数字技术治愈服务业“成本病”的路径研究——基于效率提升与结构优化视角

doi:10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2025.06.008

科研管理 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (6): 73-83.DOI: 10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2025.06.008

数字技术治愈服务业“成本病”的路径研究——基于效率提升与结构优化视角

董锋¹,赵旭¹,李春玲¹,王伦²

1.燕山大学经济管理学院，河北秦皇岛066000；
2.云南财经大学商学院，云南昆明650221

收稿日期:2024-10-10 修回日期:2025-04-10 出版日期:2025-06-20 发布日期:2025-06-06
通讯作者: 王伦
基金资助:
国家社科基金重点项目（24AGL007，2024.10—2027.12）。

Research on the paths through which digital technology cures the cost disease of the service industry: A study from the perspective of efficiency improvement and structural optimization

Dong Feng¹, Zhao Xu¹, Li Chunling¹, Wang Lun²

1. School of Economics and Management, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao 066000, Hebei, China;
2. Business School, Yunnan University of Finance and Economics, Kunming 650221, Yunnan, China

Received:2024-10-10 Revised:2025-04-10 Online:2025-06-20 Published:2025-06-06
Contact: 伦 SU王

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 服务业“成本病”的存在会影响整体经济的生产率，进而制约中国经济高质量发展动能。基于此，本文首先对“成本病”的形成机制进行梳理，然后从“效率提升”与“结构优化”两个角度切入，分别构建局部均衡模型与多部门内生增长模型分析数字技术治愈“成本病”的路径，并基于2010—2022年中国30个省份面板数据进行实证检验。结果表明：(1)就“效率提升”视角而言，数字技术能显著促进服务创新，从而推动服务业生产效率提升，即数字技术能通过赋能服务创新质效治愈“成本病”；(2)高技能劳动力、人均资本能与数字技术形成“数字化—高技能”和“数字化—资本深化”协同效应，强化数字技术的效率赋能作用；(3)从“结构优化”视角来看，数字技术一方面能够调节“效率—价格—产出”——“成本病”存在的因果链条，另一方面也能缩短行业间技术进步率差距，优化创新流动，从结构上治愈“成本病”。本研究为在服务业数“智”化转型过程中破除“成本病”问题提供了理论基础与经验证据。

关键词: 数字技术赋能, 成本病, 服务业创新, 效率提升, 结构优化

Abstract: The existence of cost disease in the service industry will affect the productivity of the overall economy and further restrict the momentum of China′s high-quality economic development. Based on this, this paper first sorted out the formation mechanism of cost disease, and then constructed a partial equilibrium model and a multi-sector endogenous growth model from the perspectives of "efficiency improvement" and "structural optimization" to analyze the path of digital technology to cure cost disease. The empirical results obtained from this study based on the panel data of 30 provincial-level regions in China from 2010 to 2022 are as follows: (1) From the perspective of "efficiency improvement", digital technology can significantly promote service innovation, thus facilitating the improvement of production efficiency in the service industry. Digital technology can empower service innovation and cure cost disease. (2) High-skilled labor and per-capita capital can form with digital technology a synergistic effect of "digitalization -high-skills" and "digitalization-capital deepening", and strengthen the efficiency empowerment of digital technology. (3) From the perspective of "structural optimization", digital technology can, on the one hand, moderate the causal chain of "efficiency-price-output" of cost disease, and on the other hand, shorten the gap of technological progress rate between industries, optimize the flow of innovation, and cure cost disease from the structure. This study will provide a theoretical basis and empirical evidence for overcoming the problem of cost disease in the process of "intelligent" digital transformation of the service industry.

Key words: digital technology empowerment, cost disease, service industry innovation, efficiency improvement, structural optimization

董锋赵旭李春玲王伦. 数字技术治愈服务业“成本病”的路径研究——基于效率提升与结构优化视角[J]. 科研管理, 2025, 46(6): 73-83.

Dong Feng, Zhao Xu, Li Chunling, Wang Lun. Research on the paths through which digital technology cures the cost disease of the service industry: A study from the perspective of efficiency improvement and structural optimization[J]. Science Research Management, 2025, 46(6): 73-83.

