双重知识网络嵌入对新创集群企业国际创业绩效的影响研究

doi:10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2024.07.017

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 如何在集群协同创业复杂情境下通过知识网络嵌入提升国际创业绩效，是新创科技型中小企业亟待解决的难题。本文基于网络嵌入性理论与组织学习理论，选取274家新创集群科技型中小企业为研究样本，构建本土及海外双重知识网络嵌入、跨组织协同学习、跨国创业导向与国际创业绩效关系的理论模型，使用层次回归分析法深入探究双重知识网络嵌入对新创集群科技企业国际创业绩效的影响机理与作用机制。研究发现：双重知识网络嵌入显著正向影响新创集群科技型中小企业国际创业绩效，产生溢出效应与边际效应；双重知识网络嵌入促进跨组织协同学习机制的形成，而跨组织协同学习在双重知识网络嵌入与国际创业绩效间起中介作用；跨国创业导向正向调节双重知识网络嵌入对国际创业绩效的影响，发挥战略引领与行动导向作用。研究结论对于降低科技型中小企业国际创业风险及提升国际创业绩效具有理论与实践指导意义。

关键词: 双重知识网络嵌入, 国际创业绩效, 跨组织协同学习, 跨国创业导向, 集群科技型中小企业

Abstract: In the information era, knowledge embedding has played an increasingly important role in the international growth of knowledge-based enterprises. Thus, it is of theoretical and practical significance to study how to promote the international entrepreneurship performance of the newly-established cluster technological SMEs through dual knowledge network embedding. This study integrated the theories of network embeddedness and organizational learning, and built an analytical framework of the relationship between dual knowledge network embedding, collaborative learning across organizations, transnational entrepreneurial orientation, and international entrepreneurial performance of technological cluster SMEs. Through an empirical analysis of 274 survey data samples, the research found that: (1) dual knowledge network embedding has a positive impact on the growth of international entrepreneurial performance of cluster technological SMEs. The embedding of knowledge network can produce positive economic externalities, exert knowledge spillover effects, enhance the stickiness among cluster enterprises, and thus provide continuous momentum for international entrepreneurship; (2) collaborative learning across organizations plays a mediating role between dual knowledge network embedding and international entrepreneurial performance; and (3) transnational entrepreneurial orientation can positively adjust the relationship between dual knowledge network embedding and international entrepreneurial performance. In theory, this study can help to better understand the internal working mechanism of dual knowledge network embedding upon international entrepreneurship performance. In terms of management practice, it has shed lights that the cluster technological enterprises should strengthen the integration and reconstruction of internal and external knowledge networks, transform embedded tacit knowledge resources into real international entrepreneurial momentum, and thus achieve the high international entrepreneurship performance.

Key words: dual knowledge network embedding, international entrepreneurial performance, collaborative learning across organizations, transnational entrepreneurial orientation, cluster technological SME

刘军伟刘华. 双重知识网络嵌入对新创集群企业国际创业绩效的影响研究[J]. 科研管理, 2024, 45(7): 153-161.

Liu Junwei, Liu Hua. Research on the impact of dual knowledge network embedding on the international entrepreneurial performance of newly-established technological clusters[J]. Science Research Management, 2024, 45(7): 153-161.

