知识产权调查对我国企业出口产品质量的影响研究

代中强, 肖苏皖

科研管理 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (7) : 110-117.

PDF(1068 KB)
PDF(1068 KB)
科研管理 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (7) : 110-117. DOI: 10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2024.07.012

知识产权调查对我国企业出口产品质量的影响研究

作者信息 +

Research on the impact of intellectual property investigations on the export product quality of Chinese enterprises

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

产品质量是推动我国外贸高质量发展、加快建设贸易强国的重要支撑,是出口数量增长和竞争力提升的内在动力。本文基于美国国际贸易委员会“不公平进口调查信息系统库”、中国工业企业数据库和中国海关数据库,整理得到微观数据。通过运用双重差分法,实证研究知识产权立案与终裁对中国企业出口产品质量的影响。研究结果表明:(1)知识产权立案调查对中国被诉企业出口产品质量有显著提升作用,这主要是因为被诉企业面对外部压力,为保持在美国市场份额,“倒逼”开展技术创新以及进行内部产品结构调整,从而提升出口产品质量;(2)在知识产权调查终裁败诉后,企业面临应诉成本高昂,对美销售减少引发的融资压力以及转向非美市场的贸易转移会阻碍被诉企业出口产品质量的提升;(3)异质性分析发现,知识产权调查对企业出口产品质量的影响因企业对美国市场的依赖程度而异;相较于对美国市场高依赖度企业而言,知识产权立案调查对美国市场低依赖度企业的产品质量促进作用较为有限,而终裁败诉对其出口产品质量的负面影响较小。本文不仅从微观视角拓展了外部需求端冲击对企业出口产品质量影响的研究,同时也为我国政府在建设知识产权涉外风险防控体系及企业海外知识产权维权机制方面提供了实际的参考。

Abstract

Product quality is an important support for promoting the high-quality development of China's foreign trade and accelerating the construction of a trading powerhouse. It is also an intrinsic driving force for the growth in export quantity and enhancement of competitiveness. This paper utilized the micro-level data obtained from unfair import investigations of the U.S. International Trade Commission, the Chinese Industrial Enterprise Database, and the Chinese Customs Database. Through the application of the Difference-in-Differences (DID) approach, it empirically analyzed the impact of intellectual property investigations on the export product quality of involved Chinese enterprises. The research findings are as follows: (1) intellectual property registration investigations have a significant positive effect on the export product quality of Chinese enterprises under investigation. This is mainly attributed to the external pressure faced by these enterprises. In order to maintain their market share in the United States, they were forced to engage in technological innovation and internal product structure perfection, thereby improving the quality of their export products; (2) When the final ruling of an intellectual property investigation is unfavorable, the investigated enterprises will face several challenges. High litigation costs, financing pressure due to reduced sales in the United States, and potential trade diversions to non-US markets all work against the improvement of their export product quality; (3) Heterogeneity analysis revealed that the impact of intellectual property investigations on export product quality varies depending on the degree of reliance on the US market by the enterprises. Compared with the enterprises with high reliance on the US market, it was found that intellectual property registration investigations have a relatively limited promotional effect on the product quality of the enterprises with low reliance on the US market, while the negative impact of a final ruling loss on their export product quality is relatively small. This paper has extended the research on how external demand shocks affect the export product quality of enterprises, with a focus on micro-level analysis. Additionally, it will offer some practical guidance for the Chinese government in developing a system to prevent and control risks associated with foreign intellectual property. It will also suggest some means to establish mechanisms for the protection of overseas intellectual property rights for enterprises.

