知识产权城市建设对企业全球价值链分工地位的影响研究

吴翟; 覃楚翔; 蒋殿春

doi:10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2024.07.014

PDF(1071 KB)

科研管理 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (7) : 127-135. DOI: 10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2024.07.014

知识产权城市建设对企业全球价值链分工地位的影响研究

吴翟 ¹ ,
覃楚翔 ² ,
蒋殿春 ³^,⁴

作者信息 +

Research on the impacts of cities construction for intellectual property on firms' status in GVCs

Wu Di ¹ ,
Qin Chuxiang ² ,
Jiang Dianchun ³^,⁴

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

全球价值链分工地位是企业参与外循环能力的重要体现。随着近年来逆全球化思潮愈演愈烈,国际循环出现局部性梗阻,如何有效提升企业全球价值链分工地位已成为当前亟须解决的重要问题。本文采用双重差分模型,基于2000—2013年间“中国知识产权试点城市”政策的准自然实验,分析各地相继开展的知识产权城市建设对于企业全球价值链分工地位的影响及其内在机制。研究发现:(1)知识产权城市建设能够显著提升企业出口国内附加值率,促进其全球价值链分工地位提升。(2)营造创新生态环境、吸引外商直接投资与引进先进生产设备,是知识产权城市建设促进企业全球价值链分工地位提升的关键作用机制。(3)知识产权城市建设提升企业全球价值链分工地位的政策效应存在显著异质性,在一般贸易企业、知识产权密集型企业与外资企业的影响更大。本研究对于全面推进知识产权强国战略,以及通过知识产权制度建设推动企业全球价值链分工地位提升均具有启示价值。

Abstract

The status in global value chains (GVCs) is an important manifestation of a firm's ability to participate in international circulation. With the intensification of the anti-globalization trend in recent years, there have been localized block in the international circulation. How to effectively enhance firms' status in GVCs has become an important issue that urgently needs to be solved. Based on the quasi-natural experiment of "China's Intellectual Property Pilot Cities" from 2000 to 2013, this paper adopted the DID model and empirically investigated the impact of cities construction for intellectual property (CCIP) on the status in firms' GVCs and its mechanism. It was found that: (1) the CCIP is helpful to the upgrading of located firms' status in GVCs; (2) creating an environment of innovation, attracting foreign direct investment, and introducing advanced production equipment are the key mechanisms; and (3) there is significant heterogeneity in the policy effects, with a greater impact on general trade firms, intellectual property intensive firms, and foreign-funded firms. Our findings will have implications for the implementation of the Intellectual Property Power Strategy, and upgrading firms' GVCs status through the CCIP.

导出引用

吴翟, 覃楚翔, 蒋殿春. 知识产权城市建设对企业全球价值链分工地位的影响研究[J]. 科研管理. 2024, 45(7): 127-135 https://doi.org/10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2024.07.014

Wu Di, Qin Chuxiang, Jiang Dianchun. Research on the impacts of cities construction for intellectual property on firms' status in GVCs[J]. Science Research Management. 2024, 45(7): 127-135 https://doi.org/10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2024.07.014

中图分类号： F752.62

参考文献

列表( 原文顺序 | 文献年度倒序 | 文中引用次数倒序 ) 可视化分析

[1]	HELPMAN E. Innovation, imitation, and intellectual property rights[J]. Econometrica, 1993(61):1247-1280. 本文引用 [2]

[2]	杨珍增, 刘晶. 知识产权保护对全球价值链地位的影响[J]. 世界经济研究, 2018(4):123-134+137. YANG Zhenzeng, LIU Jing. Intellectual property protection and GVCs position[J]. World Economy Studies, 2018 (4):123-134+137. 本文引用 [1]

[3]	胡国恒, 刘珊. 知识产权保护、自主创新与中国制造业出口国内附加值提升:基于微观数据的研究[J]. 软科学, 2022, 36(6):17-24. HU Guoheng, LIU Shan. Intellectual property protection, independent innovation and the increase of domestic value added of Chinese manufacturing export: Based on micro data[J]. Soft Science, 2022, 36(6):17-24. 本文引用 [1]

[4]	KEE H L, TANG H. Domestic value added in exports: Theory and firm evidence from China[J]. American Economic Review, 2016, 106(6): 1402-1436. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20131687 https://pubs.aeaweb.org/doi/10.1257/aer.20131687 本文引用 [2]

[5]

KOOPMAN

, WANG

, WEI

S J

. Tracing value-added and double counting in gross exports[J]. American Economic Review, 2014, 104(2): 459-494.

https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.104.2.459

https://pubs.aeaweb.org/doi/10.1257/aer.104.2.459

本文引用 [1] 摘要

This paper proposes an accounting framework that breaks up a country’s gross exports into various value-added components by source and additional double-counted terms. Our parsimonious framework bridges a gap between official trade statistics (in gross value terms) and national accounts (in value-added terms), and integrates all previous measures of vertical specialization and value-added trade in the literature into a unified framework. To illustrate the potential of such a method, we present a number of applications including re-computing revealed comparative advantages and the magnifying impact of multi-stage production on trade costs. (JEL E01, E16, F14, F23, L14)

