领导授权赋能行为对团队创造力的影响机制研究

doi:10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2025.07.016

科研管理 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (7): 165-173.DOI: 10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2025.07.016

领导授权赋能行为对团队创造力的影响机制研究

邢赛鹏^1,2,赵琛徽³,陈琴弦⁴

1.武汉工商学院管理学院，湖北武汉430065；
2.湖北商务服务发展研究中心，湖北武汉430065；
3.中南财经政法大学工商管理学院，湖北武汉430073；
4.武昌首义学院经济管理学院，湖北武汉430074

收稿日期:2024-05-05 修回日期:2024-12-29 出版日期:2025-07-20 发布日期:2025-07-14
通讯作者: 邢赛鹏
基金资助:
教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目：“数字化转型视域下领导授权赋能对员工及团队创造力的‘双刃剑’效应研究”（22YJA630097，2022.09—2025.12）；湖北省高等学校优秀中青年科技创新团队计划项目：“生成式人工智能赋能科创企业高质量发展的机制和路径研究”（T2024041，2025.01—2028.12）；湖北商务服务发展研究中心开放基金重点项目：“人工智能赋能企业数字化转型的机制与路径研究”（2024SWFW01，2025.01—2026.12）；武汉工商学院科研团队支持计划专项资助：“数字化人力资源管理”（WPT2023005，2024.01—2026.12）。

Research on the influence mechanism of empowering leadership behavior on team creativity

Xing Saipeng^1,2, Zhao Chenhui³, Chen Qinxian⁴

1. School of Management, Wuhan Technology and Business University, Wuhan 430065, Hubei, China;
2. Hubei Business Service Development and Research Center, Wuhan 430065, Hubei, China;
3. School of Business Administration, Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, Wuhan 430073, Hubei, China;
4. School of Economics and Management, Wuchang Shouyi University, Wuhan 430074, Hubei, China

Received:2024-05-05 Revised:2024-12-29 Online:2025-07-20 Published:2025-07-14

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 在数智时代下，团队创造力已经成为持续推动企业创新和获取竞争优势的重要途径。然而，如何激发团队创造力已成为企业创新发展必须解决的关键难题。本研究基于团队互动的视角，以动机性信息加工理论为理论基础，以团队类型为边界条件，从人际关系互动和信息深度加工两条路径构建有调节的双中介理论模型，探索领导授权赋能行为对团队创造力的影响机制。以国内科技型企业85个科研团队及其641名团队成员为研究对象，通过路径分析和Bootstrapping等方法进行统计检验。研究发现：(1)领导授权赋能行为通过人际关系互动正向影响团队创造力；(2)领导授权赋能行为通过信息深度加工正向影响团队创造力；(3)团队类型不仅正向调节领导授权赋能行为对信息深度加工的直接效应，而且正向调节领导授权赋能行为通过信息深度加工对团队创造力的间接效应；然而，团队类型正向调节领导授权赋能行为对人际关系互动的直接效应，以及领导授权赋能行为通过人际关系互动对团队创造力的间接效应均不显著。本研究不仅揭示了领导授权赋能行为通过人际关系互动和信息深度加工双路径对团队创造力的中介机制及边界条件，而且为领导通过授权赋能行为提升团队创造力提供管理启示。

关键词: 领导授权赋能行为, 人际关系互动, 信息深度加工, 团队类型, 团队创造力

Abstract: In the epoch of digital intelligence, team creativity has become an important way to continuously drive enterprise innovation and gain competitive advantages. However, how to stimulate team creativity has become a key challenge that must be addressed for innovative development of enterprises. From the perspective of team interaction and based on the motivated information processing theory, this paper adopted team type as the boundary condition and constructed a moderated doublemediation model from two paths of interpersonal interaction and information elaboration, and explored the influence mechanism of empowering leadership behavior on team creativity. Taking 85 R&D teams and 641 team members of domestic S&T enterprises as the research object, this paper used certain software to test the hypothesis through path analysis and Bootstrapping. The research results are as follows: (1) Empowering leadership behavior positively influences team creativity through interpersonal interaction; (2) Empowering leadership behavior positively influences team creativity through information elaboration; (3) Team type not only positively moderates the direct effect between empowering leadership behavior and information elaboration, but also positively moderates the indirect effect of empowering leadership behavior on team creativity through information elaboration. However, the direct effect that team type positively moderates empowering leadership behavior and interpersonal interaction, and the indirect effect of empowering leadership behavior on team creativity through interpersonal interaction are not significant. This study has not only revealed the influence mechanism of empowering leadership behavior on team creativity through interpersonal interaction and information elaboration, but also furnished some management enlightenment for leaders to enhance team creativity through empowerment behavior.

