我国专利侵权损害赔偿制度有效性的实证研究

科研管理 ›› 2012, Vol. ›› Issue (4): 124-130.

我国专利侵权损害赔偿制度有效性的实证研究

贺宁馨, 袁晓东

华中科技大学管理学院, 湖北武汉 430074

收稿日期:2011-08-22 修回日期:2012-02-22 出版日期:2012-04-27 发布日期:2012-04-20
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金重点资助项目"促进我国自主创新的知识产权管理研究"(编号:70633003,起止时间2007.1-2010.12)。

The effectiveness about the compesation system for the patent infringement damage in China

He Ningxin, Yuan Xiaodong

School of Management, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China

Received:2011-08-22 Revised:2012-02-22 Online:2012-04-27 Published:2012-04-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以23个省、自治区、直辖市的42家法院判决、调解的专利侵权案件为样本,采用多元线性回归模型及t检验法,对我国专利侵权损害赔偿制度是否有效地保护了专利,进行了实证研究。研究发现:请求赔偿额、专利类型、地区、年份变量对实际赔偿额的影响显著;《专利法》修改、国籍变量对实际赔偿额的影响不显著;法定赔偿额与调解赔偿额趋于一致。研究结果纠正了美国"332调查"中的不客观结论,对我国相关政策的制定与完善具有重要参考价值。

关键词: 专利侵权损害赔偿制度, 专利保护, 有效性

Abstract: Based on the samples of the patent infringement cases judged and mediated by 42 courts in 23 provinces, municipalities, and autonomous regions, the empirical study is conducted to explore the effectiveness of patent protection involving the compensation system of patent infringment damage in China by using the multiple regression analysis model and t-test. The results show that the amount of claimed damage, patent type, region, and year variables have a significant effect on the amount of damage judged; the amendment of patent law, the nationality variables have an insignificant effect on the amount of damage judged; the amount of the statutory damage is closer to the amount of mediated damage. The conclusion of the study rectifies the non-objective findings in US 332 Investigation, and it also provides some references for China's policy-making.

Key words: compensation system for patent infringement damage, patent protection, effectiveness

中图分类号:

D926.14

贺宁馨, 袁晓东. 我国专利侵权损害赔偿制度有效性的实证研究[J]. 科研管理, 2012, (4): 124-130.

He Ningxin, Yuan Xiaodong. The effectiveness about the compesation system for the patent infringement damage in China[J]. Science Research Management, 2012, (4): 124-130.

参考文献

[1] USITC. China: Effects of intellectual property infringement and indigenous innovation policy on the U.S. economy. Investigation No.332-514,2010:8-13.
[2] 管育鹰. 专利侵权损害赔偿额判定中专利贡献度问题探讨[J]. 人民司法,2010(23):83-88.
[3] 张智. 专利侵权损害赔偿评估制度研究. 成都:西南政法大学,2010.
[4] 胡海容,雷云. 知识产权侵权适用惩罚性赔偿的是与非--从法经济学角度解读[J]. 知识产权,2011(2):70-74.
[5] 和育东. 专利侵权损害赔偿计算制度:变迁、比较与借鉴[J]. 知识产权,2009,19(113):7-18.
[6] 赵梅生. 关于专利侵权救济的国际比较分析[J]. 电子知识产权,2004(11):15-18.
[7] 王凤. 我国专利侵权损害赔偿相关问题研究. 兰州:兰州大学,2008.
[8] Laura B. P. The computation of damages in patent infringement action[J]. Harvard Journal of Law & Technology,1999,5:95-142.
[9] Shapiro C.,Lemley M. A. Patent holdup and royalty stacking[J]. Texas Law Review,2007,85:1991-2049.
[10] Janicke P. M.,Ren L. L. Who wins patent infringement cases[J]. AIPLA Quarterly Journal,2006,34(1):1-41.
[11] Mark A.,Thompson,Francis W. R. An empirical analysis of the impact of patent protection on Economic Growth: an Extension[J]. Journal of Economic Development,1999,24(1):67-76.
[12] Sepetys K.,Cox A. Intellectual property rights protection in china: Trends in litigation and economic damages. http://www.nera.com/extImage/PUB_IPR_Protection_China_0109_final.pdf.2011.8.2.
[13] Dinwiddie S.K. A shifting barrier? Difficulties of obtaining patent infringement damages in Japan[J]. Wash. L. Review,1995:833.
[14] Takenaka T. Patent infringement damages in Japan and the United States: Will increased patent infringement damage awards revive the Japanese economy?[J]. Re-Engineering Patent Law, 2000,2:309-370.
[15] Reitzig M.,Henkel J.,Heath C. On sharks, trolls, and their patent prey- unrealistic damage awards and firms' strategy of 'being infringed'[J]. Research Policy,2007,36:134-154.
[16] Bessen J.,Meurer M. J. Patent failure: How judges, bureaucrats, and lawyer put innovation at risk[M]. Princeton: Princeton University Press,2008:96-146.
[17] Shapiro C.,Lemley M. A. Patent holdup and royalty stacking[J]. Texas Law Review,2007,85: 1991-2049.
[18] 陈希. 中美专利制度比较[J]. 科技投资,2008(2):77-79.
[19] Allison J. R.,Lemley M.,Walker J. Extreme value or trolls on top? The characters of the most-litigated patents[J]. University of Pennsylvania Law Review,2009,158(1):1-31.
[20] 中华人民共和国国家知识产权局. 2010年中国有效专利年度报告. http://www.sipo.gov.cn/mtjj/2011/201104/t20110421_599867.html.2011.8.2.
[21] Mazzeo M. J.,Hillel J.,Zyontz S. Excessive or unpredictable? An empirical analysis of patent Infringement awards. NO.2011-6-17. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1765891.2011.8.2.