产品创新与工艺创新知识流耦合影响因素研究——基于制造业企业的实证分析

科研管理 ›› 2012, Vol. ›› Issue (8): 16-24.

产品创新与工艺创新知识流耦合影响因素研究——基于制造业企业的实证分析

毕克新^1,2, 黄平¹, 李婉红¹

1. 哈尔滨工程大学经济管理学院, 黑龙江哈尔滨 150001;
2. 哈尔滨理工大学管理学院, 黑龙江哈尔滨 150080

收稿日期:2011-06-17 修回日期:2012-01-09 出版日期:2012-08-27 发布日期:2012-08-15
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目"基于低碳经济的制造业绿色创新体系及知识流动研究"(71073041,2011.01-2013.12); 国家自然科学基金项目"信息化条件下制造业企业工艺创新组织、模式与机制研究"(70872024,2009.01-2011.12); 国家自然科学基金项目"基于制造的产品创新与工艺创新互动关系与协调机制研究"(70473019,2005.01-2007.12)。

The influential factors of knowledge flow coupling between product innovation andprocess innovation based on manufacturing enterprises

Bi Kexin^1,2, Huang Ping¹, Li Wanhong¹

1. School of Economics and Management, Harbin University of Engineering, Harbin 150001, China;
2. School of Management, Harbin University of Science and Technology, Harbin 150080, China

Received:2011-06-17 Revised:2012-01-09 Online:2012-08-27 Published:2012-08-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 基于国内外现有研究成果,针对制造业企业产品创新与工艺创新知识流耦合的现象,深入分析了影响知识流耦合的因素,提出了相应的假设,据此构建了制造业企业产品创新与工艺创新知识流耦合的理论模型。选择我国201家制造业企业作为研究对象进行问卷调查,运用结构方程模型对所提假设进行假设检验,研究结果表明:知识流耦合度、组织环境、知识传递方式和知识节点特性与知识流耦合效率正相关,知识特性与知识流耦合效率负相关,其中组织环境对知识流耦合效率的影响最大。

关键词: 制造业企业, 产品创新, 工艺创新, 知识流耦合, 结构方程模型

Abstract: Based on both domestic and international existing research achievements, especially under the knowledge flow coupling circumstance of manufacturing enterprise product innovation and process innovation, the influential factors of knowledge flow coupling are in-depth analyzed, the corresponding hypothesis is accordingly proposed, a theoretical model of manufacturing enterprise product innovation and process innovation knowledge flow coupling is constructed. The 201manufacturing enterprises in China are chosen as the research objects in the questionnaire survey, and the structural equation model is used to verify the hypotheses. The results show that knowledge flow coupling efficiency is positively correlated with the degree of knowledge flow coupling, organization environment, knowledge transfer mode, and knowledge node characteristics, but the efficiency is negatively correlated with the knowledge characteristics, it is worth to point out that organization environment has the biggest influence on knowledge flow coupling efficiency.

Key words: manufacturing enterprise, product innovation, process innovation, knowledge flow coupling, structural equation model

中图分类号:

F406.3

毕克新, 黄平, 李婉红. 产品创新与工艺创新知识流耦合影响因素研究——基于制造业企业的实证分析[J]. 科研管理, 2012, (8): 16-24.

Bi Kexin, Huang Ping, Li Wanhong. The influential factors of knowledge flow coupling between product innovation andprocess innovation based on manufacturing enterprises[J]. Science Research Management, 2012, (8): 16-24.

