科研管理

科研管理 ›› 2017, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (9): 69-76.

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

国家重点实验室创新资源捕获过程实证研究

聂继凯1,2,危怀安3   

  1. 1扬州大学商学院,江苏 扬州225127;
    2扬州大学政府治理与公共政策研究中心,江苏 扬州225127;
    3华中科技大学公共管理学院,湖北 武汉430074
  • 收稿日期:2015-01-26 修回日期:2016-11-12 出版日期:2017-09-20 发布日期:2017-09-15
  • 通讯作者: 聂继凯

An empirical study of the capture process of innovation resources in state key laboratories

Nie Jikai 1,2, Wei Huai’an3   

  1. 1. Business College,Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225127, Jiangsu, China；
    2. Government Governance and Public Policy Research Center,Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225127, Jiangsu, China;
    3. College of Public Administration, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, Hubei, China
  • Received:2015-01-26 Revised:2016-11-12 Online:2017-09-20 Published:2017-09-15

摘要： 通过跨案例比较与理论整合构架了包括搜寻阶段、桥化阶段、内化阶段和增值阶段在内的国家重点实验室创新资源捕获过程SBIP模型。结合110份有效调查问卷，实证检验了SBIP模型及其对国家重点实验室创新资源捕获绩效产生的影响。研究结果表明：1）SBIP模型客观存在，内化阶段、桥化阶段、增值阶段、搜寻阶段对国家重点实验室创新资源捕获绩效的贡献依次递减；2）国家重点实验室创新资源捕获过程资源支撑特征明显，能力支撑乏力；3）国家重点实验室创新资源捕获过程实现途径呈现“计划-市场”二元性。另外实证结果还显示：目前我国国家重点实验室正处于快速成长期；与配置、整合创新资源相比，最大化创新资源引入量对发展我国国家重点实验室的现实意义更大。

关键词: 国家重点实验室, 创新资源, 捕获过程;SBIP模型

Abstract: The article has built the SBIP model that is the capture process of innovation resources in state key labs used cross-cases comparison with theoretical integration, and combined with 110 valid questionnaires to make an empirical test for the SBIP model and its impact on the innovation resources capture performance in state key labs. The results showed that: 1) the SBIP model exists objectively, the contribution of internalizing phase, bridging phase, propagating phase, searching phase to the innovation resources capture performance in state key labs are ordinal descending; 2) resources-support is the obvious characteristic at the capture process of innovation resources in state key labs, and ability-support is weak; 3) implementation approaches for the capture process of innovation resources in state key labs present "plan-market" duality. Other empirical results also showed that: China’s state key labs are in the rapid growth period now; compared with allocating and integrating innovation resources, maximizing intakes is more practical significance for developing China’s state key labs.

Key words: state key laboratory, innovation resources, capture process, SBIP model