Key words: empowering leadership behavior, interpersonal interaction, information elaboration, team type, team creativity

邢赛鹏, 赵琛徽, 陈琴弦. 领导授权赋能行为对团队创造力的影响机制研究[J]. 科研管理, 2025, 46(7): 165-173.

Xing Saipeng, Zhao Chenhui, Chen Qinxian. Research on the influence mechanism of empowering leadership behavior on team creativity[J]. Science Research Management, 2025, 46(7): 165-173.

参考文献

[1]姚加权，张锟澎，郭李鹏，冯绪.人工智能如何提升企业生产效率？——基于劳动力技能结构调整的视角[J].管理世界，2024，40（02），101-116.
Yao Jiaquan, Zhang Kunpeng, Guo Lipeng ,Feng Xu. How does artificial intelligence improve firm productivity?Based on the perspective of labor skill structure adjustment[J]. Management World, 2024,40(02),101-116.
[2]KOZLOWSKI S W J, BELL B S. Work groups and teams in organizations. In W. C. Borman, D. R. Ilgen, & R. J. Klimoski (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Industrial and organizational psychology, London: Wiley. 2003,12:333–375.
[3]NIJSTAD B A, PAULUS P B. Group creativity: Common themes and future directions [M]. Oxford University Press, 2003: 326-346.
[4]曾宪聚，曾凯.新质生产力：复合概念、发展基础与系统创新路径[J]．深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版)，2024，41（2）：5-15．
ZENG Xianju, ZENG Kai.Composite concept, development foundation and systematic innovation path of new productivity boosters[J]．Journal of Shenzhen University (Humanities & Social Sciences)，2024，41（2）：5-15．
[5]陈晨，秦昕，谭玲，卢海陵，周汉森，宋博迪.授权型领导—下属自我领导匹配对下属情绪衰竭和工作绩效的影响[J].管理世界，2020，36（12）：145-162．
CHEN Chen, QIN Xin, TAN Ling, LU Hailing, ZHOU Hansen, SONG Bodi. The（in）congruence effect of supervisor empowering leadership and subordinate self-leadership on subordinate emotional exhaustion and job performance[J]. Management World, 2020,（12）:145-162.
[6]彭坚，冉雅璇，康勇军，韩雪亮．事必躬亲还是权力共享？内隐追随理论视角下领导者授权行为研究[J]．心理科学，2016，39（5）：1197-1203．
PENG Jian, RAN Yaxuan, KANG Yongjun, HAN Xueliang. To empower or not to empower your followers:An implicit followership theory perspective on leadership empowerment behavior[J].Psychological Science, 2016,39(5):1197-1203．
[7]张正堂，赵李晶，丁明智．授权型领导对员工主动变革行为的影响机制[J]．科研管理，2020，41（10）：218-226．
ZHANG Zhengtang，ZHAO Lijing，DING Mingzhi. Influence mechanism of empowering leadership on employees' taking charge behavior[J]. Science Research Management, 2020,41(10):218-226．
[8]CHEONG M, YAMMARINO F J, DIONNE S D, et al. A Review of the Effectiveness of Empowering Leadership [J]. Leadership Quarterly, 2019, 30(1): 34-58.
[9]LEE A, WILLIS S, TIAN A W. Empowering leadership: A Meta-analytic examination of incremental contribution, mediation, and moderation [J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2018, 39(3):306-325.
[10]张建平，林澍倩，刘善仕，张亚，李焕荣.领导授权赋能与领导有效性的关系：基于元分析的检验[J]．心理科学进展，2021，29（09）：1576-1598．
ZHANG Jianping, LIN Shuqian, LIU Shanshi, ZHANG Ya, LI Huanrong.Empowering leadership and leadership effectiveness: A meta-analytic examination[J]．Advances in Psychological Science，2021，29（09）：1576-1598．
[11]刘璇，张向前．团队创造力研究理论评析[J]．科技进步与对策，2016，33（2）：155－160．
LIU Xuan，ZHANG Xiangqian. A review of team creativity theory[J]．Science &
Technology Progress and Policy，2016，33（2）：155－160．
[12]余璇，贺彬，刘美琳，吴绍波．人际关系视角下虚拟团队主动性人格对团队创造力的影响[J]．软科学，2022，36（2）:116-121.
YU Xuan，HE Bin，LIU Mei-lin，Wu Shao-bo．The effect of proactive personality of the virtual teams on team creativity from the perspective of interpersonal relationships[J]．Soft Science，2022，36（2）:116-121.
[13]李召敏，赵曙明．“老好人”能当好团队领导吗？——团队领导宜人性与团队创造力的关系[J]．外国经济与管理，2018,40（12）：109-124.
Li Zhaomin，Zhao Shuming．Can the “good man” Be a good team leader? A research on the relationship between leaders’ agreeableness and team creativity[J]．Foreign Economics & Management，2018，40（12）：109-124.
[14]林晓敏，白新文，林琳.团队心智模型相似性与正确性对团队创造力的影响[J]．心理学报，2014,46（11）：1734–1747.
LIN Xiaomin, BAI Xinwen, LIN Lin. Effects of similarity and accuracy indices of shared mental models on team creativity[J]．Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2014,46（11）：1734–1747.
[15]吴梦，白新文．动机性信息加工理论及其在工业与组织心理学中的应用[J]．心理科学进展，2012，20（11）：1889-1898．
WU Meng，BAI XinWen. Motivated information processing model: Theory and applications[J]．Advances in Psychological Science，2012，20（11）：1889-1898．
[16]Grant A M, Berry J W. The necessity of others is the mother of invention: Intrinsic and prosocial motivations,perspective taking, and creativity[J].Academy of Management Journal,2011,54(1):73–96.
[17]王宏蕾，孙健敏．授权型领导的负面效应：理论机制与边界条件[J]．心理科学进展，2019，27（5）：858-870.
WANG Honglei, SUN Jianmin. The negative effects of empowering leadership: Theoretical mechanisms and boundary conditions[J]．Advances in Psychological Science, 2019,27(5): 858-870．
[18]李腾.共享领导的角色配置及其对团队创造力的影响[D]．杭州：浙江大学，2019.
