组织冗余与公司绩效关系研究 —治理制度的调节作用

科研管理 ›› 2012, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (9): 78-86.

组织冗余与公司绩效关系研究 —治理制度的调节作用

陈晓红, 王思颖

中南大学商学院,湖南长沙 410083

收稿日期:2011-04-28 修回日期:2011-09-05 出版日期:2012-09-27 发布日期:2012-09-20
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金创新群体科学基金项目(70921001/G0104, 2010-2012);教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目(10JZD0020)。

The relationship between organizational redundancy and firm performance—A modificatory role of governance institution

Chen Xiaohong, Wang Siying

School of Business, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China

Received:2011-04-28 Revised:2011-09-05 Online:2012-09-27 Published:2012-09-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本文以我国制造业上市公司为样本,探讨组织冗余与公司绩效之间的关系,并检验治理制度对二者关系的调节作用。结论表明,在中国转型经济情境下,组织冗余与企业绩效之间存在倒U型的关系,一定的冗余资源有利于企业应对外部环境压力以提升企业绩效,而过量的冗余资源由于其高额成本及代理问题对企业绩效造成损害。同时,随着企业内部治理制度的不断完善,治理效率和治理水平的不断提高,组织冗余对企业绩效的影响将减弱。

关键词: 组织冗余, 治理制度, 公司绩效

Abstract: Through the empirical study on Chinese manufacturing companies, the relationship between organizational redundancy and firm performance is explored, and the moderating role of governance institution on it is verified. Conclusion shows that the inverse U-shaped curves is able to describe the relationship, and some redundant resources, which are good for enterprises copying with the external circumstance pressures, would help improving firm performance, however too much redundant resources would finally lead to excessive costs and damage the performance. Meanwhile, with the improvements of micro institutions-corporate governance, management level, and management efficiency, the organizational redundancy would have less influence on the firm performance.

Key words: organizational redundancy, governance institution, firm performance

中图分类号:

270.3

陈晓红, 王思颖. 组织冗余与公司绩效关系研究 —治理制度的调节作用[J]. 科研管理, 2012, 33(9): 78-86.

Chen Xiaohong, Wang Siying. The relationship between organizational redundancy and firm performance—A modificatory role of governance institution[J]. Science Research Management, 2012, 33(9): 78-86.

参考文献

[1] 朱高峰,郭重庆,徐性初等.全球化时代的中国制造[M].北京:社会科学出版社,2003.
[2] 方润生,陆振华,王长林等.不同类型冗余资源的来源及其特征:基于决策方式视角的实证分析[J].预测,2009(5):59-64.
[3] Cyert R, March J.A behavioral theory of the firm [M]. Englewood Cliffs,NJ: Prentice-Hall. 1963.
[4] Bourgeois,L.J.On the Measurement of Organizational Slack[J].Academy of Management Review,1981,6.
[5] Wally,S.,Chen,M.F.Effects of firm performance organizational slack, and debt on entry:A study of ten emerging product markets in USA[J].Industry and Innovation,2000,7(2):169-183
[6] Singh J V. Performance, slack, and risk taking in organizational decision making[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1986(3): 562-585.
[7] Thompson J D. Organizations in action[M].New York:McGraw-Hill,1967.
[8] Tan J, Pen M. Organizational slack and firm performance during economic transitions: Two studies from an emerging economy[J]. Strategic Management Journal,2003(24):1249-1264.
[9] Mata J , Portugal P, GuimaraesP,The survival of new plants: Start-up conditions and post-entry evolution [J].International Journal of Industrial Organization,1995,13(4):459-481 .
[10] Jensen M C, Meckling W H. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency cost, and ownership structure[J]. Journal of Financial Economics,1976(3):305-360.
[11] Leonard-Barton, D. Core competencies and core rigidities: A paradox in new product development[J]Strategic Management Journal,1992.(13):111-125.
[12] Bromiley P. Testing a causal model of corporate risk taking and performance[J]. Academy of Management Journal,1991(1):37-59.
[13] Ju M. and H. Zhao. Behind Organi- zational Slack and Firm Performance in China The Moderating Roles of Ownership and Competitive Intensity[J]. Asia Pacific Journal of Management,2009(26):4.
[14] Zhongfeng Su,En Xie & Yuan Li. Organi- zational slack and firm performance during institutional transitions[J].Asia Pacific Journal of Management,2009(26):75-91.
[15] Cheng JLC, Kesner I F. Organizational slack and response to environmental shifts: The impact of resource allocation patterns[J]. Journal of Management,1997(1):1-18.
[16] Khanna, T.& Palepu, K.Is group affiliation profitable in emerging markets? An analysis of diversified Indian business groups[J]. Journal of Finance, 2000(55):867 892.
[17] 白重恩,刘俏,陆洲等.中国上市公司治理结构的实证研究[J] 经济研究,2005(2):82- 91.
[18] 陈晓红,尹哲,曾江洪.中小企业董事会治理水平与成长性关系之研究——基于沪深中小上市公司的经验分析[J]. 华东师范大学学报,2007(5):115-120.
[19] Hu,H.W.,Tam,O.K.,&Tan,M.G.-S. Internal governance mechanisms and firm performance in China[J].Asia Pacific Journa lof Management.2009.
[20] Finkelstein,S.,&D’Aveni,R. CEO duality as a double-edged sword: How boards of directors balance entrenchment avoidance and unity of command[J]Academy of Management Journal, 1994(37): 1079-1108.
[21] Pfeffer J, Salancik G R. The external control of organizations[M]. New York, Harper Row,1978.
[22] Chen,Y.Y, &Y oung,M.N. Cross-border mergers and acquisitions by Chinese listed companies :A principal perspective.[J]. Asia Pacific Journal of Management,2009.
[23] 王跃堂,赵子夜,魏晓雁. 董事会的独立性是否影响公司绩效? [J].经济研究,2006(7):102.
[24] 蒋春燕,赵曙明.组织冗余与绩效的关系:中国上市公司的时间序列实证研究[J].管理世界, 2004(5):108-115.
[25] Boyd, B.K. CEO duality and firm performance:A contingency model [J].Strategic Management Journal, 1995(16):301–312.
[26] Peng,M.W.,Zhang,S.,&Li,X.CEO duality and firm performance during China’s institutional transitions[J].Management and Organization Review, 2007(3):205–225.
[27] 楼润平,薛声家.ERP与公司盈利绩效:来自沪深上市公司的经验证据[J].系统工程理论与实践,2011(8):1461-1469.
[28] 邹国庆,倪昌红.经济转型中的组织冗余与企业绩效:制度环境的调节作用[J].中国工业经济,2010(11):120-129.
[29] 郭立新,陈传明.组织冗余与企业技术创新绩效的关系研究—基于中国制造业上市公司面板数据的实证分析[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2010(11)52-60.