国家企业技术中心认定与“卡脖子”技术创新

doi:10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2025.05.012

科研管理 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (5): 112-121.DOI: 10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2025.05.012

国家企业技术中心认定与“卡脖子”技术创新

姚海琳¹，王文强¹，曾辉祥¹，耿红军^1,2

1.中南大学商学院，湖南长沙410083；
2.南京理工大学公共事务学院，江苏南京210094

收稿日期:2023-09-23 修回日期:2024-12-30 出版日期:2025-05-20 发布日期:2025-05-12
通讯作者: 耿红军
基金资助:
国家社科基金青年项目：“未来技术产业化的政策促进机制与路径研究”（24CGL001，2024.10—2026.12）；湖南省自然科学基金面上项目：“地方产业链政策提升产业链现代化水平的作用机制及影响效应研究”（2023JJ30738，2023.01—2025.12）。

National enterprise technology center accreditation and "bottleneck" technology innovation

Yao Hailin¹, Wang Wenqiang¹, Zeng Huixiang¹, Geng Hongjun^1,2

1. School of Business, Central South University, Changsha 410083, Hunan, China;
2. Institute of Public Affairs, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing 210094, Jiangsu, China

Received:2023-09-23 Revised:2024-12-30 Online:2025-05-20 Published:2025-05-12
Supported by:
The Pollution Leakage Effect and Governance of Enterprise Groups: The Perspective of "Space-Power" Matching of Environmental Regulation;Research on the policy mechanism and influence effect of technological innovation of key strategic material enterprises;Research on the impact effect and mechanism of local industrial chain policies to improve the modernization level of industrial chain

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 国家企业技术中心认定政策是提升企业自主创新能力的重要举措，在当前科技革命与大国博弈相互交织的关键时期，为推动“卡脖子”技术创新提供了可行方案。基于技术创新系统理论，本文选取2007—2021年中国A股上市公司数据，运用多期双重差分模型实证检验国家企业技术中心认定政策对企业“卡脖子”技术创新的影响。结果发现，国家企业技术中心认定政策对企业“卡脖子”技术创新具有显著正向影响，在考虑内生性问题和稳健性检验后结论仍然成立；机制分析表明，认定政策主要通过创新资金补充、创新人才引育、网络交互、缓解研发不确定性与知识产权保护等途径促进企业“卡脖子”技术创新；拓展研究发现，认定政策还能发挥技术溢出效应，促进其他非认定企业的“卡脖子”技术创新；异质性分析表明，当企业产权性质为国有、位于一、二线城市、产业为新兴产业以及技术中心评级为优良时，认定政策对企业“卡脖子”技术创新的影响效果更为显著。本研究验证了国家企业技术中心认定政策对企业“卡脖子”技术创新的积极影响，拓展了“卡脖子”技术创新的前因研究，在实践层面为政府有效引导企业“卡脖子”技术创新提供理论依据。

关键词: 国家企业技术中心认定政策, “卡脖子”技术创新, 多期双重差分模型

Abstract: The accreditation policy for National Enterprise Technology Centers is an important initiative to enhance the autonomous innovation capabilities of enterprises during the critical period of the current technological revolution and great power competition. It provides feasible solutions for advancing innovation in "bottleneck" technologies. However, few studies have comprehensively revealed the impact of this accreditation policy on enterprises′ innovation in "bottleneck" technologies. Based on the theory of technological innovation system, this paper selected the data from Chinese A-share listed companies from 2007 to 2021 and employed a multi-period DID model to empirically test the impact of the accreditation policy for National Enterprise Technology Centers on "bottleneck" technology innovation in enterprises. The results indicated that the accreditation policy significantly positively influences "bottleneck" technology innovation. This conclusion holds even after considering endogeneity issues and robustness tests. The mechanism analysis showed that the accreditation policy primarily promotes "bottleneck" technology innovation through supplementary innovation funding, talent introduction and cultivation, network interaction, alleviating R&D uncertainties, and intellectual property protection. Furthermore, the policy also has a technology spillover effect, enhancing "bottleneck" technology innovation in other non-recognized enterprises. The heterogeneity analysis revealed that the policy′s impact is more significant when the enterprise is state-owned, located in first- or second-tier cities, belongs to emerging industries, and when the technology center is rated as excellent. However, it also reflected potential issues with the policy in guiding innovation breakthroughs in mature industries and private enterprises. This study has affirmed the positive impact of the National Enterprise Technology Centers accreditation policy on "bottleneck" technology innovation in enterprises, expanded the antecedent research on "bottleneck" technology innovation, broadened the applicability of the technological innovation system theory in the Chinese context, and it will provide a theoretical basis for the government to effectively guide "bottleneck" technology innovation at the practical level.