LI Teng. The role configurations of shared leadership and their effects on team creativity[D]．Hangzhou：Zhejiang University，2019.
[19]SHIN S, ZHOU J. When is educational specialization heterogeneity related to creativity in research and development teams? Transformational leadership as a moderator [J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2007, 92(6):1709-1721.
[20]SRIVASTAVA A, BARTOL K M, LOCKE E A. Empowering leadership in management teams: effects on knowledge sharing, efficacy, and performance[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2006, 49(6): 1239-1251.
[21]GILSON L L, SHALLEY C E. A little creativity goes a long way: An examination of teams' engagement in creative processes [J]. Journal of Management, 2004, 30(4):453-470.
[22]RYAN R M, DECI E L. Self-Determination Theory: Basic Psychological Needs in Motivation, Development, and Wellness [M]. New York: Guilford Press, 2017.
[23]LIAO H, LIU D, LOI R. Looking at Both Sides of the Social Exchange Coin: a Social Cognitive Perspective on the Joint Effects of Relationship Quality and Differentiation on Creativity[J].Academy of Management Journal，2010,53(5):1090-1109.
[24]蒋昀洁，钱佳蓉，唐立健，蒋春燕.拒绝“内卷”：团队人际关系、工作需求创新对和谐型激情的作用机制[J]．企业经济，2021，40（3）：53-63.
JIANG Yun Jie，QIAN Jiarong，TANG Lijian，JIANG Chunyan. Refusing 'involution': the mechanism of innovative team interpersonal relationships and work needs on harmonious passion[J]．Enterprise Economy，2021，40（3）：53-63.
[25]DE DREU C K W, NJSTAD B A, VAN KNIPPENBERG D.Motivated information processing in group judgment and decision making[J]．Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2008,12(1),22-49.
[26]DE DREU C K W. Time pressure and closing of the mind in negotiation[J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,2003，91(2)：280–295.
[27]SPREITZER G M. Psychological empowerment in the workplace: dimensions, measurement and validation [J]. Academy of Management journal, 1995, 38(5):1442-65.
[28]李阳，白新文.善心点亮创造力：内部动机和亲社会动机对创造力的影响，心理科学进展[J]. 2015, 23（2）：175–181.
LI Yang, BAI Xinwen. Creating for others: An experimental study of the effects of intrinsic motivation and prosocial motivation on creativity[J]. Advances in Psychological Science，2015, 23（2）：175–181.
[29]DIMOTAKIS N, SCOTT B A, KOOPMAN J. An experience sampling investigation of workplace interactions, affective states, and employee well-being [J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2011, 32(4): 572-588.
[30]王辉，武朝艳，张燕，陈昭全．领导授权赋能行为的维度确认与测量[J]．心理学报，2008,40（12）,1297-1305．
WANG Hui,WU ChaoYan, ZHANG Yan, CHEN Zhaoquan. The dimensionality and measure of empowering leadership behavior in the chinese organizations[J]．Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2008,40(12): 1297-1305．
[31]VAN KNIPPENBERG D, DE DREU C, HOMAN A. Work group diversity and group performance: an integrative model and research agenda[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology 2004,89 (6): 1008-1022.
[32]HINSZ V B, TINDALE R S, VOLLRATH D A. The emerging conceptualization of groups as information processors [J]. Psychological Bulletin, 1997, 121(1):43-64.
[33]CHOI H S, LEVINE J M. Minority influence in work teams: The impact of newcomers [J]. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2004, 40(2):273-280.
[34]张建卫，任永灿，赵辉，周洁．变革型领导对多层面创造力的双刃剑效应[J]．外国经济与管理，2018，40（5）：31-42．
Zhang Jianwei, Ren Yongcan, Zhao Hui, Zhou Jie.The double-edged sword effect of transformational leadership on multilevel creativity [J].2018,40（5）：31-42．
[35]MUELLER J S. Why individuals in larger teams perform worse[J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes，2012, 117(1):111-124.
[36]MATHIEU J E, GILSON L L, RUDDY T M. Empowerment and team effectiveness: An empirical test of an integrated model [J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2006, 91(1): 97-108.
[37]KEARNEY E, GEBERT D, VOELPELS C. When and how diversity benefits teams:The importance of team members’ need for cognition[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2009,52(3):581-598.
[38]FARH J L, LEE C, FARH C I C. Task conflict and team creativity: A question of how much and when [J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2010, 95(6): 1173-1180.
[39]吴艳，温忠麟．结构方程建模中的题目打包策略[J]．心理科学进展，2011，19（12）：1859-1867．
WU Yan, WEN ZhongLin. Item parceling strategies in structural equation modeling[J]．Advances in Psychological Science, 2011,19(12):1859-1867.
[40]MACKINNON D P, LOCKWOOD C M, WILLIAMS J. Confidence limits for the indirect effect: Distribution of the product and resampling methods[J]. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 2004,39(3):99-12

