₂ emission performance index with meta-frontier and non-radial DEA. The performance lose is also decomposed theoretically. Based on this, the CO₂ emission performance in 58 emitters worldwide is measured for the 1995-2007 period. The conclusion includes:(1) The CO₂ emission performance is less, when meta-frontier is used as the basis, than that of group frontier. However, it can indicate the most potential to improve performance under the best technology. (2)The average CO₂ emission performance of European is better than America and Europe. Technology gap ratio in Asia, Europe and America demonstrate three different trends. (3) Technology gap and ineffective management both result in loss of CO₂ emission performance. However, the latter one is obviously higher than the former one on the whole. (4)Though CO₂ emission performance has been improved slowly, the potential carbon intensity is only the half of the actual, thus the task of emission reduction is still huge.

Key words: carbon dioxide, performance decomposition, production technology, meta-frontier

中图分类号:

F124.6

王群伟, 周鹏, 周德群. 生产技术异质性、二氧化碳排放与绩效损失—基于共同前沿的国际比较[J]. 科研管理, 2014, 35(10): 41-48.

Wang Qunwei, Zhou Peng, Zhou Dequn. Heterogeneity of production technology, carbon dioxide emission and performance lose: An international comparison based on meta-frontier[J]. Science Research Management, 2014, 35(10): 41-48.

参考文献

[1] Wang C, Chen J,Zou J.Decomposition of energy-related CO₂ emission in China:1957–2000[J].Energy,2005,30(1):73-83. [2] Fan Y, Liu L C,Wu G.,Tsai H T,Wei Y M.Changes in carbon intensity in China:Empirical findings from 1980–2003[J].Ecological Economics,2007,62(3):683-691. [3] 何建坤,苏明山. 应对全球气候变化下的碳生产率分析[J].中国软科学,2009(10):32-37. [4] Jobert T, Karanfil F,Tykhonenko A.Convergence of per capita carbon dioxide emissions in the EU:Legend or reality?[J].Energy Economics,2010,32(6):1364-1373. [5] 王文举,向其凤. 国际贸易中的隐含碳排放核算及责任分配[J].中国工业经济,2011(10):56-64. [6] Mielnik O, Goldemberg J.The evolution of the “carbonization index” in developing countries [J].Energy Policy,1999,27(5):307-308. [7] Ang B W. Is the energy intensity a less useful indicator than the carbon factor in the study of climate change? [J] Energy Policy,1999,27(15):943-946. [8] Sun J W. The decrease of CO₂ emission intensity is decarbonization at national and global levels [J].Energy Policy,2005,33(8):975-978. [9] 何建坤,刘滨. 作为温室气体排放衡量指标的碳排放强度分析[J].清华大学学报:自然科学版,2004,44(6):740-743. [10] 金碚. 资源与环境约束下的中国工业发展[J].中国工业经济,2005(4):5-14. [11] Zhang Z Q, Qu J S,Zeng J J.A Quantitative comparison and analysis on the assessment indicators of greenhouse gases emission [J].Journal of Geographical Sciences,2008,18(4):387-399. [12] Ramanathan R. Combining indicators of energy consumption and CO₂ emissions:A cross-country comparison [J].International Journal of Global Energy Issues,2002,17(3):214-227. [13] 史丹. 中国能源效率的地区差异与节能潜力分析[J].中国工业经济,2006(10):49-58. [14] Zhou P, Ang B W,Han J Y.Total factor carbon emission performance:A malmquist index analysis [J].Energy Economics,2010,32(1):194-201. [15] 刘明磊,朱雷, 范英.我国省级碳排放绩效评价及边际减排成本估计:基于非参数距离函数方法[J].中国软科学,2011(3):106-114. [16] 王群伟, 周德群,周鹏.区域二氧化碳排放绩效及减排潜力研究——以我国主要工业省区为例[J].科学学研究,2011,29(6):868-875. [17] Oh D H. A metafrontier approach for measuring an environmentally sensitive productivity growth index [J].Energy Economics,2010,32(1):146-157. [18] O'Donnell C J, Griffiths W E.Estimating state-contingent production frontiers [J].American Journal of Agricultural Economics,2006,88(1):249-266. [19] Hayami Y. Sources of agricultural productivity gap among selected countries [J].American Journal of Agricultural Economics,1969,51(3):564-575. [20] 王群伟,周鹏, 周德群.我国二氧化碳排放绩效的动态变化、区域差异及影响因素[J].中国工业经济,2010(1):45-54. [21] Wang Q W, Zhou P,Zhou D Q.Efficiency measurement with carbon dioxide emissions:The case of China [J].Applied Energy,2012,90(1):161-166. [22] Chung Y H, Fre R,Grosskopf S.Productivity and undesirable outputs:A directional distance function Approach [J].Journal of Environmental Management,1997,51(3):229-240. [23] Chiu C R, Liou J L,Wu P I,Fang C L.Decomposition of the environmental inefficiency of the meta-frontier with undesirable output [J].Energy Economics,2012,34(5):1392-1399.