技术特征对企业技术获取方式的影响 —基于中小民营企业的实证研究

科研管理 ›› 2012, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (9): 40-46.

技术特征对企业技术获取方式的影响 —基于中小民营企业的实证研究

汤建影

南京航空航天大学经济与管理学院,江苏南京 210016

收稿日期:2011-01-04 修回日期:2011-07-29 出版日期:2012-09-27 发布日期:2012-09-20
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(70702015)(2008.1-2010.12);中国博士后基金项目(20090451208)(2009.3-2011.3);江苏省博士后基金项目(0901122C)(2009.4-2011.4);南京航空航天大学哲学社会科学基金项目(V0682-091)(2008.1-2010.12)。

Technology characteristics vs. technology acquisition modes:An empirical analysis on small and medium-sized private firms in China

Tang Jianying

College of Economics and Management, Nanjing University of Aeronauticsand Astronautics, Nanjing 210016, China

Received:2011-01-04 Revised:2011-07-29 Online:2012-09-27 Published:2012-09-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本文在总结企业技术获取相关研究的基础上,分析了技术研发成本、技术不确定性、技术距离、技术生命周期等变量对民营企业技术获取方式的影响,并基于245家中小型民营企业的问卷调查数据进行了实证分析。结果显示:当技术不确定性较高,或者技术处于生命周期的中期时,民营企业倾向于内部研发;当技术的研发成本或不确定性较高时,民营企业倾向于合作研发;当技术的研发成本、不确定性较低时,或者技术距离较大、处于生命周期的后期时,民营企业倾向于外部购买;技术距离与企业的合作研发倾向之间,以及技术生命周期与企业的内部研发倾向之间呈倒U型关系。

关键词: 技术获取, 研发成本, 技术不确定性, 技术距离, 技术生命周期

Abstract: The studies related to the technology acquisitions of private enterprises are reviewed; and the influence of variables, such as R&D costs, uncertainty, distance, and lifecycle of technology, have on the acquisition approaches adopted is analyzed. An empirical analysis based on questionnaire data collected from 245 small and medium-sized private enterprises in China is conducted. The results indicate that when technology uncertainty is relatively high, or technology is in the intermediate stage of its lifecycle, enterprises tend to employ internal R&D. When R&D costs or uncertainty are relatively high, or technology distance is moderate, enterprises tend to pursue cooperative R&D. When technology R&D and uncertainty are relatively low and the technology distance is large, or the technology is in the late stage of its lifecycle, enterprises tend to have external purchase. In addition, there is a converse U-shape correlation between technology distance and cooperative R&D and between technology life cycle and internal R&D of enterprises.

Key words: technology acquisition, technology R&D cost, technology uncertainty, technology distance, technology life cycle

中图分类号:

F273.1

汤建影. 技术特征对企业技术获取方式的影响 —基于中小民营企业的实证研究[J]. 科研管理, 2012, 33(9): 40-46.

Tang Jianying. Technology characteristics vs. technology acquisition modes:An empirical analysis on small and medium-sized private firms in China[J]. Science Research Management, 2012, 33(9): 40-46.

参考文献

[1] Lambe C.J., Spekman R.E. Alliances, external technology acquisition, and discontinuous technological change [J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 1997, 14:102-116.
[2] Duarrni T.S., Forbes S.M., Broadfoot C. Managing the technology acquisition process [J]. Technovation, 1998, 18(8/9):523-528.
[3] Cho D., Yu P. Influential factors in the choice of technology acquisition mode: an empirical analysis of small and medium size firms in Korean telecommunication industry [J]. Technovation, 2000, 20(2):691 704.
[4] Hemmert M. The influence of institutional factors on the technology acquisition performance of high-tech firms: survey results from Germany and Japan [J]. Research Policy, 2004, 33(6–7):1019–1039.
[5] Jones G.K., Lanctot A., Teegen H.J. Determinants and performance impacts of external technology acquisition [J]. Journal of Business Venturing, 2000, 16:255-283.
[6] 崔雪松, 王玲. 企业技术获取的方式及选择依据[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2005(2): 141-144.
[7] 彭新敏, 吴晓波, 卫冬苇. 我国IT企业新产品开发中的技术获取模式研究[J]. 科学学研究, 2007, 25(5): 927-934.
[8] 彭新敏, 吴晓波, 卫冬苇. 基于技术能力增长的企业技术获取模式研究[J]. 科研管理,2008,29(3): 28-34.
[9] Shiu-Wan Hung, Ruei-Hung Tang. Factors affecting the choice of technology acquisition mode: An empirical analysis of the electronic firms of Japan, Korea and Taiwan[J]. Technovation, 2008, 28: 551 563.
[10] Yoshikawa T. Technology development and acquisition strategy[J]. International Journal of Technology Management, 2003, 25(6 7): 666 674.
[11] Szulanski G. Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm[J]. Strategic Management Journal, Winter, 1996, 17: 27-43.
[12] Simonin B.L. Ambiguity and the Process of Knowledge Transfer in Strategic Alliances[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1999, 20(7): 595-623.
[13] Teece D.J. Capturing Value from Knowledge Assets: The New Economy, Markets For Know-How, and Intangible Assets[J]. California Management Review, 1998, 40(3): 55-79.
[14] Cummings J.L., Teng B.S. Transferring R&D knowledge: the key factors affecting knowledge transfer success[J]. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 2003,20(1,2): 39-68.
[15] Croisier B. The governance of external research: empirical test of some transaction-cost related factors[J]. R&D Management, 1998, 28(4): 289-298.
[16] 程源, 高建. 企业外部技术获取:机理与案例分析[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2005(1):43-47.
[17] Lowe J., Taylor P. R&D and technology purchase through license agreements: complementary strategies and complementary assets[J]. R&D Management, 1998, 28(4):263-278.
[18] Chiesa V., Manzini R. Organizing for technological collaborations: managerial perspective[J]. R&D Management, 1998, 28(3): 199-212.
[19] Hamel G. Competition for Competence and Inter-Partner Learning Within International Strategic Alliances[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1991, Special issue, 12: 83-103.
[20] Song J., Almeida P., Wu G. Learning-by-Hiring: When is Mobility More Likely to Facilitate Inter-firm Knowledge Transfer? [J]. Management Science, 2003, 49(4): 351-365.
[21] Ford D. Develop your technology strategy [J]. Long Range Planning, 1988, 21: 85-94.
[22] Madhok A. Cost, value and foreign market entry mode: the transaction and the firm[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1997,18: 39-61.
[23] Tyler B., Steensma H. Evaluating technological collaborative opportunities: a cognitive modeling perspective[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1995, 16:43-70.