Key words: national enterprise technology center accreditation policy, "bottleneck" technology innovation, multi-period DID model

姚海琳王文强曾辉祥耿红军. 国家企业技术中心认定与“卡脖子”技术创新[J]. 科研管理, 2025, 46(5): 112-121.

参考文献

[1]欧阳桃花, 曾德麟.拨云见日——揭示中国盾构机技术赶超的艰辛与辉煌[J].管理世界, 2021, 37(08):194-207
[2]OUYANG Taohua, ZENG Delin.Seeing the clouds—revealing the hardships and glory of China's shield machine technology catch-up[J].Management World, 2021, 37(08):194-207
[3]葛爽, 柳卸林.我国关键核心技术组织方式与研发模式分析——基于创新生态系统的思考[J].科学学研究, 2022, 40(11):2093-2101
[4]GE Shuang, Liu Xielin.The digital economy drives innovation—The intermediary role of knowledge flow[J]. Studies in science of science.2022, 40(11):2093-2101.[J].Studies in science of science, 2022, 40(11):2093-2101
[5]单宇, 刘爽, 马宝龙.国产替代过程中关键核心技术的适应性重构机制——基于海信集团～视像技术的纵向案例研究[J].管理世界, 2023, 39(04):80-100
[6]SHAN Yua, LIU Shuangb and MA Baolong.Adaptive Reconfiguration Mechanism of Key Core Technologies in the Process of Domestic Substitution: A Longitudinal Case Study Based on Hisense Group' s 1969-2022 Video Technology[J]. Management World.2023, 39(04):80-100.[J].Management World, 2023, 39(04):80-100
[7]陈劲, 阳镇, 朱子钦.“十四五”时期“卡脖子”技术的破解:识别框架、战略转向与突破路径[J].改革, 2020, (12):5-15.[J].改革, 2020, 12(12):5-15
[8]Chen Jin, Yang Zhen, Zhu Ziqin.Cracking of " stuck neck" technology in the 14th Five-Year Plan period:Identification framework, strategic turn and breakthrough path[J].[J].Reform,, 2020, 12(12):5-15
[9]国家企业技术中心认定管理办法[D].中华人民共和国国务院公报, 2016(14):53-57.[J]., 2016, 14(无):53-57
[10]Measures for the Identification and Administration of National Enterprise Technology Centers[D].Gazette of the State Council of the People' s Republic, 2016(14):53-57.[J]., 2016, 14(无):53-57
[11]庄德林, 郭云龙, 许基兰.国家企业技术中心时空分异特征及影响因素[J].[J].浙江学刊, 2020, 03(03):142-150
[12]ZHUANG Delin, GUO Yunlong, XU Jilan.Characteristics and influencing factors of spatiotemporal differentiation of national enterprise technology center[J].Zhejiang Academic Journal, 2020(03):142-150.[J].Zhejiang Academic Journal, 2020, 03(无):142-150
[13]汪樟发, 汪涛, 王毅等.国家认定企业技术中心政策的历史演进:基于政策文本的研究[J].中国软科学, 2009(10):168-179.[J].中国软科学, 2009, 10(无):168-179
[14]WANG Zhangfa, WANG Tao, WANG Yi, et al.The historical evolution of the policy of the technology center of the state-recognized enterprise:a study based on the policy text[J].Chinese soft science magazine, 2009(10):168-179.[J].Chinese soft science magazine, 2009, 10(无):168-179
[15]李昱璇, 方卫华.“卡脖子”技术概念辨析——内生性矛盾、国家主体与外部限制的共同建构[J].科学学研究, 2023(04):1-15.[J].科学学研究, 2023, 04(无):1-15
[16]Li Yuxuan, Fang Weihua.Analysis of the technical concept of " stuck neck" ——Internal contradiction, joint construction of state subject and external limitation[J].Studies in science of science, 2023(04):1-15.[J].Studies in science of science, 2023, 04(04):1-15
[17]赵雪峰, 吴德林, 吴伟伟等.基于深度学习与多分类轮询机制的高质量“卡脖子”技术专利识别模型——以专利申请文件为研究主体[J].数据分析与知识发现, 2022(10):1-18.[J].数据分析与知识发现, 2022, 10(无):1-18
[18]ZHAO Xuefeng, WU Delin, WU Weiwei, et al.Patent Identification Model of High-quality " Stuck Neck" Technology Based on Deep Learning and Multi-classification Polling Mechanis—Taking patent application documents as the research subject[J].Data Analysis and Knowledge Discovery, 2022(10):1-18.[J]..Data Analysis and Knowledge Discovery, 2022, 10(无):1-18
[19]贺远琼, 刘路明, 田志龙等.“政产学用”如何驱动“卡脖子”技术的双核创新？——基于华中数控的纵向案例研究[J].南开管理评论, 2022(09):1-38.[J].南开管理评论, 2022, 09(无):1-38
[20]HEYuanqiong, LIULuming, TIANZhilong, etal.HowDoes" Government-Industry-University-User" Drive the Dual-Core Innovation of " Stuck Neck" Technology? [J].Nankai Business Review, 2022(09):1-38.[J].Nankai Business Review, 2022, 09(无):1-38
[21]王璐瑶, 曲冠楠.面向“卡脖子”问题的知识创新生态系统分析：核心挑战、理论构建与现实路径[J].科研管理, 2022, 43(04):94-102