参考文献

[1] Baumol W. Macroeconomics of unbalanced growth: the anatomy of urban crisis [J]. American Economic Review, 1967, 57(3): 415-426.
[2] 江小涓，靳景．数字技术提升经济效率：服务分工、产业协同和数实孪生[J]．管理世界，2022，38(12)：9-26．
[3] Baumol W, Blackman S, Wolff E. Unbalanced growth revisited: asymptotic stagnancy and new evidence [J]. American Economic Review, 1985, 75(4): 806-817.
[4] Young A. Structural transformation, the mismeasurement of productivity growth, and the cost disease of services [J]. American Economic Review, 2014, 104(11): 3635-3667.
[5] 李晓华．数字技术与服务业“成本病”的克服[J]．财经问题研究，2022，(11)：16-26．
[6] 王恕立，胡宗彪．中国服务业分行业生产率变迁及异质性考察[J]．经济研究，2012，47(04)：15-27．
[7] 蔡跃洲，牛新星．中国数字经济增加值规模测算及结构分析[J]．中国社会科学，2021， (11)：4-30+204．
[8] 刘平峰，张旺．数字技术如何赋能制造业全要素生产率?[J]．科学学研究，2021，39(08)：1396-1406．
[9] 田秀娟，李睿．数字技术赋能实体经济转型发展——基于熊彼特内生增长理论的分析框架[J]．管理世界，2022，38(05)：56-74．
[10] Baumol W, Blackman S, Wolff E. Unbalanced growth revisited: asymptotic stagnancy and new evidence [J]. American Economic Review, 1985, 75(4): 806-817.
[11] 雷小清．信息通信技术对服务业“成本病”的影响研究——基于OECD国家生产率的增长核算分析[J]．财经论丛，2011，(04)：16-21．
[12] 江小涓．高度联通社会中的资源重组与服务业增长[J]．经济研究，2017，52(03)：4-17．
[13] 李帅娜．数字技术赋能服务业生产率：理论机制与经验证据[J]．经济与管理研究，2021，42(10)：51-67．
[14] 谭洪波．全球化分工“治愈”了鲍莫尔成本病吗? ——以美、中、印三国为例[J]．经济体制改革，2018(02)：145-151．
[15] 杜传忠，侯佳妮．制造业与服务业融合能否有效缓解服务业“成本病”——基于WIOD中国数据的经验事实[J]．山西财经大学学报，2021，43(03)：28-42．
[16] Melitz M J. The impact of trade on intra‐industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity[J]. econometrica, 2003, 71(6): 1695-1725.
[17] Antoniades A. Heterogeneous firms, quality, and trade[J]. Journal of International Economics, 2015, 95(2): 263-273.
[18] Prettner K, Strulik H. Innovation, automation, and inequality: Policy challenges in the race against the machine[J]. Journal of Monetary Economics, 2020, 116: 249-265.
[19] Acemoglu D, Restrepo P. The race between man and machine: Implications of technology for growth, factor shares, and employment[J]. American economic review, 2018, 108(6): 1488-1542.
[20] Jones C I. R & D-based models of economic growth[J]. Journal of political Economy, 1995, 103(4): 759-784.
[21] Aghion P, Howitt P. A model of growth through creative destruction[J]. 1990.
[22] Acemoglu D, Aghion P, Bursztyn L, et al. The environment and directed technical change[J]. American economic review, 2012, 102(1): 131-166.
[23] 易信，刘凤良．金融发展、技术创新与产业结构转型——多部门内生增长理论分析框架[J]．管理世界，2015，(10)：24-39+90．
[24] Acemoglu D. Introduction to modern economic growth[M]. Princeton university press, 2008.
[25] 宋健，郑江淮．产业结构、经济增长与服务业成本病——来自中国的经验证据[J]．产业经济研究，2017，(2)：1-13．
[26] 陈梦根，周元任．数字经济、分享发展与共同富裕[J]．数量经济技术经济研究，2023，40(10)：5-26．
[27] 周小亮，吴武林．中国包容性绿色增长的测度及分析[J]．数量经济技术经济研究，2018，35(08)：3-20．
[28] F?re R, Grosskopf S, Norris M, et al. Productivity growth, technical progress, and efficiency change in industrialized countries[J]. American economic review, 1994: 66-83.
[29] 庞瑞芝，郭慧芳．数字经济能克服服务业“成本病”吗?——来自城市层面的经验证据[J]．经济与管理研究，2023，44(10)：54-74．
[30] 陈景华，王素素，陈敏敏．服务业双向FDI、空间溢出与服务业全要素生产率——来自中国的经验证据[J]．山东财经大学学报，2020，32(01)：87-96．
[31] Shao S, Yang Z, Yang L, et al. Can China's energy intensity constraint policy promote total factor energy efficiency? Evidence from the industrial sector[J]. The Energy Journal, 2019, 40(4).
[32] Fuchs-Schündeln N, Hassan T A. Natural experiments in macroeconomics[M]//Handbook of macroe-conomics. Elsevier, 2016, 2: 923-1012.
[33] Acemoglu D. Technical change, inequality, and the labor market[J]. Journal of economic literature, 2002, 40(1): 7-72.
[34] 随洪光，高钰琳，周瑾，等．劳动力保护抑制了出口产品质量吗？——基于资本深化视角的经验研究[J]．南开经济研究，2023，(11)：149-167．
[35] 韩兆安，吴海珍，赵景峰．数字经济驱动创新发展——知识流动的中介作用[J]．科学学研究，2022，40(11)：2055-2064+2101．

数字技术治愈服务业“成本病”的路径研究——基于效率提升与结构优化视角

Research on the paths through which digital technology cures the cost disease of the service industry: A study from the perspective of efficiency improvement and structural optimization

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 3

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	余菲菲王丽婷. 数字技术赋能我国制造企业技术创新路径研究[J]. 科研管理, 2022, 43(4): 11-19.
[2]	龚轶, 王铮, 顾高翔. 技术创新与产业结构优化—一个基于自主体的模拟[J]. 科研管理, 2015, 36(8): 44-51.
[3]	赵玉林,张钟方. 高技术产业发展对产业结构优化升级作用的实证分析/FONT[J]. 科研管理, 2008, 29(3): 35-42 .