关键词

知识产权调查 / 出口企业 / 产品质量

Key words

intellectual property investigation / export enterprise / product quality

引用本文

导出引用
代中强, 肖苏皖. 知识产权调查对我国企业出口产品质量的影响研究[J]. 科研管理. 2024, 45(7): 110-117 https://doi.org/10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2024.07.012
Dai Zhongqiang, Xiao Suwan. Research on the impact of intellectual property investigations on the export product quality of Chinese enterprises[J]. Science Research Management. 2024, 45(7): 110-117 https://doi.org/10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2024.07.012
中图分类号: F752.02   

参考文献

[1]
代中强, 蔡华津. 美国知识产权调查的贸易抑制效应研究[J]. 国际贸易问题, 2019(8):124-137.
DAI Zhongqiang, CAI Huajin. Study on trade inhibition effect of intellectual property survey in the United States[J]. Journal of International Trade, 2019(8):124-137.
[2]
杨荣珍, 石晓婧. 美国对华337调查与企业出口行为:基于我国制造业企业数据的实证分析[J]. 国际经贸探索, 2020, 36(3):79-94.
YANG Rongzhen, SHI Xiaojing. 337 investigation and enterprise export behavior: Empirical analysis based on the data of China's manufacturing enterprises[J]. International Economics and Trade Research, 2020, 36(3):79-94.
[3]
代中强, 阮东芝. 美国知识产权调查对中国企业出口产品范围的影响研究[J]. 国际贸易问题, 2022(8):37-52.
DAI Zhongqiang, RUAN Dongzhi. The effect of US intellectual property investigation on the export product range of Chinese enterprises[J]. Journal of International Trade, 2022(8):37-52.
[4]
庄子银, 李宏武. 贸易、知识产权与出口企业创新:基于美国337调查的实证分析[J]. 世界经济研究, 2018(4):75-87+136.
ZHUANG Ziyin, LI Hongwu. Trade, intellectual property rights and export firm's innovation: An empirical analysis based on the US 337 survey[J]. World Economy Studies, 2018(4):75-87+136.
[5]
侯文涤. 知识产权调查对我国出口企业生产率的影响:以美国337调查为例[D]. 济南: 山东财经大学, 2018.
HOU Wendi. The impact of intellectual property survey on the productivity of China's export enterprises:A case study of 337 investigation in the United States[D]. Jinan: Shandong University of Finance and Economics, 2018.
[6]
HELPMAN E. Innovation, imitation, and intellectual property rights[J]. Econometrica, 1993, 61(6):1247-1280.
[7]
施炳展. 中国企业出口产品质量异质性:测度与事实[J]. 经济学(季刊), 2014, 13(1):263-284.
SHI Bingzhan. The product quality heterogeneity of China firm's export: Measurement and facts[J]. China Economic Quarterly, 2014, 13(1):263-284.
[8]
许家云, 张俊美. 知识产权战略与中国制造业企业出口产品质量:一项准自然实验[J]. 国际贸易问题, 2020(11):1-14.
XU Jiayun, ZHANG Junmei. Intellectual property strategy and Chinese manufacturing firm's export quality: A quasi-natural experiment[J]. Journal of International Trade, 2020(11):1-14.
[9]
GLASS A J, WU X. Intellectual property rights and quality improvement[J]. Journal of Development Economics, 2007, 82(2):393-415.
[10]
KIEDAISCH C. Intellectual property rights in a quality-ladder model with persistent leadership[J]. European Economic Review, 2015, 80(8):194-213.
[11]
MELITZ M, OTTAVIANO G. Market size, trade, and productivity[J]. Review of Economic Studies, 2008, 75(1):295-316.
[12]
LU Y, TAO Z, ZHANG Y. How do exporters respond to antidumping investigations?[J]. Journal of International Economics, 2013, 91(2):290-300.
[13]
AMITI M, KHANDELWAL A K. Import competition and quality upgrading[J]. Review of Economics and Statistics, 2013, 95(2):476-490.
[14]
PIVETEAU P, SMAGGHUE G. Estimating firm product quality using trade data[J]. Journal of International Economics, 2019, 118(3):217-232.

基金

国家社会科学基金项目:“中美贸易摩擦背景下美国知识产权调查的触发机制、影响效应及应对策略研究”(19BJL118)
国家社会科学基金项目:“中美贸易摩擦背景下美国知识产权调查的触发机制、影响效应及应对策略研究”(2019.07—2023.12)

PDF(1068 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/