我国区域技术专业化模式比较研究

科研管理 ›› 2012, Vol. ›› Issue (10): 9-16.

我国区域技术专业化模式比较研究

冯仁涛, 余翔

华中科技大学管理学院, 湖北武汉 430074

收稿日期:2011-04-01 修回日期:2011-09-16 出版日期:2012-10-27 发布日期:2012-10-22
基金资助:
本文受国家自然科学基金资助,基金项目批准号:71072033,起止时间:2011.1-2013.12;本文同时受中央高校基本科研业务费资助,HUST:编号2010MS136,起止时间:2010.1-2011.12。

Comparison of regional patterns for technological specialization in China

Feng Rentao, Yu Xiang

School of Management, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China

Received:2011-04-01 Revised:2011-09-16 Online:2012-10-27 Published:2012-10-22

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 区域技术专业化模式反映了区域技术能力的分布情况,了解技术能力的分布是制定科学合理的区域技术发展战略的前提和基础。本文利用我国31个省区在1985-2010年间的国内发明专利授权数据,将专利数据的国际分类信息与技术领域对应,构造表示区域技术专业化模式的显性技术优势指标(RTA),分析了各省区跨技术领域专业化模式及其随时间的变化情况,并对各省区的技术专业化模式进行了评价,为有针对性的制定技术发展战略提供参考。

关键词: 技术专业化, 发明专利, 显性技术优势, 区域技术优势

Abstract: Regional patterns of technological specialization are viewed as the distribution of technology across sectors, which is the prerequisite and basis for carrying out credible and rational technology development strategy. Data involving the granted Chinese invention patents of 31 provinces during the period of 1985-2010 are collected and classified into technological sectors in accordance with their main International Patent Classification (IPC) to form the Revealed Technological Advantage (RTA) index. Regional patterns of technological specialization across technological sectors are analyzed over different periods with RTA index. Furthermore, the patterns during the period of 2001-2010 for 31 provinces are evaluated, which will provide the guidance for the policy of technology development of theses provinces.

Key words: technological specialization, invention patent, RTA, regional technological advantage

中图分类号:

F062.4

冯仁涛, 余翔. 我国区域技术专业化模式比较研究[J]. 科研管理, 2012, (10): 9-16.

Feng Rentao, Yu Xiang. Comparison of regional patterns for technological specialization in China[J]. Science Research Management, 2012, (10): 9-16.

参考文献

[1] Vertova, G. National technological specialisation and the highest technological opportunities historically[J]. Technovation, 2001, 21(9): 605-612.
[2] (挪)詹·法格博格,(美)戴维·莫利,(美)理查德·纳尔逊主编,柳卸林,郑刚,蔺雷,李纪珍译. 牛津创新手册. 北京:知识产权出版社, 2006: 288-289.
[3] 吴志红,辜胜阻.创新型国家需要健全的区域创新体系. 人民政协报,2008.01.18.
[4] Pavitt, K. International Patterns of Technological Accumulation[J]. Ed. by Hood, N., Vahlne, J.E. Strategies in Global Competition. Croom Helm, London, 1988.
[5] Archibugi, D., M. Pianta. Specialization and size of technological activities in industrial countries: the analysis of patent data[J]. Research Policy, 1992, 21(1): 79-93.
[6] Garcia-Vega, M. Does technological diversification promote innovation? An empirical analysis for European firms[J]. Research Policy, 2006, 35(2): 230-246.
[7] Todtling, F., M. Trippl. One size fits all? Towards a differentiated regional innovation policy approach[J]. Research Policy, 2005, 34(8): 1203-1219.
[8] 俞文华. 韩国在华发明专利申请格局、技术结构与比较优势及政策含义[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2007(7): 132-140.
[9] 俞文华. 美国在华技术比较优势演变及其政策含义—基于1985-2003年美国在华职务发明专利申请统计分析[J]. 科学学研究, 2008, 26(1): 98-104.
[10] 俞文华. 企业发明专利、技术比较优势和外国专利控制—基于国家知识产权战略实施的视角[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2010(3): 39-44.
[11] 官建成,王刚波. 技术领域优势的国际比较研究[J]. 科学学研究, 2008, 26(1): 90-97.
[12] Griliches Z. Patent statistics as economic indicators: a survey[J]. Journal of Economic Literature, 1990, 28(4): 1661-1707.
[13] Mahmood, I. P., Singh, J. Technological dynamism in Asia[J]. Research Policy, 2003, 32(6): 1031-1054.
[14] 李习保.中国区域创新能力变迁的实证分析:基于创新系统的观点[J]. 管理世界,2007(12): 18-30.
[15] Guellec, D., B. van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie. Applications, grants and the value of patent[J]. Economics Letters, 2000, 69(1): 109-114.
[16] Schmoch, U. Concept of a technology classification for country comparisons. Final report to the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). http://www.wipo.int/export/sites/www/ipstats/en/statistics/patents/pdf/wipo_ipc_technology.pdf,2011-8-31.
[17] Soete, L. G., S. M. E. Wyatt. The use of foreign patenting as an internationally comparable science and technology output indicator[J]. Scientometrics, 1983, 5(1): 31-54.
[18] Laursen, K. The impact of technological opportunity on the dynamics of trade performance[J]. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 1999, 10(3-4): 341-357.
[19] Cantwell, J., B. Andersen. A statistical analysis of corporate technological leadership historically[J]. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 1996, 4(3): 211-234.