科研管理 ›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (2): 125-134.

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

企业投资主导要素研究

张信东,于静   

  1. 山西大学经济与管理学院,山西 太原030006
  • 收稿日期:2015-07-13 修回日期:2017-04-05 出版日期:2018-02-20 发布日期:2018-02-02
  • 通讯作者: 张信东
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金面上项目(71371113);教育部人文社科研究项目(14YJA790034)

Discussion on the first driving factor for enterprises’ investment

Zhang Xindong, Yu Jing   

  1. School of Economics and Management, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006,Shanxi, China
  • Received:2015-07-13 Revised:2017-04-05 Online:2018-02-20 Published:2018-02-02

摘要: 现金流和成长机会作为影响企业长期投资决策的两大核心要素,已是不争的事实。然而,当我们进一步思考,二者之中,谁是主导企业投资的关键要素?学界尚缺乏讨论。进而,鉴于无形资产与有形资产对企业经营发展意义的差异性,本文将区别研究两种投资的主要驱动因素,是现金流,还是成长机会?同时,企业的生存与发展不可能脱离其所处的外部环境,本文还将进一步探讨宏观经济状况与投资者情绪对两类投资对其主要驱动要素的敏感程度。为使研究结果更为准确且有意义,我们通过查找科技部官方网站公布2006-2013年度的国家级创新型企业名录,逐一确定其中的上市公司,以此为样本,借鉴McLean和Zhao(2014)的投资决定模型进行研究。(注意:此处公式见文中P3的公式(4))本文将资产投资率I/A区分无形资产投资率与有形资产投资率分别研究,将成长机会q与内部现金率CF/A作为主要解释变量,且体现宏观经济状况E与投资者情绪S对两种驱动要素与投资间关系的调节作用。结合我国金融市场实际,本文参照Baker与Wurgler(2006)投资者情绪指数的构建方法,以封闭式基金折价率、交易量、IPO数量、上市首日收益、新增投资者开户数、消费者信心指数六个指标为基础,并与工业生产增加值、居民消费价格指数、工业品出厂价格指数和宏观经济景气指数四个宏观经济状况的代理变量正交化,以此消除宏观经济状况的影响,利用主成分分析方法审慎地构建了适合中国现实背景的投资者情绪指数。同时,为了更真实地反映企业无形资产的投资实际,本文将其界定为“无形资产投资”、“开发支出”资产账户的本期增量与费用化的本期研发支出的总和。运用多元回归方法,实证检验了企业无形资产投资与有形资产投资的主要驱动因素是现金流,还是成长机会。本研究得到了有意义的结论:无形资产投资受成长机会驱动的敏感度几近或者胜过其受内部现金流驱动的敏感度;而有形资产投资则相反,其首要地受内部现金流驱动,然后才是成长机会;总资产投资主导要素仍为内部现金流,这与我国企业投资仍以有形资产投资为主的事实相符。此外,在考虑企业环境状况时,本研究还发现,投资者情绪强化了成长机会对企业无形资产投资决策的影响作用,而向好的宏观经济状况却强化了企业有形资产投资决策对现金流依赖的敏感性。本研究从一个新颖而独特的视角提出企业投资决策中主导要素问题的思考,借鉴并创新性地应用了国际学术前沿模型,区别关注无形资产投资与有形资产投资,并综合宏观经济状况与投资者情绪外部影响,研究中国企业投资问题,夯实了企业投资理论,充实了投资驱动的相关研究成果,有着较大的学术参考价值。同时,在这个创新驱动发展的时代,无形资产日益成为企业决胜市场的关键,确定其主要驱动因素至关重要,本研究对企业创新及研发活动投资决策行为具有重要的现实指导意义。

关键词: 企业创新, 研发活动, 无形资产投资, 有形资产投资, 成长机会, 现金流

Abstract: Cash flow and growth opportunities have been widely considered as the two core elements in investment decision. However, when we think further, among the two, which is the most important driving force in investment? The question has got little attention. Furthermore, in view of the different effects on enterprise development derived separately from intangible assets and tangible assets, this paper explores the primary driving force behind the two kinds of investment respectively. Meanwhile, since the external environment is vital in decision-making, this research further studies the effect of macroeconomic condition and investor sentiment on the investment sensitivity to cash flow and growth opportunities. In order to obtain more accurate and more significant results, we selected public companies from National Innovative Enterprises, which are listed on the website of the Ministry of Science and Technology of the People’s Republic of China from 2006 to 2013 as samples. We refer to the investment-decision model from McLean and Zhao (2014). (Here insert the formular (4) in page 3 of our paper) Here, I/A is defined as the investment rate of intangible asset and the investment rate of tangible asset separately, and the growth opportunity q and the cash flow CF/A are the main explanatory variables. The macroeconomic condition E and the investor sentiment S are taken into account as well. Referring to Baker and Wurgler (2006), and considering the reality of China's financial market, we constructed an investor sentiment index with six variables: the closed-end fund discount, the trading volume, the number of IPOs, the average first day’s return of IPOs, the new investor accounts and consumer confidence index. Macroeconomic conditions are likely to affect investor sentiment, so all the sentiment variables are regressed on four macroeconomic variables and the residuals from these regressions are used as the investor sentiment proxies in our tests. We use the macroeconomic condition and investor sentiment proxies in the same regressions, so the effect of one variable is measured while the other is controlled. Meanwhile, different from the current studies, the contents of the intangible asset investment here include the increment in accounts of "intangible asset" and "development expenditure" and the R&D expenses, which cover the true input of enterprises’ R&D activities. This paper gets a significant conclusion that the growth opportunities sensitivity to intangible asset investment is almost equal, even stronger, compared with the cash flow. However, tangible asset investment is more sensitive to cash flow, rather than growth opportunities. The first driving factor of total asset investment is cash flow as well, which is consistent with the current situation that most business investments are tangible asset investments in China. Furthermore, when considering external environment, we find that investor sentiment strengthens the effect of growth opportunities on intangible asset investments, while expansive macroeconomic condition makes tangible asset investments more sensitive to cash flow. In summary, we put forward a novel and unique perspective to consider the issue of driving factors in investment decision-making. We adopt McLean and Zhao’s model (2014) to Chinese enterprises investment problems. Our highlights lie in distinguishing intangible asset investment and tangible asset investment, and taking the macroeconomic condition and at the same time the investor sentiment into account. This paper contributes much in academic value to both enterprise investment theory and investment-driving research. What is more important, in this innovation-driven era, intangible asset is increasingly becoming the key element of corporate success, making determining its primary driving factor essential. This paper also has important practical significance for enterprise innovation and R&D investment decision-making.

Key words: enterprises&rsquo, innovation, R&D activities, intangible assets investment, tangible assets investment, growth opportunities, cash flow