科研管理 ›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (9): 20-29.

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

民营与国有科创孵化器服务模式实证比较研究

胡文伟1,李湛2,殷林森3,刘晓明3,华蓉晖3,孙娟1   

  1. 1.上海工程技术大学 管理学院,上海201620; 2.上海社会科学院 应用经济研究所,上海200020; 3.上海立信会计金融学院 金融学院,上海201209
  • 收稿日期:2017-01-19 修回日期:2017-06-19 出版日期:2018-09-20 发布日期:2018-11-06
  • 通讯作者: 殷林森
  • 基金资助:

    国家社会科学基金重点项目:“国家级新区与拓展发展新空间研究”(15AZD072,2016.03-2018.02);上海市软科学研究计划重点项目:“基于市场机制的科技创新创业服务模式研究”(14692100700,2014.06-2015.05)。

A comparison of the service model between private and state-owned enterprise incubators

Hu Wenwei1, Li Zhan2, Yin Linsen3, Liu Xiaoming3, Hua Ronghui3, Sun Juan1   

  1. 1.School of Management,Shanghai University of Engineering Science, Shanghai 201620, China;
    2.Institute of Applied Economics,Shanghai Academy of Social Science,Shanghai 200020,China;
    3.School of Finance,Shanghai Lixin University of Accounting and Finance, Shanghai 201209, China
  • Received:2017-01-19 Revised:2017-06-19 Online:2018-09-20 Published:2018-11-06

摘要: 客观了解孵化服务业的真实状况,有助于机制改革和政策制定能有效推动市场化发展。对上海的科创孵化器进行了问卷调查,通过数据整理和统计分析,重点比较分析了民营孵化器与国有孵化器在基础服务、辅导服务、专业服务、融资服务等四大类服务的覆盖率和满意率以及在孵企业特征和企业评价。采用总体比例之差z检验的统计方法对两类孵化器之间差异的显著性进行了假设检验,全方位深入分析了服务模式的异同性,剖析了产生差异的主要原因,对政策环境的完善提出了建议。检验结果显示,两类孵化器在基础服务、融资服务、企业特征和企业评价上存在显著差异,部分细分项目上的差异则更大。国有孵化器强于提供优惠政策服务并引入更多风投,民营孵化器在办公环境、创业氛围、租金优惠、天使投资等方面表现更佳,而且更愿接纳早期初创企业,但是先天条件差、风险大、成本高、利润薄等问题对民营孵化器的可持续发展带来挑战。

关键词: 民营孵化器, 国有孵化器, 市场化, 服务模式

Abstract: It is helpful to promote the development of market-oriented incubator about mechanism reform and policy set by understanding the real situation of incubator service industry. The paper made a questionnaire survey to the incubator in Shanghai. According to the data collection and statistical analysis, the paper focused on the comparative analysis of the private and state-owned incubator about base services, counseling services, professional services, financing services, and analyzed the service coverage rate and satisfaction rate and characteristics of enterprises in incubation. Using the statistical method of Z Test, the paper made a test of the significant differences between the two types of incubators, did a full range of in-depth analysis of the similarities and differences of service mode, analyzed the main reasons and put forward the suggestion on the policy environment. The test results show that there are significant differences about basic services, financing services, enterprise characteristics and evaluation of enterprise, and there are more great difference in some segment project. As usual, The state-owned incubator tend to provide preferential policies service and introduce more venture capital, while private incubators tend to be better in the aspects about office environment, entrepreneurial atmosphere, rent concessions and more willing to accept early start-ups. But there are some challenges to the sustainable development of private incubators, such as congenital conditions, high risk, high cost, profit thin.

Key words: private incubator, state-owned incubator, marketization, service model