领导授权赋能行为对团队创造力的影响机制研究

Research on the influence mechanism of empowering leadership behavior on team creativity

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 10

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	任永灿, 张建卫, 赵辉. 21世纪以来国内外团队创造力的比较研究[J]. 科研管理, 2022, 43(11): 65-72.
[2]	耿紫珍马乾丁琳. 从谏或噤声？家长式领导对团队创造力的影响[J]. 科研管理, 2021, 42(5): 200-206.
[3]	戴万亮杨皎平李庆满. 内部社会资本、二元学习与研发团队创造力[J]. 科研管理, 2019, 40(1): 159-169.
[4]	郝向举王渊王进富薛琳. 临时团队情绪智力对团队创造力的影响研究[J]. 科研管理, 2018, 39(8): 131-141.
[5]	邓今朝,喻梦琴,丁栩平. 员工建言行为对团队创造力的作用机制[J]. 科研管理, 2018, 39(12): 171-178.
[6]	耿紫珍, 刘新梅, 张晓飞. 批评激发创造力?负反馈对团队创造力的影响[J]. 科研管理, 2015, 36(8): 36-43.
[7]	王端旭, 薛会娟. 交互记忆系统对团队创造力的影响及其作用机制——以利用性学习和探索性学习为中介[J]. 科研管理, 2013, (6): 106-114.
[8]	耿紫珍, 刘新梅, 沈力. 合作目标促进科研团队创造力的机理研究[J]. 科研管理, 2012, (8): 113-119,136.
[9]	张燕, 章振. 性别多样性对团队绩效和创造力影响的研究[J]. 科研管理, 2012, 33(3): 81-88.
[10]	王端旭,薛会娟. 交互记忆系统与团队创造力关系的实证研究/FONT[J]. 科研管理, 2011, 32(1): 122-128 .