参考文献

[1] KNIGHT G A, CAVUSGIL S T. Innovation, organizational capabilities and the born global firm[J]. Journal of International Business Studies, 2004, 35(2): 124-141.
[2] CAVUSGIL S T, KNIGHT G A. The born global firm: An entrepreneurial and capabilities perspective on early and rapid internationalization[J]. Journal of International Business Studies, 2015, 46 (1): 3-16.
[3] WANG M C, CHEN P C, FANG C. A critical view of knowledge networks and innovation performance: The mediating role of firm’s knowledge integration capacity[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2018,88(8):222-233.
[4] RUIZ-PALOMINO P, MARTINEZ-CANAS R. From opportunity recognition to the start-up phase: The moderating role of family and friends-based entrepreneurial social networks[J]. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 2021, 17(2):1159-1182.
[5] 赵艺璇,成琼文.知识网络嵌入、知识重组与企业中心型创新生态系统价值共创[J].经济与管理研究,2021,42(10): 88-107.
ZHAO Yixuan, CHENG Jingwen. Knowledge network embedding，knowledge reorganization and value co-creation of the focal firm innovation ecosystem[J]. Research on Economics and Management, 2021,42(10): 88-107.
[6] 欧忠辉,蔡猷花,胡慧芳.知识网络嵌入情境如何激活企业双元创新?—基于QCA的研究[J].科研管理,2021,42(6): 94-101.
OU Zhonghui, CAi Xianhua, HU Huifang. How knowledge network embedding context activates firms’ ambidextrous innovation?—A research based on the QCA method[J]. Science Research Management, 2021, 42(6): 94-101.
[7] LIU N, MAO J Q, GUAN J C. Knowledge convergence and organization innovation: The moderating role of relational embeddedness[J]. Scientometrics, 2020, 125(3):1899-1921.
[8] CAPONE F, LAZZERETTI L. INNOCENITI N. Innovation and diversity: the role of knowledge networks in the inventive capacity of cities[J]．Small Business Economics，2021，56(2) : 773－788．
[9] FRENKEN K, CEFIS E, STAM E. Industrial Dynamics and Clusters: A Survey[J]．Regional Studies，2015，
49(1):10-27.
[10] 李鹏,吴瑶,彭华涛.知识网络嵌入与国际创业企业成长关系研究[J].科学学研究,2022,40(8): 1441-1451.
LI Peng, WU Yao, PENG Huatao. Research on the relationship between knowledge network embedding and the growth of international entrepreneurial enterprises[J]. Studies in Science of Science, 2022, 40(8): 1441-1451.
[11] NERKAR A, PARUCHURI S. Evolution of R & D capabilities: the role of knowledge networks within a firm[J]. Management Science, 2005, 51(5):771-785.
[12] 曹洲涛,欧阳素珊.多重知识网络嵌入性对团队创新绩效的“双刃剑”效应—失败学习的中介作用[J].科技进步与对策,2020,37(24): 142-151.
CAO Zhoutao, OUYANG Susan. The Double-edged sword effect of multiple knowledge network embeddedness on team innovation performance—the mediating role of error-based learning[J]. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 2020, 37(24): 142-151.
[13] 尹俣潇,梅强,徐占东.创业网络关系嵌入与新创企业成长—创业学习的中介作用[J].科技管理研究,2019,39(5):199-206.
YIN Yuxiao, MEI Qiang, XU Zhandong. The embedding of entrepreneurial network relationship and the growth of new enterprises：The intermediary role of entrepreneurial learning[J]. Science and Technology Management Research, 2019,39(5):199-206.
[14] 杜群阳,郑小碧.天生全球化企业跨国创业导向与国际化绩效—基于网络关系与学习导向动态耦合的视角[J].科研管理,2015,36(3):118-126.
DU Qunyang, ZHENG Xiaobi. Relationship between international entrepreneurial orientation and international performance of the born global enterprises—A view from the dynamic coupling of network relationship and learning orientation[J]. Science Research Management, 2015,36(3):118-126.
[15] 段万春,王玉华,许成磊.组织协同学习机制与整合优化方法研究[J], 科技进步与对策，2017,34(22):13-19.
DUAN Wanchun, WANG Yuhua, XU Chenglei. Research on the mechanism of organizational collaborative learning and the method of integrating and optimizing[J]. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 2017, 34(22):13-19.
[16] TOHIDI H, SEYEDALIAKBAR S M, MANDEGARI M. Orgainzational learning measurement and the effect on firm innovation[J]. Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Jnccn, 2013, 2(6):561-568.
[17] DONG J Q, Yang C H. Being ccentral is a double-edged sword: Knowledge network centrality and new product development in US Pharmaceutical Industry[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2016, 113(1):379-385.
[18] KESIDOU E, SNIJDERS C.External Knowledge and Innovation Performance in Clusters: Empirical Evidence from the Uruguay Software Cluster[J]. Industry and Innovation, 2012 19(5):437-457.
[19] 肖亮,王璐雅,徐榆雯,余福茂.多重知识网络嵌入对跨境B2C出口企业绩效的影响研究[J].管理学报,2018,15(10): 1056-1063.
XIAO Liang, WANG Luya, XU Yuwen. Research on the effect of multi-knowledge network embeddedness on the perfomrmance of cross-border B2C export enterprises[J]. Chinese Journal of Management, 2018,15(10): 1056-1063.
[20] YAYAVARAM S, CHEN W R. Changes in firm knowledge-edge couplings and firm innovation performance: the moderating role of technological complexity[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2015, 36(3)377-396.
