各主体层次知识资本化模式:多重案例研究

科研管理 ›› 2012, Vol. ›› Issue (8): 72-79,89.

各主体层次知识资本化模式:多重案例研究

卫武¹, 韩翼²

1. 武汉大学经济与管理学院, 湖北武汉 430072;
2. 中南财经政法大学工商管理学院, 湖北武汉 430074

收稿日期:2010-12-03 修回日期:2011-06-21 出版日期:2012-08-27 发布日期:2012-08-15
基金资助:
中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金:动态环境下组织知识转化、知识资本与企业绩效之间的关系研究(1101017),起止时间:2010-2012; 国家自然科学基金项目:发展中国家跨国公司逆向知识转移及其治理机制研究(70872086,起止时间:2009-2011)。

The modes of knowledge capitalization at different main body levels: A study of multiple cases

Wei Wu¹, Han Yi²

1. School of Economics and Management, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China;
2. School of Business Administration, Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, Wuhan 430074, China

Received:2010-12-03 Revised:2011-06-21 Online:2012-08-27 Published:2012-08-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 在个人、团队和组织知识向知识资本的转化过程中,存在许多模式影响着知识资本化的效果,各主体层次知识的资本化模式一直是企业知识管理研究的重点。基于对相关的理论解释和研究命题,本文挑选具有代表性的六个企业作为研究对象,采用多重案例研究方法,通过对这六个企业跨案例的对比分析,验证并识别个人、团队和组织知识资本化模式。其研究结果表明:个人知识资本化的模式包括培训、干中学和教育投资;团队知识资本化的模式包括团队会议、团队规范、团队互动、团队构成;组织知识资本化的模式包括组织支持、组织结构、组织文化、组织制度、信息技术。

关键词: 主体层次, 组织知识, 知识资本, 资本化模式

Abstract: When individual, team, and organizational knowledge is transformed into knowledge capital, many modes will have the influence on the result of knowledge capitalization. Knowledge management research has recently paid more attention to the modes of knowledge capitalization at different main body levels. Based on the theoretical interpretation and propositions, six representative firms are selected as research samples, and multiple cases research method is adopted to validate and identify individual, team, and organizational knowledge capitalized modes by using cross-case comparative analysis. The research findings indicate as follows: (1) Individual knowledge capitalized modes include training, learning by doing, and the investment in education. (2) Team knowledge capitalized modes include team meetings, team norms, team interactions, and team compositions. (3) organizational knowledge capitalized modes include organizational support, organizational structure, organizational culture, organizational institution, and information technology.

Key words: main body level, organizational knowledge, knowledge capital, capitalized mode

中图分类号:

F272.92

卫武, 韩翼. 各主体层次知识资本化模式:多重案例研究[J]. 科研管理, 2012, (8): 72-79,89.

Wei Wu, Han Yi. The modes of knowledge capitalization at different main body levels: A study of multiple cases[J]. Science Research Management, 2012, (8): 72-79,89.

参考文献

[1] Edvinsson, I., Sullivan, P. Developing a Model for Managing Intellectual Capital[J]. European Management Journal, 1996, 14(4): 356-364.
[2] 葛秋萍. 知识资本化的获益机制及影响因子探究[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理,2007(12):162-166.
[3] Polanyi, M. Personal Knowledge: Toward a Post Critical Philosophy[M]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1962.
[4] Cooke, N. J., Salas, E., Cannon-Bowers, J. A., et al. Measuring Team Knowledge[J]. Human Factors, 2000, 42(1): 151-173.
[5] Nonaka, I. The Knowledge-Creating Company[J]. Harvard Business Review, 1991, November-December: 96-104.
[6] Wang, I. M., Shieh, C. J., Wang, F. J. Effect of Human Capital Investment on Organizational Performance[J]. Social Behavior & Personality: An International Journal, 2008, 36(8): 1011-1022.
[7] Mathieu, J. E., Schulze, W. The Influence of Team Knowledge and Formal Plans on Episodic Team Process-Performance Relationships[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2006, 49(3): 605-619.
[8] 赵静杰,张少杰. 知识资本化及其评价指标体系分析[J]. 情报科学,2005,23(9):1314-1320.
[9] 西奥多·W·舒尔茨. 人力资本投资[M]. 北京:商务印书馆,1990.
[10] 贺小刚,沈瑜. 创业型企业的成长:基于企业家团队资本的实证研究[J]. 管理世界,2008(1):82-95.
[11] 赵顺龙,韩濮庚. 基于组织资本的企业战略联盟分析[J]. 江西社会科学,2004(10): 110-114.
[12] Wang, I. M., Shieh, C. J., Wang, F. J. Effect of Human Capital Investment on Organizational Performance[J]. Social Behavior & Personality: An International Journal, 2008, 36(8): 1011-1022.
[13] Tsang, E. W. K. Acquiring Knowledge by Foreign Partners from International Joint Ventures in a Transition Economy: Learning-by-Doing and Learning Myopia[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2002, 23(9): 835-855.
[14] Stewart, T. A. Intellectual Capital: The New Wealth of Organizations[M]. Doubleday/Currency, 1997.
[15] Austin, B. Capitalizing Knowledge: Essays on the History of Business Education in Canada[M]. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2000.
[16] Soller, A. Understanding Knowledge-Sharing Breakdowns: A Meeting of the Quantitative and Qualitative Minds[M]. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2004, 20(3): 212-223.
[17] Mitchell, R., Nicholas, S. Knowledge Creation in Groups: The Value of Cognitive Diversity, Transactive Memory and Open-mindedness Norms[J]. Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 2006, 4(1): 67-74.
[18] 柯江林,孙健敏,石金涛,顾琴轩. 企业R&D团队之社会资本与团队效能关系的实证研究——以知识分享与知识整合为中介变量[J]. 管理世界,2007(3):89-101.
[19] Morone, P., Taylor, R. Knowledge Diffusion Dynamics and Network Properties of Face-To-Face Interactions[J]. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 2004, 14(3): 327-351.
[20] Anand, V., Clark, M. A., Zellmer-Bruhn, M. Team Knowledge Structures: Matching Task to Information Environment[J]. Journal of Managerial Issues, 2003, 15(1): 15-32.
[21] Eisenberger, R., Hungtington, R., Hutchison, S., et al. Perceived Organizational Support[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1986, 87(3): 500-507.
[22] 刘海建,陈传明. 企业组织资本、战略前瞻性与企业绩效:基于中国企业的实证研究[J]. 管理世界,2007(5):83-93.
[23] Grevesen, C. W., Damanpour, F. Performance Implications of Organizational Structure and Knowledge Sharing in Multinational R&D Networks[J]. International Journal of Technology Management, 2007, 38(1/2): 113-136.
[24] Lemon, M., Sahota, P. S. Organizational Culture as a Knowledge Repository for Increased Innovative Capacity[J]. Technovation, 2004, 24(6): 483-498.
[25] 罗珉,王雎. 组织间关系的拓展与演进:基于组织间知识互动的研究[J]. 中国工业经济,2008(1):40-49.
[26] Merchant, K. A., Van der Stede, W. A., Zheng, L. Disciplinary Constraints on the Advancement of Knowledge: The Case of Organizational Incentive Systems[J]. Accounting, Organizations & Society, 2003, 28(2/3): 251-286.
[27] Heinrichs, J. H., Lim, J. S. Model for Organizational Knowledge Creation and Strategic Use of Information[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 2005, 56(6): 620-629.
[28] Eisenhardt, K. M. Building Theories from Case Study Research[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1989, 14(4): 532-550.