通过跨案例比较与理论整合构架了包括搜寻阶段、桥化阶段、内化阶段和增值阶段在内的国家重点实验室创新资源捕获过程SBIP模型。结合110份有效调查问卷，实证检验了SBIP模型及其对国家重点实验室创新资源捕获绩效产生的影响。研究结果表明：1）SBIP模型客观存在，内化阶段、桥化阶段、增值阶段、搜寻阶段对国家重点实验室创新资源捕获绩效的贡献依次递减；2）国家重点实验室创新资源捕获过程资源支撑特征明显，能力支撑乏力；3）国家重点实验室创新资源捕获过程实现途径呈现“计划-市场”二元性。另外实证结果还显示：目前我国国家重点实验室正处于快速成长期；与配置、整合创新资源相比，最大化创新资源引入量对发展我国国家重点实验室的现实意义更大。

The article has built the SBIP model that is the capture process of innovation resources in state key labs used cross-cases comparison with theoretical integration, and combined with 110 valid questionnaires to make an empirical test for the SBIP model and its impact on the innovation resources capture performance in state key labs. The results showed that: 1) the SBIP model exists objectively, the contribution of internalizing phase, bridging phase, propagating phase, searching phase to the innovation resources capture performance in state key labs are ordinal descending; 2) resources-support is the obvious characteristic at the capture process of innovation resources in state key labs, and ability-support is weak; 3) implementation approaches for the capture process of innovation resources in state key labs present "plan-market" duality. Other empirical results also showed that: China’s state key labs are in the rapid growth period now; compared with allocating and integrating innovation resources, maximizing intakes is more practical significance for developing China’s state key labs.