组织双元性的培育与效应：组织学习视角

科研管理 ›› 2014, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (2): 87-93.

组织双元性的培育与效应：组织学习视角

周俊¹, 薛求知²

1. 苏州大学东吴商学院, 江苏苏州 215021;
2. 复旦大学管理学院, 上海 200433

收稿日期:2011-12-22 修回日期:2013-02-25 出版日期:2014-02-25 发布日期:2014-03-10
作者简介:周俊（1978- ），男（汉），安徽庐江人，博士，副教授，研究方向：战略管理与国际商务。
薛求知（1952- ），男（汉），上海人，博士，教授，研究方向：跨国经营管理。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金青年项目“软件外包企业的交易专用性投资对能力构建的作用：机制及影响因素”（71102116），起止时间：2012年1月-2014年12月；苏州大学东吴商学院青年基金项目“组织双元性的适用情境及培育路径研究”，起止时间：2009年12月-2013年12月。

Cultivation and effect of organizational ambidexterity：From theoretical perspective of organizational learning

Zhou Jun¹, Xue Qiuzhi²

1. Dongwu Business School, Soochow University, Suzhou 215021, Jiangsu, China;
2. Management School, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China

Received:2011-12-22 Revised:2013-02-25 Online:2014-02-25 Published:2014-03-10

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本文基于组织学习视角探讨组织双元性的培育机制以及双元性对企业绩效的影响。综合运用统计分析法和案例研究法，发现，组织学习促进双元性培育；双元性提高企业绩效；双元性在组织学习和企业绩效之间发挥部分中介作用。本研究揭示了区别于Gibson和Birkinshaw（2004）所述的另一类情境型双元，明晰了组织学习对双元性培育的作用机制，并丰富了反映双元性和组织绩效关系的经验证据。

关键词: 组织双元性, 组织学习, 情境型双元, 组织情境

Abstract: Fromthe theoretical perspective of organizational learning, this paper explores the cultivating mechanism and the effect of organizational ambidexterity on firm performance. Based on statistical analyses and case studies, this paper arrives at the following conclusions. Firstly, organizational learning promotes organizational ambidexterity. Secondly, organizational ambidexterity improves firm performance. Last but not theleast, organizational ambidexterity plays a partially mediating role between organizational learning and firm performance. Taken together, this research reveals another kind of contextual ambidexterity which is different from Gibson and Birkinshaw's(2004), clarifies the mechanisms of impact organizational context has on organizational ambidexterity, and enriches the empirical evidence on the relationship between organizational ambidexterity and organizationalperformance.

Key words: organizational ambidexterity, organizational learning, contextual ambidexterity, organizational context

中图分类号:

F272.3

周俊, 薛求知. 组织双元性的培育与效应：组织学习视角[J]. 科研管理, 2014, 35(2): 87-93.

Zhou Jun, Xue Qiuzhi. Cultivation and effect of organizational ambidexterity：From theoretical perspective of organizational learning[J]. Science Research Management, 2014, 35(2): 87-93.

参考文献

[1] 周俊, 薛求知.双元型组织构建研究前沿探析[J].外国经济与管理, 2009, 31(1):50-57. [2] Gibson, C.B., Birkinshaw, J.The antecedents, consequences and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity[J].Academy of Management Journal, 2004, 47(2):209-226. [3] Gupta, A.K., Smith, K.G., Shalley, C.E.The interplay between exploration and exploitation[J].Academy of Management Journal, 2006, 49(4):693-706. [4] Mirow, C., Hoelzle, K., Gemuenden, H.G.The Ambidextrous Organization in Practice:Barriers to Innovation within Research and Development[R].Working Paper, 2008. [5] Hult, G.T., Ferrel, O.C.Global organizational learning capacity in purchasing:construct and measurement[J].Journal of Business Research, 1997, 40(2):97-112. [6] Sinkula, J.M.Market information processing and organizational learning[J].Journal of Marketing, 1994, 58(1):35-45. [7] March, J.G.Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning[J].Organization Science, 1991, 2(1):71-87. [8] Levinthal, D.A., March, J.G..The myopia of learning[J].Strategic Management Journal, 1993, 14(1):95-112. [9] Eisenhardt, K.M., Tabrizi, B.N.Accelerating adaptive processes:product innovation in the global computer industry[J].Administrative Science Quarterly, 1995, 40(1):84-110. [10] Hult, G.T., Ketchen, J., Nichol, E.L.Organizational learning as a strategic resource in supply management[J].Journal of Operations Management, 2003, 21(5):541-556. [11] He, Z.L., Wong, P.K.Exploration vs.exploitation:An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis[J].Organization Science, 2004, 15(4):481-494. [12] 焦豪, 周江华, 谢振东.创业导向与组织绩效间关系的实证研究——基于环境动态性的调节效应[J].科学学与科学技术管理, 2007, 28(11):70-76. [13] Baron, R.M., Kenny, D.A.The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research:Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations[J].Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986, 51(6):1173-1182. [14] Freedman, L.S., Schatzkin, A.Sample size for studying intermediate endpoints within intervention trials of observational studies[J].American Journal of Epidemiology, 1992, 136(9):1148-1159. [15] Hurley, R.F., Hult, R.F.Innovation, market orientation, and organizational learning:An integration and empirical examination[J].Journal of Marketing, 1998, 62(1):42-54. [16] 贺远琼, 田志龙.组织学习与企业绩效之间的关系——基于适应能力视角的实证研究[J].研究与发展管理, 2008, 20(1):91-96.