[6]	刘斌, 魏倩, 吕越, 祝坤福. 制造业服务化与价值链升级[J]. 经济研究, 2016, 51(3):151-162. LIU Bin, WEI Qian, LÜ Yue, et al. Servitization of manufacturing and value chain upgrading[J]. Economic Research Journal, 2016, 51(3):151-162. 本文引用 [2]

[7]	吴汉东. 中国知识产权法律变迁的基本面向[J]. 中国社会科学, 2018(8):108-125+206-207. WU Handong. The basic orientation of changes of intellectual property law in China[J]. Social Sciences in China, 2018(8):108-125+206-207. 本文引用 [1]

[8]	纪祥裕, 顾乃华. 知识产权示范城市的设立会影响创新质量吗?[J]. 财经研究, 2021, 47(5):49-63. JI Xiangyu, GU Naihua. Does the establishment of intellectual property model cities affect innovation quality?[J]. Journal of Finance and Economics, 2021, 47(5):49-63. 本文引用 [2]

[9]

HALPERN

, KOREN

, SZEIDL

. Imported inputs and productivity[J]. American Economic Review, 2015, 105(12): 3660-3703.

https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20150443

https://pubs.aeaweb.org/doi/10.1257/aer.20150443

本文引用 [1] 摘要

We estimate a model of importers in Hungarian microdata and conduct counterfactual analysis to investigate the effect of imported inputs on productivity. We find that importing all input varieties would increase a firm’s revenue productivity by 22 percent, about one-half of which is due to imperfect substitution between foreign and domestic inputs. Foreign firms use imports more effectively and pay lower fixed import costs. We attribute one-quarter of Hungarian productivity growth during the 1993–2002 period to imported inputs. Simulations show that the productivity gain from a tariff cut is larger when the economy has many importers and many foreign firms. (JEL D24, F13, F14, L60)

[10]	唐宜红, 张鹏杨. FDI、全球价值链嵌入与出口国内附加值[J]. 统计研究, 2017, 34(4):36-49. TANG Yihong, ZHANG Pengyang. FDI, global value chain embeddedness and domestic value added in exports[J]. Statistical Research, 2017, 34(4):36-49. 本文引用 [2]

[11]	毛其淋, 许家云. 外资进入如何影响了本土企业出口国内附加值?[J]. 经济学(季刊), 2018, 17(4):1453-1488. MAO Qilin, XU Jiayun. How does foreign entry affect domestic value-added of local firms' exports?[J]. China Economic Quarterly, 2018, 17(4):1453-1488. 本文引用 [1]

[12]	佟家栋, 范龙飞. 知识产权保护与国内价值链网络深化升级[J]. 经济学动态, 2022(2):18-34. TONG Jiadong, FAN Longfei. Intellectual property protection and upgrading in domestic value chain network[J]. Economic Perspectives, 2022(2):18-34. 本文引用 [1]

[13]	张杰, 郑文平, 陈志远. 进口与企业生产率:中国的经验证据[J]. 经济学(季刊), 2015, 14(3):1029-1052. ZHANG Jie, ZHENG Wenping, CHEN Zhiyuan. Imports and firms' productivity: Evidence from China[J]. China Economic Quarterly, 2015, 14(3):1029-1052. 本文引用 [1]

[14]	谷克鉴, 李晓静, 崔旭. 生产性投入进口与企业全要素生产率:水平影响与垂直溢出[J]. 国际贸易问题, 2020(10):1-16. GU Kejian, LI Xiaojing, CUI Xu. Productive input imports and total factor productivity: Horizontal effect and vertical spillover[J]. Journal of International Trade, 2020(10):1-16. 本文引用 [1]

[15]	戴翔, 王如雪. 人工智能条件下人口老龄化对全球价值链攀升的影响[J]. 经济管理, 2023, 45(3):28-43. DAI Xiang, WANG Ruxue. The impact of population aging on the global value chain upgrade under the condition of artificial intelligence[J]. Business and Management Journal, 2023, 45(3):28-43. 本文引用 [1]

[16]

BRANDT

, VAN BIESEBROECK

, ZHANG

. Creative accounting or creative destruction? Firm-level productivity growth in Chinese manufacturing[J]. Journal of Development Economics, 2012, 97(2): 339-351.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2011.02.002

https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0304387811000216

本文引用 [1]

[17]	AHN J B, KHANDELWAL A K, WEI S J. The role of intermediaries in facilitating trade[J]. Journal of International Economics, 2011, 84(1): 73-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2010.12.003 https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0022199611000031 本文引用 [1]

[18]	余淼杰, 张睿. 中国制造业出口质量的准确衡量:挑战与解决方法[J]. 经济学(季刊), 2017, 16(2):463-484. YU Miaojie, ZHANG Rui. Estimating China's manufacturing export quality: Pitfalls and remedy[J]. China Economic Quarterly, 2017, 16(2):463-484. 本文引用 [1]

[19]	吴翟, 王文晓. 增值税转型与企业全球价值链分工位置升级[J]. 中国经济问题, 2023(6):37-51. WU Di, WANG Wenxiao. VAT reform and firms' GVC upstreamness upgrading: A quasi-natural experiment of value-added tax reform in China[J]. China Economic Studies, 2023(6):37-51. 本文引用 [1]

[20]

吴翟, 王文晓. 股票市场开放影响企业内部控制有效性机理探究:来自中国实施“沪深港通”交易制度的经验证据[J]. 中央财经大学学报, 2023(9):106-116.

