基于自我认知理论的家长式领导对建言的影响

科研管理 ›› 2014, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (10): 150-160.

• 论文 • 上一篇

基于自我认知理论的家长式领导对建言的影响

田在兰¹, 黄培伦^1,2

1. 华南理工大学广州学院, 广东广州 510600;
2. 华南理工大学工商管理学院, 广东广州 510640

收稿日期:2012-11-26 修回日期:2014-01-07 出版日期:2014-10-25 发布日期:2014-10-23
作者简介:田在兰（1981-），女（汉），湖北，华南理工大学广州学院，博士生，研究方向：组织行为与人力资源管理。
黄培伦（1949-），男（汉），上海，华南理工大学工商管理学院，教授，博士生导师，研究方向：组织行为与人力资源管理。

Researches on the effects of paternalistic leadership on voice behavior from the self-cognitive perspective

Tian Zailan¹, Huang Peilun^1,2

1. Guangzhou College of South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510600;
2. Business Administration of South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510640

Received:2012-11-26 Revised:2014-01-07 Online:2014-10-25 Published:2014-10-23

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 从以下属为中心的自我认知视角，提出员工的自我效能感是其建言行为的内源性动机，并结合社会影响理论和组织支持理论探讨家长式领导对员工建言行为的影响机制。研究以IT行业的配对样本为研究对象，采用问卷调研的实证研究方法，研究结果表明，家长式领导通过员工的自我效能感影响员工的建言行为，而组织支持感则对家长式领导和自我效能感的影响起调节作用。

关键词: 家长式领导, 建言行为, 自我效能感, 组织支持感

Abstract: From the self-cognitive perspective which take the staff as the center, this paper puts forward that the employees' self-efficacy is the extrinsic motivation of voice behavior. It studies on the effect mechanism of paternalistic leadership on employees'voice behavior combined with the social impact theory and the organizational support theory. The paper researches on the paired samples from IT industry with empirical research methods of questionnaire investigation, and concludes that paternalistic leadership influence employees' voice behavior through self-efficacywhile perceived organizational support has moderating effect between paternalistic leadership and employees' self-efficacy.

Key words: paternalistic leadership, voice behavior, self-efficacy, perceived organizational support

中图分类号:

F272.91

田在兰, 黄培伦. 基于自我认知理论的家长式领导对建言的影响[J]. 科研管理, 2014, 35(10): 150-160.

Tian Zailan, Huang Peilun. Researches on the effects of paternalistic leadership on voice behavior from the self-cognitive perspective[J]. Science Research Management, 2014, 35(10): 150-160.

参考文献

[1] 梁建,唐京.员工合理化建议的多层次分析:来自本土连锁超市的证[J].南开管理评论,2009,12(3):125-134. [2] Hofstede G.Culture's consequences: Comparing values,behaviors,institutions,and organizations across nations[M].Thousand Oaks:Sage Publications(Second edition),2003. [3] Tangirala S,Ramanujam R.Exploring nonlinearity in employee voice: the effects of personal control and organizational identification[J].Academy of Management Journal,2008,51(6):1189-1203. [4] 魏昕,张志学.组织中为什么缺乏抑制性进言？[J].管理世界,2010(10):99-1087. [5] Detert J R,Burris E R.Leadership behavior and employee voice:Is the door really open?[J].The Academy of Management Journal Archive,2007,50(4):869-884. [6] Liu Wu,Zhu Renhong,Yang Yongkang.I warn you because I like you: Voice behavior, employee identifications, and transformational leadership[J].The leadership Quarterly,2010,(21):189-202. [7] 李锐,凌文辁, 柳士顺.上司不当督导对下属建言行为的影响及其作用机制[J].心理学报,2009,41(12):1189-1202. [8] Morrison E W,Wheeler-Smith S L,Kamdar D.Speaking up in groups: A cross-level study of group voice climate and voice[J].Journal of Applied Psychology,2011,96(1):183-191. [9] Ng, T. W. H., & Feldman, D. C. Employee voice behavior: A meta-analytic test of the conservation of resources framework [J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2012, 33(2), 216 234. [10] Desert, J. R., & Edmondson, A. C. Implicit voice theories: Taken-for-granted rules of self-censorship at work [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2011, 54(3), 461 488. [11] 段锦云, 张倩.建言行为的认知影响因素、理论基础及发生机制[J]. 心理科学进展,2012, 20(1), 115 126. [12] Bandura, A.Social foundations of thought and action:A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ[M]. Prentice Hall, 1986. [13] Milliken F J,Morrison E W,Hewlin P F.An exploratory study of employee silence:Issues that employees don't communicate upward and why[J].Journal of Management studies,2003,40(6):1453-1476. [14] Eisenberger R, Huntington R, Hutchison S, et al.Perceived organizational support[J].Journal of Applied Psychology,1986,71:500－507. [15] 郑伯埙,周丽芳,樊景立.家长式领导:三元模式的建构与测量[ J].本土心理学研究,2000(14):3-64. [16] Wong C A,Spence Laschinger H K,Cummings G G.Authentic leadership and nurse's voice behavior and perceptions of care quality[J].Journal of Nursing Management,2010,18(8):889-900. [17] Walumbwa F O,Schaubroeck J.Leader personality traits and employee voice behavior: Mediating roles of ethical leadership and work group psychological safety[J].Journal of Applied Psychology,2009,94(5):1275-1286. [18] Bandura A. Self-efficacy: The Exercise of Control [M]. New York: Freeman, 1997. [19] Lepine J A, Van Dyne L. Voice and cooperative behavior as contrasting forms of contextual performance: Evidence of differential relationships with big five personality characteristics and cognitive ability [J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2001, 86(2): 326~336. [20] Van Dyne L, Kamdar D, Joireman J. In-role perceptions buffer the negative impact of low LMX on helping and enhance the positive impact of high LMX on voice [J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2008, 93(6): 1195~1207. [21] 魏蕾,时勘.家长式领导与员工工作投入:心理授权的中介作用[J].心理与行为研究,2010,8(2):88-93. [22] 万舒超.家长式领导、团队认同、关系、团队公民行为作用机制研究[D].杭州:浙江大学管理学院,2009. [23] 李超平.心理资本——打造人的竞争优势[M].北京:机械工业出版社,2007:89. [24] Luthans Fred, Norman Steven M., Jensen Susan M. The value of the psychological capital of immigrant entrepreneurs [J]. International Journal of Business and Globalization, 2007,(2). [25] 田喜洲,谢晋宇.心理资本对接待业员工工作态度与行为的影响效应与机理[J].软科学,2010,24(5). [26] Schwarzer R, Babler J, Kwiatek P, Schroder K, Zhang J X. The assessment of optimistic self-beliefs: Comparison of the german, spanish, and Chinese versions of the general self-efficacy scale [J]. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 1997, 46(1): 69-88. [27] Van Dyne L, Lepine J A. Helping and voice extra-role behaviors: Evidence of construct and predictive validity [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1998, 41(1): 108-119. [28] 段锦云, 王重鸣, 钟建安. 大五和组织公平感对进谏行为的影响研究[J]. 心理科学, 2007, 30(1): 19-22.

