科研管理

科研管理 ›› 2017, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (10): 138-149.

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

中国博士后科学基金绩效评估体系构建及实证研究

刘云1,杨芳娟2 ,陈颖2，刘文澜3   

  1. 1.北京理工大学管理与经济学院，北京100081；
    2.中国博士后科学基金会，北京100083；
    3.中国航天系统科学与工程研究院， 北京100048
  • 收稿日期:2014-12-22 修回日期:2016-04-14 出版日期:2017-10-20 发布日期:2017-10-11
  • 通讯作者: 杨芳娟
  • 基金资助:

    基金项目：人力资源和社会保障部科技项目“中国博士后科学基金资助绩效评估体系设计及实证研究”；国家自然科学基金面上项目“国家创新体系国际化政策协同机制、过程模型及效应评估研究”（71573017）。

The construction and empirical study of the performance evaluation system of China Postdoctoral Science Foundation

Liu Yun1, Yang Fangjuan1, Chen Ying2, Liu Wenlan3   

  1. 1. School of Management and Economics, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China;
    2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation, Beijing 100083, China;
    3. China Aerospace Academy of Systems Science and Engineering, Beijing 100048, China
  • Received:2014-12-22 Revised:2016-04-14 Online:2017-10-20 Published:2017-10-11

摘要： 中国博士后科学基金是中国博士后制度的重要组成部分，自1985年设立以来，已成为中央财政资助博士后科研工作的主渠道之一。本文在系统分析中国博士后科学基金绩效评估需求和绩效特征的基础上，基于循证设计理论研究构建了中国博士后科学基金整体资助与管理绩效评估框架以及项目绩效评估指标体系，首次开展了针对近年来中国博士后科学基金资助项目的绩效评估实证研究，研究结果表明中国博士后科学基金初步形成了较完整的资助体系、促进了高层次创新型青年人才成长和创新性研究成果的取得，最后从改进基金资助模式和资助类型方面提出了政策建议。

关键词: 中国博士后科学基金, 绩效评估体系, 实证研究

Abstract: Chinese Postdoctoral Science Foundation (CPSF) is an important part of Chinese Postdoctoral System. It has become one significant source of research fund from central government for postdoctoral researchers since it was established in 1985. Based on the performance evaluation of CPSF’s requirement and characteristics, an evidence based evaluation design approach of CPSF’s funding and management performance evaluation framework is proposed. It also construct the CPSF’s program evaluation index system. Then it does performance evaluation empirical research on CPSF for the first time. All finding indicates that CPSF has formed complete funding system. CPSF plays an important role in cultivate high-level talents and achieve scientific creativities. Finally this paper puts forward some policy proposals on funding mode and type.

Key words: China Postdoctoral Science Foundation, performance evaluation system, empirical research