动态环境下企业战略柔性与创新绩效关系研究

科研管理 ›› 2014, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (1): 1-8.

• 论文 • 下一篇

动态环境下企业战略柔性与创新绩效关系研究

范志刚¹, 吴晓波²

1. 杭州师范大学阿里巴巴商学院, 浙江杭州 310036;
2. 浙江大学管理学院, 浙江杭州 310058

收稿日期:2012-07-06 修回日期:2013-06-05 出版日期:2014-01-25 发布日期:2014-01-25
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金重点项目(批准号：71232013;起止时间： 2012.1-2016.12); 浙江省自然科学基金 (批准号：Q12G02015;起止时间：2012.1-2014.12); 浙江省哲学社会科学规划项目(批准号：12JCGL10YB;起止时间：2012.07-2014.06)。

Empirical research on strategic flexibility and innovation performance under dynamic environment

Fan Zhigang¹, Wu Xiaobo²

1. Alibaba Business School, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou 310036, Zhejiang, China;
2. Management School, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, Zhejiang, China

Received:2012-07-06 Revised:2013-06-05 Online:2014-01-25 Published:2014-01-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 动态环境中战略柔性对企业创新绩效具有重要影响，但对其具体作用机制现有文献还缺乏深入剖析。本文从主动与被动两个角度出发，识别了前瞻型战略柔性与反应型战略柔性，在此基础上引入环境变化速度和环境变化难以预测性为调节变量，提出并验证了两种战略柔性对企业创新绩效的不同作用机制。对长三角制造业企业的实证研究表明，前瞻型与反应型战略柔性均对企业创新绩效有正向影响，但其作用效果和机制存在显著差异：总体来看，前瞻型战略柔性对企业创新绩效的效果更明显;环境变化越迅速，前瞻型战略柔性对企业创新绩效的正向作用越明显;环境变化难以预测性越高，反应型战略柔性对企业创新绩效的正向影响作用越明显。这些结论深化和拓展了战略柔性理论，也为企业的战略实践提供了有益参考。

关键词: 前瞻型战略柔性, 反应型战略柔性, 创新绩效, 环境动态性

Abstract: Strategic flexibility in a dynamic environment has an important impact on enterprises' innovation performance, but an in-depth exploration still lacks in the present literature as to its specific working mechanism. This paper examines the effects of strategic flexibility on innovation performance by incorporating proactive and reactive strategic flexibility into the framework of strategic flexibility, and the moderating effects of environmental change. By conducting an empirical study of 228 sample Chinese manufacturing firms, the results show that: (1) Both proactive and reactive strategic flexibility have positive effects on innovation performance; (2) Rate of environmental change positively moderates the relationship between proactive strategic flexibility and innovation performance, and negatively moderates the relationship between reactive strategic flexibility and innovation performance; (3) Turbulence of environmental change positively moderates the relationship between reactive strategic flexibility and innovation performance. The results indicate that firms facing fast rate of environmental change should pay more attention to proactive strategic flexibility, while facing high turbulence of environmental change should pay more attention to reactive strategic flexibility. These results have not only deepened and broadened the theory of strategic flexibility, but also provided helpful references for the strategic practices of enterprises.

Key words: proactive strategic flexibility, reactive strategic flexibility, innovation performance, environmental dynamics

中图分类号:

F279.23

范志刚, 吴晓波. 动态环境下企业战略柔性与创新绩效关系研究[J]. 科研管理, 2014, 35(1): 1-8.

Fan Zhigang, Wu Xiaobo. Empirical research on strategic flexibility and innovation performance under dynamic environment[J]. Science Research Management, 2014, 35(1): 1-8.

