装备制造业发展对工业的带动作用及溢出效应——基于两部门模型的实证检验

科研管理 ›› 2011, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (8): 98-104.

装备制造业发展对工业的带动作用及溢出效应——基于两部门模型的实证检验

孙晓华, 田晓芳

大连理工大学经济学院,辽宁大连 116024

收稿日期:2009-11-15 修回日期:2010-08-09 出版日期:2011-08-27 发布日期:2011-08-12
作者简介:孙晓华(1978-),男,辽宁抚顺人,大连理工大学经济学院副教授,博士,硕士生导师,从事技术创新与产业发展方面的研究。田晓芳(1983-),女,内蒙古通辽人,大连理工大学经济学院硕士研究生,研究方向为产业经济。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目(70803006),教育部人文社科资助项目(07JC790043),中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助(DUT10RW312)。

The impetus function and spillover effects of the development of equipment manufacturingindustries on entire industry—Based on a two-sector model

Sun Xiaohua, Tian Xiaofang

College of Economics, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China

Received:2009-11-15 Revised:2010-08-09 Online:2011-08-27 Published:2011-08-12

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本文将工业分为装备制造和非装备制造两类部门,应用两部门模型研究装备制造业发展对工业经济的带动作用以及对非装备制造部门的溢出效应,并运用2000-2007年我国31个省区的面板数据进行了实证检验,结果表明:(1)装备制造业对非装备制造部门存在显著的溢出效应,外溢弹性为7.996%;(2)装备制造业对整个工业经济的带动作用十分明显,贡献率达到9.15%;(3)装备制造业的平均要素边际产出比非装备制造部门高出10.07%。

关键词: 装备制造业, 带动作用, 溢出效应, 两部门模型

Abstract: The entire industry is diveded into two departments consisting of equipment manufacturing and non-equipment manufacturing, a two-sector model is applied to research on the impetus function and spillover effects of the development of equipment manufacturing industries on entire industry. The panel data constituted by time-series data from the year of 2000 to 2007 and cross-section data from 31 provinces in China has been taken in use for empirical testing, the results show that (1) There are enormous spillover effects on non-equipment manufacturing sector from the equipment manufacturing industry, and the spillover elasticity is 7.996 percent; (2) The impetus function of equipment manufacturing industry on the entire industrial economics is obvious, and the contribution rate reaches at 9.15 percent; (3) The average element marginal output ratio for equipment manufacturing industry is 10.07 percent higher than that for non-equipment manufacturing sectors.

Key words: equipment manufacturing industry, impetus function, spillover effect, two-sector model

中图分类号:

F426

孙晓华, 田晓芳. 装备制造业发展对工业的带动作用及溢出效应——基于两部门模型的实证检验[J]. 科研管理, 2011, 32(8): 98-104.

Sun Xiaohua, Tian Xiaofang. The impetus function and spillover effects of the development of equipment manufacturingindustries on entire industry—Based on a two-sector model[J]. Science Research Management, 2011, 32(8): 98-104.

参考文献

[1] R. Findlay. Relative Backwardness, Direct Foreign Investment and the Transfer of Technology: A Simple Dynamic Model[J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics,1978,92(1):1-16. [2] T. Koizumi and K.J. Kopecky. Foreign Direct Investment,Technology Transfer and Domestic Employment Effects[J]. Journal of Internaional Economics, 1980, 10(1):1-20. [3] P. M. Romer. Endogenous Technology Change[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1990, 98(5):71-102. [4] P. Aghion and P. Howitt. A Model of Growth Through Creative Destruction[J]. Econometrica,1992,60(2):323-351. [5] R. J. Barro and X. Sala-i-Martin. Technological Diffusion, Convergence, and Growth[J]. Journal of Economic Growth, 1997, 2(1):1 26. [6] G. Feder. On export and Economic Growh[J]. Journal of Development Economics, 1983, 12(1), 59-73. [7] Y. H. Rhee, B. Ross-Larson, G. Pursell. Korea's Competitive Edge: Managing the Entry into World Markets[M]. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press,1984. [8] S. Clerides, S. Lach, J. Tybout. Is Learning by Exporting Important? Micro-dynamic Evidence from Colombia, Mexico and Morocco[J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1998, 113(3): 903-948. [9] R. Ram. Exports and Economics Growth in Developing Countries Evidence from Time-series and Cross-section Data[J]. Economics Development and Cultural Change, 1987, 36(1): 51-72. [10] M. O. Odedokun. Alternative Econometric Approaches for Analyzing the Role of the Financial Sector in Economic Growth: Time-series Evidence from LDCs[J]. Journal of Development Economics,1996, 50(1): 119-146. [11] E. C. Wang. Externalities between Financial and Real Sectors in the Development Process[J]. International Advances in Economic Research, 1999, 5(1): 149-150. [12] E. C. Wang. A Dynamic Two-sector Mode for Analyzing the Interrelation between Financial Development and Industrial Growth[J]. Internation Review of Economics and Finance, 2000, 9(3): 223-241. [13] 杨全发.中国地区出口贸易的产出效应分析[J].经济研究,1998(7):22-26. [14] 余甫功,欧阳建国.高技术产业发展对工业的带动作用和溢出效应研究-基于两部门模型的省际Panel Data的实证检验[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2007(7):35-43. [15] 许和连,栾永玉.出口贸易的技术外溢效应:基于三部门模型的实证研究[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2005(9):103-111. [16] 何洁.外商直接投资对中国工业部门外溢效应的进一步精确量化[J].世界经济,2000(12):29-36. [17] 张军,吴桂英,张吉鹏.中国省际物质资本存量估算:1952-2000[J].经济研究,2004(10):35-44 [18] 黄永峰,任若恩,刘晓生.中国制造业资本存量永续盘存法估计[J].经济学季刊,2002(1):377-396. [19] 余甫功,欧阳建国.高技术产业发展对工业的带动作用和溢出效应研究—基于两部门模型的省际Panel Data的实证检验[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2007(7):35-43 [20] E. Borensztein, J. D. Gregorio, J. W. Lee. How Does Foreign Direct Investment Affect Economic Growth?[J]. Journal of International Economic, 1998, 45(1):115-135.