[22]Wang Luyao, Qu Guannan, Juan Rogers.Analysis of knowledge innovation ecosystem facing the "stuck neck" problem: core challenges,theoretical construction and practical path[J].Science Research Management, 2022, 43(04):94-102
[23]Chen Z, Liu Z, Suárez Serrato J C, et al.Notching R&D investment with corporate income tax cuts in China[J].American Economic Review, 2021, 111(7):2065-2100
[24]Brown J R, Martinsson G, Petersen B C.Do financing constraints matter for R&D?[J].European Economic Review, 2012, 56(8):1512-1529
[25]Ko Y C, Zigan K, Liu Y L.Carbon capture and storage in South Africa: A technological innovation system with a political economy focus[J]. [J].Technological Forecasting and Social Change,, 2021, 16(6):120-633
[26]Wu R, Liu Z, Chen X, et al.Certification effect of R&D subsidies on debt financing: do institutional forces matter?[J].R&D Management, 2021, 51(5):538-550
[27]徐扬, 陶锋, 韦东明.资质认定型创新政策能否促进企业技术创新“增量提质”——来自国家认定企业技术中心政策的证据[J].南方经济, 2022(08):113-132.[J].南方经济, 2022, 8(6):113-132
[28]XU Yang, TAO Feng, WEI Dongming.Can the qualification innovation policy promote the " incremental quality improvement" of enterprise technological innovation——Evidence from the policy of national recognized enterprise technology center[J].South China Journal of Economics, 2022(08):113-132.[J].South China Journal of Economics, 2022, 8(6):113-132
[29]张树满, 原长弘.制造业领军企业如何培育关键核心技术持续创新能力[J].科研管理, 2022, 43(04):103-110
[30]ZHANG Shuman, YUAN Changhong.How can manufacturing leaders cultivate continuous innovation capabilities in key core technologies?[J].Science Research Management, 2022, 43(04):103-110
[31]权小锋, 刘佳伟, 孙雅倩.设立企业博士后工作站促进技术创新吗——基于中国上市公司的经验证据[J].中国工业经济, 2020(09):175-192.[J].中国工业经济, 2020, 9(9):175-192
[32]Quan Xiaofeng, LIU Jiawei, SUN Yaqian.Does the establishment of enterprise postdoctoral workstation promote technological innovation—Based on the empirical evidence of Chinese listed companies[J].China Industrial Economics, 2020(09):175-192.[J].China Industrial Economics, 2020, 9(9):175-192
[33]王文娜, 胡贝贝, 刘戒骄等.产学研合作深度与国家高新区全要素生产率[J].科学学研究, 2021, 39(09):1641-1651
[34]WANG Wenna, HU Beibei, LIU Jiejiao, et al.Depth of industry-university-research cooperation and total factor productivity of national high-tech zone[J].Studies in science of science, 2021, 39(09):1641-1651
[35]刘凤根, 郅守洋, 张敏等.好”“坏”不确定性与企业&投入强度[J].科研管理, 2022, 43(03):37-45
[36]Liu Fenggen, Zhi Shouyang, Zhang Min et al.quot;Good" and "bad" uncertaintyandenterprise R&D investment intensity[J].Science Research Management, 2022, 43(03):37-45
[37]Ahuja G, Morris Lampert C.Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: A longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions[J].Strategic management journal, 2001, 22(6‐7):521-543
[38]吴超鹏, 严泽浩.政府基金引导与企业核心技术突破：机制与效应[J].经济研究, 2023, 58(06):137-154
[39]Wu Chaopeng, Yan Zehao.Government fund guidance and enterprise core technology breakthrough:mechanismand effect[J].Economic Research Journal, 2023, 58(06):137-154
[40]Yang C H.How artificial intelligence technology affects productivity and employment: firm-level evidence from taiwan[J].Research Policy, 2022, 51(6):104-136
[41]黎文靖, 郑曼妮.实质性创新还是策略性创新?——宏观产业政策对微观企业创新的影响[J].经济研究, 2016, 51(04):60-73
[42]LI Wenjing, ZHENG Mani.Substantive innovation or strategic innovation?—— the impact of macro industrial policy on micro enterprise innovation[J].Economic Research Journal, 2016, 51(04):60-73
[43]黎文靖, 彭远怀, 谭有超.知识产权司法保护与企业创新——兼论中国企业创新结构的变迁[J].经济研究, 2021, 56(05):144-161
[44]LI Wenjing, PENG Yuanhuai, TAN Youchao.Judicial Protection of Intellectual Property Rights and Enterprise Innovation:On the Changes of the Innovation Structure of Chinese Enterprises[J].Economic Research Journal, 2021, 56(05):144-161
