威权领导与下属建言的关系：一个跨层分析

科研管理 ›› 2014, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (10): 86-93.

威权领导与下属建言的关系：一个跨层分析

邱功英, 龙立荣

华中科技大学管理学院, 湖北武汉 430074

收稿日期:2014-03-25 修回日期:2014-07-04 出版日期:2014-10-25 发布日期:2014-10-23
作者简介:邱功英（1987-），女（汉），湖北武汉人，华中科技大学管理学院博士研究生，研究方向：领导、人力资源管理。
龙立荣（1963-），男（汉），湖北潜江人，华中科技大学管理学院教授，博士生导师，研究方向：组织行为学和人力资源管理等。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金重点项目《转型期和谐劳动关系：分享型领导、员工心理契约与人力资源策略研究》（71232001），起止时间：2013.1-2017.12；国家自然科学基金面上项目《绩效薪酬强度对突破性创新行为的影响：内在动机的保护机制》（71071064），起止时间：2011.1-2013.12。

The relationship between authoritarian leadership and subordinates’ voice: A cross-level analysis

Qiu Gongying, Long Lirong

School of Management, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, Hubei, China

Received:2014-03-25 Revised:2014-07-04 Online:2014-10-25 Published:2014-10-23

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以65个团队中的65位管理者以及264位下属为研究对象，运用跨层次分析方法，探讨了团队的威权领导对下属建言上司和建言同事行为的影响，以及领导-成员交换、团队-成员交换的中介效应和关系流行度的调节效应。结果发现：威权领导对下属建言上司和建言同事均有消极影响；领导-成员交换在威权领导与下属建言上司关系中起中介作用，团队-成员交换在威权领导与下属建言同事关系中起中介作用；关系流行度正向调节了领导-成员交换与建言上司之间的关系，对团队-成员交换与建言同事之间的关系调节作用不显著。

关键词: 威权领导, 建言行为, 领导-成员交换, 团队-成员交换, 关系

Abstract: This study tested the influence and mechanisms of authoritarian leadership on speaking up and speaking out, including the mediating role of leader-member exchange (LMX) and team-member exchange (TMX), and the moderating role of guanxi prevalence. Data were collected from 264 employees and their immediate supervisors. Theoretical hypotheses were tested by HLM and the results of HLM analysis revealed that authoritarian leadership had a significant negative influence on both speaking up and speaking out. LMX mediated the relationship between authoritarian leadership and speaking up, and TMX mediated the relationship between authoritarian leadership and speaking out. As a moderator, guanxi prevalence strengthened the positive relation between LMX and speaking up. But the moderating role of guanxi prevalence on the relation between TMX and speaking out was not significant.

Key words: authoritarian leadership, voice behavior, leader-member exchange, team-member exchange, guanxi

中图分类号:

F279.23

邱功英, 龙立荣. 威权领导与下属建言的关系：一个跨层分析[J]. 科研管理, 2014, 35(10): 86-93.

Qiu Gongying, Long Lirong. The relationship between authoritarian leadership and subordinates’ voice: A cross-level analysis[J]. Science Research Management, 2014, 35(10): 86-93.