参考文献

[1] OECD/Eurostat.Oslo Manual: Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Technological Inno- vation Data[M].Paris:OECD/Eurostat,2005:12-56.
[2] Andrea,Mantovani.Complementarity between product and process innovation in a mono- poly setting[J].Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 2006,15(3):219-234.
[3] Utterback.M.James,W.J.Abernathy.A dynamic model of product and process innovation[J]. Omega,1975,3(6):639-656.
[4] Abernathy.J.W,J.M.Utterback.Patterns of industrial innovation[J].Technology Review,1978, 80(7):40-47.
[5] 许庆瑞,郭斌,王毅.中国企业技术创新——基于核心能力的组合创新[J].管理工程学报, 2000(4):1-10.
[6] Ester,Martinez-Ros.Explaining the decisions to carry out product and process innovation:the Spanish case[J].The Journal of High Technology Management Research,2000,10(2):223- 242.
[7] 毕克新,孙德花,李柏洲.制造业企业产品创新与工艺创新协调机制研究[J].科学学研究, 2008, 26(4):846-851.
[8] 毕克新,孙德花,李柏洲.基于系统动力学的制造业企业产品创新与工艺创新互动关系仿真研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2008(12):75-80.
[9] 毕克新,孙德花.制造业企业产品创新与工艺创新协同发展博弈分析[J].管理评论,2010, 22(5):104-111.
[10] 毕克新,孙德花.基于复合系统协调度模型的制造业企业产品创新与工艺创新协同发展实证研究[J].中国软科学,2010(9):156-192.
[11] 贾卫峰,党兴华.技术创新网络核心企业知识流耦合控制研究[J].科研管理,2010,31(1):56- 62.
[12] 吴勤堂.产业集群与区域经济发展耦合机理分析[J].管理世界,2004(2):133-136.
[13] 郝生宾,于渤,吴伟伟.企业网络能力与技术能力的耦合度评价研究[J].科学学研究,2009, 27(2):250-254.
[14] Roberts.J.From know-how to show how, Questioning the role of information and com- munication technologies in knowledge transfer[J].Technology Analysis&Strategic Manage- ment,2000,12(4):429-443.
[15] Wathne.K,J.Roos,G.Krogh.Towards a Theory of Konwledge Transfer in Cooperative Context [J].Managing kowledge:perspectives on cooperation and competition,1996:55-81.
[16] Davenport.T,L.Prusak.Working Kowledge:How Organizations Manage What They Know[M]. Boston:Haxvard Business Sehool Press,1999.
[17] Szulanski.G.Exploring Internal Stickiness: lmpediments to the Transfer of Best Practice within the Firm[J].Strategie Management Joumal,1996,17:27-43.
[18] Cumming.J.L,S.B.Teng.Transferring R&D knowledge: the key factors affecting Knowledge transfer Sueeess[J].Journal of Engineering and Technology Management,2003,20:39-68.
[19] 张莉,Wan Fang,林与川,Qiu Pingping.实验研究中的调节变量和中介变量[J].管理科学, 2011, 24(1):108-116.
[20] Bock.G.W,G.Y.Kim.Breaking the Myths of Rewards:An Exploratory Study of Attitudes about Knowledge Sharing[J].Information Resources Management Journal,2002,15(2):14-21.
[21] Simonin.B.L.Ambiguity and the Proeess of Knowledge Transfer in Strategie Allianees[J]. Strategie Management Journal,1999,20(7):595-623.
[22] Nonakal.I,H.Takeuchi.The Knowledge Creating ComPany: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation[M].NewYork:Oxfoud University Press,1995.
[23] Cohen.W.M,D.A..Levinthal.Absorptive capacity: A new perspective of leaming and innova- tion[J].Adrnlnistrative Science Quanterly,1990,35:128-152.
[24] Grant.R.M.Prospering in dynamically competitive environments:Organizational Capability as knowledge in integration[J].Organization Scienee,1996,7(4):375-387.
[25] Hamel.G,L.Y.Doz,K.C.Prahalad.Collaborate with yaur conpetilors and win[M].Harvard Busi- ness Review,1989,67(1):133.
[26] Hansen.N,T.Tieney.What`s your strategy for management knowledge[J].Harvard Business Review,1999, (3).
[27] 付睿臣.制造业企业信息化对技术创新能力影响及实证研究.哈尔滨理工大学博士学位论文,2009:92-93.