战略转型背景下企业创新能力重构的二元机理：信雅达1996-2012年纵向案例研究

科研管理 ›› 2014, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (2): 1-9.

• 论文 • 下一篇

战略转型背景下企业创新能力重构的二元机理：信雅达1996-2012年纵向案例研究

陈力田¹, 吴志岩²

1. 浙江工商大学工商管理学院, 浙江工商大学浙商研究中心, 浙江杭州 310018;
2. 浙江大学管理学院, 浙江杭州 310058

收稿日期:2012-02-29 修回日期:2013-06-09 出版日期:2014-02-25 发布日期:2014-03-10
作者简介:陈力田（1987- ），女（汉），安徽庐江人，浙江工商大学工商管理学院讲师，博士，研究方向为技术创新与战略管理。
吴志岩（1987- ），男（满），辽宁沈阳人，浙江大学管理学院博士研究生，研究方向为技术创新与战略管理。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金面上项目《我国企业自主创新能力的演进规律与提升机制研究》（批准号：71172115）；浙江省哲学社会科学规划课题成果《政府与市场协同驱动浙商企业自主创新机制研究：多重制度压力的视角》（项目编号：13NDJC046YB）；浙江省教育厅科研资助项目《浙江省中小企业创新能力演化机制研究》（项目编号：Y201329786）；本研究受浙江省高校人文社会科学重点研究基地（浙江工商大学工商管理学科）《技术并购过程中企业创新能力重构机理：基于扎根理论的案例研究》项目资助（项目编号：13GSGL10YB）。

Ambidexterity mechanism of enterprise innovation capability reconfiguration under strategic transition context：A longitude case study in Sunyardfrom 1996 to 2012

Chen Litian¹, Wu Zhiyan²

1. School of Business Administration, Zhejiang Gongshang University, Hangzhou 310018, China;
2. School of Management, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China

Received:2012-02-29 Revised:2013-06-09 Online:2014-02-25 Published:2014-03-10

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 转型升级背景下，停留在仿造战略的企业，如何实现战略转型，实现能力重构成为学界和业界关注的焦点问题。针对此问题，本文以我国软件企业信雅达作为观测样本，进行了探索性纵向案例研究，揭示了战略转型背景下企业创新能力重构过程中的“破坏-增强”二元平衡机理。一方面，创新能力重构过程中自上而下的能力破坏机理：有着复杂战略构想的企业，更易通过战略性学习全面感知到环境中的新机会，进而自上而下地引发创新能力进行主动有意识的变异，促进创新能力的创造性破坏。另一方面，创新能力重构过程中自下而上的能力增强机理：通过惯例化学习从工作实践中抽象出惯例，再通过能力学习从惯例中抽象出能力，使其从个人层面向企业层面扩散，实现自下而上的能力变异和积累。这一发现将能力破坏型的战略性学习和能力增强型的能力学习、惯例化学习结合起来，发现了其匹配均衡的二元机理，对动态能力观、能力重构和组织学习等研究领域具有理论意义；对处于战略转型的企业的创新活动具有实际意义。

关键词: 企业创新能力, 能力重构, 二元机理, 案例研究

Abstract: Under the background of economic transition and upgrading, it becomes the focus issue in both academia and industry that how enterprises,whoused to adopt the imitation strategy, achieve capability reconfiguration. In order to solve this problem, this paper selected Sunyard, a software enterprise, as the observed sample, and conducted a longitude case study (from 1996 to 2012). Results showed an ambidexterity mechanism between capability disruptive learning and capability reinforced learning in the process of enterprise innovation capability reconfiguration. On the one hand, there is a top-down capability disruptive learning mechanism. Enterprises with complex strategic schema are able to recognize new opportunities during strategic learning process, and identify the direction of new variation of innovation capability reconfiguration. On the other hand, there is a bottom-up capability reinforced learning mechanism. Enterprises abstract routines form work practices during routinized learning process. Then, enterprises abstract capabilities form routines and leveraged it from personal-level to enterprise-level during capability learning process. This finding integrated the theory of capability disruptive learning (strategic learning) and capability reinforced learning (capability learning and routinized learning), highlighted the ambidexterity mechanism between them.This paper not only has theoretical contribution on dynamic capability perspective, capability reconfiguration and organizational learning theory, but also has managerial implication on enterprises' innovation management practice under transition context.