参考文献

[1] Nadkarni, S. and V. Narayanan. Strategy frames, strategic flexibility and firm performance: the moderating role of industry clockspeed. Academy of Management, 2004.383-397.
[2] Harrigan, K., Exit barriers and vertical integration [J]. The Academy of Management Journal, 1985. 28(3): 686-697.
[3] Matusik, S. and C. Hill, The utilization of contingent work, knowledge creation, and competitive advantage [J]. The Academy of Management Review, 1998. 23(4): 680-697.
[4] Hatch, J. and J. Zweig, Strategic flexibility: The key to growth [J]. Ivey Business Journal, 2001. 65(4): 44-47.
[5] Tao, W.T.C. and J. Rongxia, An Empirical Study on the Effect of Strategic Flexibility on Enterprise Performance [J]. Chinese Journal of Management, 2011. 08(3):78-91.
[6] Zhang, M., Information systems, strategic flexibility and firm performance: An empirical investigation [J]. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 2005. 22(3): 163-184.
[7] Zhou, K.Z. and F. Wu, Technological capability, strategic flexibility, and product innovation [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2010. 31(5): 547-561.
[8] Evans, J., Strategic flexibility for high technology manoeuvres: A conceptual framework [J]. Journal of Management Studies, 1991. 28(1): 69-89.
[9] Johnson, J., et al., Market-focused strategic flexibility: conceptual advances and an integrative model [J]. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 2003. 31(1): 74-89.
[10] Garcia, R., R. Calantone, and R. Levine, The role of knowledge in resource allocation to exploration versus exploitation in technologically oriented organizations [J]. Decision Sciences, 2003. 34(2): 323-349.
[11] Golden, W. and P. Powell, Towards a definition of flexibility: in search of the Holy Grail? [J]. Omega, 2000. 28(4): 373-384.
[12] Sutcliffe, K. and A. Zaheer, Uncertainty in the transaction environment: an empirical test [J]. Strategic management journal, 1998. 19(1): 1-23.
[13] Cooper, R. and S. Edgett, Maximizing Productivity in Product Innovation [J]. Research-Technology Management, 2008. 51(2): 47-58.
[14] Griffith, D., G. Yalcinkaya, and R. Calantone, Do marketing capabilities consistently mediate effects of firm intangible capital on performance across institutional environments? [J]. Journal of World Business, 2010(45):217-227..
[15] Moorman, C. and A. Miner, Organizational improvisation and organizational memory [J]. The Academy of Management Review, 1998. 23(4): 698-723.
[16] Dess, G. and D. Beard, Dimensions of organizational task environments [J]. Administrative science quarterly, 1984. 29(1): 52-73.
[17] Fine, C., Clockspeed: Winning industry control in the age of temporary advantage[M]. 1998: Basic Books.17-19.
[18] Buganza, T., C. Dell'Era, and R. Verganti, Exploring the relationships between product development and environmental turbulence: the case of mobile TLC services [J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2009. 26(3): 308-321.
[19] Weiss, A. and J. Heide, The nature of organizational search in high technology markets [J]. Journal of Marketing Research, 1993. 30(2): 220-233.
[20] Koka, B., R. Madhavan, and J. Prescott, The evolution of interfirm networks: Environmental effects on patterns of network change [J]. Academy of management review, 2006. 31(3): 721-734.
[21] Schreyogg, G. and M. Kliesch-Eberl, How dynamic can organizational capabilities be? Towards a dual-process model of capability dynamization [J]. Strategic management journal, 2007. 28(9): 913-928.
[22] Churchill Jr, G., A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs [J]. Journal of Marketing Research, 1979(01): 64-73.
[23] Hinkin, T., A brief tutorial on the development of measures for use in survey questionnaires [J]. Organizational Research Methods, 1998. 1(1): 104-121.
[24] Karri, R., Strategic flexibility and firm performance, Washington State University. 2001.45-76.
[25] Jaworski, B. and A. Kohli, Market orientation: antecedents and consequences [J]. The Journal of Marketing, 1993. 57(3): 53-70.
[26] Lane, P.J., J.E. Salk, and M.A. Lyles, Absorptive capacity, learning, and performance in international joint ventures [J]. Strategic management journal, 2001. 22(12): 1139-1161.
[27] 温忠麟, 侯., 张雷, 调节效应与中介效应的比较和应用[J]. 心理学报, 2005. 37(2): 268-274.
[28] Malone, T.W., Modeling coordination in organizations and markets [J]. Management science, 1987(03): 1317-1332.
[29] Paik, Y., The impact of strategic flexibility on business performance in the international business environment, University of Washington. 1991.72-79.
[30] Celuch, K., G. Murphy, and S. Callaway, More bang for your buck: Small firms and the importance of aligned information technology capabilities and strategic flexibility [J]. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 2007. 17(2): 187-197.
[31] Narver, J.C., S.F. Slater, and D.L. MacLachlan, Responsive and Proactive Market Orientation and New-Product Success [J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2004. 21(5): 334-347.

动态环境下企业战略柔性与创新绩效关系研究

Empirical research on strategic flexibility and innovation performance under dynamic environment

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	刘微微金英哲毕克新. 多维邻近性、创新开放度与合作创新绩效——基于网络演化视角[J]. 科研管理, 2023, 44(8): 162-172.
[2]	马增林, 于璟婷, 王磊. 远程工作对远程员工创新绩效的双刃剑效应[J]. 科研管理, 2023, 44(8): 173-182.
[3]	赵富强胡伟陈耘张秋红. 整合共享型人力资源实践与个体创新绩效——知识交换与目标导向的作用[J]. 科研管理, 2023, 44(8): 183-192.
[4]	肖艳红张刚庞立君马晶梅. 网络双重嵌入与数字创新搜寻战略匹配研究[J]. 科研管理, 2023, 44(7): 134-143.
[5]	吴航陈劲. 网络伙伴多样化的影响因素与创新情景[J]. 科研管理, 2023, 44(6): 137-143.
[6]	赵胜民于星慧. 创新失败对企业再创新绩效的影响：高管薪酬激励的调节作用[J]. 科研管理, 2023, 44(6): 183-192.
[7]	张秀峰胡贝贝陈伟张树静. FDI数量、质量与国家高新区创新绩效[J]. 科研管理, 2023, 44(5): 54-61.
[8]	刘欣萌李随成张彩林王祥. 伙伴关系对企业创新绩效的影响：有调节的中介模型[J]. 科研管理, 2023, 44(4): 154-163.
[9]	齐丽云, 王佳威, 刘旸, 吕正纲. 高管团队异质性对企业绿色创新绩效影响研究[J]. 科研管理, 2023, 44(4): 175-184.
[10]	王伟楠王凯严子淳. 区域高质量发展对“专精特新”中小企业创新绩效的影响机制研究[J]. 科研管理, 2023, 44(2): 32-44.
[11]	王海花杜梅刘钊成. 高校知识网络对产学协同创新绩效的影响研究[J]. 科研管理, 2023, 44(2): 116-126.
[12]	周楠, 杨竹. 制度距离与中国企业跨国并购创新绩效[J]. 科研管理, 2023, 44(2): 81-88.
[13]	李梓涵昕. 创新漏斗视角下开放性和独占性机制对企业创新绩效的影响研究[J]. 科研管理, 2022, 43(9): 99-108.
[14]	孟凡生徐野赵刚. “智能+”对制造企业创新绩效的影响机制研究[J]. 科研管理, 2022, 43(9): 109-118.
[15]	芮正云, 马喜芳. 反思性知识重构、企业即兴能力及其创新效应[J]. 科研管理, 2022, 43(9): 176-184.