国家重大工程项目资源配置行为分析

科研管理 ›› 2012, Vol. ›› Issue (4): 147-154.

国家重大工程项目资源配置行为分析

郭春东^1,2, 黄璐¹, 朱东华¹, 汪雪锋¹

1. 北京理工大学管理与经济学院, 北京 100081;
2. 河北科技进大学经济管理学院, 河北石家庄 050018

收稿日期:2010-09-08 修回日期:2011-03-01 出版日期:2012-04-27 发布日期:2012-04-20
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金重点项目(编号:70639001):科技奥运管理机制、影响评估与信息平台研究,起止时间2006.07-2010.06。

The allocation behavior of national major project resources

Guo Chundong^1,2, Huang Lu¹, Zhu Donghua¹, Wang Xuefeng¹

1. School of Economics and Management, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China;
2. School of Economics and Management, Hebei University of Science and Technology, Shijiazhuang 050018, China

Received:2010-09-08 Revised:2011-03-01 Online:2012-04-27 Published:2012-04-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本文提出基于典型相关分析的国家重大工程科技资源配置行为测度模型,对科技资源配置行为的投入产出边际弹性进行敏感性分析,并以"奥运科技(2008)行动计划"支持的项目数据库中能源环保类分数据库项目数据进行实证分析,结果表明投入指标中科技人力资源的边际弹性远高于科研经费和研发时间的边际弹性,产出指标中报告的边际弹性为负,投入的三个原始变量对于产出指标中论文的边际弹性优于其他指标,并给出相应的建议分别是应注重建立科技供给与需求及时、有效对接的、以政府为主导的多部门联合的组织协调机制,高度重视国际学术交流与合作,以及通过激励和约束机制,引导科研人员发表高水平和高质量的科研论文。

关键词: 重大工程, 资源配置, 典型相关分析, 科技奥运, 知识生产函数

Abstract: A resource-allocation behavior model for the national major projects has been proposed based on canonical correlation analysis method. By taking the projects from two fields-energy and environmental supported by the database of the Olympic science and technology (2008) action plan as example, allocation behavior has been measured and explored according to marginal elasticity between input and output of projects resources derived from the knowledge production function. Results show that the marginal elasticity of human resources in the input indexes is better than that of R&D resource and development time, the report marginal elasticity in the output indexes is negative, and the marginal elasticity of three original input indexes to the papers in output indexes are better than that of other indexes in China. The corresponding suggestions include that (1) a prompt and effective coordination mechanism should be established by the government to link the supply and demand of science and technology; (2) the international academic exchanges and cooperation should be attached great importance; and (3) the incentive mechanism should be set up to inspire researchers produce high standard and quality research papers.

Key words: major project, resources allocation, canonical correlation analysis, high-tech Olympics, knowledge production function

中图分类号:

F204

郭春东, 黄璐, 朱东华, 汪雪锋. 国家重大工程项目资源配置行为分析[J]. 科研管理, 2012, (4): 147-154.

Guo Chundong, Huang Lu, Zhu Donghua, Wang Xuefeng. The allocation behavior of national major project resources[J]. Science Research Management, 2012, (4): 147-154.

参考文献

[1] 高梁, 刘洁. 国家重大工程与国家创新能力[J]. 中国软科学,2005(4):17-22.
[2] Uwe Cantner, Andreas Pyka. Classifying Technology Policy from an Evolutionary Perspective[J]. Research Policy, 2001, 30(5): 759-775.
[3] John A Alic. Postindustrial Technology Policy[J].Research Policy,2001,30(6):873-889.
[4] 江静.中国省际R&D强度差异的决定与比较[J].南京大学学报,2006(3):13-25.
[5] D.Guellec, Van Pottelsberghe. The Impact of Public R&D Expenditure on Business R& D[J]. Economics of Innovation and New Technology,2003,(3):225-243.
[6] Seung-Hoon Yoo.Public R&D Expenditure and Private R&D Expenditure: a Causality Analysis[J]. Applied Economics Letters,2004,11(11):711-714.
[7] Wu, Yonghong. The Effects of State R&D Tax Credits in Stimulating Private R&D Expenditure: A Cross-state Empirical Analysis[J].Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 2005,24(4):785-802.
[8] Pavitt, K., Robson,M., Townsend, J..The Size Distribution of Innovating Firms in the UK: 1945-1983[J]. Journal of Industrial Economics,1987,35(3):297-316..
[9] Odagiri, Hiroyuki. R&D Expenditures, Royalty Payments and Sales Growth in Japanese Manufacturing Corporations [J]. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 1983, 32(1):61-72.
[10] Scholefield, J. H..The Allocation of R&D Resource [J]. R&D Management, 1994, 24(1):91-97.
[11] Matthew Rafferty, Mark Funk. Demand Shocks and Firm-financed R&D Expenditures [J]. Applied Economics, 2004, 36(14):1529-1536.
[12] Katharine Wakelin. Productivity Growth and R&D Expenditure in UK Manufacturing Firms [J]. Research Policy, 2001, 30(7):1079-1090.
[13] Jorg C. Mahlich, Thomas Roediger-Schluga. The Determinants of Pharmaceutical R&D Expenditures: Evidence from Japan[J].Review of Industrial Organization,2006, 28(2):145-164.
[14] Scherer.Size of Firm, Oligopoly and Research: a Comment[J]. Journal of Economics and Political Science,1965,20(5):423-429.
[15] J.E. Jankowski. R&D: Foundation for Innovation[J].Research Technology Management, 1998, 41(2):14-20.
[16] 菲利普·阿吉翁,彼得·霍依特.内生增长理论[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2004.
[17] R. Riffith, R. Harrison. The Link between Product Market Reform and Macro-economic Performance. http://europa.eu.int/comm/economy_finance/publications/economic _papers/2004/ecp209en.pdf.
[18] Yasuda, Takehiko. Firm Growth, Size, Age and Behavior in Japanese Manufacturing [J]. Small Business Economics, 2005, 25(1):1-15.
[19] 彭华涛.区域科技资源配置的新制度经济学分析[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2006(1):141-144.
[20] 刘玲利. 科技资源配置理论与配置效率研究. 吉林大学, 2007.
[21] 钟华. 基于DEA方法的国家R&D投入产出效率研究. 中国科学院研究生院(文献情报中心), 2008.
[22] 邹清云. 财政科技投入产出的效率研究及政策启示. 暨南大学, 2008.
[23] 高真真. 区域科技人才投入产出效率评价研究. 天津大学, 2008.
[24] 张晓瑞. 我国区域科技资源配置效率研究[J]. 工业技术经济, 2009(1).
[25] 姚平, 梁静国. 基于DEA的工业行业资源配置效果评价研究[J]. 科技管理研究, 2007(3).
[26] 李静萍, 谢邦昌编著. 多元统计分析方法与应用[M].北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2008.6.