Key words: enterprise innovation capability, capability reconfiguration, ambidexterity mechanism, case study

中图分类号:

270.7

陈力田, 吴志岩. 战略转型背景下企业创新能力重构的二元机理：信雅达1996-2012年纵向案例研究[J]. 科研管理, 2014, 35(2): 1-9.

Chen Litian, Wu Zhiyan. Ambidexterity mechanism of enterprise innovation capability reconfiguration under strategic transition context：A longitude case study in Sunyardfrom 1996 to 2012[J]. Science Research Management, 2014, 35(2): 1-9.

参考文献

[1] Szeto, E. Innovation capacity: working towards a mechanism for improving innovation within an inter-organizational network[J]. The TQM Magazine. 2000, 12 (2): 149-158. [2] Dutta, S., Narasimhan, O., Rajiv, S. Conceptualizing and measuring capabilities: methodology and empirical application. Strategic Management Journal[J].2005, 26 (3):277-285. [3] Crossman, M. and Mapaydin, M. A multi-dimensional framework of organizational innovation: a system review of the literature[J]. Journal of Management Studies. 2010, 47(6):1154-1191. [4] Forsman, H. Innovation capacity and innovation development in small enterprises: A comparision between the manufacturing and service sectors[J]. Research Policy. 2011, 40:739-750. [5] Nelson, R.R.and Winter, S.G. An evolutionary theory of economic change[M]. Belknap Press: Cambridge, MA.1982. [6] Barton, L. D. Core capabilities and core rigidities[J]. Strategic Management Journal. 1992, Summer special issue, 111-126. [7] Teece, D.J., Pisano, G., Shuen, A. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management[J].Strategic Management Journal.1997, 18(7): 509-533. [8] Barreto, I. Dynamic capabilities: a review of past research and an agenda for the future[J].Journal of Management. 2010, 36(3):256-280. [9] Wang, C.L. and Ahmed, P.K. Dynamic capabilities: A review and research agenda[J]. International Journal of Management Reviews, 2007, 35(1), 9:31. [10] Cyert, R.M., March, J.G. The behavioral theory of the firm[M]. Prentice Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ. 1963. [11] Andrews, K.R. The concept of corporate strategy[M]. Irwin: Homewood, IL. 1971. [12] Hannan, M. T. and Freeman, J. H. Structural inertia and organizational change[J]. American Sociological Review. 1984, 49(2): 149-164. [13] Lavie, D. Capability reconfiguration:an analysis of incumbent responses to technological change[J].Academy of Management Review.2006, 31(1):153-174. [14] Andreu, R. and Ciborra, C. Organisational learning and core capabilities development:the role of IT[J].Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 1996.10(5):111-127. [15] 毛武兴, 闫同柱, 刘景江, 许庆瑞. 我国企业核心能力的培育与提高:战略、路径与案例研究[J].科研管理, 2004, 25(2):37-43. [16] Henk, W., Volberda, et al. Absorbing the Concept of Absorptive Capacity: How to Realize Its Potential in the Organization Field[J]. Organization Science.2010, 21(4):931-951. [17] Karim, S., Mitchell, W. Path-dependent and path breaking change:reconfigurating business resources:following acquisitions in the U.S.Medical sector, 1978-1995[J]. Strategic Management Journal.2000, 21(9): 1061-1081. [18] Karim, S. Modularity in organizational structure: the reconfiguration of internally developed and acquired business units[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2006, 27(7): 799-823. [19] Karim, S. and Williams, C. Structual knowledge: how executive experience with structural composition affects intrafirm mobility and unit reconfiguration[J]. Strategic Management Journal.2012, 33(5): 681-709. [20] 赵晓庆. 浙商创新能力提升的模式[M].浙江大学出版社, 浙江杭州, 2011. [21] Yin, R. Case study research:design and methods[M].Thousands Oaks:Sage Publications, 2003. [22] Eisenhardt, K.M. Making fast strategic decisions in high-velocity environments[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1989, 32(3): 543-576. [23] Yan, A. and B. Gray. Bargaining power, management control and performance in U.S.-Chinese joint ventures: A comparative case study[J]. Academy of Management Journal.1991, 37(6): 1478-1517. [24] Laamanen, T.and Wallin, J. Cognitive dynamics of capability development paths[J].Journal of Management Studies.2009, 46(5):950-981. [25] Ozcan, P. and Eisenhardt, K.M.Origin of alliance portfolios: entrepreneurs, network strategies and firm performance[J]. Academy of Management Journal. 2009, 52(2):246-279 [26] Eisenhardt, K.M., Martin, J.A. Dynamic capabilities: what are they?. Strategic management Journal[J].2000, 21(10):1105-1121. [27] Anderson, P., and Tushman, M. L. Technological discontinuities and dominant designs: A cyclical model of technological change[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1990, 35(5): 604-633. [28] Tushman, M., and Anderson, P. Technological discontinuities and organizational environments[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly.1986, 31(4): 439-465. [29] Carroll, G. R., Bigelow, L. S., Seidel, M.-D. L., and Tsai, L. B. The fates of de novo and de alio producers in the American automobile industry 1885-1981[J]. Strategic Management Journal. 1996, 17(Special Issue): 117-137.