[45]王康, 李逸飞, 李静等.孵化器何以促进企业创新?——来自中关村海淀科技园的微观证据[J].管理世界, 2019, 35(11):102-118
[46]WANG Kang, LI Yifei, LI Jing, et al.How can incubators promote enterprise innovation? Micro evidence from Zhongguancun Haidian Science and Technology Park[J].Management World, 2019, 35(11):102-118
[47]Beck T, Levine R, Levkov A.Big bad banks? The winners and losers from bank deregulation in the United States[J].The journal of finance, 2010, 65(5):1637-1667
[48]Alder S, Shao L, Zilibotti F.Economic reforms and industrial policy in a panel of Chinese cities[J]. Journal of Economic Growth, 2016, 21: 305-349.[J].Journal of Economic Growth, 2016, 21(21):305-349
[49]Li P, Lu Y, Wang J.Does flattening government improve economic performance? Evidence from China[J]. Journal of development economics, 2016, 123: 18-37.[J].Journal of development economics, 2016, 123(无):18-37
[50]朱金鹤, 王雅莉, 侯林岐.文明城市评比何以促进劳动力流入? 来自地级市的准自然实验证据[J].产业经济研究, 2021, (3): 43-56.[J].产业经济研究, 2021, 3(3):43-56
[51]Zhu J H, Wang Y L, Hou L Q.How can the civilized city evaluation promote labor inflow? Quasi-natural experimental evi? dence from prefecture-level cities in China[J]. [J].Industrial Econom? ic Research, 2021, 3(3):43-56
[52]Zeng H, Ran H, Zhou Q, et al.The financial effect of firm digitalization: Evidence from China[J]. [J].Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2022, 183(12):19-51
[53]Wei J, Zuo Y.The certification effect of R&D subsidies from thecentral and local governments: Evidence from China[J].R&D Management, 2018, 48(5):615-626
[54]蒋舒阳, 庄亚明, 丁磊.产学研基础研究合作、财税激励选择与企业突破式创新[J].科研管理, 2021, 42(10):40-47
[55]Jiang S Y, Zhuang Y M, Ding L.Industry-university-institute basic research cooperation,selection of fiscal and tax incentives and break? through innovation of enterprises[J].Science Research Manage? ment, 2021, 42(10):40-47
[56]孙薇, 叶初升.政府采购何以牵动企业创新——兼论需求侧政策“拉力”与供给侧政策“推力”的协同[J].中国工业经济, 2023(01):95-113.[J].中国工业经济, 2023(01):95-113., 2023, 01(无):95-113
[57]SUN Wei, YE Chusheng.Why does government procurement affect enterprise innovation:On the synergy between demand-side policy " pull" and supply-side policy " push" [J].China Industrial Economics, 2023(01):95-113.[J].China Industrial Economics, 2023, 01(无):95-113
[58]曹春方, 张超.产权权利束分割与国企创新——基于中央企业分红权激励改革的证据[J].管理世界, 2020, 36(09):155-168
[59]CAO Chunfang, ZHANG Chao.Bundle division of property rights and innovation of state-owned enterprises:Evidence based on the reform of dividend right incentive of central enterprises[J].Management World, 2020, 36(09):155-168
[60]Mao J, Tang S, Xiao Z, et al.Industrial policy intensity,technological change,and productivity growth: Evidence from China[J].Research Policy, 2021, 50(7):104-287
[61]Lee, K., Malerba, F., 2017. Catch-up cycles and changes in industrial leadership: windows of opportunity and responses of firms and countries in the evolution of sectoral systems. Res. Policy 46 (2), 338–351.[J].Research Policy, 2017, 46 (2):338-351
[62]Byun S K, Oh J M, Xia H.Incremental vsbreakthrough innovation: The role of technology spillovers[J].Management Science, 2021, 67(3):1779-1802
[63]穆荣平, 蔺洁, 池康伟等.创新驱动社会服务数字转型发展的趋势、国内外实践与建议[J].中国科学院院刊, 2022, 37(09):1259-1269
[64]Mu Rongping, Lin Jie, Chi Kangwei, et al.Trends of digital transformation of innovation-driven social services,practices and suggestions at home and abroad[J].Bulletin of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2022, 37(09):1259-1269

国家企业技术中心认定与“卡脖子”技术创新

National enterprise technology center accreditation and "bottleneck" technology innovation

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 0

编辑推荐

Metrics