参考文献

[1] Fuller J B, Marler L E, Hester K. Promoting felt responsibility for constructive change and proactive behavior: Exploring aspects of an elaborated model of work design[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2006, 27(8): 1089-1120. [2] Van Dyne L, LePine J A. Helping and voice extra-role behaviors: Evidence of construct and predictive validity[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1998, 41(1): 108-119. [3] Whiting S W, Podsakoff P M, Pierce J R. Effects of task performance, helping, voice, and organizational loyalty on performance appraisal ratings[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2008, 93(1): 125-139. [4] Morrison E W. Employee voice behavior: Integration and directions for future research[J]. Academy of Management Annals, 2011, 5(1): 373-412. [5] Milliken F J, Morrison E W, Hewlin P F. An exploratory study of employee silence: Issues that employees don't communicate upward and why[J]. Journal of Management Studies, 2003, 40(6): 1453-1476. [6] LePine J A, Van Dyne L. Voice and cooperative behavior as contrasting forms of contextual performance: Evidence of differential relationships with big five personality characteristics and cognitive ability[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2001, 86(2): 326-336. [7] 段锦云, 魏秋江. 建言效能感结构及其在员工建言行为发生中的作用[J]. 心理学报, 2012, 44(7): 972-985.Duan Jinyun, Wei Qiujiang. The structure of voice efficacy and its role in the formation mechanism of employee voice behavior[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2012, 44(7): 972-985. (in Chinese) [8] Detert J R, Burris E R. Leadership behavior and employee voice: Is the door really open?[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2007, 50(4): 869-884. [9] Liu W, Zhu R, Yang Y. I warn you because I like you: Voice behavior, employee identifications, and transformational leadership[J]. Leadership Quarterly, 2010, 21(1): 189-202. [10] 李锐, 凌文辁, 柳士顺.上司不当督导对下属建言行为的影响及其作用机制[J]. 心理学报, 2009, 41(12): 1189-1202.Li Rui, Ling Wenquan, Liu Shishun. The mechanisms of how abusive supervision impacts on subordinates' voice behavior[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2009, 41(12): 1189-1202. (in Chinese) [11] 樊景立, 郑伯壎. 华人组织的家长式领导:一项文化观点的分析[J]. 本土心理学研究, 2000(13): 127-180.Fan Jingli, Zheng Boxun. A cultural analysis of paternalistic leadership in Chinese organization[J]. Indegeous Psychological Research in Chinese Societies, 2000, 13: 127-180. (in Chinese) [12] 郑伯壎, 周丽芳, 樊景立. 家长式领导量表:三元模式的建构与测量[J]. 本土心理学研究, 2000(14):3-64.Zheng Boxun, Zhou Lifang, Fan Jingli. A triad model of paternalistic leadership: Constructs and measurement[J]. Indegeous Psychological Research in Chinese Societies, 2000, 14: 3-64. (in Chinese) [13] Cheng B S, Huang M P, Chou L F. Paternalistic leadership and its effectiveness: Evidence from Chinese organizational teams[J]. Journal of Psychology in Chinese Societies(Hong Kong), 2002, 3(1): 85-112. [14] 吴敏, 黄旭, 徐玖平, 阎洪, 时勘. 交易型领导、变革型领导与家长式领导行为的比较研究[J].科研管理, 2007, 28(3): 168-176.Wu Min, Huang Xu, Xu Jiuping, Yan Hong, Shi Kan. Comparative study of transactional, transformational, and paternalistic leadership behaviors and leadership mechanism[J]. Science Research Management, 2007, 28(3): 168-176. (in Chinese) [15] Chan S C H, Huang X, Snape E, Lam C K. The Janus face of paternalistic leaders: Authoritarianism, benevolence, subordinates' organization-based self-esteem, and performance[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2013, 34(1): 108-128. [16] Hambrick D C, D'Aveni R A. Top team deterioration as part of the downward spiral of large corporate bankruptcies[J]. Management Science, 1992, 38(10): 1445-1466. [17] Eisenhardt K M, Bourgeois L J. Politics of strategic decision making in high-velocity environments: Toward a midrange theory[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1988, 31(4): 737-770. [18] Lavelle J J, Rupp D E, Brockner J. Taking a multifoci approach to the study of justice, social exchange, and citizenship behavior: The target similarity model[J]. Journal of Management, 2007, 33(6), 891-927. [19] Graen G B, Uhl-Bien M. Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective[J].Leadership Quarterly, 1995, 6(2): 219-247. [20] Seers A. Team-member exchange quality: A new construct for role-making research[J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1989, 43(1): 118-135. [21] Xu E, Huang X, Lam C K, et al. Abusive supervision and work behaviors: The mediating role of LMX[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2012, 33(4): 531-543. [22] Wang H, Law K S, Hackett R D, et al. Leader-member exchange as a mediator of the relationship between transformational leadership and followers' performance and organizational citizenship behavior[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2005, 48: 420-432. [23] Wayne S J, Shore L M, Liden R C. Perceived organizational support and leader-member exchange: A social exchange perspective[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1997, 40: 82-111. [24] Ko J. Impact or leadership and team members' individualism -collectivism on team processes and outcomes: A leader-member exchange perspective[D]. Unpublished Doctorial Dissertation, University of Arizona, 2005.［25] Phillip J M, Douthitt E A, Hyland M M. The role of justice in team member satisfaction with the leader and attachment to the team[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2001, 86(2): 316-325. [26] Liden R C, Wayne S J, Sparrowe R T. An examination of the mediating role of psychological empowerment on the relations between the job, interpersonal relationships, and work outcomes[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2000, 85(3): 407-416. [27] Banks G C, Batchelor J H, Seers A, et al. What does team-member exchange bring to the party? A meta‐analytic review of team and leader social exchange[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2013, 35(2): 273-295. [28] Kamdar D, Van Dyne L. The joint effects of personality and workplace social exchange relationships in predicting task performance and citizenship performance[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2007, 92(5): 1286-1298. [29] Fu P P, Tsui A S, Dess G G. The dynamics of guanxi in Chinese hightech firms: Implications for knowledge management and decision making[J]. Management International Review, 2006, 46(3): 277-305. [30] Chen C C, Chen Y R, Xin K. Guanxi practices and trust in management: A procedural justice perspective[J]. Organization Science, 2004, 15(2): 200-209. [31] Seers A, Petty M M, Cashman J F. Team-member exchange under team and traditional management: A naturally occurring quasi-experiment[J]. Group & Organization Management, 1995, 20(1): 18-38. [32] Hofstede G. Cultural constraints in management theories[J]. Academy of Management Executive, 1993, 7(1): 81-94. [33] Farh J L, Hackett R D, Liang J. Individual-level cultural values as moderators of perceived organizational support-employee outcome relationships in China: Comparing the effects of power distance and traditionality[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2007, 50(3): 715-729. [34] Kipnis D, Schmidt S M, Wilkinson I. Intra-organizational influence tactics: Explorations in getting one's way [J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1980, 65(4): 440-452.