[21] 李杰义,闫静波,王重鸣.双重知识网络嵌入性、学习能力与国际化速度——快速国际化情境下的实证研究[J].经济管理,2018,40(9):74-91.
LI Jieyi, YAN Jingbo, WANG Chongming. How does the regional government implement the strategy of innovation driven development?—Empirical research on the "three effects and one performance" model[J]. Studies in Science of Science, 2009,37(1):121-129.
[22] 潘宏亮.国际创业经验、创新要素累积与天生国际化企业双元创新[J].科研管理,2020,41(3):43-51.
PAN Hongliang. The effect of international entrepreneurial experience and innovation elements accumulation on dual innovation of born global[J]. Studies in Science of Science, 2020, 41(3):43-51.
[23] GILSING V A, DUYSTERS G M． Understanding novelty creation in exploration networks—Structural and relational embeddedness jointly considered[J]. Technovation, 2008, 28 ( 10) : 693 － 708．
[24] 陈初昇,王玉敏,衣长军.海外华侨华人网络、组织学习与企业对外直接投资逆向技术创新效应[J].国际贸易问题,2020(4):79-86.
CHEN Chusheng, WANG Yumin, YI Changjun. Overseas Chinese network, organizational learning and reverse technology innovation of outward foreign direct investment[J]. Journal of International Trade, 2020(4):79-86.
[25] BOLOGA R, LUPU A R. Organizational Learning net-works that can increase the productivity of IT consulting companies—a case study for ERP consultants[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2014, 41(1):126-136.
[26] 许学国.跨组织协同学习机理及实证研究[J].系统管理学报,2010(3): 284-291.
XU Xueguo. Mechanism of Organizational Synergetic Learning and Empirical Study in China[J]. Journal of
Systems & Management, 2010, 19(3): 284-291.
[27] SINKULA, J M, BAKER, W E, NOORDEWIER, T. A framework for market-based organizational
learning: linking values, knowledge, and behavior[J]. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 1997,
25(4):305–318.
[28] 刘亚军,和金生.创业导向,组织学习对核心能力及组织绩效的影响研究—来自华中,华南,华北地区210个企业的实证[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理,2009,30(4):152-158.
LIU Yajun, HE Jinsheng. The influence of entrepreneurial orientation and organizational learning to core competence and performance: A survey of 210 companies from center, south and north China[J]. Science of Science and Management of S & T, 2009,30(4):152-158.
[29] 葛晓永,赵曙明,吴青熹.学习导向、团队信任与企业创新绩效:一个理论的模型[J].现代管理科学,2016,(2),6-8.
GE Xiaoyong, ZHAO Shuming, WU qinxi. Research on the relationship among learning orientation, team
trust and enterprise innovation performance- A theoretical framework[J]. Modern Management Science,
2016, (2),6-8..
[30] MTIGWE B. The Entrepreneurial Firm Internationalization Process in the South African Context--a Comparative Approach[J]. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 2005, 11(5):358-77.
[31] LORIA M B, MORENO-LUZON M D. Organizational learning: proposal of an integrative scale and research instrument[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2014, 67(5):692-697.
[32] KRAUS N T, ANGELSBER M, et al. Antecedents of international opportunity recognition in born global firm[J]．Journal of Promotion Management，2017, 23 (3) : 386－406.
[33] 刘军伟,刘华.跨国创业导向对国际化创新绩效的影响—基于科技型中小企业的实证研究[J].技术经济与管理研究,2022(6):52-57.
LIU Junwei. LIU Hua. The impact of transnational entrepreneurship orientation upon international innovation performance： An empirical study based on the small and medium-sized technological enterprises[J]. Journal of Technical Economics & Management, 2022(6):52-57.
[34] 杜群阳,李凯.从创业导向到跨国创业导向:一个文献综述[J].国际贸易问题, 2012(7): 96-105.
DU Qunyang, LI Kai. Entrepreneurial orientation & transnational entrepreneurial orientation: An literature review[J]. Journal of International Trade, 2012(7): 96-105.
[35] CHOW, I H. The Relationship between Entrepreneurial Orientation and Firm Performance in China[J]. SAM Advanced Management Journal, 2006, 71(3):11-20.
[36] SHEPHERD D A. 1999. Venture capitalists' assessment of new venture survival[J]. Management Science, 45(5):621-632.
[37] 张秀娥,李梦莹.创业激情对创业成功的作用机制研究[J].科研管理,2021,42(09):120-126.
ZHANG Xiue, LI Mengying. A research on the influence mechanism of entrepreneurial passion on
entrepreneurial success[J]. Science Research Management,2021,42(09):120-126.
[38] 潘宏亮.创业者吸收能力、双元创新战略对天生国际化企业成长绩效的影响[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2018,39(12):94-110.
PAN Hongliang. The effect of absorptive capacity of the entrepreneurs and ambidexterity innovation
strategy on the growth performance of born globals[J]. Science of Science and Management of S.& T,
2018,39(12):94-110.
[39] 郑小碧.跨国创业导向、技术创新能力与天生全球化企业国际化绩效[J].科研管理，2019,40(10):230-239.
ZHENG Xiaobi. International entrepreneurial orientation，technology innovation ability and international performance of born global enterprises[J]. Science Research Management, 2019,40(10):230-239.
[40] UZZI B. Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1997, 42(2):35-67.