摘要
利息税是我国政府调节居民消费的重要政策工具,它对居民储蓄与消费的影响不言而喻。然而,我国利息税的收入再分配效应如何?尤其基于实证方面的检验是学界值得进一步探讨的问题。本文力图从平均税率累进性和税后基尼系数的角度,在理论方面分析了利息税对收入再分配的影响;在实证方面,利用中国2000—2007年城镇居民调查数据进行了实证检验。通过实证分析发现:第一,利息税平均税率在城镇不同收入组之间都具有累进性,从而利息税具有收入再分配的正效应。第二,利息税的税后基尼系数小于税前基尼系数,即利息税具有缩小收入差距的作用;第三,利息税的收入再分配效应因时期不同而存在差异;第四,降低利息税率导致利息税的收入再分配效应减弱。
Abstract
Interest income tax is an important political tool for Chinese government to regulate the consumption of residents, which has a certain effect on the relationship between saving and consumption. It is worthwhile to further discuss the effect of interest income tax on income redistribution in China, especially from the empirical perspectives. From the angles of average tax rate progressiveness and pre-tax and after-tax Gini coefficient, the effect of interest income tax on income redistribution is theoretically analyzed. Empirically, the effect is tested using the survey data of urban residents from 2000 to 2007. The results are as follows: First, the average rate of interest income tax is progressive among different income groups, therefore has a positive effect on income redistribution. Second, the Gini coefficient of after-tax interest is less than the pre-tax Gini coefficient: it is meant that the interest income tax has the effect for reducing income gap. Third, there are differences of the effect in the various periods. Fourth, reducing the rate of interest income tax weakens the income redistribution effect of interest income tax.
关键词
利息税 /
税负累进性 /
基尼系数 /
收入再分配
Key words
interest income tax /
tax progressiveness /
Gini coefficient /
income redistribution
何辉, 尹音频, 张清.
利息税的收入再分配效应研究—基于2000-2007年中国城镇居民调查数据[J]. 科研管理. 2011, 32(5): 55-60
He Hui, Yin Yinpin, Zhang Qing.
The effect of interest income tax on income redistribution:Based on the survey data of urban residents in China from 2000 to 2007[J]. Science Research Management. 2011, 32(5): 55-60
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] 何辉,尹音频.调整利息税率对中国居民人均消费影响的实证分析—基于1985-2008年的经验数据[J].统计研究,2009(6):23-28.
[2] 尹音频,何辉.调整个人储蓄利息所得税率对我国稳态人均消费的影响—基于拉姆齐模型的实证研究[J].财经论丛,2009(3):22-27.
[3] 何辉,张清.利息税对居民消费的长期稳态效应研究—基于中国经验数据的动态模拟分析[J].铜陵学院学报,2010(5):19-22.
[4] Eduardo M.R.A. Engel, Alexander Galetovic and Claudio E. Raddatz. Taxes and income distribution in Chile: Some unpleasant redistributive arithmetic[J]. Journal of Development Economics. 1999, 59:155–192.
[5] Jonathan R. Kesselman and Ron Cheung. Tax Incidence, Progressivity, and Inequality in Canada[J]. Canadian Tax Journal, 2004, 52(3):709-756.
[6] Richard M. Bird and Eric M. Zolt.The limited role of the personal income tax in developing countries[J]. Journal of Asian Economics,2005, 16(6):928-946.
[7] 阎坤,于树一.利息税税率调整更有效[J].银行家,2005(3):31-34.
[8] 雷和平.建议取消或暂停征收利息税 .金融时报,2008-03-12,第002版.
[9] 高培勇.拨开利息税存废纷争的重重烟云—告诉你一个真实的利息税 .中国财经报,2007-07-26,第001版.
[10] 高培勇.全面、正确地认识利息税 .中国社会科学院院报,2007-08-02,第001版.
[11] 冯源,罗胜.我国利息税税负累进程度分析—以北京地区为例[J].税务与经济,2008(2):70-73.
基金
本文为国家社会科学基金项目《金融市场税收政策效应评估与税制优化研究》(项目号:07XJY033,起止时间:2007.7-2011.7)阶段性研究成果;国家社会科学基金项目(项目号:10CJY016,起止时间:2010.7-2011.12)阶段性研究成果。高校省级优秀青年人才基金项目《金融市场税收政策的收入再分配效应研究—基于城镇居民调查数据实证分析》(项目号:2011SQRW046,起止时间:2010.7-2012.7)阶段性研究成果;安徽财经大学青年教师科研项目《金融市场税收政策的收入分配效应及税制优化研究》(项目号:ACKYQ1012,起止时间:2010.2-2011.6)阶段性研究成果。