技术创新联盟知识转移决策的主从博弈分析

科研管理 ›› 2012, Vol. ›› Issue (4): 41-47,61.

技术创新联盟知识转移决策的主从博弈分析

蒋樟生, 胡珑瑛

哈尔滨工业大学管理学院, 黑龙江哈尔滨 150001

收稿日期:2009-05-15 修回日期:2009-12-25 出版日期:2012-04-27 发布日期:2012-04-20
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目(70872025,2009.01-2011.12)。

The knowledge transfer decisions in a technology innovationalliance based on leader-followers game

Jiang Zhangsheng, Hu Longying

School of Management, Harbin Institute of Technology, Heilongjiang Harbin, 150001, China

Received:2009-05-15 Revised:2009-12-25 Online:2012-04-27 Published:2012-04-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 通过分析盟主企业和合作伙伴的知识转移决策对联盟合作创新的影响,建立技术创新联盟知识转移决策的主从博弈模型,指出联盟存在和发展的前提条件是盟主企业的知识边际收益足够大,合作伙伴按照各自知识边际收益的比例结构转移其知识资本,盟主企业的知识转移决策与其自身的知识边际收益正相关,与合作伙伴知识边际收益之和负相关,为联盟成员确定最佳动态竞争合作关系以及灵活机动的管理方式提供决策支持。

关键词: 创新联盟, 知识转移, 知识产出, 主从博弈

Abstract: The leader-followers game model of knowledge transfer decisions in the technology innovation alliance is established to analyze the influences of knowledge transfer decisions of the core firms and partner enterprises on the alliance cooperation innovation. The results are as follows: The preconditions for the existence and development of the alliance are that the knowledge marginal revenues of the core firms are large enough. Partner enterprises transfer their knowledge capital according to the proportion structure of their own marginal revenues. There is a positive correlation between the knowledge transfer decision of the core firm and its own marginal revenue, and a negative correlation between the knowledge transfer decision of the core firm and the sum of partners enterprises marginal revenues, which might provide some theoretical supports for the selections of optimal dynamic competitive and cooperative relationship and managerial flexibility among member enterprises.

Key words: innovation alliance, knowledge transfer, knowledge output, leader-followers game

中图分类号:

F279.21

蒋樟生, 胡珑瑛. 技术创新联盟知识转移决策的主从博弈分析[J]. 科研管理, 2012, (4): 41-47,61.

Jiang Zhangsheng, Hu Longying. The knowledge transfer decisions in a technology innovationalliance based on leader-followers game[J]. Science Research Management, 2012, (4): 41-47,61.

参考文献

[1] Khamseh H M, Jolly D R. Knowledge transfer in alliances: determinant factors [J]. Journal of Knowledge Management, 2008, 12(1):37-50.
[2] Gil A E, Passino M K. Stability analysis of network-based cooperative resource allocation strategies [J]. Automatica, 2006, 42(2):245-250.
[3] Narteh B. Knowledge transfer in developed-developing country inter-firm collaborations: a conceptual framework [J]. Journal of Knowledge Management, 2008, 12(1):78-91.
[4] Chen C J. The effects of knowledge attribute, alliance characteristics, and absorptive capacity on knowledge transfer performance [J]. R&D Management, 2008, 34(3):311-321.
[5] 陈菲琼. 我国企业与跨国公司知识联盟的知识转移层次研究[J]. 科研管理, 2001, 22(2):66-73.
[6] 庄亚明, 李金生. 高技术企业知识联盟中的知识转移研究[J]. 科研管理, 2004, 25(6):50-55.
[7] Morasch K. Strategic Alliances as Stackelberg Cartels - Concept and Equilibrium Alliance Structure [J]. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 2000, 18(2): 257-282.
[8] Lin M H. Strategic Airline Alliances and Endogenous Stackelberg Equilibria [J]. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 2004, 40(5): 357-384.
[9] Guiomar M H, Pierre C, Estelle M. Deforestation and Foreign Transfers: a Stackelberg Differential Game Approach [J]. Computers & Operations Research, 2006, 33(2): 386-400.
[10] Samaddar S, Kadiyala SS. An analysis of interorganizational resource sharing decisions in collaborative knowledge creation [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2006, 170(1): 192-210.
[11] Ding X H, Huang R H. Effects of knowledge spillover on inter-organizational resource sharing decision in collaborative knowledge creation [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2009, 35(4):1-27.
[12] Samaddar S, Kadiyala S S. An analysis of inter-organizational resource sharing decisions in collaborative knowledge creation [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2006, 170(1):192-210.
[13] Griliches, Zvi. Issues in Assessing the Contribution of R&D to Productivity Growth [J]. Bell Journal of Economics, 1979, 10: 92-116.
[14] Jaffe, A B. Real effects of Academic Research [J], American Economic Review, 1989, 79 (5): 957-970.
[15] Ronde P, Hussler C. Innovation in regions: What does really matter? [J]. Research Policy, 2005, 34(8):1150-1172.