战略转型背景下企业创新能力重构的二元机理：信雅达1996-2012年纵向案例研究

Ambidexterity mechanism of enterprise innovation capability reconfiguration under strategic transition context：A longitude case study in Sunyardfrom 1996 to 2012

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	林海芬, 曲廷琛. 组织悖论视角下战略变革方向塑造过程探究[J]. 科研管理, 2023, 44(6): 40-50.
[2]	贾依帛苏敬勤. 全球价值链下隐形冠军治理角色研究——基于知识权力视角[J]. 科研管理, 2023, 44(3): 122-132.
[3]	郭小超, 姜宇婷, 张强, 张生太, 崔敏杰. 复杂情境下企业主导逻辑构建与更新路径研究[J]. 科研管理, 2023, 44(1): 100-113.
[4]	武建龙鲍萌萌陈劲黄静. 产业联盟创新生态系统升级路径研究[J]. 科研管理, 2022, 43(9): 20-31.
[5]	王雪冬. 企业社会责任与商业模式创新互噬过程研究[J]. 科研管理, 2022, 43(7): 106-114.
[6]	王志涛王孟姣. 基于共演理论的企业战略转型——以万达集团为例[J]. 科研管理, 2022, 43(6): 53-62.
[7]	陈寒松田震. 公司创业情境下孵化企业服务生态系统构建——基于资源编排理论[J]. 科研管理, 2022, 43(5): 11-22.
[8]	黄昊王国红. 制度逻辑视角下创新型中小企业的社会防御机制研究[J]. 科研管理, 2022, 43(3): 108-116.
[9]	刘海兵, 杨磊. 后发高新技术企业创新能力演化规律和提升机制[J]. 科研管理, 2022, 43(11): 111-123.
[10]	崔淼周晓雪. 克服组织惯性：数字化战略更新的实现及演进路径研究[J]. 科研管理, 2022, 43(10): 89-98.
[11]	颉茂华王娇刘铁鑫. 国企混改提升企业战略绩效路径研究——双元创新理论下的双案例分析[J]. 科研管理, 2022, 43(10): 99-115.
[12]	臧树伟张娜娜. 时机选择、追赶陷阱与企业能力重构[J]. 科研管理, 2021, 42(9): 87-93.
[13]	郭丕斌张爱琴. 负责任创新、动态能力与企业绿色转型升级[J]. 科研管理, 2021, 42(7): 31-39.
[14]	颉茂华, 赵圆圆, 刘远洋. 网络联结、资源获取与组织学习互动影响战略绩效路径研究——基于长城汽车的纵向案例研究#br#[J]. 科研管理, 2021, 42(5): 57-69.
[15]	郑帅王海军. 模块化下企业创新生态系统结构与演化机制——海尔集团2005—2019年的纵向案例研究[J]. 科研管理, 2021, 42(1): 33-46.