基于自我认知理论的家长式领导对建言的影响

Researches on the effects of paternalistic leadership on voice behavior from the self-cognitive perspective

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	李艳妮徐兰香. 先前经验对新产品开发绩效的影响机制[J]. 科研管理, 2023, 44(3): 142-150.
[2]	王莉, 夏萱. 品牌社区中用户创新行为缘何缺失，又因何兴起？——基于权力感视角的研究[J]. 科研管理, 2023, 44(2): 176-183.
[3]	张秀娥王超李帅. 制度环境、创业自我效能感与创业意愿[J]. 科研管理, 2022, 43(5): 59-66.
[4]	耿紫珍马乾丁琳. 从谏或噤声？家长式领导对团队创造力的影响[J]. 科研管理, 2021, 42(5): 200-206.
[5]	张海涛肖岚李鹏陈古鹏. 建设性自恋型领导和中层管理者创新创业行为[J]. 科研管理, 2021, 42(3): 172-179.
[6]	谢江佩,戴馨,黎常. 团队成员权力感知对建言行为的影响研究[J]. 科研管理, 2020, 41(7): 201-209.
[7]	李伟梅继霞熊卫. 情绪智力、劳动策略与情感耗竭：有调节的中介模型[J]. 科研管理, 2020, 41(6): 228-236.
[8]	尹奎,徐渊,宋皓杰,邢璐. 科研经历、差错管理氛围与科研创造力提升[J]. 科研管理, 2018, 39(9): 169-176.
[9]	易朝辉段海霞任胜钢. 创业自我效能感、创业导向与科技型小微企业绩效关系研究[J]. 科研管理, 2018, 39(8): 99-109.
[10]	冯镜铭刘善仕吴坤津. 谦卑型领导与下属建言：传统性的调节作用[J]. 科研管理, 2018, 39(8): 120-130.
[11]	郭韧,周飞,林春培. 组织知识共享氛围对管理创新的影响：基于员工自我效能的调节中介模型[J]. 科研管理, 2018, 39(10): 70-78.
[12]	阎亮张治河. 组织创新氛围与员工创新行为——一个混合机制模型[J]. 科研管理, 2017, 38(9): 97-105.
[13]	张亚军张军伟刘汕. 领导宽恕对员工建言的影响研究[J]. 科研管理, 2017, 38(11): 66-74.
[14]	屠兴勇，张琪，王泽英，赵紫薇，何欣. 知识工作者内生动机、知识共享意愿与创造力：机制与路径[J]. 科研管理, 2017, 38(10): 111-118.
[15]	逄键涛温珂. 主动性人格对员工创新行为的影响与机制[J]. 科研管理, 2017, 38(1): 12-20.