摘要

 来自中国实施“沪深港通”交易制度的经验证据证实，股票市场开放影响上市公司企业内部控制有效性且影响具有差异性。笔者以中国A股市场实施“沪深港通”这一股票市场开放政策的准自然实验，基于2013—2019年间中国A股相关上市企业研究样本的有效数据,运用双重差分模型的实证方法，实证检验了股票市场开放与企业内部控制有效性之间的关联及其变化。检验结果证实：股票市场开放与上市公司企业内部控制有效性正相关。股票市场开放通过改善外部信息环境，缓解了企业外部投资者与管理层间存在的信息不对称与代理问题，进而正向提高了上市公司企业内部控制有效性;股票市场开放正向影响企业内部控制有效性的显著差异性通过进一步的异质性分析验证。本研究通过以中国实施“沪深港通”交易制度的经验证据实证检验股票市场开放与企业内部控制有效性之间的影响机理，拓宽了公司治理和证券监管方面的学术探索边界，研究结论为保障中国股票市场的健康发展提供了理论依据和实证。

, WANG

Wenxiao

. The impact of stock market opening on firms' internal control: Evidencs from China's “shanghai shenzhen hong kong stock connect” [J]. Journal of Central University of Finance and Economics, 2023(9):106-116.

本文引用 [1]

[21]

吴翟, 王文晓. 担保物权制度改革对企业全球价值链分工位置影响机理研究:来自中国《物权法》准自然实验的经验证据[J]. 中央财经大学学报, 2022(7): 115-128.

摘要

2007年中国担保物权制度改革对企业全球价值链分工位置的影响是一项不容忽视的重要举措。笔者以2005—2013年间中国工业企业为研究样本，基于中国《物权法》实施这一准自然实验，构建双重差分模型，通过实证检验担保物权制度改革与企业全球价值链分工位置变化，揭示二者的影响关系及其机理。结果证实：中国担保物权制度改革显著推动了企业全球价值链分工位置的提升，其间发挥关键作用的是改善融资约束。担保物权制度改革通过提高企业债务融资能力、调整企业负债期限结构和改善企业商业信用融资能力三个渠道缓解融资约束并促进企业全球价值链分工位置提升。进一步的异质性检验表明：担保物权制度改革对企业全球价值链分工位置的提升效应在不同类型的企业存在显著差异。本研究以来自中国《物权法》准自然实验的经验证据，揭示了担保物权制度改革对企业全球价值链分工位置的影响机理，拓展了国际贸易和分工理论，丰富了“法与贸易”研究领域的现有文献，为通过法律制度改革促进企业全球价值链位置提升提供了理论和实证依据。

, WANG

Wenxiao

. Impacts of security interest system reform on firms' GVC positions: Quasi-natural evidence from Chinese property law[J]. Journal of Central University of Finance and Economics, 2022 (7): 115-128.

本文引用 [1]

[22]	聂长飞, 卢建新, 冯苑, 等. 创新型城市建设对绿色全要素生产率的影响[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2021, 31(3):117-127. NIE Changfei, LU Jianxin, FENG Yuan, et al. Impact of innovative city construction on green total factor productivity[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2021, 31(3):117-127. 本文引用 [1]

[23]	唐宜红, 张鹏杨. 全球价值链嵌入对贸易保护的抑制效应:基于经济波动视角的研究[J]. 中国社会科学, 2020(7):61-80+205. TANG Yihong, ZHANG Pengyang. The inhibitory effect of global value chain embedment on trade protection: From the perspective of economic fluctuation[J]. Social Sciences in China, 2020(7):61-80+205. 本文引用 [1]

[24]	倪红福. 全球价值链中的累积关税成本率及结构:理论与实证[J]. 经济研究, 2020(10):89-105. NI Hongfu. Cumulative tariff cost rate and structure in the global value chain: A theoretical and empirical study[J]. Economic Research Journal, 2020(10):89-105. 本文引用 [1]

[25]	蒋殿春, 于洋, 方森辉. 专利试点政策如何影响城市创新水平[J]. 南开经济研究, 2021(6):34-52. JIANG Dianchun, YU Yang, FANG Senhui. How does the patent pilot policy affect urban innovation?[J]. Nankai Economic Studies, 2021(6):34-52. 本文引用 [1]

[26]	覃楚翔. 多维证成与解读:我国作品署名推定条款的变革[J]. 科技与法律(中英文), 2023(3):87-96. QIN Chuxiang. Multidimensional proof and interpretation: The reform of presumption rule of signature of works in China[J]. Science Technology And Law(Chinese-English Version), 2023(3):87-96. 本文引用 [1]